Susan Rice is confirmed as Fake News

Seems that story is just another part of the vast right wing racist conspiracy to destroy Obama's legacy.

thinkprogress.org/susan-rice-explained-1a72785b100e

The totally phony Susan Rice story, explained:

The former national security advisor’s surveillance activity is neither illegal or unethical...

thinkprogress.org/susan-rice-explained-1a72785b100e

Other urls found in this thread:

thinkprogress.org/susan-rice-explained-1a72785b100e
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

Blumpf BTFO!

What does this mean for her?

>thinkprogress

Leaking Felony

fucking lol

If it wasnt illegal or unethical Im sure she wont mind answering a few questions then.

>thinking anyone gives a shit what a retarded gender studies graduate thinks

she will still go down for the irs fraud. to the after school clubs they attend in seattle

>thinkprogress.org/susan-rice-explained-1a72785b100e
what a shitty article, how to they write this stuff with a straight face. donald fucking duck stole the election but this "report" is total bs.

what kind of creature is she looking like here?

a three-toed sloth comes to mind but i think there is something else happening here

hideous woman either way

when intelligence agencies conduct investigations into people, a lot of the time they end up interviewing or otherwise collecting info on people who aren't relevant to the investigation. in order to protect the privacy of these people, their names and any information personal to them is classified.so for example, a CIA document about a bunch of chinese spies in manhattan might have a sentence saying something like "Donald Trump also attended the party, he was observed talking with colleagues X Y Z but was not deemed relevant". to protect his identity, personal information would be classified so it would become "[CENSORED] also attended the party, he was observed talking with [CENSORED], but was not deemed relevant".when you "unmask" someone, that means that you redact this censorship. normally it is done for later follow ups to the investigation, but to do it for basically no reason is a big no-no. to do it simply because you want to find out information about someone to later blackmail them with is a BIIIG NO NO. to do it after you've already been caught fucking with investigations in the past is a bullet-in-the-head no no

The website even lists it as
>5 minute read
people who cant read that article in under 2 minutes are challanged mentally, like the author

I'm so awake right now. Aren't you guys excited about this treasonous sheboon? Please wake up!

Nigga, she's fucked

>thinkprogress.org

AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHA

might as well post shareblue too

>you have committed an illegal act
>no we didn't you're a nazi there's no evidence
>this is the smoking gun evidence
>that act isn't illegal because reasons
>

>leddit shills

>security advisor’s surveillance activity is neither illegal or unethical

o rly???

>Nuh-Uh
>(((Kira Lerner))) of the (((Center for American progress))))

Nice refutation.

Isn't the point that Nunes said info he saw on members of trump team was completely unrelated to Russia? So then what reason is there for it? Other than to get the upper hand on Trump. Former NSA workers have said that in some cases that security agencies will use NSA info that's inadmissible in court to find guilt, then work their way backwards forming a case that will hold up. Seems they were maybe trying the same. Sure, it might not be illegal. But if, as it's theorized this info was put into presidential daily briefings, Obama was receiving detailed info on a presidential candidate without really any valid reason, whilst he was also campaigning for Hillary. Which, correct me if i'm wrong, seems unethical to me.

...

Fact status: checked
Almond status: activated
OP status: phaggot

>"When someone with credentials to request the classified information asks that they become public, the process is known as unmasking."
>"asks that they become public"
Who the fuck do they think they're fooling with this shit? Not the FBI. Not someone with authority to investigate the leaks.
Susan Rice needs to lawyer up, 100%. So does Farkas even though shes probably just a stooge. Stop doing television, and lawyer up. Loretta Lynch can forget about lawyering up she needs to just flee the country. She probably already has.

I feel unfettered joy in my soul.No way to spin this in a way that avoids prison.

...

>interfering in an election is not unethical or illegal
So what's the DNC been bitching about this whole time?

"The names of unidentified Americans are masked in intelligence reports to protect the identity of third-parties. When someone with credentials to request the classified information asks that they become public, the process is known as unmasking."

Categorically incorrect. The only way that this would become public would be after a lengthy legal process wherein the unmasked US person was prosecuted for rather significant crimes.

>think progress

Stoped reading there

>The former national security advisor’s surveillance activity is neither illegal or unethical...

>Defending Big Brother/Sistah
Only ShariaBleu could think this is acceptable.

Can we please stop talking about this non story. Sage goes in all fields.

This is now a men against white women thread. Stop dating them. Let them date African Americans. We white men don't need degenerate white woman. We should stay single and have no kids at all or date women of color.

...

>thinksoros.org

ROFL how much did he pay you to do this pathetic attempt at dmg control?

>what does this mean for her?

If she falls on her sword for Lord Obongo?

About 20 years in Federal prison.

If she snitches for a plea deal/immunity?

Either a year or two in minimum security Federal country club and/or a tragic accident where she breaks her neck trying to learn how Houdini used to escape from dufflebags while handcuffed and thrown into a freezing river... because according to friends and the new books scattered around her apartment... she took up a huge interest in learning escape magic as a hobby!

What's better for the Republicans
1- people go to jail?
2- it!s legal- Republicans have in their hands the most powerful legal tool to destroy political opponents for the next few elections. Basically Watergate plumbers multiplied a thousand fold?

...

>What's better for the Republicans

What matters is what is best for the America. That is what MAGA is about.

>Trump and associates spied on for year.
>No dirt

Uh oh

>Make up Russia story.

...

>shillblue thinking we'll listen to them