Has this happened to anyone else?

Has this happened to anyone else?

What made you give up your cuckservitive views?

Other urls found in this thread:

reason.com/blog/2011/07/20/being-libertarian-may-cause-au
zerothposition.com/2016/07/22/an-overview-of-autistic-libertarianism/
autismpolicyblog.com/2012/10/libertarians-and-autism.html
washingtontimes.com/news/2012/oct/16/all-about-libertarians-mystique-profile-increases/
quora.com/Are-there-disproportionately-many-libertarians-with-Aspergers-Syndrome-If-so-why
youtu.be/f82mHHAt6yI?t=6m5s
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

reason.com/blog/2011/07/20/being-libertarian-may-cause-au
zerothposition.com/2016/07/22/an-overview-of-autistic-libertarianism/
autismpolicyblog.com/2012/10/libertarians-and-autism.html
washingtontimes.com/news/2012/oct/16/all-about-libertarians-mystique-profile-increases/
quora.com/Are-there-disproportionately-many-libertarians-with-Aspergers-Syndrome-If-so-why

Oh, maybe just the fact that the FREE MARKET == AUTISM
reminder to call out lolbertarians because that's exactly what they are: one gigantic LOL at the original republicans; you know, the people who actually wanted to run a REPUBLIC.
don't take sub-18y/o autists seriously. ever. they will fuck things up like the edgy faggots they are with their jewish scams.

I went straight from cucked all races are probably equal green party enviro to 14/88 in one year of Sup Forums
The veil has been lifted from my eyes

I recognise that inferiority of other races but I'm not a cuck nazi

no

Kinda like leftist communists expect themselves to be the among the elite the same could be said about the nazis among Sup Forums. They think they will be the ones in charge. Both types are useful idiots for people much more capable than them.

Nazis think just because they're right on one issue, strong and well protected borders, they're right on absolutely everything else.

Someone post pictures of mullatto Sup Forums users i.e. 95% of Sup Forums's user base

I realized the Hitler did nothing wrong.

>Today, Bentham and arguably Kant would might be diagnosed with Asperger’s

nice professional articles that cant even into english

>being this wrong about everything

Except you misunderstand what the 'socialist' part of National Socialism means. Which makes your comparison a false equivalency.

Everyone is different with different capabilities, therefor you can't have true freedom if you have equity/equality. And vice versa you can't have equality if you have freedoms because the genuine differences between people in a truly free society will allow those differences to manifest themselves. No one that's a NatSoc expects to be some kind of elite. Just expect the most of out the individual relative to his capabilities.

With leftist communists everyone is the same no matter what and equity no matter what.

Pic related too a country reduced to rubble from a war they were not the aggressors in and shot them to the number 1 spot.

Communism took a weak country and managed to break it even more.

I'd be happy as a border guard desu. Just give me a gun and let me shoot any beans trying to cross illegally.

it happens to literally everyone eventually

we can't live like libertarians/minarchists/ancaps until all the spics and niggers and commies are gone

Limited government ability to control large businesses means that even (((greedy people))) who have not infiltrated the state can become powerful enough for their corruption and agendas to harm the population.

>>With leftist communists everyone is the same no matter what and equity no matter what.

>In a higher phase of communist society, after the enslaving subordination of the individual to the division of labor, and therewith also the antithesis between mental and physical labor, has vanished; after labor has become not only a means of life but life's prime want; after the productive forces have also increased with the all-around development of the individual, and all the springs of co-operative wealth flow more abundantly—only then can the narrow horizon of bourgeois right be crossed in its entirety and society inscribe on its banners: From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs!

the lefties are right about a few things. capitalism will resort to fascism when it's in crisis. many former libertarians now nazi/fascists these days.

That exactly happened to me, it was the realization that a lare government in the hands GOOD and WISE leadership had the capability of ruling well, with inspiration from Germany national socialism. A big government does have HAVE to be bad if it's in the right hands, in fact a larger government has more potential to do better things for the sake of the people they govern.

A longtime Nazi, I've been convinced that AnCap is a greater redpill because the reasons some AnCaps propose for physical removal are stronger than the reasons that Hitler proposed. People have no idea what these arguments are but Hoppe fully explains them here: youtu.be/f82mHHAt6yI?t=6m5s The trouble is that all libertarian groups are filled with shills and disinfo because they're a threat to the government.

The reverse happened to me. Before i was full authoritarian, now I'm libertarian.

>when you can be an ancap while violating the NAP and denying negative liberties

i'm not getting this

Do you guys ever feel like the wrong side won WW2?

Fascism is what NatSoc is all about. What's the problem with that again? Totally free market would be retarded. You need a dash of socialism in there for order.

>From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs!

Which is what Hitler actually did, to a degree. He took the best parts from the left/right and mixed them up with fascism. And it worked which is why I added this at the end of my post:

"Pic related took a country reduced to rubble from a war they were not the aggressors in and shot them to the number 1 spot.

Communism took a weak country and managed to break it even more."

Anywhere communist ideals have been tried have ended in self-destruction, failure and genocide. They are socialists who ignore human nature while NatSoc embrace and work with it.

nope. not at all. the only side that should win is you

>>Fascism is what NatSoc is all about. What's the problem with that again? Totally free market would be retarded. You need a dash of socialism in there for order.
this could be fine or totally wrong depending if one thinks fascism is acceptable along with their own conception of what socialism is. many self-proclaimed left socialists argue for the complete dismantlement of capitalism and unelectied hiearchies, which some fascists governments have been, but then that's their own conception of socialism.

>Anywhere communist ideals have been tried have ended in self-destruction, failure and genocide. They are socialists who ignore human nature while NatSoc embrace and work with it.
it's a really mixed bag. there's been plenty of socialists uprisings in rich and poor countries that have been quelled. the only places where socialist ideologies became the main political ideologies were shithole countries that immediately had to change gears and work under power politics. there's no instances of socialism being tried under a vacuum.

>this could be fine or totally wrong depending if one thinks fascism is acceptable along with their own conception of what socialism is
We have a pretty solid definition of National Socialism and how it works as well as successful real world trial runs by Nazi Germany. America has the resources and manpower they did, just on a bigger scale.

>many self-proclaimed left socialists argue for the complete dismantlement of capitalism and unelectied hiearchies, which some fascists governments have been
>but then that's their own conception of socialism.

But adding onto the first part of your point; transparency would be key. We shouldn't rely on always having an altruistic leader like Hitler or Trump to take care of those who wish to turn the system on the people it's supposed to serve. Lack of transparency, or rather too much transparency shedding light on to WHY there was such a lack of transparency is what destroyed the Democrats. But their version of Socialism was more akin to Communism rather than National Socialism. DNC pushed equity and destruction of national identity.

>it's a really mixed bag. there's been plenty of socialists uprisings in rich and poor countries that have been quelled. the only places where socialist ideologies became the main political ideologies were shithole countries

You should hop in that Venezuela thread lad. It's been tried in a vast array of countries, failing everywhere. It's always true communism, it always will be true communism. Look into how pathological systems like this start. Look into the psyche of a person pushing murderous ideologies like communism. See how they become increasingly detached from reality, giving up coherence and consistency, to willfully ignore human nature and push said ideology. There's more than just theoretical economics behind it. Its equally as important to consider the psychological aspects of these ideologies. Which NatSoc does, because again it works with human nature - not against

cuckservatives don't understand what demographic warfare is, or why so many young white guys are just all of the sudden getting radicalized. pretty much boomers who still drink the jew juice that blacks and spics are just like them and won't budge