So, Sup Forums

So, Sup Forums

Under a fascist government of your own design, what civil liberties would you restrict? What would the social area of your fascistic utopia look like?

General discussion of what you'd want in a fascist government also welcomed.

Other urls found in this thread:

historyplace.com/worldwar2/riseofhitler/25points.htm
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

>no LGBTQ
>marxist college professors will either fall into line or go for helicopter rides
>no more mass immigration
>humane repatriation for existing minorities
>drug dealers will be shot on sight
>massive reform of public schools, young people will be taught relevant skills, emphasis on physical health and strength
>women will be moved out of workforce, emphasis on homemaking
>jewish owned mass media monopoly will be broken up
>basic public healthcare will be taken care of
>federal reserve will be nationalized
>preprocessed food and drink will be phased out
>people will receive incentives to grow their own fruits and vegetables
>schools will reinforce Christian values and society

It's not perfect, but it's a darn good start.

Drug dealers and rapists would be killed extrajudicially by police. Protesters could be run over by cars if they block traffic and they're families would have to pay for damages to the car. Guns would be banned in places with high populations, but knives and swords would be legal for unconcealed carry.

>>no LGBTQ
Kill or imprison? How would you stop people from being "in the closest" like they were when homosexuality was illegal in years prior?

>>massive reform of public schools, young people will be taught relevant skills, emphasis on physical health and strength
You sure that's a good idea? The nazis tried that, the whole huge emphasis on physical health and strength, and as a result had some of the worst academic results in the entire world for the brief period they were in power prior to the war.


>>jewish owned mass media monopoly will be broken up
How?


>>people will receive incentives to grow their own fruits and vegetables
What sort of incentives?

^ I like your idea of pushing values. I, however would push the philosophy of Confucianism and Christianity would probably rise in numbers with more devout followers.

>Guns would be banned in places with high populations, but knives and swords would be legal for unconcealed carry.


Surely you'd want to remove any and all weapon ownership? Allowing the citizens of your nation to own firearms invites challenge to your tyranny.

>massive reform of public schools, young people will be taught relevant skills, emphasis on physical health and strength

how is physical health and strength relevant? everyone has a STEM nowadays.

>women will be moved out of workforce, emphasis on homemaking

this would be extremely disadvantageous for you country's economy

^ also the US already has great emphasis in these areas in their education system.

This sounds perfect.

>Drug dealers and rapists would be killed extrajudicially by police

Forgot to talk about this one. The idea of extrajudicial execution seems to strongly invite corrupt behaviour from the police.

this as well desu, duterte's war on drugs seems to be going horribly.

I would have schools put an emphasis on computer programming, bio-engineering, engineering, and mathematics. I would keep vocational programs for the idiots too. I'd put more funding in Future Farmers of America in rural areas and allow people to take community college courses at younger ages.

Values are going to be pushed regardless. It might as well be positive ones.

LGBTQ people are a cancer on society. I'm not going to create an inquisition to hunt every last one down, but if they're flamboyant in public, they will be dealt with.

How do you think we'll break up the media? Mass arrests and investigations into high treason against the people seem like a good place to me. Like LGBTQ people, they have a net negative effect on society. Therefore, they have to go.

As far as incentives go, tax credits seem as good of a method as any other.

this is fucking stupid

>>this as well desu, duterte's war on drugs seems to be going horribly.

On the contrary, the people absolutely love Duterte and claim that cities in the Philippines are much safer now.

this is retarded

Weak people create a weak society.

>this would be extremely disadvantageous for you country's economy

Akshully.... read this before you talk about the effect of women in the workforce on the economy.

>I would have schools put an emphasis on computer programming, bio-engineering, engineering, and mathematics.
I would make all nerds be forced into work camps

I can only get so erect, user.

>but if they're flamboyant in public, they will be dealt with.
So, people are allowed to be gay, but not publicly? How would you deal with someone who is publicly homosexual, such as kissing their gay partner in a town square, for instance.

>How do you think we'll break up the media? Mass arrests and investigations into high treason against the people seem like a good place to me

I don't know. That's why I would ask. Who would you arrest, and on what charge? What behaviour would you consider treasonous?

>As far as incentives go, tax credits seem as good of a method as any other.
Wouldn't you be punishing people who live in urban centers to a degree?

At the start of his presidency yeah, nowadays there are reports of many unjustified killings by the police and some call for human rights violations

>Weak people create a weak society.
How so? Surely academic and moral strength is more relevant than physical ability in the modern world.

Will read/digest that image.

You're never going to fully eliminate homosexuality, I'll be the first to admit that. But everyone can agree that they have a net negative effect on society. So, if we want to improve our society, degenerative behavior must be dealt with.

I'd like to reference this thread for you: >> It's obvious that the media has an objective in mind to undermine white societies and force us into pointless conflicts. I'm not saying we shoot every sound technician at your local broadcast station, but I am saying that we find out who is pushing these narratives, and deal with them. Permanently.

>Wouldn't you be punishing people who live in urban centers to a degree?

Screw urbanites.

Remove shitskins, mandatory fitness regimen for every citizen. Public nudity and sex is ok. Businesses can monopolize until they become a problem in which case they will be broken up. Everyone must have at least one child somehow either through fathering one or donating sperm. Married couples get a year of paid leave to raise their children. People who commit petty crimes are fined. People who commit major crimes are either executed after trial or turned into castrated sex slaves and tossed into the designated furry neighborhood to be enjoyed as a public good

But joking aside, if we humanely repatriated the minorities in this country back to their respective homelands, there would suddenly be a lot of open real estate in urban centers. I think that turning that open land into gardens where citizens could grow their own fruits and vegetables would be an excellent way to help the society overall.

All laws must be enforced by judges ala judge dredd style. No voluntary enforcement of laws by the executive branch and no ignoring or defying federal law by states and municipalities.

>what civil liberties would you restrict?

All of them. People lack the will to defend their rights, so why do they deserve any? Britain is ripe for despotism, and the majority of people deserve it.

gotta respect the dedication.

I'll be honest I'm fairly disappointed by this thread, a lot of this seems to be anons just dishing out against things they dislike via power fantasy instead of truly rational legislation.

Though I suppose I reap what I sow by asking a question about civil liberties. Next time I should ask about economics. Though from the sounds of this thread their answers to economics wouldnt be that far off the commies.

>massive reform of public schools
kids should be homeschooled until high school desu

its a bit autistic coming onto pol and thinking anons are going to be dishing out rational legislation when it takes a fully staffed parliament supported by law reform councils and advisory boards months and months to even formulate proposals to change or implement law.

The best you can ask for is a rough idea of vaguely what you would like.

>Allowing the citizens of your nation to own firearms invites challenge to your tyranny.
Trickle down tyranny, the more loyal get guns and can dominate their lessers.

this image is one of the hardest redpills I've ever found on this site.
I explained it to my gf and even she could understand it. Really activated her almonds.

Below 95 IQ: abortion mandatory, no welfare

Above 110 IQ: abortion forbidden. for women who stay married, $10000 a year for 13 years per child up to mother's age at birth of 25 with $3000 added for each year younger to a minimum of 18 years

Immigration policy for parity with each other land (exactly so many residence permits to those from X land as there are of ours with residence permits living there).

Payments to quit for any immigrant where there is a surplus of immigrants (including 2nd generation) compared to our living in their lands of origin. No welfare of any kind to any immigrant

I would give everything people want, as long as it didn't interfere with anything that would deny my government of power.

You got my vote

Another dictator that kills himself...

>dishing out against things they dislike
There are things that need to be destroyed in the swiftest, most brutal, and most expedient way possible.
-homosexuality
-destruction of the family unit
-non christian teachings
-illegal drugs, their users, and their pushers
-minorities (though these should be humanely repatriated to the country of their ethnic origin)
-public schooling in it's current state
-food preparation and culture in it's current state (processed foods, fast foods, harmful preservatives, etc)
-the fact that the modern family is so far from self sufficient that if supply lines were ever cut 60% of the population would outright starve
-Feminism and female empowerment(working, voting, etc)
-The federal reserve

It isn't a 'power fantasy' to realize that you need to cut out a cancerous tumor, making sure that there's no way it could spread, before you can heal the patient. It's cold hard fact. pretty much has it right, though I'm not so worried about (((jewish influence))) as I am about any influence that goes against fundamental biblical teachings. Simply put, if we ran the country based on the rules and precepts in the Bible, we'd see an upturn in our country that would make the 1950's jealous.

Sup Forumsacks, what was that website that allowed you to create your own model government, like select wether it's Single Party/2 party/multiparty, constiutional monarchy/autocracy/technocracy as well as chose how you fund policies? I forgot it.

>Homosexuality
>No Christian teachings.
The most successful empires were pre Christian and many societies did just fine with homosexuality. It's always existed and it is not harmful. Sex has never been harmful. The most harmful thing to society is taxes and immigration

Have you not heard of urban gardening? People in NYC have been gardening on their roofs since the 1850's

>no islam
>no marxism
>no central banks
>no single moms

>just illegal drugs
Cigs and beer are just as degenerate, fag.

>(degenerate)sex has never been harmful
>pic related
>aids
>every other STD
>massive increase in birth defects
uh huh.

Also, those 'successful' empires were built on the backs of slaves and human suffering. It took a once majority Christian nation (USA) to finally lead the world out of that kind of horrible thinking.

Another non-argument (tu quoque fallacy).

Now this is a redpill if ive ever seen one. This will be the only image i have ever downloaded from this website since i want to read it a few times more.

>What is safe sex
Sex has never been the cause for societal decline no matter how much you try to warp history. Also slavery under Rome was a pretty good deal. Hardly suffering.
>Birth defects
Now that's just factually incorrect. Birth defects come from incest and random mutations outside of anyone's control. It's not some punishment for random sex. You're absolutely deluded.
>AIDS
Blame the chimp fucker for being patient zero and the niggers in Africa who spread it. People who use AIDS as an argument against gay people are literal fucking retards. Read a biology book, jesus

Oh also Christianity permits slavery so your pro Christian argument is invalid. Kill yourself christcuck

You can take my life but you will never take my cigarettes

HIV and AIDS Diagnoses. In 2014: Gay and bisexual men accounted for 83% (29,418) of the estimated new HIV diagnoses among all males aged 13 and older and 67% of the total estimated new diagnoses in the United States.

What is your statement to this

>Blame patient zero
Yeah. I want to blame the sucker that started the flu or the fucker that started hepatitis.

probably "shut it down"

Thank you, sir. I wish I could claim credit for it, but I found it on here as well.

I would tax heavily, kill- nuke entire cities which disobey, and spent most of taxmoney on science to create genetically modified superior human beings capable to colonize the space and create a galactic empire. also help creating artificial environment on other planets.
when they get created and sent to their journey, the state will nuke and destroy the entire planet.

This. There's a good fucking reason why they don't let fags donate blood.

I'd be pretty fucking easy going. Welfare n shit would exist kinda.

>Controlled immigration
>Job guarantee scheme(glorified workhouses)
>Intervention on fatties/unfit people
>National Service
>if you get to 70 and aren't fiscally independent you go to a retirement village off to carousel.

it was filteries if anyone was interested.

historyplace.com/worldwar2/riseofhitler/25points.htm

There you go.

Shouldnt you be in school

>>anyone i don't like will be killed extrajudicially. police is my execution squad.

yeah, women are just going to comply with that. right. or how about 'gas women in concentration camps because :feminism: and :deeneracy'

>sex has never been harmful except where sex has been harmful ex. Incest
The big problem now is how incest is being piggybacked off of faggotry acceptance because lets face it. Its 2 consenting adults right?

Anything deemed destructive to the nation and it's people.

Marriage would be restricted to man and woman, to ensure greatest uniform distribution of the sexes.

Divorce can only be authorized if abuse has taken place, and evidence can be provided.

Prostitution and pornography would be banned.

I don't like it, but I would open a propaganda department that would incentivize a healthy population and healthy habits. Things like hypersexuality would be frowned upon, and the nation would be well informed if it's destructive nature.

Above all else, I would have positive eugenics and state sponsored incentives for increasing the birthrates of genetically superior couples.

>complete halt on immigration
>based census on "non european migratory background"
>establish that max population with non european background can be 2%
>75% income tax on family units (both parents pay 75% income tax) with non european migratory background
this deals with shitskins and race mixing.

On education:
>compulsory state funded education
>civic education classes as a cover for instilling strong sense of national identity in kids. Stress out the importance of demographics (mostly aimed at making kids want to be parents in the future), Helps in preventing degenerate crap like drugs. Instill strong work ethic
>mandatory gender classes for kids: sounds progressive but you would teach men to be men and women to be women
>mandatory PT classes 1 hour per day + tax deduction for people actively going to the gym
>insert strong anti marxist books and themes in history classes
>stronger ties between education and the job market. Hold meeting with business owners, create special business days, etc. Helps kids in studying something that will grant them a job in the future
>Mandatory Christian history and culture classes. Even if you are a fedora tippier, you'll probably recognize that Christianity is important to keep a state strong

Miscellaneous
>Tax cuts and fiscal incentives for couples with children
>privitized pension system
>death penalty for more serious crimes
>castle law doctrine of self defense
>fund classical and traditional arts while completely defunding modern ones
>ban foreign investors from owning any stake in the media
>complete ban on islam and mosques
>law requiring the creation of x workplaces for foreign investors wanting to open businesses locally
>labor protection law ensuring locals have priority in hiring over foreign workers

Oh yes, I forgot:
>ban homosexual propaganda like in Russia
>no marriage for faggots
>ban on prostitution
>ban on the production and distribution of pornography

add eugenics
and replace the last one with paganism and sounds good

>ban racemixing
>humanely resettle non-whites*
>decriminalize all drugs
>promote white families
>reward white mothers who have lots of children
>crack down on LGBT propoganda
>tax fat people, promote fitness and excellence
>2 years mandatory service for males, females are barred from military roles

*defined as 95% European

>rights to protest and speek against the government are supressed because they breed discontent in the heart of the otherwise good, working citizen
>illegal immigrants are high class criminals
>serious disabilities are illegal - death sentence
>right to jury is dissolved because it impedes the government
>all people must be working or in active military service
>being unemployed for more than a month is seen as a crime
>polyamory is seen as social degeneracy - criminal
>all depressent drugs are very illegal
>strong nationalist sentiments and discipline are to be injected into education to make the next generation love their country
>all people must be registered as people within the government
>having children outside of a hospital is illegal
>having children outside of marriage is degeneracy - criminal
>all marriages must be done in accordance with the government
>a group of people in every city are to be appointed to clean the city of litter daily
>knowing of but not telling the government of any criminal activity - race mixing, illegal marriage, illegal child birth, etc. - is to be an accomplice to any criminal activity
>pedophiles are to be executed publicly
>criminals and accomplices are moved to highly guarded work camps on the outskirts of the country
>children must be trained to use a gun proficiently, and, upon turning 15, must be given a government approved gun for protection from any criminals
>refugees are always refused

What about white refugees of european descent?

...

Parroting numbers is not an argument. Let me explain why.
So, your implication is that homosexuality by its very nature spreads or causes disease despite the fact that the biggest hotbed of AIDS is Africa. Among straight people. This is not a gay problem. It's an unsafe sex problem. Just because some retards decide to go bareback doesn't mean you should ban sex. That's retarded. Now consider, even if gay sex was intrinsically more harmful than straight sex. It isn't but let's pretend it is for a moment that it is, that would still not justify banning it because it only harms other gay people whom you hate regardless because they tend not to have kids. None of this has any effect on straight people because you can't turn gay. Also, condoms exist. So the issue of homosexuality would be one that solves itself so it is pointless to interfere with it. There is simply no logically consistent argument to ban gay sex. It's never been harmful to society and anyone who actually read a history book would know that