MSNBC IN DAMAGE CONTROL

MSNBC IN DAMAGE CONTROL

MSNBC’s Matthews, Corn Meltdown, Claim Susan Rice ‘Unmasking’ Controversy Is Racist and Sexist

>On Tuesday’s edition ofHardball, MSNBC host Chris Matthews and MSNBC political analyst/Mother JonesD.C. bureau chief David Corn were unglued over the Susan Rice“unmasking”controversy, suggesting that it was racist and sexist for these accusations to be leveled at the former National Security Adviser because she’s never done anything wrong.

>“Why is he going after Susan Rice? It’s like he pulls out — he’s like an old deejay. He pulls out the old records from 20 years ago and plays them again,”Matthews later wondered to Corn and fellow panelist Simon Marks (who unsuccessfully tried to argue that Rice has done herself no favors in giving contradictory statements).

>After a series of clips from Republican Senators Rand Paul (Ky.), Lindsey Graham (S.C.), and Tom Cotton (Ark.), Matthews quipped,“okay, Bates Motel.”He then read a Mike Huckabee tweet about Rice being in an orange jumpsuit, and it was at this point that the three panelists lost their minds:

>DAVID CORN: Oh god!

>MATTHEWS: I mean, Huckabee has no shame. These guys are trooping along, like camp followers of Trump.

>MARKS: They’re looking for a pinata? They found one in Susan Rice. I do think —

>MATTHEWS: Notice it's always a female? Just a thought.

>MARKS: — well, that’s true. That's also true. But I do think she slightly played into her hand — into their hands.

>MATTHEWS: Typhoid Mary?

>MARKS: No. Clearly not. But the best things Susan Rice could do is not —

>MATTHEWS: Susan Rice's job is to watch national security. As she told Andrea today, our colleague, she made it very clear what she was doing was when she saw an American name show up in a surveillance of a foreign perhaps agent, she wanted to know who that was. What's wrong with that?

newsbusters.org/blogs/nb/curtis-houck/2017/04/04/msnbcs-matthews-corn-meltdown-claim-susan-rice-unmasking

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=zJK3HpdzbVA
twitter.com/AnonBabble

>Corn replied that Rice hasn’t done a single thing wrong and when Marks again tried unsuccessfully to suggest Rice isn’t entirely blameless on the Trump surveillance, Matthews did Rice’s bidding by parroting without reservation:“She said there was no surveillance. She wasn't saying she didn't pick up some names by asking through proper authorities who's are they talking about...By the way, this is all after the election. This wasn't politics.”

>While Matthews had already uncorked charges of sexism, Corn reiterated those and went further by suggesting those covering it are racists:

>At the end of the day, we need some element of decency. When Rand Paul gets out there and says she's abused this right, there is not an iota of evidence that she's abused anything. Calling her Typhoid Mary? She — all we know now is that she did her job. Did she do something wrong? There is no information indicating that. So they are making her, you know, basically they're defaming her without any reason to do so because she's a woman. Maybe because she's a black woman. Maybe because they didn't like her during Benghazi.

>In typical Matthews fashion, he sprinted out of left field with this bizarre analogy film analogy:

>A little British commentary from me right now. Remember that scene inMan for All Seasonswhere Henry the Eighth, Robert Shaw, steps into the muddy water when he gets off the boat and all the courtiers jump into the water with him. That’s what we’re watching, led by Huckabee.

They can't be this Fucking stupid to double down on identity politics, are they?

>suggesting that it was racist and sexist

lol.

youtube.com/watch?v=zJK3HpdzbVA

How do people like Chris Matthews? He is such a smug piece of shit, always so condesending to anyone not on his side.

Media is trying very hard to not report on it, CNN flat out said they wouldn't report on it and called it "fake news". You know we are on to something when the media and democrats are doing all they can to divert away from this story.

Jesus Christ Mika is hard to listen to, such a cunt! But they shit Morning Joe down

Bump

Appreciate the bump user.

We need to fight against the shills and spam on this board with actual discussion.

Exactly. Keep making threads. Fight spam by spamming important shit.

>It is illegal to unmask improperly.
It is illegal to unmask improperly.
>It is illegal to disclose for political reasons
It is illegal to disclose for political reasons
>It is illegal to downgrade classification and share raw intelligence data on an incoming POTUS
It is illegal to downgrade classification and share raw intelligence data on an incoming POTUS

SAY IT WITH ME FOLKS: LIFE SENTENCE.

It will soon be revealed that King Nigger himself order the illegal surveillance of the Trump administration. Shills eternally BTFO

>basically they're defaming her without any reason to do so because she's a woman.

saying someone is defaming someone because they are a woman is itself defamation.

they are engaging in the very thing they are accusing the other of engaging in and there is far more evidence in favour of rice being a crook than rand paul going after rice because she is a woman.

so pathetic. their scripts are obvious for all to see.

you do realize this is a non-story right? no credible news source is going along with these ridiculous allegations. this is just to distract from the Trump - Russia connection.

nothing to see here.

All I did yesterday user, apparently spamming articles with the source opens up alot of discussion

>hurrrr only liberal media is credible news source

Wonder who is behind this post?

>MSM
>credible

Isn't it weird that the Russian narrative is the story that's falling apart without evidence and the Obamagate spying story is constantly gaining corroboration? Really makes you think.

Fuck off shill.

It seems that it doesn't have to distract people from the Russian conspiracy. All the people who are screaming it exists and now too busy trying to bury this. Your killing your own agenda libshits.

>Rand says it might be eavesdropping for political reasons
>some guy in the background holds up a card or shows them the teleprompter
>NO NO SENATOR, TOTALLY DIFFERENT, STOP DESTROYING THE NARRATIVE.
these fuckers are so obvious

What's their other option? Overtime they try to deny Trump's claims, they end up with egg on their face and try to pretend it never happened.

They're not dumb, they're just fucking evil.

>LEAKED NOTHIN TO NOBODY

What did she mean by this?

Logically, it means she leaked something to everybody.

Pretty much this.

When CNN said it was fake news and refused to cover it, that made the story get even bigger and Fox now gets to call out the other channels for ignoring this and playing it off as nothing.

Also notice how they constantly try and dial back this issue and switch back to the Russia atory, it's so obvious how bias they are being that I think even libshits are starting to see it.

That she is a dindu

>image

Underrated

>racist
>sexist

There they go. Using those words fewer and fewer whites give a fuck about as they wake up to the multicult mess they're in. But keep using them, morons. They become weaker with each utterance.

Matthews made me lose my faith in human objectivity and reason. He's no dummy, to watch him ignore this story and make counter accusations is bizarre.

Double negative senpai.

Rice conducted ILLEGAL political espionage on incoming POTUS campaign using taxpayer-funded security and intelligence agencies. ILLEGALLY unmasked and leaked private conversations to Jewish Fake News media. Then confessed her guilt with a double negative so that she has plausible deniability ??? LOL

This is why you don't put sheapes in positions of power

I think it just means she's an Obama-era communist ghetto nigger who chimps out when she don get no mo gibs.

This leaf gets it.

If there were any real substantial proof that there actually was a Trump-Russia connection, it would have been leaked by now.

17 intelligence agencies have already agreed about proofs. The science is settled at this point. there is no debate.

Are you a Russiacaust denier?