"I am a fiscal conservative and a social progressive."

"I am a fiscal conservative and a social progressive."

Is this the worst kind of person? Why does this ideology trigger liberals?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=B1OPxitgvmw
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

I am a social conservative and a fiscal moderate.
Because I want the people well fed, well schooled, well mannered, and well suited to serve God.

But if you want my money to pay for abortions and single moms having children that they raise in morally depraved conditions you can fuck right off.

>I am a social conservative and a fiscal moderate.

So, you're an adult.

can you really separate fiscal and social is what i am asking. are they not cause and effect?

not really
>no massive social programs
>allow people to live how they want if it doesn't hurt others
fiscally conservative, socially liberal

>tax money to help drug addicts
>leave people alone

>can you really separate fiscal and social is what i am asking.
Tough question.

I suspect that most of the people who are fiscally conservative and socially "progressive" (I hear socially liberal more frequently) are young people who are from wealthy enough families that they've been shielded from financial hardship.

They probably have gay friends and want to be able to behave in a libertine fashion, but they're also circumspect enough to realize that a massive redistribution of wealth by the government is going to a) Make daddy less able to buy them cool shit, b) decrease their trust fund income, or c) make the good job that their expensive education enabled them to get less lucrative. So they have some interest in fiscal conservatism.

In a way I do think they separate the fiscal from the social because they are not aware that being poor can often put a person's character to the test and many come up wanting. They also separate the two on the converse because their considerable wealth isolates them from the fact that immorality can often lead to impoverishment. In contrast the working class girl who gets pregnant at 17 outside of wedlock is often sorely aware of the economic opportunities her decisions have cost her.

I believe there is a strong correlation between fiscal and social, but the wealthy are often protected enough by their wealth to miss the connection.

I am a Social Conservative and a Fiscal Leftist.

so don't let refugees in but give them all the money?

No, so don't let refugees in but spend that money on your own people.

Because in real life its not possible. Its an ideology made by teenagers for teenagers.

Yep, same here. Basically old Labour, before it got hijacked, for me. Fuck Corbyn. There's literally no party for someone economics left and not socially "progressive" anymore.

so if your own people are like you, then you would spend less money on them. fiscal and social are intertwined.

>allow people to live how they want if it doesn't hurt others
But whether your lifestyle can hurt others often depends on
>Rich people get divorced
>Not much changes.
>Kids have to visit one parent on the weekends.
>Still go to good schools.
>Still have good lives.

>Poor people divorce
>Children no longer live in an economically viable household.
>Dad can't afford child support and gets into trouble with the law.
>Parents hate each other.
>Children don't have both parents in their lives
>The really shitty thing is that if you give them money to alleviate the poverty you are also subsidizing the prevalence of broken homes.

So a scenario where rich people can do their thing without harming others is one where poor people can hurt each other badly.

>so if your own people are like you, then you would spend less money on them
What?

>But whether your lifestyle can hurt others often depends on
* depends on economic status

this is what it is. but i have heard middle aged adults say this. maturity level?

basically this means
>I'm not a commie but I think buttfuckers are just swell

Who got it?

BLC - Big Lucite Cock

How can white bois even compete?

Ireland wastes a get

That is the ideology of most "liberals" though

>gets into trouble with the law.
well this is a major difference in the two scenarios you painted for the poor vs rich
I wouldn't be surprised if divorce rates were much lower for people in poverty, the biggest issue is poor people tend to have kids out of marriage at a much higher rate, which then leaves a single parent who is dependent on the government

a lot of what you said here is true, but poor people can succeed in school and have nearly free college and be put at nearly the same "advantage" as someone who was born upper middle class

>"I am a fiscal conservative and a social progressive."

Why do people think this is special?
That's literally every western cuckservative politician
LITERALLY Merkel

look at smaller closed groups of people. they tend to be fiscal and socially the same. amish, artist communes, etc.

We're not a small group of people, there are millions of Austrians.

This """ideology""" is a meme. Every single young person who doesn't know shit about politics says that they are a fiscal conservative and socially liberal. They say they're socially liberal because they want to fit in, and saying they're "fiscally liberal" makes it sound like they want to waste money, so naturally they say the opposite.

it would be a lot easier to say "i have a black friend" or "muslim friend" for the euros.

I said this to an apparent leftist at a bar one night - it triggered him and he became visibly upset, yelling to the point that I thought he would fight me if I pushed it further.

>I wouldn't be surprised if divorce rates were much lower for people in poverty,
You'd think that but then you need to consider the fact that the entire welfare system is geared toward helping single mothers.

IIRC the marriage rate in general among the poor has plummeted. Quite possibly because the government benefits upon which they depend would be removed if there was an able bodied man in the household.

>but poor people can succeed in school and have nearly free college and be put at nearly the same "advantage" as someone who was born upper middle class
True they can be competitive. But they would probably have some life experience that lets them know that things like recreational drugs are not personal choices that happen in isolation from the community. To the upper middle class libertarian young person drug legalization means that they can go to a rave on Friday night and not have to worry about the cops. For their lower class peers drug legalization means possible erosion of an already weakened social fabric. Of course, the take on this can flip quite dramatically. For example the disparity between crack cocaine and powder cocaine sentencing was originally advocated by black community leaders to help combat the crack epidemic. Now they claim it oppresses their community.

>I wouldn't be surprised if divorce rates were much lower for people in poverty,

It is the middle class and upper middle class that don't divorce.

If you have millions, you don't care.
If you have nothing, Uncle Sam is there to help.
If you have like 80 grand total coming in each year, then you'll be working away the rest of your life and whether you stay married or get divorced and hopefully find new spouses doesn't matter.
If you and your wife both earn low 6 figures and want to retire by 50 then you have a very strong incentive not to divorce and blow your plans apart by needing to maintain separate households. You're also probably too busy to pursue another spouse.

I'm an American. Fuck all you demented ideologues.

you have to go back pedro.

It basically translates as:
>I don't mind degeneracy and white genocide as long as you let me keep my shekels

>and a social progressive.

you are fucking retard user.

Musk is exactly that by his own words.
youtube.com/watch?v=B1OPxitgvmw

I'm surrounded by these faggots, I'll explain the rational.

These types are basically always
>white
>affluent or greater
>"proud democrats"
>oddly few gays in their lives
>rarely any minorities, except a few professionals
>95% white friends, nice houses, private schools for their kids etc.

They think because they are for gay marriage or whatever, that they are good to go from a socially acceptable approach to morality. It is essentially an older version of virtue signaling, where it more moral to be a Democrat than a republican, but they actually lead conservative lifestyles.


They have a total disconnect that Liberalism, SJWs, and all the modern lefty ideas are all masks for redistribute wealth.

They absolutely don't understand that to be "good democrats", they should financially support wasteful Government spending, gibsnedats, and luxuries like the NEA. They are stuck in the blue pill, and all they know is that they prefer being rich, and SAYING you are republican means you are mean and selfish.

There is also a sense of being civic minded, but completely absolving yourself of any responsibility.

>see social problem
>"someone" should do something
>I'll vote democrat so Gov. can fix it
>won't donate time/money to issue
>feel great about "helping" the problem
>time to buy another luxury car

>Why does this ideology trigger liberals?

Because they don't think you are actually for minorities and marginalized retards if you don't want to pay up too.

>Is this the worst kind of person
Yes. They want society to degenerate into a hyper-individualistic hellhole where there are no communal, spiritual, or racial bonds.


Analysis is right on the money.

...

N A Z B O L

>fiscal conservative and a social progressive
A jew?

Heil!

that would be socially progressive for others, unless your palestinian.

Translation: I like money and porn

>Fiscal conservative
>Jew

Because liberals are all commies now who fully intend to seize and redistribute your private property to enforce social justice.

Naturally, (((they))) will get a cut for doing the memetic dirty work.

>"I am a fiscal conservative and a social progressive."
Fiscal conservative is the most retarded concept ever.

Fiscal statist VS fiscal libertarian makes sense, but what's a "fiscal conservative" ?
Someone who doesn't want the color of banknotes to change too often ?

>They think because they are for gay marriage or whatever, that they are good to go from a socially acceptable approach to morality
who cares if gays can get married
if atheists can get married gays should be able to too

yeah

> I don't understand what double-wuote means.
You're a fucking retard El6gLRTm

RARE
E
R
E