Is atheism redpilled or is it just a Jewish ploy

Is atheism redpilled or is it just a Jewish ploy

Other urls found in this thread:

reddit.com/r/atheism/comments/62d8q5/atheists_unveil_a_dozen_billboards_in_denver_the/
youtube.com/watch?v=oZtJP7M-9Og
youtube.com/watch?v=5AII--2mSxA
blume-religionswissenschaft.de/english/index_english.html
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

All Abrahamic Religions plus Atheism are a Jewish plot.

Sup Forums is just a honeypot, when the globalist finally seize the government (and they will) people associated with site like this will be executed in a pol pot style opposed intellectual cleansing

Sup Forums bfto by reddit once again

reddit.com/r/atheism/comments/62d8q5/atheists_unveil_a_dozen_billboards_in_denver_the/

youtube.com/watch?v=oZtJP7M-9Og
youtube.com/watch?v=5AII--2mSxA

Everyone born atheist

exact opposite

>is not believing in magic a conspiracy?
That's a stupid question.

Please create a universe through natural means

>Christcucks LITERALLY think people automatically believe in Abrahamic jew religion as a default state straight out of the womb

Kek same people that believe in demonic possession and angels and shit

oh hey i live a couple blocks away from this

>Draculaen education

and yet you still dont get anything from being an atheist

>babies come out the womb believing the universe created itself for no reason an unfathomable amount of time ago

For people who think themselves so intelligent and enlightened, Atheists sure are terrible at understanding metaphor and spiritual discourse.

babies are born either elect or reprobate

Tbh I never thought of predestination much but if there's an election then I see why it makes sense

the top kikes running the banks and american (an europe) are all two-faced atheists

If it is purely materialist then it is spread for the sake of (((Tikkun Olam))). The doctrine Tikkun Olam is to destroy all belief systems to cause a catastrophic end forcing (((their))) god to come and unfuck everything, though it ends with a Zionist world order.

Atheism isn't necessarily bad, but most atheists are edgy retards and don't hold stable values, they follow in line with feminists in being critical of every social system, but they never see the importance in the systems they seek to overthrow. A society cannot maintain itself with completely amorphous values, some people realize that and just elect to keep their brand of atheism to themselves.

Ask an atheist man this, who do you trust to be more stable in a relationship a woman who has been religious her entire life, or one who is completely liberated and scoffs at every traditional system? I'm an athiest myself, but I see the value in some of the practices other religions have setup; their guidelines and laws weren't pulled out of thin air, they were developed thousands of years ago by warlords, priests, warriors, and politicians who wanted their civilizations to survive. Not all religions do that necessarily, but it isn't too hard to figure out which ones are better to have around than others. Nothing can be preserved if it is in a constant state of change.

That Lockean tabula rasa nonsense was destroyed ages ago. Now it's understood that man has a natural propensity for religion, hell there are even evolutionary biologists that claim atheism is a sickness that's killing itself because of low birth rates

That being said the type of atheism "preached" in the modern world is meant to convert people to materialism and turn them into cogs for sustaining the treadmill of commercialism.

...

Keep believing worshiping cows and taking a shit bath will give you salvation then.

>hell there are even evolutionary biologists that claim atheism is a sickness that's killing itself because of low birth rates

Source: your unwiped ass

Laos is an atheist country with one of the highest birthrates in the world

Atheism was functional when it was concerning it self with pointing out fallacies in Religions.
Atheism failed utterly when it started tryharding to explain the existence.
Truth is in neither option.

>pointing out fallacies in Religions.
like?

like, every single unsubstantiated claim religions made, which is like 99.975632123% of them

How is that a fallacy?
Religion has always claimed to be based on faith not material proof

Interesting. Source?

I'm not a Hindu my roach friend

Laos is majority Buddhist

What I'm saying is just a fact, but you neckbeards sure get butthurt when you realize the truth. Michael Blume wrote a lot about this phenomena about fertility levels, here's some of his work if you're interested

blume-religionswissenschaft.de/english/index_english.html

u can not claim to hold the truth, and then proceed to create policies and influences from that "truth", and claim to be just harmless faith.

I have nothing against religion, as long as it knows its place. But i do have o so much against ((jewd)) religions.

Muslim? Even worse. Is there even a good religion?

Ride the Tiger

>and then proceed to create policies and influences from that "truth
Why not?
>harmless
define harm?

Calvinism

This guy get it

This is one of the redpills that most fedoras refuse to swallow, when confronted with the data they typically downplay the importance of fertility, look away from Ahmed's brood next door, and mumble something about uploading their consciousness

Keep guessing

Thanks

because that "truth" is just blind belief, based in nothing.
that "truth" can be what ever anyone imagines, from Satanism to Buddhism.

Harm in this case is when religious doctrine starts telling other humans how they MUST think and feel. That is why the marriage of Religion and State is pure cancer.

And that comes from someone that very much believes in God, but not trough blind faith but trough knowing the God.

...

That's the price we all pay.

Jewish ploy, you are spirit, you are more than the flesh. That's why the elite are all into Kabbalah and black magick but then push Atheism on goyim so they are sitting ducks.

>that "truth" can be what ever anyone imagines, from Satanism to Buddhism.
OK then what should policies be based on?
>Harm in this case is when religious doctrine starts telling other humans how they MUST think and feel.
No they tell you what you can do just like any other form of government

But don't serve their false god/savior.

Policies should be based around human sense of good and bad, role of government is to protect u from harm, not to indoctrinate u into anything.

U see religion is not government, that is exact problem, i hope u can see it.
Even outside of government, religion should never tell you how to think and feel. Religion should be a beacon of light in the heart of man. The one he clings to when this darkness that surround us starts choking us.

Institutional Religion with the doctrine of Dogma is pure cancer, and it has been demonstrated trough the history million times over.

You can be atheist and still believe that the population requires religion.

>human sense of good and bad,
whos sense?
What does than mean
>u from harm
you still have not defined harm
what is the secular purpose for life?

harm = someone steals from u (be it life, be it health, be it property, be it freedoms)

and not only human sense of bad that is based around the above mentioned /harm, but the logic. The logical system that has mission of preservation of population inside of the state, preservation of its interests.
religion did not invent morality, hurt and abuse the animal, animal will feel pain.

Secular purpose of life does not matter, the State should not be concerned with defining the purpose of life of its citizens, it should only protect.
The individual, trough his own inspiration, or trough the shared mind with the group he feels like he belong to, is the one that defines the purpose of life.

I've noticed that as skeptics better understand the importance of religion they're able to accept it more readily. I hope the same happens to you user

Atheism is the true religion of the goy. One of the most cancerous mindsets one can have, full of leftists and communists. It sucks that I was not born in a religious place.