Why do you think women are not capable of frontline positions in the military?
Women are just as capable and studies have shown they are less prone to fatigue and battlefield induced trauma than their male counterparts
>inb4 women are physically weaker
What does being physically stronger matter when modern guns shoot 2000 rounds per minute?
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
youtube.com
twitter.com
>what is being captured and raped?
>zey are smaller, zey are weaker, and zey are less intelligent, and zey must earn less
It isn't rape if you secretly want it on the inside
Not any worse than what happens to most POWs?
Previous thread
I agree with your shooting modern guns analogy, because Modern Warfare is 1000% about standing in a constant location and firing your high-tech gun at an immobile opponent.
Once a few out of those two thousand head your way, which gender would you prefer trying to yank you into safety as you're bleeding out?
(((Studies))) Sure pal if women were so good why are they only fighting in the frontlines in ZOG controlled armies?
women in the military need to be put on the front lines so we can get rid of the genetic dead ends plaguing our society.
Isn't it ironic that Turks and Jews are the only two militaries in Europe with active combat women, jet pilots and chopper pilots?
I thought we were isis
whats goin' on?
>Turks and Jews
>Cancer of the world
Yep women in the army is really a bad idea
What will happen to population if women are sent to the front lines?
Yea, its not like we drop soldiers in the night to take over a town, then blow it up while clearing a landing strip, rebuilding it into a military base while landing millions of tons of equipment, personal, food and fuel.
Too be fair mate thats more of a african problem than most other nations.
The frontline is exactly where those dykes belong. No better way to get rid of em.
don't fall for it guise
How do you operate in hijab?
Watch any female military training videos vs male training videos. You'll find the female training is horribly watered down version of actual training. They flinch when being yelled at. They hesitate to fully submerge their heads in water. Female marines will confirm that they are physically inferior to males. It's not even anything to be ashamed about.
The fact that this is an issue today shows the malicious intent that feminism poses for women wanting to separate them from their femininity.
Once women are not being raped by the enemy, call me. Then we can talk about putting women in any position other than NURSE.
>What does being physically stronger matter
not being able to pull a wounded comrade?
you're all terrible so you don't notice the difference
Kek potato farmer
I see you haven't heard of the Taliban.
>male units do better
>integrated units do poorer
>all female units are retardation
>turks and jews
>Europe
Come here britshits
>What does being physically stronger matter when modern guns shoot 2000 rounds per minute?
Those modern guns and those 2000 rounds and much more stuff have to be moven from point A to point B. Do you think that everything is transported by helicopter or other vehicles? Search how much the standard infantry soldier carries on his body, now imagine going up a mountain, or doing a march with all that and then doing hours of fighting.
Women make poor warriors, and the technological implementations that we have so far, doesn't make them equitable to male soldiers.
What is carrying heavy equipment
what is carrying wounded comrades
being able to handle that weapon requires strength, running with all the gear (men will end up carrying the heavy shit over long terrain better to have more of them) retrieving wounded soldiers, moving debris, holy shit there are a million reasons you need to be physically strong to be in the military and I don't believe for a second 95% of women could handle the equivalent military workload of their male counterparts for a longer duration, shut the fuck up with your stamina bullshit
>battlefield induced trauma than their male counterparts
what was that study i saw posted some week ago about female football players being extremely brittle?
just realized it is bait...fuck
>1 post by this idea
You faggots, and everyone replying to this without saging, need to be curb stomped.
>2000 rounds per minute
Only if you want to melt your barrel.
Marines found that women more prone to physical injuries. Effectively, having women in the military reduces combat effectiveness.
Not to mention that most of the best females, are no better than your average Joe.
>Women are just as capable
No, sweetie.
Also, men put themselves into unnecessary risk in combat to defend women and jeopardize missions from being successful. This increases casualty counts because men instinctually protect females even when those women think they're "equal"
And, if women were equal, why does every physical test allow them special breaks and considerations that the men do not get?
That alone proves they cannot hang at the same level as men in the military, so your argument is pure horseshit, you dumb leaf.
>>inb4 women are physically weaker
>What does being physically stronger matter when modern guns shoot 2000 rounds per minute?
ok so imagine carrying your 65kg menhir in constested territory for 3 to 4 days without sleeping
WHY THE HELL would you take a women for this job when you can take a huge guy that will do it 100% better ?
Israel trains women but they are no longer used in combat infantry because they learned their lesson.
Biggest problem with women in close proximity stress situations (soldiers, police) is that, as much as people deny it, you can't override biology. Biology says protect the females. Women can say, "I don't need protection" doesn't matter you're playing with instinct. So the presence of women messes with strict adherence to command,
And when there is no need for protection, the other driving instinct of all males is to breed the females. And fight over females. Doesn't matter if everyone's a highly trained professional and overtly everyone behaves. The female still will be signalling and the males still will be responding. Having females around really messes with moral.
Lastly, I notice that females in military don't have mandatory birth control. Female wants out she just gets pregnant. I'm quite sure if given the option 2/3's of the guys at Verdun or Monte Cassino or at Chosin Reservoir or Hue would have gone with pregnancy if only they could get the hell out of there. If the shit ever starts getting heavy a large chunk of the female force will suddenly become indisposed. And its not like the civilian population will tolerate a lot of women coming back in bags. They can barely tolerate guys coming back that way.
>Why do you think women are not capable of frontline positions in the military?
one word: tampons
>tfw people got so mad at him for saying that because deep down they fear he's right.
>Supporting jobs
Yes
>Active combat
No
Male soldiers will always prioritize the safety of a female squad member over the safety of male squad members or the success of the mission. I don't care how much training and conditioning you put soldiers through - nothing is going to suppress 100,000 years of basic human instinct.
>A FUCKING LEAF