Stop obeying the compulsory territorial monopolist of ultimate decision-making and of taxation known as the state.
Stop obeying the compulsory territorial monopolist of ultimate decision-making and of taxation known as the state
okay
wtf im in prison now
Stop obeying as long as you're not jeopardising your own safety
...
...
Is this what father fedora would want you to save?
The state is the only guarantee against arbitrary violence. Hans Hermann Hoppe has the reasoning capabilities of an autistic teenager.
That is some high level retard speak.
State needs to function allegorically. If the logos doesn't work for "state" in reference to "state of consciousness" or "state of matter", then it probably doesn't work for "political state" either.
>The state is the only guarantee against arbitrary violence.
Bullshit. What are rights enforcement agencies?
www.fallacyfiles.org/equivoqu.html
If you abolished all states right now, you'd get humans forming groups, war lords fighting for control and eventually in the long run you'd get war lords who have established a territory and agreed with other war lords on its area and definition. In other words you'd have proto states.
Anarcho capitalism can't exist.
Exactly my point.
...
Yeah man, btw my giant corporate empire is going to import 20,000,000 unemployed Nigerians to work for me, cheap labour.
They're going to integrate into your society too, and if you disobey, I'll have the authoritarian-militaristic capitalist state next door come annex your homes, then point a gun to your head until your daughter gets impregnated by one of my Nigerian workers.
Getting a job is a quick way to start paying taxes to the government for you sweat. Slavery much?
>>plz
N
U
K
E
US
i think the psg/insurance co we hired will have something to say about this
Oh my goodness get this laughable ponce out of here. Socialist atheistic monarchy? Is that what you're preaching now?
There's never been a "rights enforcement agency" that didn't depend on the state's capabilities for violence to enforce anything.
This. States are fundamentally entities that suspend the eternal war of the warlords. Prime examples would be the areas today with weak states, i.e. Somalia, Afghanistan.
Define violence. Define state.
human community that (successfully) claims the monopoly of the legitimate use of physical force within a given territory.
Is charity violence because it serves as propaganda for the organization or cause providing it?
Are there universal human rights or laws of nature that govern this use of physical force?
This type of reasoning sees nations as just arbitrary economic zones on a map
Actually a nation is a people
Violence is the use of physical force, so charity is not violence, no.
>Are there universal human rights or laws of nature that govern this use of physical force?
Human rights are social constructions enforced by the state, like all laws.
Laws of nature are the backdrop to everything, besides that I can't think of any specifically related to the use of physical force.
Do the laws of nature determine how the "social constructions" are formed? From where do the laws of nature come?
If I stop obeying them the compulsory territorial area I'm confined in by the powers that be will be severely limited.
> Do the laws of nature determine how the "social constructions" are formed?
Social constructions arise in a historical process of interaction between humans dependent on their environment.
> From where do the laws of nature come?
I don't think anyone knows that.
Picture a world where there are only A and B .
Either A owns everything including the body or B, which means he is enslaved.
Or A and B both owns everything equally:
But if there are milions of other people that owned everything equally, you would require to ask the permission of everyone at every time to do anything, ie. you would be unable to do nothing and so you'd starve, and if you are dead you cannot think about morality.
Therefore absolute property is the trascendental condition of morality.
*the body of