NICAS-GATE. GET IN HERE !

NICAS-GATE. GET IN HERE !

H3H3 Exposes WSJ for FAKE NEWS

youtube.com/watch?v=lM49MmzrCNc

Mike Cernovich Tweet
twitter.com/Cernovich/status/848657152461897729

Jack Nicas Twitter
twitter.com/jacknicas

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=rDy0CTdtLL8&t=121s
youtube.com/watch?v=HUzuyoeVU4E
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

checked

and honestly the problem is that huge companies are bending the knee to an outcry of a single screeching leftest, not the the leftist themselves exist.
This is why people were so pissed off about the yookalaylee thing

Nobody cares.

hes a jew, he got enough problems leave him be

Some lawyer at Google is getting hot and bothered right now

These trips don't feel organic. I can feel it in my bones.

reminder that h3h3 is an israel shill.

Unironically dismissing what he says because he's Jewish.

Wew lad

Any realistic chance that WSJ / Jack Nicas can get sued over this? Sorry I have to ask but I'm not that well versed in American law.

Sorry his IQ is higher then yours.

looks like a typical beta male

Need to get a #WSJunsubscibe trending

I don't think he is Independent so the WSJ should be liable somewhat

>WSJ bragged about breaking a story that pressured companies into pull hundreds of millions if not billions of dollars worth of ad deals from youtube
>it's now proven the story was fake news and doctored

WSJ is fucked

Jack Nicas phone number

>Sniveling little nu-male about to get drilled
made my day

Your ads won't serve on specific content if you configure your account correctly.

how is he israeli shill? i remember him talking about that place like its the shithole that it is

VERY big chance. Doctored claims that caused Google to lose a shit ton money and hurt their company's image so much their biggest clients left.

Lawyers at Google are tightening their kippahs as we speak, because they are about to tear the WSJ a new one.

What prefix do I need to dial? Just US and I'm through?

Ask him if he enjoys being employed, while he still is I guess

Thanks to the WSJ photoshopping, I'll always associate Coca-cola with the n-word from now on.

It's evidence of fake news that even normies have to acknowledge and it is a pretty big deal. I think this event may mark a turning point in how people read news, at least in the youth who watch this crap.

...

>(((trusted flagger)))

Just called and left a message, he says he doesnt check his voicemail but yolo

Thought so too. Simply having the word nigger in the tittle won't get a video demonetised.

Doesn't remove the fact that 2 screenshots had the exact same view-count.

He photoshopped it.

alright, who has the best message to him?

>claimed by TV network
>"nigger" not removed from the title
hmm

Got already debunked, it's from another YouTuber (check the IDs, they are not the same). Wondering why he's covering the asses of WSJ & Nicas

Go refresh a youtube video a few times. The view count doesn't update straight away (to stop refresh bots from inflating views).

yes. that has the area code on it

man the tweets of that guy that wrote the pewdiepie article is ridic he should be burned at the same steak

view counts aren't real time and are often delayed

I just left a message saying "I hope you enjoyed your employment, because a half a million people saw evidence of your photoshops and youre about to be a victim of the same headhunting smearing you love to impel on others"

I wanted to just laugh leaving a "HAHAHA YOURE DONE KIKE" but I dont want to give them any ammo

Even then, the WSJ are still guilty of defamation.

kek

youtube.com/watch?v=rDy0CTdtLL8&t=121s

The WSJ?
The paper that runs paid fake news for Communist China?
That one?

This must be some sort of Russian trickery!

Why are the normies suddenly so quick to trust a screenshot of earnings and views from someone who posts racist videos on Jewtube?

YOU'RE A BLOCKHEAD JACK, AND YOU WILL NEEEEEEEEEVER WORK FOR THE NEW YORK TIMES

he hated it there and openly harassed hassidic jews

Rupert murloch lawyers Vs Google lawyers. Most epic jew fight of 2017 ?

I also don't get this. Are these companies so incompetent that they make multi-million $$ decisions based on some cuck's screenshot

The irony here is that the WSJ are the ones using the n-word.

The backlash was real for those companies. Fearing boycot, you better think quick.

Just saying "we dropped out" is less of a gamble than being the only one who is "investigating it". The WSJ knows this, thats why they did it. They want new media to collapse.

You can play ads on demonetized videos. h3h3-Jew fucked up, lol.

Hey Brother,

The_Donald here. Don't you think that's going a little to far? What if he has an important text message and can't see it because he has too many texts from people?

Let's just stick to posting about Hillary Clinton here, please.

Cheers!

-the_Donald, signing off

thanks m8 b8

Don't fucking call this number. He can use all the troll calls he gets for sympathy and everyone will go right back on his side

This is beautiful. It's great for demoralizing leftist boards like Hacker News. They read this and now they understand WSJ is fake news, just like "the alt-right" told them all along. And anyone who tries to shoot it down is shitcanned for being anti-google.

>Big money lawyers vs big money lawyers
Boy oh boy, looks like we've got ourselves a good ol' fashioned Heeb-off here.

youtube.com/watch?v=HUzuyoeVU4E

oh wow, look at all those ads :^)


if this video gets taken down, then this place is 100% filled with damage control shills

Like they'll give a fuck.

They'll say WSJ is Rupert Murdoch Neocon shit and not (((real news))) like CNN, Huffpo, MSNBC, or BBC.

You can play ads on demonetized videos. H3H3-Jude want only Shekels.

>trustedflagger

the viewer count don't make sense

the code doesn't make sense

he worked for some shady stock trading company while he was in israel scamming people and apparently owes some jews money back home, it all gets hushed up whenever it gets brought up and its hard to find info on

So... whe does Youtube / Google file a libel suit against WSJ and this "reporter".

I care.

>Sup Forums likes to scream fake news at everything
>when real fake news gets exposed Sup Forums says "nobody cares"

You're truly pathetic, cuckboi

WHEN!?

is this cernoKIKE an idiot or something. His only proof of fake news is that the view count is identical while two ads are screencapped as evidence. View count hardly ever changes, its delayed every half hour or so..

what i take away from that is that he naively dealt with jews and got redpilled on them

I think you mean when does WSJ and Nicas file a libel suit against h3h3.

I can already hear Google's lawyers masturbating to the millions of shekels they're going to make.

>WSJ
Weekly Shounen Jump is fake news

>cernovich "evidence" is that the view count didnt update
>nicas clearly watched the same video for the ad repeatedly in a short span of time

>implying view count updates for every page count

everyone in this story is retarded

You think Google aren't able are to figure out this story is a hoax? Google are in on the whole charade. The initial stories about ads showing on Islamic extremism propaganda was phase 1, this made up shit about ads on "racist" content is phase 2. Sooner or later, they'll be demonetising "alt-right" political channels using all this as cover. This is about the establishment trying to regain control of information flow.

>tfw the racist goys make you loads of shekels

This is why pol will never have a true movement

Quick rundown please?

>likngimg tfhenobithff

Doesn't change that the WSJ lied

>fake trips
Get help

Fake as shit. h3h3 has no credibility at all.

Fuck off Jack.

That chair in the background is badass

H3H3-Jude fucked up. The video was monetised by OmniaMediaMusic. Evidence in source code of original video.

...

Bingo. They used this story as an excuse to roll out restricted mode. What is restricted mode you ask? It blocks conservative content by default.

The shills are strong today. They want to D&C because HES A JOOOOO!!! Instead of focusing on the huge fucking scandal that is the Wall Street Journal publishing fake news to attack alternative media. They really don't want another gamergate.

>H3H3
Moving on up in the world?

i need a quick rundown on this situation i dont even know who that youtube faggot is

OmniaMediaMusic is a fake copyright claiming company, probably owned by jews.

People are saying that if the music in the offending video was copyrighted, then the copyright holders might still have ads shown on the video, and all the revenue would go to the copyright holders, not the video creator.

So there's still a remote chance H3H3 is full of it and the WSJ is right.

Although I doubt that.

This guy looks like someone you'd see on TV after he ran over a bunch of faggots in Nice

People are upset that corporations are exercising their free market right and ability to stop advertising where they don't want to, and Youtubers are upset that they have to get an actual job instead of relying on making half-baked 10 minute long videos of them making fun of other videos and profiting off that via ads.
Basically: Real life is hitting Youtubers right in the face and they fucking hate it.

h3h3 fucked himself today claiming the WSJ faked the story about ads on racist content on Youtube.

Lied about what?

ad's were playing

Top...:..:..:....KEK

This is false. Omnia Media or whatever is the channel partner. If it was claimed copyright it would be in the source (see pic for comparison)

he constantly talks about how shitty Israel is

archived youtube videos are fucked up, thats not proving anything.

The uploader said his video was not monetized, so no ads could be playing.

If his video had been claimed by another company it would simply have been taken down.

>Sorry his IQ is higher then yours.

I've been triggered by this insulting stereotype. I'll have you know I'm a intellectually challenged AND frivolously spending Jew.

This.

As if there wasn't enough reason to distrust media already.

See

>WSJ versus Google
We have been outjewd

What a great timeline we live in boys!

>If his video had been claimed by another company it would simply have been taken down.
That's not at all how the system works, still. I explained this to you at least twice in the last thread.

The claimer may just take the ad revenue and leave the video up. It's not an "automatic" deletion.

The entire video would have been shut down if it actually were a copyright claim.

I have honestly never seen a video get a copyright claim both stay online AND keep showing ads.

If one of your videos were making money to some fraudulent company, you could personally take it down and reupload it without the music.