The Syrian Rebels are attempting to use chemical weapons and frame Assad

They have done this on a couple of occasions. Their primary goal is to gain economic and political support from the West. In the past it has even been proven to be the rebels, being the ones using the toxins. If Assad falls, we will have a second Iraq. This is assuming the Russian dont come in and start WWIII before the West can overthrow Assad. Some people in D.C. want the war to go on, and fear Assad will be the one to drive the terrorist out of his region. This threatens the war economy, and several politicians wallets.

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=2pOMCmVc3wY
poll-maker.com/poll1033861xc62B44Ad-43
youtube.com/watch?v=CaVjtqZwS1s
presstv.ir/Detail/2017/01/11/505784/Syria-Aleppo-Saudi-Arabia-chemical-weapons
kurdistan24.net/en/news/68860958-993b-42c3-b9f1-15a7d726f7e7/Chemical-weapons-workshop-discovered-in-Aleppo
twitter.com/powerpuffsama2/status/849806853915779077
msf.org/article/syria-thousands-suffering-neurotoxic-symptoms-treated-hospitals-supported-msf
washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/nearly-1500-killed-in-syrian-chemical-weapons-attack-us-says/2013/08/30/b2864662-1196-11e3-85b6-d27422650fd5_story.html?utm_term=.1f85ad980ef0
theguardian.com/world/2017/apr/04/syria-chemical-attack-idlib-province
foxnews.com/world/2017/03/17/syrian-missile-fired-at-israeli-jets-is-intercepted.html
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khan_Shaykhun
telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/syria/10039672/UN-accuses-Syrian-rebels-of-chemical-weapons-use.html
theduran.com/was-hillary-clinton-behind-the-chemical-weapons-attack-in-syria/?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter
davidduke.com/four-out-of-five-migrants-are-not-from-syria-eu-figures-expose-the-lie-that-the-majority-of-refugees-are-fleeing-war-zone-zio-watch-september-19-2015/
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

Have had an article up about this since yesterday, and seen some others spreading the news.
MSM is going all out on blaming Assad though.

Just like the last Syrian false flag gas attack

Same shit different day under the zionist thumb.

>v23b5EYW
Very odd the MSM would take stance /s

first will be war against syria next will be war against russia.

>>my fighting goyim army

youtube.com/watch?v=2pOMCmVc3wY

Not really. It all goes on who's paying the bills.
Who gains from this and is also supporting rebels?

Assad is winning on these fronts, why would he suddenly attack with chemical weapons despite not having a record of doing so while the 'rebels' have made, stored and used on multiple occasions?

poll-maker.com/poll1033861xc62B44Ad-43

who did it Sup Forums?

I was being sarcastic lol

Gee maybe has something to do with the fact that Assad doesn't keep tabs on every single bomb and soldier used in the war? Maybe because Arabs are fucking idiots and can't tell sarin bombs from regular ones?

Or are we going with the /sg/ narrative that Assad forces are all professional pro-white, National Socialist sandnigger-killing machines who have never done any harm, that fight for Christian values and secularism under the control of the hivemind Assad who controls every single thing they do?

This was a bombing on a chemical weapon facility. The rebels and the Google's are just trying to control the narritive

>BLOW UP MIDDLE EAST
>WORLD PEACE

Well gee user, should we ignore who has the track record for using chemical weapons?
I mean, the 'rebels' have never done anything like this before.
Yeah, let's go with the guy winning the war suddenly committing large-scale war crimes because 'lol why not?' when the West is finally backing down from its destabilization narrative.

>only thing close to a secular country in the region
>destroying it will help the fight against ISIS

>assad DINDU nuffin
>if it looks like he did do something it is a western plot to frame him

repeat steps one and two ad nauseam

why is it so surprising that assad would use chem weapons? thousands of people have already been killed by his forces using conventional weapons, i dont see why you think he is some angelic figure who would never dream of using chemical weapons given that he is already a mass murderer

>news begins to break that the Obama administrating was in fact spying on Trump during his campaign
>in fact, they were spying on all of their political opponents and journalists
>biggest scandal in political history is looming, and coverage will be unavoidable for the MSM
UNLESS...
>sarin attack in Syria!
>omg the children!
>omg Putin just OUTLAWED gay clown pictures!
>RUSSIA RUSSIA RUSSIA
>Those poor children!

This is the most blatant false flag I've ever seen. I'm done even trying to keep up with this shit anymore.

>Syrian rebels

You mean Israeli black operatives wearing shemaghs

bump

The Russians did an air strike on a ammo depot/laboratory and blew up some chemical weapons

youtube.com/watch?v=CaVjtqZwS1s

FSA (Al Qaeda) has been known and proven to have stock piles of chemical weapons.

presstv.ir/Detail/2017/01/11/505784/Syria-Aleppo-Saudi-Arabia-chemical-weapons

kurdistan24.net/en/news/68860958-993b-42c3-b9f1-15a7d726f7e7/Chemical-weapons-workshop-discovered-in-Aleppo

Just even more proof that Assad is not involved in these attacks

>attempting
LOL.
Dumbass, its too late to whine """"attempting"""" when you grabbed your dick looking at trap.

...

fuck trump

If America is stupid enough to attack Syria will Russia and Iran finally attack the Saudis?

>Assad is winning on these fronts, why would he suddenly attack with chemical weapons despite not having a record of doing so while the 'rebels' have made, stored and used on multiple occasions?
Trump fell for a trap.

Nice proxy Vladimir.

>They have done this on a couple of occasions.

The utter lack of sauce.

twitter.com/powerpuffsama2/status/849806853915779077

What did they mean by this?

>accidentally used the wrong bomb
>all the destroyed chemical weapons weren't actually destroyed
>they stocked regular bombs and sarin bombs next to each other


Your argument is fucking retarded.

If it was an attack why aren't the casaulties relatively close to the "attacks" in 2013?

2013 "attack"
msf.org/article/syria-thousands-suffering-neurotoxic-symptoms-treated-hospitals-supported-msf

>3600 hospitalized

washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/nearly-1500-killed-in-syrian-chemical-weapons-attack-us-says/2013/08/30/b2864662-1196-11e3-85b6-d27422650fd5_story.html?utm_term=.1f85ad980ef0

>1500 dead

2017

theguardian.com/world/2017/apr/04/syria-chemical-attack-idlib-province

>100 hospitalized and 70 dead

This is a really nice picture of white sage.

This proves Assad dindu nuffin, indeed

Yes it's the same shit, i agree. They are unable to topple assad so out of nowhere "assad uses gas attack".. Why the hell would he do that when SA is doing pretty well in defending syria.. It's just as suspicious as the first one.

...

Also did you guys remember the story about a israeli jet being shot at by syrian army for violating airspace?

ffoxnews.com/world/2017/03/17/syrian-missile-fired-at-israeli-jets-is-intercepted.html

as far as i can understand the russians claim that it was missile strike that accidentally hit a depot of gas stored by the rebels.

Yeah pretty uncanny isn't it.

We must use or hotline to Trump and warn him of this false flag.

I mean think about this for a second, the first alledged gas attack done by assad (i'm inclined to believe it was the "rebels" too) The western world is like ASSAD must go..

Yeah ofcourse assad does it one more time just after trump has said he won't pursue regime change in syria.. I mean total genius move by assad, why not give the entire world the excuse to try to get rid of him by doing the exact same thing.. Amazing that people can believe that it's really assad that did this..

This is what the media would have you believe
>trump ran a campaign of non interference in the middle east in general, except for taking out isis
>putin supports assad fighting against isis and the jihadis
>trump wants to ally with putin to destroy isis
>assad is meanwhile doing pretty well with SA defending syria from these "rebels".
>trump comes out and reaffirms that he won't pursue regime change in syria
>everything seems to be working out for assad
>but then assad the evil dictator decides.. ok THIS IS THE TIME I WILL NOW 2 DAYS LATER FUCK EVERYTHING UP FOR MYSELF BY LAUNCHING A GAS ATTACK
>you guys assad did this, we have to get rid of him (claims the rebels)

Intermeresting!

'we'
all the people that constantly try to make Trump betray the US
Trump is currently cleaning the White House from Kremlin's plants
Assad will be crushed

>Assad will be crushed
It's not assad that is the problem it's the "rebels" you dolt, which are really an ISIS proxy.. That want assad gone so they can gain control over syria. Assad is trying to stabilize the situation so it doesn't turn into similar bullshit as in libya, iraq and almost egypt. And HE's the one who has to go, so i guess boneheads like you want to go for failure number 3, first saddam, then ghadaffi and now assad?

Got any comment on this?

The rebels didn't kill children with gas you fucking shill. What a great way to stabilize the situation.

Trump WILL remove the dictator Assad from power

Was interesting because early reports indicated that it was the rebels that were responsible or that a depot that the rebels had of gas was blown up in an airstrike (they didn't know the gas was stored there) which then ofcourse set it lose.

But then it seemed to have been spun into anti assad so they are trying to claim for the second time that assad does gas attack on purpose eventhough assad has no fucking reason to do this because everything is going his way recently, SA is doing well, trump says he won't try to topple assad, and ally with russia to defeat isis and then all of a sudden this happens.. Yeah SURE BUDDY!

>All Danish media saying Assad gassed his people before an investigation is made

we need some Dane-bro's to dig into the Danish media.

Something smells

>the rebels didn't kill children with gas you fucking shill, what a great way to stabilize the situation..
The "rebels" (ISIS proxy) are LOSING to SA you idiot, they have every reason to take advantage of an unfortunate situation (their own gas depot being blown the fuck out by accident) and claim such an attack was deliberately done to assad, because they are trying to try to coerce western forces to invade/to apply political pressure to topple assad.. Which was the whole point of claiming that the first gas attack was done by assad aswell.

Either assad is the biggest idiot in the universe when everything seems to be going his way, or there's something fishy to this.

>Muh war economy shadow politicians
>I just finished playing Metal Gear solid and have political opinions now!

They get their information from UN sources and others, who interestingly enough first claimed that the rebels were responsible and then the story changed to being anti assad, when some other nations probably figured out they might try to use this politically to topple assad.

>Assad doesn't keep tabs on every single bomb

nope. these require special maintenance and delivery.

Impeach Trump

reminder

a UN released a report not so long ago filled with solid evidence Assad has used chemical weapons wtf are you on about?

Israeli just loves arabs and wants to take care of them

What's also interesting is that there was recently an incident where an israeli jet was fired on by SA missiles for violating airspace under the guize of stopping weapons from syria go going to hezbollah..

It's also very clear that israel does not like assad..

Could they have accidentally let one rip and then blamed it on assad?

foxnews.com/world/2017/03/17/syrian-missile-fired-at-israeli-jets-is-intercepted.html

Here's the story from a little while back about the israeli jet.

Ofcourse either way the rebels will ofcourse no matter if they did it themselves or who did it or how it happened.. OFCOURSE try to spin it and blame it on assad because they're getting their asses kicked, there have been several examples of this kind of psyop from the jihadis.

>implying mgs isnt one of the closest depictions to reality of whats going on
Pleb

>Russian dont come in and start WWIII
nice meme

>the Russian dont come in and start WWIII
>pver Syria

my sides

Good goyim, 0.02 schekels has been transfered to your account.

Fuck i hate you toothpaste's, you are the kike's of Europe. Gas yourself.

What's the point of these shill threads?
American spy satellites are so good that they can see individual sandniggers convulsing from those bombs and also identify the planes that dropped them. There are also boots on the ground IN Syria.

Reminder that the rebels used sarin gas and needed some place to store it. Like a building in rebel territory.

If Russia loses Syria it's all over for them. It is now or never

What you idiots don't understand is that the jihadis are very interested in assad going, so they can turn it into the same mess as libya and iraq.. so whatever they can do to smear assad these "rebels" will ofcourse do. Aswell as there are also others that have gepolitical interests in deposing assad and replacing him with a puppet, neither of which has anything to do with assad being a dictator or not.

It's almost like you idiots are begging for syria becoming the same kind of clusterfuck as iraq and libya.. And claiming russians and assad are evil for not wanting that to happen.. wake the fuck up man..

The key is to realise the terrorists are setting up the stage for them to be the ones using chemical weapons on the SAA while Assad cops the blame.

At the same time, Netanyahu has managed to take over the white house. It's fucking frightening.

>assad DINDU nuffin
How's the weather like GCHQ?

The town that alleged attack took place is under control of al-Qaeda. Should we trust al-Qaeda? I say no, but Westren leaders and MSM trust them.

>During the Syrian Civil War, the town fell to the control of the Syrian opposition, and in 2014 fell to Jabhat al-Nusra. Deutsche Welle reported: "Idlib province, where Khan Sheikhun is located, is mostly controlled by the Tahrir al-Sham alliance, which is dominated by the Fateh al-Sham Front, formerly known as the al-Qaeda affiliated al-Nusra Front."

>On 4 April 2017, the town came under a heavy air attack, suspected to have used chemical weapons. 73 people were killed.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khan_Shaykhun

>this
This is exactly what the russian report suggests aswell. That they fired on a storage depot that they didn't realize contained this gas. And then it ofcourse got out and then the "rebels" (isis proxy) took the opportunity to spin it into that "assad has attacked us with gas, you need to get rid of him help us please".

more war = more pizza!
>country known for child prostitution conspicuously absent from graphic ....

let me parahprase that
>startin ww3
>over Syria

How fucking retarded do you have to be? in the heat of the cold war when the US was literally responsible for daily downing of Soviet aircraft in Afghanistan by proxy ww3 didn't start and now you telling me they will? get real

And how is that bad? have you ever compared the amount of Libyan and Syrian refugees? or the death toll?

>And how is that bad if syria becomes same mess as iraq and libya?
Ok toothpaste don't cut yourself from all that edge

>The rebels didn't kill children with gas you fucking shill.
Sure. telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/syria/10039672/UN-accuses-Syrian-rebels-of-chemical-weapons-use.html

theduran.com/was-hillary-clinton-behind-the-chemical-weapons-attack-in-syria/?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter

>Was Hillary Clinton behind the transfer of chemical weapons used in Idlib, Syria?

I see you ran out of Alex jones arguments and realized you are an ignorant twat

>How fucking retarded do you have to be?
Are you underage or do you not know a lick of history?

>And how is that bad?
Not only are you an edgy kid, but there were all the chances to already end this pointless war and yet this fucking shit happened again. Fuck off, dumb kike.

...

>I see you ran out of Alex jones arguments and realized you are an ignorant twat
No it's just that your argument that the situation in libya and iraq that yeah let's go for a third time disaster, is a good thing is such a downright insane proposal that i actually thought you were being edgy/satirical.

But now i see you've just completely lost the plot.

>have you ever compared the amount of Libyan and Syrian refugees? or the death toll?

You are actually claiming that the rebels fighting assad is a bigger disaster than libya and iraq.. Nope and might i add how fucking retarded is it possible for you to be at this point? I don't see how you can top that but you'll probably find a way.

The reason for the massive amounts of migrants is because very few of them are actually FROM syria but economic migrants from all over blending in with the actual refugees. Not because the syrian civil war is worse.

...

I'm 22
An I am fairly balanced and well read on history thanks for you concern though.

Zero arguments so far only you are edgy you are stupid you are insane etc.

All I want you to tell me how Libya is worse than Syria curently, but even that's too much for your little peanut brain apparently

Death toll who is worse?
Refugees who is worse?

>how fucking retarded is it possible for you to be at this point?

kek says the actual clinical retard

>zero arguments so far
See this It's sad that i even have to spell it out to you why that is. You don't seem to have a clue about the situations in those places.

>An I am fairly balanced and well read on history thanks for you concern though.
Not nearly enough lad.

The rebels in that area are al-Qaeda terrorists.
Fuck you al-Qaeda shill.

>An I am fairly balanced and well read on history thanks for you concern though.
That certainly isn't the case.

>All I want you to tell me how Libya is worse than Syria curently
How is it not? There's a power struggle going on in Libya and nobody's gaining any real grounds. It's just casualties.
On the other hand in Syria, Assad was and is still currently winning.

>Death toll who is worse?
>Refugees who is worse?
You can't be serious right now. Majority of migrants aren't even from Syria and the actual deathtolls aren't even known, considering that in both places wars are still ongoing.
davidduke.com/four-out-of-five-migrants-are-not-from-syria-eu-figures-expose-the-lie-that-the-majority-of-refugees-are-fleeing-war-zone-zio-watch-september-19-2015/

Fuck off shill

>claims that syrian civil war is worse than libya and iraq combined, so deposing assad will be a good thing for syria.
>gets called an edgelord
>complains about zero facts
>i spell it out to you since i sadly have to why you're wrong.
>responds with "actual clinical retard" instead of addressing it since it just occured to you that i was correct.
Fucking toothpaste newfag edgelord find another thread, the grownups are talking.

fuck you

...

fuck you idiot

you are shilling for terrorists!