Ethan Klein backtracks WSJ claims; The Truth Is Still Out There

youtube.com/watch?v=L71Uel98sJQ

>WSJ photoshops ad on a YouTube video with N* in its title
>h3h3productions claims it's fake
>WSJ gets hold of Ethan and tells him to take the vid down or he'll get sued
>Ethan freaks out and listens to the WSJ shills, takes his video down because he's a good goy
>nothing to see here, move along, time to sleep

Ethan didn't show any fucking proof, he simply got wet feet and took the video down.

The OP image has not been debunked. WSJ may still be at fault here. It's up to Sup Forums now to get these fuckers.

Other urls found in this thread:

i.4cdn.org/gif/1491074798028.webm
mirror.ninja/6329h0
youtu.be/g0_n-j5rd0Y
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

>N*
you realise you're on Sup Forums right? You can say nigger, hell you can call people it.

as for the vids, it's just kikes kiking kikes.

who gives a fuck about h3h3, they're just jewtubers with nothing better to do

You can't skip 15 second ads I thought

I'm torn. On one hand fuck this Nicas MSM cuntbag

On the other hand fuck Ethan for making shit tons of money for sitting on his fat ass all day and being Captain Reddit

Is there any way we can make them both suffer?

Hello goyim children, today I'm gonna teach you it's cool to hate to hate your parents hehehehe

>Is there any way we can make them both suffer?
GTK

You can't, but you also don't get a small preview thumbnail at the bottom right of the video during the ad

I wouldn't know.

umm ethan and heila are pretty talented. just look up heilas paintings they're fucking cool and unique looking.

then with ethan he's very funny ya htye might get paid untraditionally but they create content that millions of people watch its not like they're a welfare leech or something.

I domt fuvking care about your shitty eceleb ebegging for money. That earlier lawsuit was a lie and they made $100k off you stupid redditors. Go away back to r/the_donald

I just noticed my OP img is cut off, not sure what happened

>
>umm ethan and heila are pretty talented. just look up heilas paintings they're fucking cool and unique looking.
>
>then with ethan he's very funny ya htye might get paid untraditionally but they create content that millions of people watch its not like they're a welfare leech or something.


Her fucking art is grotesque and ameutuer as fuck. /ic/ found out she was selling there shitty marker pieces for 4 thousand dollars. She is a modern art hack and Ethan is a eceleb crybaby just like Boogie. Go back to Redgay faggot.

Adblock. Solved. Now please leave our fucking board.

That looks like shit. I wouldn't even pay a dime for it.

Can you speak in anything that isnt buzzwords

This. Leave our fucking board and go back to the_Donald

Ethan is already being sued by one person and its literally costing him more than 200,000 dollars to resolve in just legal fees. It's a tough situation for him, leave him alone. If anything, and if you know better, feel free to send him a message about your feelings

What are you talking about? He is telling the truth. We get it, you really like Redgay, Amazing Athiest, armored sleptic, and bernie sanders. But here, we dont appreciate that shit and we want you and your fucking kind OUT

Who. Cares. He. Is. A. Jew.

Ethans entire channel is revolved around trying to get other youtubers to lose money and by some sort of karma he's getting the shit end of the stick.
Sorry your content has been garbage since you started getting money, maybe this will force you to get back in gear.
Make something funny again, and get your head out of fucking with other peoples livelihoods.
Can I offer you a nice egg in this trying time?

HE'S FUCKED
WIFE LEAVING HIM FOR PORN SOON
i.4cdn.org/gif/1491074798028.webm

I hate Jews too, but Ethan is alright. It's nice that he's middle of the spectrum and literally calls out degenerate shit on YouTube. He literally points out sexualized child YouTube content and says that's the most fucked up shit ever and needs to be removed. He will call anyone on bullshit no matter what side of the spectrum you are and you can respect that

All Jews should be deported to Isreal tho desu

He is a kike. Go back to rebbit

Better a Jew than a lonely basement dweller who won't go anywhere in life.

Your jealousy is showing. :-]

Ok kikenigger, where do you live? I bet I could kick the shit out of you.

He makes money doing something and his wife sold art wahhh. As if you would turn down a stack of cash because you'd rather work construction. "go back to R faggg" "I don't care about e celebs faggot" like you're higher class degenerates

Go back to stormfront

>leave him alone

It's as if you're not even aware how much of a faggot you sound like.

...

shut the fuck up kike

I never said leave him alone though. Just stated some facts and to message him your feelings, stormweenie

This shit has to be redpilling him. He puts the work into making these vids just to be threatened by Jews to take them down. I'd be annoyed and pissed off if I were him.

im confused, explain the picture please

>never said leave him alone though

>It's a tough situation for him, leave him alone.

You're so fucking retarded. Stop breathing.

Oh no I made a mistake.

Whatever will I do?

Paranoid schizos like you guys will be the death of the white race, because people will always point to you guys first

Ethan literally calls out SJW bullshit on a regular basis and other degenerate content, and you will still vilify him based on him being a Jew.

>not remembering what I typed less than a minute ago
>you're the schizo

...

Ethan isn't ashkenazi so you can stop memeing anytime larper

I don't care what he is, I was remarking on user's learning disability.

Gas em

Is he a Mizrahim or a Sephardim? Because to me, he looks Spanish or Italian

I don't think we should argue semantics with someone who is clearly on /our/ side. I don't care whether he says nigger. Maybe he doesn't want to. Not my problem, and it certainly is his right.

>On the other hand fuck Ethan for making shit tons of money for sitting on his fat ass all day and being Captain Reddit

>someone else exploits the internet age and captalism
>someone me projects with "sitting on ass all day"
>someone me is a piece of shit for still not realizing he's a piece of shit

Fuck off PJW

>WSJ gets hold of Ethan and tells him to take the vid down or he'll get sued
Remember you can never out-jew an Arch-Jew. Their kikeromancy is really unparalleled.

>he is a kike

So is Milo.

>go back to stormfront
>already on pol

Go back to rebbit and kill yourself.

Im not a shill, but I have actually seen ads that show a thumbnail for the video on unskipable ads. Pic related is what I literally just saw when I clicked on the first video I saw on youtube.

It may be a browser difference. I use chrome, im signed into my youtube channel and that's what I got

>those cola colors

Is Coca Cola pandering to spics?

> Milo is talked about on here when he outed himself as a pedo.
People were fine with him being a gay kike because he would admit kikes were in power and that gays and trannies were mentally ill. But he got dropped after outing himself as a pedo.

>I am a huge faggot please rape my face the post

Slow down there champ.

Can I get a basic rundown? This shit is being pulled between people that want to see WSJ get fucked and people that want Youtube and h3h3 to get fucked.

Context:
>WSJ writes an article seemingly out of nowhere saying that Pewdiepie is making anti-semitic jokes and showing anti-semitic imagery.
>Pewdiepie loses partnership with Disney and some other contracts.
>The article paints Pewdiepie as a nazi by picking some things out of context. Other outlets pick up on it and push the anti-semite idea even more.
>Pewdiepie's fans call BS on WSJ. Pewdiepie apologizes in case anybody was offended and assures that he is not a nazi and was making jokes to show absurdity of some situations.

Now a month later. This does not involve Pewdiepie but one of the authors is the same as the Pewdiepie articles.

>WSJ contacts big brands on Youtube about how their ads are being shown next to racist videos.
>Author posts one image in the article and a bunch on Twitter about it.
>The images look suspect. They're croped pixel perfect, they hold the same view count and one of them has a little image thumbnail.
>H3h3 reaches out to the owner of the youtube video in question.
>We find out that the owner does not get advertising revenue from this.
>H3h3 makes a video saying that WSJ is attacking Youtube again.
>Talks about the irregularities in the images and says that WSJ is trying to attack new media again.
>H3h3's main point seems to be that the video couldn't have ads because the owner was not getting ad revenue.
>Turns out that some copyright owner was monetizing the video instead. In other words, there were ads on that video.
>H3h3 takes down the video and retracts the statement.

It doesn't clear up the oddities of the images given as proof.

I wish I would've seen the h3h3 video before it was taken down. I want to see the evidence they showed

So does this mean the images could still be fake if the monetization of that video wasn't released to coke ads like the images suggested?

>also
After, copyright owner monetizes video, it has:
1.)About 160k views (+8k before claim, so total 261k views is ok, but thats not the problem here)
2.)Add revenue 12$

12$ means that it showed some low tier adds and not the adds from big brands like coca-cola, toyota or starbucks. Screens are fake.

>So does this mean the images could still be fake if the monetization of that video wasn't released to coke ads like the images suggested?
The images could definitely be fake. You can explain all of them, but that doesn't necessarily mean they are not fake.

>mirror.ninja/6329h0
That's a mirror for the video that was taken down.

That could indeed be.

>THE IMAGE HAS NOT BEEN DEBUNKED.

Retard. They started doing this less than a year ago. I sometimes get 5-20 second ads that don't let me skip. I remember quite clearly because the stupid skip thing appears at the bottom right, but at first it will say "video will play after ad" or something to that effect, and then it disappears and just leaves the ad of the proceeding video.

pic related, fagg0t

Two things about this.

Youtube / Google / Alphabet are big and smart enough to have evidence if WSJ has faked this. They don't need H3H3 to fight their battles. If it true, you would already know about it. Does all still seem a bit fishy on WSJ's part but I guess it could be as simple as this Nicas guy has found easy money in attacking youtube these days.

Two, I read the reddit thread last night and they were frothing at the mouth at how the WSJ is trash and they wanted to burn it to the ground. Now I just read the debunking of the H3H3 video thread and suddenly the entirety of reddit is posting saying WSJ is great and H3H3 is retarded. It's such a shithole for hivemind, virtue signalling and they have no shame in doing it.

This is unrelated but my last name is Klein and I often wonder if I should change it. My "Jewish" connection is via adoptive grandparents and I'm not Jewish at all in any way but I'm carrying around the name. On one hand, changing it would look like I'm trying to Jew-deceive people like Bernie Sanders but keeping it means I pass along this retarded name to my kids. What do, Sup Forums?

holyshit. you are literally the person sam hyde is telling us about, in his rutgers talk. You actually think thats art. KYS

This
>ads on youtube

Then
>wsj shows edgy youtuber making Jew jokes
>disney doesn't want to be associated with that and drop edgy youtuber
>tards get mad

Now
>edgy youtuber says 100 yr old conservative newspaper owned by Rupert Murdoch is making shtbup and trying to make him poor
>his evidence is some no name youtuber
>realizes his "evidence" is bullshit and has been walking claims back so he doesn't get sued
>tards mad at newspaper

>it could be as simple as this Nicas guy has found easy money in attacking youtube these days.

He is a guy that reports exclusively on Alphabet/Google related things at the WSJ.

>Youtube / Google / Alphabet are big and smart enough to have evidence if WSJ has faked this. They don't need H3H3 to fight their battles.

This is what I think as well. Hell, it might be that in this case H3h3 is right, but Google/Alphabet are simply trying to find more evidence on attacks against their interests.

On the other hand, the media does attack Google quite a lot across the world. Usually it was for Google News though.

Your name is literally a German word. Do people really think it's a jewish name?

I don't think non-Jews have that last name anywhere sadly. Maybe I'm wrong. I hope so because it's not like there is a backup to really go to. I guess I could use my other grandpa's last name but that seems even weirder than just making something up.

join the livestream for updates on the whole WSJ controversy

youtu.be/g0_n-j5rd0Y

discord link in the description, pastebine explaining everything as well

>Youtube / Google / Alphabet are big and smart enough to have evidence if WSJ has faked this.
They don't need to
Google is serving ads on algorithms that can now also get data from automatic CC, if someone says "razor sharp" in a fucking video, chances are you'll get some fucking gillette video, same with other kind of bullshit
If they feel the ads are racist, they can blame the algorithm, Google has stopped caring about that long ago, and I'm surprised people haven't figured it out yet, since it's been THREE FUCKING YEARS SINCE THIS WAS IMPLEMENTED

Nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger

>wsj shows edgy youtuber making Jew jokes

They took him out of context though. Not only that there were some factual inaccuracies that they later retracted that lent credence to the idea that he supported those ideas. For example, they claimed that he paid for the guy to say "Hitler did nothing wrong," even though he just viewed the video and commented about it. This was all available information for the reporters. They later fixed those silently without a word in the article about the edit.

It was a rather obvious hit piece. They didn't even have to do any serious allegations. The rest of the media does those.

Fuck off kike

So you think Disney wants to touch that with a 10 foot pole?

Disney isn't fond of Jew jokes anymore

He IS a jew

Oh, I do think it's normal that Disney stood away. I'm finding more fault with WSJ for doing such a piece in the first place. It just seems out of place.