O N E D R O P
O N E D R O P
Jordan Lee
Other urls found in this thread:
journals.plos.org
twitter.com
Carter Cox
>Moortugal
Lincoln Rogers
Meds not looking forward to checking trips of truth
Elijah Brown
Admixture is not the same thing as ancestry though. For example not even Iceland has 100% European admixture - not a single country has.
Brandon Butler
R I P
Julian Cooper
What did you try to say and what the fuck is this? It literally makes it look like Iraqi Jews are genetically similar to Europeans.
Wyatt Barnes
reminder that the reason for that overestimation in the OP is literally because central Euros have increased east Asian affinity when compared to south Euros, but the author, by wrongly assuming they don't(wrongly because of other statistics), concludes that any shift in the african direction must be due to african admixture
this is why Sardinians in the same study get a 0.2% with ADMIXTURE but much more using the authors dumb idea
using my own ideological interpretation of scientific data, I show you most non south Euros have part amerindian DNA, thus they are non white mongrels who should go back to the steppe
welcome to Sup Forums man
Jordan Murphy
Find one testing for the same metrics as the data I posted, please.
>because central Euros have increased east Asian affinity when compared to south Euros
>east Asian
>concludes that any shift in the african direction must be due to african admixture
>african
>african admixture=/=african admixture
If you can prove your claim, sure. Source your conclusion, or else we take the current information if no refutation is offered.
Landon Hill
post your sources first and argue your data, you are the one making the claim in the OP
Logan James
>wikipedia
>moorjani et al
>ameateur college funded research