H3H3 proves WSJ to be fake news

youtu.be/lM49MmzrCNc

This time they're gonna burn, bois. Ethan has evidence that they used fake screenshots to demonize YouTube.

Let's start the shitstorm:
[email protected]
[email protected]
twitter.com/jacknicas
[email protected]

Other urls found in this thread:

archive.is/ZQvM5
npr.org/2017/02/13/515043661/wall-street-journal-editor-defends-trump-coverage-at-staff-meeting
youtube.com/user/WSJDigitalNetwork
youtube.com/user/WSJWorldStream
youtube.com/user/TheShortAnswerWSJ
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

Its time to start editing some WSJ articles and spam advertisers to pull funding without actually checking if the articles are legitimate.

A single faggot cant out meme an entire online community,

my favourite unexpected development of 2017 so far is the escalating YouTube VS Media war

bump

Eric Feinberg is behind the Youtube ad censorship

>Eric Feinberg MADE the YouTube ad boycott happen so he could SELL his technique for fixing it.

>He's doing it for $$ archive.is/ZQvM5

its just amazing how fast the mainstream media can shoot themselves in the foot by listening to their moronic editors.

thank you based (((Ethan)))

>patented algorithm to detect racism

SJWs never cease to amaze me.

What should i write?

A large percentage of younger internet users get their news and entertainment from places like YouTube, and the MSM is starting to feel threatened. So now a few of them, specifically the WSJ for now, are picking fights. This Nicas guy is an idiot though, and is almost single handedly destroying his companies reputation. If he has a job in two weeks I'll be very surprised

>YouTube Jew vs Fake news Jews

Golly, I love this timeline

This is big guys. Even if you don't give a shit about ecelebrities, use this to our advantage to greatly harm the reputation of the WSJ. Work the meme magic

He has yet to reply on twitter after this thing went live, this faggot is most likely crying in a corner as we meme.

Its like they don't realize the sheer size and dedicated autism of the group they are going against.

WSJ is the best newspaper in America right now. If you guys would stop sucking Pewdiepie's cock for one second you would realize they are most conservative of the big three papers (NYT, WaPo, WSJ). In fact their editor got shit for being too pro-Trump:

npr.org/2017/02/13/515043661/wall-street-journal-editor-defends-trump-coverage-at-staff-meeting

I love whatever fucks up the US media. They are the biggest villains on the planet

> Feinberg

Wow I am so fucking surprised.

this entire post is low energy. even lower energy than Jeb

LONDON
O
N
D
O
N

the conservative media is fucked too, dude

Fox News is no better than CNN, CNN just happens to be a target at the moment, so everyone focuses them. Its great

Look at my evidence, the WSJ is a racist newspaper and may be threatening to the jew world order.

Someone call McDonalds right now.

I caught this before it was deleted. Do I trust it? Not really, but maybe a more adventurous user could check.

>(((Fein)))(((berg)))

bamp!

newspapers are obsolete user, we don't need "journalists" to process information for us anymore

or insofar as we do, we can find individuals we trust and sponsor their content on an individual basis. no editorial boards, no corporate cocksucking. the internet's revolutionary potential necessitates a new way of doing things that hasn't quite arrived yet, but its starting to

bump

>>Eric Feinberg MADE the YouTube ad boycott happen so he could SELL his technique for fixing it.
>Feinberg
>Sell

Oy vey!

they are dying, but they still have power

literally fucking over all of youtube. WSJ lies are having an actual devastating impact on people's lives by robbing them of employment. shit is cray dawg

lmao its fucking real. but probably not for long.

Gonna use my accounts to spam mail this to Youtube (Alphabet). They lost over fucking $750m on advertisement because of this and they will completely CRUSH WSJ for this.
Not to mention that we can benefit from this aswell, by taking down WSJ.

buuuump

HAHAHAHAHAHA JEWS FIGHTING OTHER YESSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS

>robbing them of employment

Youtube is a private company. There's nothing that says they have to provide employment to anyone. You guys are the biggest faggots.

I dont have access to more articles to edit, if anyone could send me archived articles that would be great.

They have YouTube channels as well.
youtube.com/user/WSJDigitalNetwork
youtube.com/user/WSJWorldStream
youtube.com/user/TheShortAnswerWSJ

BUMP

how do you know ?

youre overthinking it. im talking about not only youtubers, but people who actually have a job at youtube (lots of people). those people now have their jobs in danger, which, maybe youre some spoiled california punk who doesnt understand consequences, but not having job security = bad

Call it and say you are with some other newspaper and ask for a comment for his fake screenshots

Sth like this:

Subject: Article "Google’s YouTube Has Continued Showing Brands’ Ads With Racist and Other Objectionable Videos"

Dear WSJ newsroom,

Today I was shocked to learn that one of your articles contains an obviously fake screenshot that was used as proof. As has been revealed, the YouTube algorithm filters racial slurs, therefore it's impossible to monetize the displayed "Chief Keef dances to Alabama n****r".

Please review the aforementioned article and act accordingly. As a frequent user of your website, I rely on factual information and I would like my trust not to be taken for granted.

Best wishes,
XX

Today I was shocked to learn that

>There's nothing that says they have to provide employment to anyone

There's nothing that says content creators have to use youtube to reach their audience.

Without content creators, youtube dies. Without youtube, content creators happily find a new home.

>Scandinavian doesn't understand how capitalism works

I'm not surprised. I live in SV about 3 miles away from Google. It's easy as fuck to get a job. Let me tell you right now, no-one at youtube is worried about job security unless they are some loser with skills who somehow lucked their way into their current job.

>Checks flag

Man Hanz you got cucked pretty hard by (((them))) huh? lol

Lawsuit incoming. Google has lost a lot of money because of this bullshit.

Exactly. There is nothing wrong with this either.

no skills*

no ads on youtube = no money = people at youtube get fired

its not complicated

(((FEINBURG)))

BAHAHAHHAAHAHA!

SUPERBUMP! MSM ON SUICIDE WATCH!

((((Ethan)))

...

Well then its in Youtube's best interest to provide "employment" to their content creators.

They don't have to, but they should.

every god damned time

>inb4 WSJ jettisons this "journalist" before they get into deep shit with Google

BUMP BUMP BUMP!

>e celeb bullshit
FUCK OFF REDIT

BUMP BUMP BUMP FUCK THE WSJ!

Can we get this trending with normies?

WHY IS IT ALWAYS (((THEM)))

It's also in your best interest to breathe, but you don't have to.

Who thinks this is 10x bigger than Gamergate?

this story has actual consequences for all of us, you fat retard

Shades of that kike who went after Richard Spencer's mom.

>"YOUR SON IS AN EVIL RACISS OY VEYYY! But you can make it up to us right now Mrs. Spencer by selling all of your property to us below market value and then donating the proceeds to these Jewish charities :^) Don't worry about the paperwork I already drew it up for you all you need to do is sign here :^) "

These fucking heebs are just plain arrogant

LYING FUCKS WSJ! GOING DOWN!

This is massive

Google could take legal action against WSJ for loss of ad revenue totally billions

They'll try to pretend the report simply went rogue but it'll still make them the permanent face of 'fake news'

>berg
Every fucking time.

Bigger? WSJ will shit their pants the second Google finds out it's all fake.

It really doesn't. If you guys cared so much about youtube censorship you would start a competitor or at least move to a competitor like vimeo or dailymotion.

Of course no-one gives enough of a fuck do any of this shit. It's just manufactured controversy to get these shitty e-celebs more views.

I should also add: The Jewess immediately took to the media and said Mrs. Spencer already agreed to the sale and the donation... BEFORE SHE EVEN REPLIED. That's how this story originally hit the wire on HuffPoop and all those other shitty blog sites. The Jewess did a presser and announced it as a done deal (it wasn't).

Plz hang yourself this e-celeb jew is actually helping us you FAGGOT. Go back to fucking your little brother, inbred sack of shit

>"I'm doing this for the indursty"
>Google could make their own solution
>"not without violating my patent"

Did this kike actually spend money to file a patent for software word filtering?

You do realize that we have a common enemy with the jew at this point, right?

>Starting a competitor of a Google enterprise that still manages to make about 0$ revenue

I can see you are not a kike.

WSJ are the same Jews who went after PewDiePie, btw
There's a Jew jihad against the emerging nationalist youth culture and they think attacking e-celebs is the way to win it, as the youth no longer watches TV

>(((feinberg)))

Every. Time. Every fucking time.

>this will contribute to the ever-constant decline of mainstream media, which very well might result in their total annihilation, which will permanently alter the entire damn planet. Who fills their void? Where will news come from now? Will there ever again be such a thing as "reliable information"?
>Google (youtube) might sue the shit out of WSJ and fucking own that shit, which, yknow, will be gloriously entertaining
>Youtube might literally disappear (youtube has never gained a surplus. They own so many goddamn harddrives and spend so much time and energy so that 12year olds can upload videos of themselves crying, and they do it all FOR FREE. If youtube doesnt get sufficient income from advertisement, itll be massively losing business. In fact, to a certain extent, it already is). No more youtube = no more damn youtube, hombre

You sound pretty jealous about it

GRRRAAAHHHHH

THE PAPER OF RECORD!

YEAH, CRIMINAL RECORD!

BAMP!

BUMP

It's not censorship retard. It is a WSJ employee intentionally creating false claims, which the WSJ showed to companies funding ads, which has cost YouTube millions of dollars. Google will crush WSJ in a tidal wave, this is the end for them.

It keeps happening.

Oh look another libertardian e-celeb kike promoting himself on Sup Forums.
Sage.

It doesn't matter what they align themselves as politically, even if they fight on my side on occasion.

WSJ went after new media to censor facts and "problematic content". Whether their motivation is stemming from left-wing ideals of hive mentality, or they are simply scared of disappearing, we cannot look the other way on this.

They're trying to shut down our strongest platform because of what we have to say. Balanced during parts of the election or not, that cannot stand.

jeb!

INB4. WSJ BANKRUPT! I can smell blood

Hey Berg go back to making fake screenshots

Let's hope WSJ doesn't make you disappear

You're half-right. What WSJ is doing to shake-down the internet out of booty burning because Trump won is probably illegal, though. That another Jew ended up pointing it out is merely a (((coincidence)))

BUMP !!!!!

This Jew can be based sometimes. SOMETIMES

BUMP!!!!!!!!

Sometimes when you echo into the abyss the abyss echoes back.

go away WSJ, youve been rumbled

Let's start the shitstorm rolling, we need to bring these scums down

this

Probably the guy had a virus on his computer, and it was just serving extra ads. Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity.
But WSJ is still fake news.

>greedy jew working with jew media to falsely slander Jewtube

>all of this uncovered by fat meme jew

Oh, it's real alright boi

Wow. Google could sue wsj for slander. 1 billion dollars

Most ecelebs will throw anyone under the bus to preserve their shekels. They'll even do the SJWs work for them.