Sup Forums is overpopulation a problem? If so then why?

...

Because that population is most likely going to be niggers and mud slimes.

The overpopulation of Sup Forums has become a problem.

Earth is full of niggers, spics, sandniggers and chinks

No; it's brainwashing to get 1st World people's to stop breeding.

Humans are cancerous

What is food, what is land, what is water, what is resources in general??????????

Kill yourself and take as many non-Whites with you...

First world countries need to have more children. We are the ones dying at our own expense meanwhile the shitskins have 8 children.

I like how that picture is supposed to look like complex calculations but it's all super basic stuff.

Also yes, overpopulation is the biggest issue facing this planet and the driver of basically every single other problem.

Pretty sure that all the northern region of canada is empty fucking tundra. People can live there assuming proper infrastructure is built to funnel food and rare materials in. Would be no different than what imbecile western nations do for Africa. Until that region is populated then overpopulation isn't a problem, the sun will die off first most likely because even if it did get to the point of "overpopulation" the WEAK WILL FEAR THE STRONG and cause conflicts which will solve the problem anyway

Yes it's a problem. Good thing our overlords think about it.

It's not. When you hear the term "overpopulation" being thrown about, it's really in reference to third world shitholes that can't handle the sheer size/growth of its population. Of course this problem is caused by UN funding of cyclical poverty in these areas, but the solution is obviously to keep doing more of the same...

yes because a good human life requires a lot of resources. We cannot grow exponentially forever without destroying the earth.

Scary, this was made in 1980, not that long ago. Yet since then the world population has nearly doubled

You say world but you really mean Africa.
They multiply at OUR expense and it's time to get angry about it.

But where's the perpetual balance with nature?

No, we have a greed problem but no population problem.

As soon as you understand that every man woman and child on this planet can fit (shoulder to shoulder) in HALF the state of RI

Yes, obviously.

We are guaranteed, 100%, that we will have mass starvation within the next 50 years. Guaranteed. Because the population is exploding, and we are simply not going to have food for several billion people. They will starve.


People dance around and avoid talking about it, but yes, we are massively overpopulated and we are objectively going to have a mass catastrophe this century because of our failure to live sustainably.

People need farm land and water to live. It's the capacity of the environment that matters, not the amount of space humans take up you stupid fuck.

anthing above 0.5 billion humans in unacceptable

We need to cut back on chinks, niggers, and pajeets. White countries don't have too much of an overpopulation problem but we will if current immigration trends continue.

That has a prerequisite world war in which most of the human population dies tho

Then and only then will we start being good neighbors to the trees

>tfw Idiocracy is going to become reality

what do you expect from a meme made by niggers though?

>Drop of 7 points over 150 years
WOW!!!
These are all projections, anyways. Frankly, by the time 2100 rolls around, Technology will be so advanced that it is likely we will have less need for natural intellect.

In terms of allocation of resources we are going to see a eventual natural culling of populations who outgrow their impossible-to-maintain or nonexistent food resource chains. This effect combined with an "inconvenient" economic crisis, millions will starve when the overpopulation issue hits critical mass, while those in charge will say nothing effective can be done.

This will be after rich countries pledge and deliver billions of dollars of food and aid to countries reproducing much faster than us under the guise of humanitarianism, giving those with inferior countries relief for but a day combined with a sustained and possibly increased reproduction rate, effectively worsening the long-term problem.

A true international gut check will occur concerning whether sustainable countries prop-up an exploding population, sweeping the problem of exponentially-growing overpopulation under the rug until the parasites of ineffective governance and bottleneck resource logistics we've been supporting grows to the point of killing the host that fed it to that size.

That's where cultural marxism, antinationalism, and liberalism is leading us: grooming our children to be either parasites or hosts of parasites, most likely both, living shoulder to shoulder while those in power skim off the top and enjoy the luxury of open spaces, abundant food, and privacy.

It's a problem when we are accelerating into a high-trust society that resolves conflict through peaceful dispute resolution, a society that puts a premium on learning and advancement. This society is also increasingly automating menial work so as to not need so many people. This allows for better resource management as well.

However, by flooding such society with low-intelligence, violent people who breed profusely, then that society is doomed. There aren't enough resources and the conditions which allow them to breed and produce (the benefits from the more advanced, Western society) will
be overrun and ultimately destroyed.

Africa and South Asia (India, Pakistan, Bangladesh) will be the death of the world.

Way to oust yourself as someone that doesn't understand how countries develop.
Overpopulation is a typical trend in developing countries and has been for years, and it did happen to primarily white countries, just earlier. It is not overpopulation relative to physical space, mind you, but carrying capacity. We live in unprecedented times where developing countries are being financially occupied by various warring powers. Before, they were simply literally occupied. Now they're more or less left to their own devices.

7 points is a huge drop when we are talking about averages in the millions.

>we will have less need for natural intellect.
We will never have less need for natural intellect.
You sound like you could use some more yourself.

>living shoulder to shoulder while those in power skim off the top and enjoy the luxury of open spaces, abundant food, and privacy.
As if that isn't occurring right now in our current neoliberal system? Everyone on the right is either a hypocrite, or working their asses off in the hopes of climbing the social ladder, a feat which has never been less likely to happen in the history of America.

>Attain the ability to augment your natural strength via tools and weapons
>Natural strength of humans declines
>Attain the ability to warm yourself without fur
>Body hair in humans declines
>Attain the ability to augment one's intelligence via referencing a global brain, literal brain implants or simple access to the internet
>Natural intellect goes down
It's a theory about what is to come which I made as a response to a post that was a theory about what is to come. Nothing but semantics, not to mention the way IQ is determined is not, in all cases, representative of intelligence, which is borderline impossible to ascertain. Off yourself.

Overpopulation, when it occurs is an obvious problem. Why? Natural Laws.
Every ecosystem has a carrying capacity limit. Overshooting usually results in violent disruptions and chaos. Furthermore, from an unchecked sociological perspective, it matters who is overpopulating as a regressive majorities would cause social regression.

You and I are too different to share the same future friend.

Men like you will destroy the human race.

Yes, because the efficacy of neoliberal politics has been proven time and time again.

Yes, but only for non whites, and mainly in the third world. They're the ones breeding at an exponential rate, yet are unable to ensure proper housing, food, and medical care without assistance.

Solution? Stop fucking supporting their dumbasses. Yes, some people may die. But it's necessary to bring their population down to a more sustainable level.

White birth rates need to increase, though. That's why it doesn't make sense for cucks to use "muh overpopulation" as an excuse to not have children.

This one knows. There are people in parts of the world untouched by the industrial society but still manage to live good lives because everything is within reach and plentiful. If they play their cards right.

Over population is a massive sociological and environmental problem. Borders are good because you are hinting to those out side of them that they need to stabilize what they are doing and find better methods than farting out dependents.

Never listen to some of the more hipstery socialists talk about "artificial scarcity" it is not artificial, it is simply mismanaged. Scarcity is real. The artificial part is going to happen with a socialist or capitalist, or any large managed system.

Worthless populations are a problem.
>see: Africans and muslims world wide

This. The way we're using farmland, water, and other resources right now is 100% unsustainable.

It is a problem. Kys first

can't have a child. I am middle-aged WASP and can't get a fucking full-time job, despite applying to roughly 75 places over the past ten months. I have an IQ Of 143 and a college degree as well.

Yes, we have to exterminate everybody with a IQ under 100

Overpopulation of whites would be paradise.

There is no advantage to making the population larger than it currently is.

It just makes life worse for everyone as infrastructure and logistics struggles to cope.

Non-whites should have their birth rates reduced; trying to outbreed them is completely fruitless.

Bill Clinton pumps and dumps all the time, Why not you as well?

Because we dont have the resources to sustain such a population. The left likes to complain "SAVE DA INVIRUNMENT. STOP USIN FOZIL FUELLZ N SHIEET" but are perfectly fine with the billion chinks and poo in loos using a VASTLY greater amount of fuel and resources than us, cut the population of China, India and all of Africa in half and we'd be at a much more sustainable level

Whites and Japanese should breed more while everyone else needs to breed less. I suggest we stop giving aid to overpopulated areas like India and Africa.

America is far from overpopulated despite population numbers. There's still a shit ton of uninhibited areas.

So the problem will just keep getting worse.
Good solution

The uninhibited areas are made up of huge deserts and dense rain forests.

We already have stopped aid to africa haven't we?

it diminishes the value of human life. everyone feels insignificant and replaceable because they are

No. If you look at birthrate trends, the overall human birthrate has fallen dramatically except in Sub-Saharan Africa where birthrates have almost doubled. However, the child survival rate in Africa is appallingly low. So really, we're facing a decline of the human population. We may very well see the disappearance of 500 million Chinese by 2050 along with nearly 300 million Indians.

No, the world will end long before we run out of space

Limited resources

antibiotics where a mistakes, white superior hygiene helped us thrived, no thanks to antibiotics you can sustain overpopulation.

Soon when antibiotics are useless again we will laugh