Sargon of Akkad - ?

Just started listening to his videos.

He seems highly analytical, and quite smart and impartial. However he seems so analytical he sometimes disappears down the wrong rabbit hole - he talks about the alt-right, but seems to identify it as exactly the same as white nationalism - he ignores the men's rights people, gamergate, traditionalist Catholics, free speech militants, Libertarians, general populists, red pilled atheists and others who are committed to rolling back the liberal machine. The pool of people who actively supported Donald Trump is even broader - including the Zionist Jews.

I know the brand 'alt-right' is increasingly owned by Richard Spencer as he claims it and the liberal media wants to associate it with Nazis. But it wasn't always like that, and it seems to be a tactic with the left to associate a brand with Nazism and then try and past it on even the most moderate free speech advocate.

Does Sargon ultimately help? Does he need to be advised that he is only helping the SWJ order?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=o49cGq9UUBY
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Entry tier redpill. Ultimately a centrist fence-sitting cuck. Spams gay porn to people he doesn't like.

Quadroon of Mossad

Some people on here will inevitably hate him, but in the end, we all share the current goal of stopping SJW cancer and bringing down the establishment. You can get a variety of opinions on him, and a variety of other political commentators, but he's ultimately becoming one of the more mainstream ones.

He gets really repetitive and sounds like a parrot.
Hes a pseudo intellectual.
Good enough for the youtube community tho, theyll eat it up.

he's a good place to start, I think. He doesn't come off as an ideological enemy as easily as someone like milo or stefan, and he drops enough redpills to get lefties thinking. And he's sane enough about enough issues that I don't think he's misleading.

He's good for normie conversion at least. he's not as 'scary' as murdoch murdoch or something.

>ignores gamergate
ayy lmao. good post friendo

All of his early videos are about gamergate

There's been a thread up all day.
It dies, and this one replaces it.
(((Coincidence)))

Yeah, mixed feeling about him - he seems sincere and digs for actual evidence (I wish more anons would do this) but also repetitive, his videos can be tedious. Overall I like the guy as he is quite good at calling the SJW's out on their bullshit. But I probably wont watch many more of his videos unless they are pertaining precisely to something I want to get some evidence on - his strength is his research and use of evidence - but he often goes off down the wrong track, and he can be a bit long winded.

Carl you really need to stop shilling your channel.

Fair enough - haven't watched the whole catalogue, my bad.

wasn't that just when he was Hakked of Assad?

This.

Mate your videos are okay but if you're going to keep making these threads use a proxy so it's less obvious.

OK I'll settle for him being an entry-level red pill.

If the alt-right was a cigarette brand, he would be the Silk Cut ultra light menthol one.

Isn't that spinos troll account ?

...

...

...

...

...

why you slide my thread with your chig chong memes?

>>Anonymous (ID: e9xttJ3K)
04/05/17(Wed)20:37:12 No. 52 KB
52 KB JPG
...Anonymous (ID: tino9V0D)
04/05/17(Wed)20:37:14 No. 110 KB
110 KB JPG
...Anonymous (ID: yVH31zjo)
04/05/17(Wed)20:37:15 No. 91 KB
91 KB JPG
...Anonymous (ID: ZQU60hQX)
04/05/17(Wed)20:37:17 No. 76 KB
76 KB JPG
...Anonymous (ID: 19d6WBIn)
04/05/17(Wed)20:37:18 No. wtf

He's talking about the alt-right right now because that's what's topical. He talked about Gamer Gate, Feminism, Atheism, etc when it is trending.

Nigga has like 1200 hours of video out there.

an ally - even if he claims otherwise.

hopefully the left finds a way to make his life uncomfortable enough to drop the classical liberal pretense.

Makes good dollar filling his niche, and I've enjoyed listening to him in the past, but I find his scope is way too narrow these days, I feel like he could do so much more, like he should have 'evolved' with the channel. He brings good arguments but I find him to be a bit of a one trick pony by this point with the SJW bashing.

cuck by your guy's standards here.

i like sargon but i don't think the jews rule the world either so

he is a tactical nihilist. disregard him

>He seems highly analytical
He isn't. He's actually really retarded

>Some people on here will inevitably hate him, but in the end, we all share the current goal of stopping SJW cancer and bringing down the establishment
Sargon is worse than SJWs. SJWs help us by polarizing politics. Sargon seeks to depolarize and bring people to the center of cuckolded moderate liberalism. He's a much worse enemy.

Carl stop shilling your shitty channel here

Sargon is kind of a first step to being redpilled. I started watching hi, Amazing atheist, and a few other channels like that who make anti SJW videos and several months later I ended up here. So yeah, I guess you could say he ultimately helps.

Sargon is worth paying attention to (set his long-ass vids to 1.5x and play vidya/draw/do chores/drive while listening) but I don't think he should be anyone's sole source of info. He can be kind of a fag sometimes, and more than once I've been disappointed when he's casually admitted to not knowing anything about a subject that is sort of important.

kys and sage

youtube.com/watch?v=o49cGq9UUBY video related tells you all about sargon

heh....I remember the last 4 times I read this thread

>Sargon
>highly analytical
>smart
>etc.

lel

I hate to be "that guy", but the discourse he is a part of is your "semi-enlightened" critique of post-modern insanity and delusion amongst the anti-intellectual fringe of the so-called new left. Deconstructing the arguments of the Greens and Sarkeesian's is not difficult because, they simply aren't arguments in the philosophical sense, they are opinions. As such, you cannot judge the actual quality of the content he produces on the merits of his ability to deconstruct unsubstantiated gibberish which is easily refutable. Indeed true quality would manifest itself in his ability to reconstruct his own positions in a cohesive way. Here I find that he fails miserably, often ending up postulating superficial arguments which themselves are about as aloof as those claims that come from the "new left" he so much rejects. You will often find him recoiling in conversations where it comes down to actual policy with any economic or geopolitical implication. He has time and again proven that he isn't good for anything else than to shout at left-wing politicians which he considers to be idiotic. His understanding of political theory is extremely flawed, as is his understanding of political and economic ignorance. For all that he himself would claim, he would actually benefit from a few university courses, although I doubt his ego would be able to take it. As someone who has finished studies on the the doctoral level, I find his "analysis" trivial at best, if I were to consider them analysis at all. Concealing a lack of proper schooling in a subject with anger might work amongst the masses, but not amongst the educated.

hes a stupid faggot

Nah he was actually hacked about a month ago. Sent gay porn to a bunch of Youtubers, including a few boipuccis to DeFranco.