So apparently, white people have most neanderthal blood in them due to interbreeding with their kind, but nogs supposedly have zero neanderthal blood.
What can be implied from this? Did neanderthal blood give us superpowers that pure homo sapiens blood didn't entail?
Other urls found in this thread:
washington.edu
youtube.com
youtube.com
newscientist.com
news.nationalgeographic.com
twitter.com
they gave us white skin straight hair different colored hair and different colored eyes also our bigger brains
are you saying that we were sandnigger-skinned before interbreeding with neanderthals? If so, what if neanderthals were the true master race that got flooded by rapefugees from middle-east and all white people today are actually mongrels?
well we certainly didn't evolve our features as we weren't separated from the niggers long enough but who knows how everything went down
next logical step is to start a mars colony and evolve into master race that cannot biologically interbreed with niggers
kek
Neanderthals have quite a bit larger cranial capacities than Homo Sapiens. More cranial capacity means a large brain, which with our brains being of similar structure would mean more intelligent.
Why not just do it manually with genetic engineering? Create a strain of whites who can't breed with negroids. Make it impossible for race traitorous women to betray their race. Lmao.
caucasian and mangolian race have 3% of neanderthal dna in our genome that is nothing ,maybe no nigger races are smarter than niggers not because of neanderthal
Homo Neanderthalensis is presumed to have been wiped out in one of two most likely cases. The first being bred that the species was bred into a larger population of Homo Sapiens. The other being that as a result of a mass Homo Sapiens migration from Africa around 70,000 - 30,000 years ago, Homo Neanderthalensis was eradicated in a genocide. Apparently 1-4 percent of modern Middle Eastern and European human DNA is shared with Neanderthals.
So really, white people didn't evolve from Neanderthals, and they didn't 'give us' straight hair and white skin. We evolved these traits due to the climate, as Neanderthals had previously.
As for the 'master race' concept, 100,000 years ago, archaic Homo Sapiens had comparably smaller brains than Neanderthals, and were less physically strong also. But it is believed that Sapiens were able to overrun the Neanderthal population because of their advanced social skills and unique cognitive abilities. Sapiens were also able to overrun the Homo Erectus populations in greater Asia because of this.
Thats not actually true though. Blue eyes are only 10k years old from a single ancestor. Neanderthals did have some things like red hair but if I remember right it is red because of different genes than cause the red in homo sapiens so they evolved independently. White skin evolved around the baltic sea and spread from there from lack of vitamin D most likely. Either that or aesthetic like the blue eyes.
>What can be implied?
That not even subhumans will fuck a Nigger.
>That not even subhumans will fuck a Nigger.
>caucasian and mangolian race have 3% of neanderthal dna in our genome that is nothing
>Apparently 1-4 percent of modern Middle Eastern and European human DNA is shared with Neanderthals.
Incorrect: on an individual basis, that figure is approximately right. But pupulation wide, whites have assimilated about 25% of the Neanderthal genome, just spread about many individuals.
Whites are subhumans
Whites can't be neanderthal. Whites are too sissy and their men can't even produce sperm in their balls LMAO
No Whites became smart because the cold weather forced us to use new tools, think creatively and adapt. Sub Saharan Africans never had to worry about running out of food and resources it was all there for them so they didn't evolve to think creatively.
roach pls
Ok
>whites have assimilated about 25% of the Neanderthal genome
citation needed
>white people have most neanderthal blood in them
You're thinking of asian people.
Asians generally have ~4% neanderthal dna whereas white people generally have ~2%
Hey look a roach that got his information about neanderthals by watching Flintstones instead of reading up on actual information.
You really should pick up a book and read up on neanderthals.
>on an individual basis, that figure is approximately right
I do beg your pardon, that is what I referred to. Thanks.
>whites have assimilated about 25% of the Neanderthal genome
Could I get a source on this? This really doesn't seem right.
Completely wrong. There are no proven genetic disparities between 'whites' and sub saharan africans. European Sapiens were not more intelligent than African Sapiens and did not evolve to think more creatively, but more that their environment was in the perfect location, with the right resources, climate and just the right amount of tribal competition to allow the more recent European domination of the world.
Sandman did a great video explaining Neanderthals:
youtube.com
If by superpowers you mean their hability not to be able to use its brain to the fullest potential, each day that goes by I'm more certain that is the case
nah dude we didn't evolve white skin
False, whites have the 2nd most neanderthal DNA at 3.8-4.1%
Snowchinks have upto 5%
Of course we did. How would a gene that came from Neanderthals be spread across a population of humans vastly larger than their own? It's just not possible.
come on man you guys make fun of American education but it seems like you're the one who didn't learn about evolution
Wow, we sure are afraid of what people say online nowdays
newscientist.com
Don't be a twat now. Try using that superior brain of yours.
WE
There were two cradles of civilization, one in Mesopotamia and one in South Africa. Mesopotamia's humans are responsible for great civilizations. Babylon, Egypt, Persian, Roman, etc etc.
The South African cradle has done nothing. Every nigger is sub par, just look at their continent. 125k years and they literally a just a step or two out of the Stone Age. This is why I laugh whenever I see nigs chimp about slavery. Slavery was the greatest happening in their entire lineage. Due to white people needing farm tools niggers now are able to reap all the benefits the "white devil" has to offer. Then chimp about how horrible their ancestors had it. It's really remarkable. If the slavery never happened niggers that are the western worlds scourge today would all have 40 year life expectancy.
So without racemixing we would have been like niggers? Really makes you think.
racmixing is the final redpill desu
>two cradles of civilization
kek
>125k years and they literally a just a step or two out of the Stone Age.
Because they didn't need to mate.
Unlikely. It wasn't just mixing, it was also necessity to adapt to our new environment, and tens of thousands of years of natural genetic divergence from the ones who stayed in africa, who also likely intermixed with other homonids in africa in the same way we mixed with neanderthals.
Actually white people have only medium amounts.
Around 2%. Some Asian populations have around 4%
Neanderthals were autistic flower children, living in harmony with the nature, taking care of sick and burying the dead.
They weren't at all like modern day turks, aka savages
neanderthals were savage manlets with underdeveloped frontal lobes.
>Because they didn't need to mate.
Exactly. And they still don't need to today.
"says Sandra Beleza"
wow man that really cleared it all up now that everyone agrees with her
It's not racemixing if they were different species by the way.
Also, it could still have been Sapiens that wiped out all/most Neanderthals, (not necessarily outbreeding) and Sapiens would still have evolved physical traits similar to Neanderthals (white skin, fair hair, blue eyes etc.) because of the climate
Living in cold environments requires long-term planning skills, complex hunting parties, cooking, storing of meats, strong morals because everyone has to stay together and cooperate or they freeze to death, etc etc.
WUZ
So what would your argument be then? That we all got our white skin from Neanderthals?
>ancient Neanderthals mated with Neanderthals
>ancient blacks mated with goats, rhinos, elephants, lions, pigs, dogs, chickens, sabretooth tigers....
You're right, OP, blacks are sooooooo much more diverse.
>kys
>>>/saged/
my argument is that we were not separated from niggers long enough to evolve our own white skin and other white features on our own without mixing with neanderthals
...
You're both oversimplifying it. So is that journalist.
There is first the matter of where the genes for lighter pigmentation came from, and it would seem they existed in some frequency among both neanderthals and "modern" humans.
Then there is the matter of the selective pressure that drastically increased the frequency of those genes within the European population - environmental factors, of which culture is also one.
11k-19k years ago as the time frame for this selective sweep is a bit tricky, because it places the selective sweep after the "dying out" of neanderthals in Europe (at least as a separate entity), but before agriculture arrived in Europe.
My previous understanding was that the real selective pressure for pale skin (on genes which already existed in the palaeolithic European population) came with the transmission of agrarian culture throughout Europe, which happened after 11k years ago.
Why? Because going from a diet of foraged fruit, veg, leafy greens and MEAT, to a comparatively nutrient-deficient cereal-based diet, in combination with the higher latitude of Europe in comparison to other agrarian regions in the Mid East, meant depigmented skin was selected for to increase vitamin D.
Mid Easterners with a shit vitamin D deficient diet, could still get it from the sun without going paler. Inuits, who live in northern latitudes where they cannot get vitamin D from the sun without depigmenting, have never had to depigment because their meat heavy diet still gives them plenty.
(will continue)
I've studied it and it's mostly this. Neanderthals had bigger brains but they had a more primitive actual brain. They had less ridges and brain folds, and most of the extra brain was in the back for more precise body control (like a gorilla). Interbreeding with humans allowed a more advanced homo-sapiens brain (although less coordinated body) combined with the larger capacity of a neanderthal head.
They also probably donated genes specialized for resisting diseases found in colder climates (as opposed to tropical diseases).
However, if the 11k-19k time-frame is correct, the agrarian diet plus latitude cannot explain it. Besides, those environmental factors still had to select for a gene which was already there.
Another explanation is the collapsing of previously diverged West Eurasian Hunter-Gatherer lines, which happened about 12.5k years ago, so within this time-frame. There was an old siberian lineage that had previously diverged from the West Eurasian Hunter-Gatherers, following which different branches of this old siberian were absorbed both back into Western Hunter-Gatherer populations, but also into Eastern Hunter-Gatherer populations. Some of them then went on to cross the bering strait as one of the founding Amerindian influxes, the rest was largely subsumed by EHG's who later developed mongoloid features as we know them.
But that's besides the point. It may be that this old siberian lineage had been selected more strongly for pale skin because of latitude, for example, and when they mixed back with WHGs, even those WHGs had experienced weaker selective pressure for the trait, it proved advantageous and stuck in a way that it didn't with mongoloids.
>white people have most neanderthal blood
I thought that was chinks
The people who have the most neanderthal blood are the Papua New Guineans, I believe, with waning distribution throughout the rest of SE Asia.
Their high levels of neanderthal are courtesy of the denisovans, who were a hybrid between neanderthals and another as-of-yet unidentified homonid.
Nogs aren't pure homo sapiens. Their kind mixed with another hominid in Africa thousands of years ago as well.
that's outdated information. east asians have more neanderthal admixture than europeans on average. though yes it's true, sub-saharan africans have no neanderthalis DNA.
anything about what was gained by the non-sub-saharan world from neanderthalis/denisovae genetics is nothing but speculation, though it can be easily assumed that the genetic splash was beneficial, as genetic diversity is positively correlated with general survivability.
this post is complete bullshit. genetic studies demonstrate 1-3% in europeans on average and 4-6% in asians on average depending on the geographical location, between neanderthalis and denisovae.
thinking there is such a thing as a "pure" homo sapien reflects a dramatic misunderstanding of natural selection.
>caucasian and mangolian race have 3% of neanderthal dna in our genome that is nothing
>nothing
>yet we share ~96% dna similarity with chimps
news.nationalgeographic.com
the gene has been associated with creativity, not intelligence as some people here suggest. but it's kinda unfounded and hard to prove
>pro-white evolution picture
>posts pic of some half-arab looking mutt who lost genetic lottery
JUST
That is exactly what happened
Now it is happening again
The people of the future are going to see whites the way we see neanderthals now, and they're going to talk about how they're better than a pure negro because they have 1% European DNA.
you don't understand how the data is being presented. 96%~ of our DNA is similar to chimpanzees, 99.7%< of our DNA is similar to neanderthalis, and if you're not sub-saharan african, 1-6%+ of your DNA is literally identical to neanderthalis, as in you could copy and paste it. the same does not hold true between the parts that are "similar".
KANGZ AND SHIET
Snowniggers aren't white. They're niggers.
>So apparently, white people have most neanderthal blood
Nope, East Asians do.
shut the fuck up ahmed.
and Papua new Guineans apparently
>Neaders took in fleeing homo sapiens, then bred with them while taking care of them.
>This kept happening until the mix breeds started moving back south.
>Neander/Homo sapiens in the north became "whitey".
>Neander/Homo Sapiens in the Mediterranean became arabs fighting the African hordes.
>Neander/Homo Sapiens that traveled east mixed with Denisovan.
Neander capacity for compassion is what's killing Europe today. That and a lack of Ideology.
they are on their way to Germany and Sweden.
>There are no proven genetic disparities between 'whites' and sub saharan africans.
nigga please.
sub saharan groids never advanced past the mud and stick houses with dirt floors until the white man came along.
they never had to put any effort into food gathering because all they had to do was climb the lowest tree for fruit or dig a few inches in the ground for a tuber.
Neanderthals gave Whites and Asians 2 important things that were synergistic:
1. Genes for a bigger skull in which to hold a larger brain
2. Genes for cold climate resistance that allowed us to evolve in glaciated Eurasia, where intelligence and altruism was heavily selected for.
Climate drove evolution for bigger brains, which could grow big because we had the genes for larger skulls and the ability to survive the climate.
Africans did not get these. North Africans got some of them when glaciers expanded and forced our ancestors and their genes to flow back south into the Levant.
This is homo erectus. He looks more like black folks than Neanderthals. Perhaps modern Africans are descended from homo erectus and are a different species?
Neanderthals never existed. Gtfo with your jaw fragment or tooth or whatever, calling it a damned different species
whoa, here's an idea.
what if they are the Atlantians and they live in Agatha with in the hollow earth and periodically come out to mate through their hole in the north pole?
Whites and Asians did not "evolve from Africans". We share a common ancestor 40k years ago. Black Africans also evolved from our common ancestor-- but in very different ways of course, because the environment was very different.
>are you saying that we were sandnigger-skinned
No we were literally niggers. The mixing with neanderthals happened in the middle east.
>Whites and Asians did not "evolve from Africans". We share a common ancestor 40k years ago. Black Africans also evolved from our common ancestor-- but in very different ways of course, because the environment was very different.
Yes, this. This is something that libtards, mudsharks, coalburners and afrocentrists really seem to struggle with, too.
Although we've been diverging for longer than 40k years. More like 50k.
10k years ago is how long ago polars and grizzlies diverged from one another, for reference. And they're considered separate species. Not on the basis of not being able to have offspring, because they can, but on the basis that their anatomies and behavioural traits show striking differentiation in adapting to their respective environments.
what the hell he looks like those roaches from mars?
neanderthals were superior to sapient monkeys and their blood allowed those lucky sapient monkeys who ventured out of africa to evolve into modern humans.
This ia just further proof of my theory that the diffrence of the african and white race, is not that of an race but rather its two seperate species. White man is a son of neanderthal, and this not through racemixing but we are EVOLVED neanderthals thus we find the DNA of neanderthal in the white man, as off for the africans are of another species, probably even them self evolved from a dirrent species of monkey on a diffrent location, and probably at a diffrent point in time as well.
you need to read the book "the neanderthal's necklace". they were superior tool makers far outclassing all others.
^ this guy gets it.
I am pretty sure neanderthal were the smart ones and we were the savage ones, look at Africans