Ask a liberal anything, and I will answer as politely as I can.
------
THREAD RULES:
1. NO NAME CALLING, AD HOMS, OR OTHER SHITPOSTING.
2. ONLY POST IMAGES RELEVANT TO THE THREAD. PSEUDO-SCIENTIFIC "RACE AND IQ" CHARTS ARE NOT RELEVANT, AND I WILL BLOCK YOUR ID.
3. WOMEN AND NONWHITES WELCOME.
------
Other urls found in this thread:
french revolution was useless and co-opted by radicals real quick
american revolution is the best
Your revolution didn't even manage to solve slavery.
How can Bernie still win?
kill yourself petrol sniffing emu vago licking abo shill sharia blue nigger jew
not op but bernie cant win. hes too old. murica doesn't want to vote in a prez elect that will die or be hospitalized
bu-t bernie has the russians on his side. how can he lose whit their super duper election hacking technology
People will vote for Bernie. You know he has the highest approval ratings of all the major front runners right now? Like he said, it's a political revolution.
>that picture
>implying liberals like freedom
Wew
Are you a liberal or a leftist?
what does it feel like to be legally retarded?
if they do theyre retarded, I favor socialism but you don't want your leader dying in the middle of a political revolution. that leaves you open to stalinists
That's why we pick a formidable VP to run with him.
How cool does Bernie look in his car?
The French revolution was a libertarian right thing, nothing to with your ilk.
What do you think about the way American children are being raised youtu.be
Do you hate white people?
Why do you continue to insist that Islam is a religion of peace even after each terror attack gets worse and worse and rape (including child rape) continues to skyrocket among refugees?
Would you like to go for a helicopter ride?
>Thread rules
>THREAD RULES:
What makes you think you can enforce rules here?
>1. NO NAME CALLING, AD HOMS, OR OTHER SHITPOSTING.
Step one is literally declaring this thread a personal safe space.
>2. ONLY POST IMAGES RELEVANT TO THE THREAD. PSEUDO-SCIENTIFIC "RACE AND IQ" CHARTS ARE NOT RELEVANT, AND I WILL BLOCK YOUR ID.
You mean only content that agrees with your world-view.
>3. WOMEN AND NONWHITES WELCOME.
And away we go with the racism and sexism, right out of the gate.
Why are Liberals such blatant fascists?
>durrr
op might litterally be that retarded but I choose to believe he is saying hes going to ignore anyone who acts like a nigger and cant speak like a polite human being
as well as ignore memeing which ditracts from the topic.
He can't. But he'll try again, if he's still alive.
Most likely, the Socialist President, when s/he comes, will be young and vigorous and likely female.
We like freedom, but it is one value among many, others being justice, fairness, equality, and a right to seek historical revenge.
I don't dwell on semantics.
False.
Only neurotics and the sexually maladjusted get bent out of shape over teenagers doing sexual things. American sexual behavior is mostly a regression to the historical mean.
>Do you hate white people?
Their role in most (literally most) of the suffering over the past 300 years makes it hard to celebrate them, and I say that as a white person.
Islam can mean whatever its adherents believe it to mean, regardless of whether their beliefs fit the Quran. So if a Muslim is peaceful because of Islam, then for him Islam is a religion of peace.
>I don't dwell on semantics
You realize there's a sizeable difference between liberal and leftist right?
The former is primarily a capitalist ideology with an emphasis on individuality
The latter is for the socialists, commies, and all other types of cancer
Are traps gay?
Fuck off and die.
whats ur favorite pizza topping
TheArtOfTheTroll.jpg
>a right to seek historical revenge
That's a new one
0/10 bait
No, traps are mentally ill. You are gay for being attracted to penis.
>THREAD RULES:
typical "liberal", ladies and gents
That's the trouble with Liberals, they say one thing and mean another.
Why do you guys celebrate piety when the faith in question is Islam, but shun any form of Christian fundamentalism?
For the left, why do pious muslims go in the "good people" bin, while a group like puritans or baptists are relegated to the "bad people" bin?
T. agnostic, classical liberal nauseated by the modern left's tolerance of intolerance and authoritarian tendencies
What does being Liberal mean to you? For what reasons do you associate yourself with the moniker?
Why are you so desperate to label race and IQ charts as pseudoscientific? If I said we're all equal at running would that make sense? Why would it be any different for IQ
Tough.
How would you label a Socialist who is tolerant of individual freedoms, provided they allow for a culture of fairness?
What a moronic question.
I'm not Muslim, but applying modern ethics to the 7th century is a fool's errand.
I don't like pizza.
It's not, actually. Most cultures have some concept of literal or metaphorical irredentism.
Only white people ended slavery. Do you blame blacks for still having millions of slaves in Africa?
It's not so much that Islam is "good" and Christianity is "bad," and you'll rarely hear liberals talk in such terms. The issue is one of practical emphasis. Muslims have gone through the wringer lately, while Christians have not. So it makes sense to emphasize the suffering of Muslims at this point in time.
>a right to seek historical revenge
This national guilt by association shit is rich. Anyone can choose to be a victim if they try hard enough.
I'm Italian. So I should hate the French for Napoleon. But France should hate me for Rome's Gallic conquest. But we should both hate Germany for the Germanic migrations.
And Greece should hate all of us for 2500 year old cultural appropriation.
Fucking retarded. Mass scale victimhood only effects a population that embraces the "victim" identity/mindset.
You are delusional. White people have created virtually all of the great things that the world now relies upon. Not only that but only an ignorant moron would think whites have done anything abnormal. Do you blame the Turks for the crimes of the ottomans? Or would that be racist?
Liberal confirmed
What role have white people had in Maoist China? In cannibalistic Africa? You stupid fucking subhuman?
Most places were WORSE before white people showed up, and are now worse AFTER they left.
Ever heard of the Arab slave trade you stupid prick? Half a million slaves to the US. 150 million jigs to Arabia.
White people are a civilizing fucking force. The world is just a hard place. They have to do what they have to do but do it in the most painless way possible.
Liberalism, to me, just means people being allowed to do what they want, within a culture that fosters tolerance and seeks to smooth inequalities.
looks like a fukkin lefty audi?
Most such charts are literally pseudo-scientific insofar as career scientists reject them.
Discuss your hypocrisy on Islamic intolerance
That's classic liberalism AKA libertarianism. Which does not work when you have 1. a welfare state 2. a huge barbarian population
>pseudo scientific race and IQ charts
oh my.
Tell me, why was Germany (Like any other Europian country) rebuilt fairly quickly after a devastating war.
But negro countrys suck ass to this day?
Why did the pure blood negro never invent a wheel if all people are the same? And some didnt even find fire!
Why were the subsaharian africans, north american natives and abbos far behind europians in every aspect of prgress, when they met the first time?
Op is a cunt
But the existence of recent criticism of a concept is not logical cause for approval of that concept. You need a bit more in the way of justification.
An example: rapists have gone through the wringer lately. Does it make sense to emphasize the suffering of rapists at this point in time?
Who cares
are scientists some sort of Gods to you? lol
This comes from a physics student and I highly admire some of my professors.
But when stuff gets pollitical in someway, they all say what the jews tell them.
If you would be acctually intrested you would know that the guy who won a nobel price for discovering the DNA got in a lot of trouble when he published his papers on getetical difference between human races.
It was not like people dissagreed with him, he was simply forced to take it back. Noone ever debunked any of his works.
>44
Checked
Neoliberalism is incompatible with freedom. How do you handle the cognitive dissonance? Do you even try or do you accept that the state enforcing ideals of "fairness" is just a cover for socialism/communism and anti-western values?
Wow, and people wonder why trump won.
What do you think about the Spencer-punching incident?
You don't even know what neoliberalism means.
1. Where the fuck you think you are
2. We make the rules
3. GTFO shill
Sage
Are you a socialist, from an economic perspective?
If so, why do you believe it would work someday despite countless empirical evidence where it gave nothing but scarcity to a given people?
IT was a war for independence, not a revolution.
Triggers me how that massive discrepancy is ignored
>consumerism
>revolution as a marketable commodity
Showed you.
well it was a revolution as well. don't you see how your constitution was innovative? Or how deep you influenced the world with your ideals?
the entire latin america fought for their independence cause everyone was inspired by you, for instance. Also, as you managed to successfully create and maintain a huge republic, you undermined the main premises of the monarchic system. That's revolutionary as fuck.
Those ideas were refinements of exclusively English political values.
And it failed and will continue to fail because shit skins and swarthy cucks love a fat socialist dick raping their blasted anus.
Universal suffrage was the final nail.