Thread for discussion of the Jewish Question, Race Realism, National Socialism, Anti-Communism, Fascism, Traditionalism, White Nationalism, and European Identity Movements. Share links, PDFs, reading, videos, and propaganda. > 卐 - SMASH THE LEFT! > 卐 - COUNTER DEGENERACY! > 卐 - EXPOSE ZOG!
卐 IF YOU DO NOT SEE A GENERAL IN THE CATALOG PLEASE COPY FROM THE PASTEBIN AND CREATE ONE! - HELP SPREAD THE LOVE! 卐 卐 PASTEBIN - pastebin.com/vPZPyDhK 卐
卐 - FASCIST/NATSOC MOVIES: --------------------------- The following link contains 26 Third Reich movies (One from fascist Italy, one from occupied France). All are good quality DVDRIP (x265 codec) and all have English subtitles.
List and genre: >Bismarck 1940 Biopic, Historical >Condottieri 1937 Historical, Adventure (Fascist Italy) >Das Herz Der Königin (The Heart of the Queen) 1940 Anti-British, historical >Der große König (The Great King) 1942 Biopic, historical >Der Kaiser von Kalifornien (The Emperor of California) 1936 Anti-greed, historical >Der Sieg Des Glaubens (The Triumpth of the Faith) 1933 NSDAP propaganda
>Night Canada, I will reflect on the civic nationalism meme and consider what a successful Pan-European State would need to look like. Will do burger, good night
Ryder Fisher
what are the bullet points of national socialism?
dont post edgy gas the jews XDDDD
what are the key tenants?
Isaac Reyes
So I'm curious, if by some miracle Canada managed to gas the kikes/shitskins and establish a national socialist government, what kind of racial dogma would it embrace? Northern Europeans only or a more Pan-European racial policy?
Xavier Jackson
Are you really asking for a quick rundown when there's a literal fuckton of documentation in the OP? Come on now.
- Emphasis on tradition, culture, the nuclear family - Elimination of degenerate cultural influences - Strong centralized state - Non-participation in the jewish central banking system - State policies to help the white race to thrive and repopulate - Strong military - No jews Feel free to select from the hundreds of sources we've already provided.
Religious arguments are a luxury we can only indulge once the goddamn shitskin menance has been drive back into the jungle.
John Peterson
================================ 卐 - MYTHS ABOUT NATSOC (Part 3) >"National Socialism / Fascism was a failed system"
It's intellectually dishonest to label something that was forcibly crushed a "failed system", implying that a nation bombed into collapse during war is comparable to a system imploding politically during peace-time. The Soviet system failed, as did the Roman Empire, and every Chinese or Ottoman dynasty. Some of these examples of government lasted thousands of years, while some didn't last more than a generation. All forms of government inevitably fail. This has been true since ancient times. Polybius famously articulated this process of Anacyclosis: social organization paradigms rise, fail, and give way to further systems. This is the cycle of history.
Jaxon Harris
Fascism is not a failed system, it was a defeated system: A.) it was not an economic system, but a social one; B.) the so-called "failed system" had a control group: the US. Germany, Italy, and the US were operating under Keynesean policies; only one of them won the war, and experienced a massive period of growth once their industrial rivals were destroyed. So no, it wasn't a failed system, because both sides were using it, including the side that won.
================================ 卐 - MYTHS ABOUT NATSOC (Part 2) >"National Socialism is just (((socialism)))"
NatSoc redefined socialism as "Germanism/Volkism", which they saw as "producer-oriented capitalism", as opposed to "Jewish capitalism", aka, international finance, globalism, wall street, etc. In theory, NatSoc economics was a version of Keynesianism, tailored to the Völkisch nature of whichever people adopted it. Its not one dogmatic economic system,and Hitler often joked that the lack of a specific ideology was their strength. NatSoc could be more "free market" as Americans know it, or less. But NatSoc is always in favor of the Volk over economic identity, of "producer capitalism" over "finance capitalism".
Hitler tried to clarify the distinction in 1938: >“’Socialist’ I define from the word ‘social’ meaning in the main ‘social equity’. A Socialist is one who serves the common good without giving up his individuality or personality or the product of his personal efficiency. >Our adopted term ‘Socialist has nothing to do with Marxian Socialism. ((((Marxism))) is anti-property; true socialism is not. ((((Marxism))) places no value on the individual, or individual effort, of efficiency; true Socialism values the individual and encourages him in individual efficiency, at the same time holding that his interests as an individual must be in consonance with those of the community. All great inventions, discoveries, achievements were first the product of an individual brain. It is charged against me that I am against property, that I am an atheist. Both charges are false.”
Jaxon Myers
================================ 卐 - MYTHS ABOUT NATSOC (Part 1) >"National Socialism is just (((socialism)))"
Marxist (Left) socialism and National (Right) Socialism are "antipodal zeitgeists engaged in dialectic". That's a fancy way to say they're opposite ideologies designed to clash, like Yin and Yang.
NatSoc was fundamentally an ideology built around race, while Marxist socialism was entirely different: built around class. Hitler aimed to unite the right and left, including workers and their bosses, into a new German nation based on racial identity. Socialism, in contrast, was a class war between workers, bosses, and owners (Capitalists), aiming to build a workers state in which race and gender were insignificant. Socialists, especially Marxist socialists, were anti-religious atheists, whereas NatSoc went so far as to make Christianity the religion of the state.
The differences go on and on: Marxist socialism was internationalist, NatSoc was nationalist. Marxist socialism was egalitarian, whereas NatSoc believed that nature was unequal and required competition. Marxist socialism wanted to nationalize all private industry, while NatSoc privatized every major industry except the railroads (it considered these a military asset. In fact, Hitler once joked "they didn't need to nationalize property because they nationalized people". NatSoc drew on a range of pan-German theories, which wanted to blend Aryan workers and Aryan magnates into a super Aryan state, which would involve the eradication of class-focused socialism as a non-German ideology.
America would have to be one of the saddest cases in history, wouldn't it? I mean, consider all that America has achieved within the few centuries of its existence - and this is with niggers and Jews holding it back. Imagine an America where the transatlantic slave trade never happened and instead of being open to immigrants, they adopted a "White America" policy like we did. No Jews would be able to take control either, then. Its potential for greatness and glory would be awe-inspiring. I believe had history gone this way, America would have become truly the greatest nation in human existence. We can only hope that one day Americans will manage to clear their country of all the filth that's holding it back.
Kevin Howard
>No Jews would be able to take control either, then. Let's not be naive, user. There isn't a single political entity, country, or square foot of land on God's green earth that the jew hasn't tried to subvert. If there were any sizeable goy settlement on Antarctica, under the sea, or on the moon you better BELIEVE that they'd be paying reparations to the jews today for no apparent reason.
Dominic Diaz
Heil Hitler
Easton Perez
Bampen glorious bread
HAIL VICTORY BROTHERS
Robert Jones
Sieg Heil Suomi Guten abendt Straya
Jeremiah Stewart
>survey on the holocaust >no option for "It didn't happen but I wish it did" Shit survey
Isaiah Martin
The downside(?) of a German victory in WW2 would be that America probably would never become a superpower in the first place. A large chunk of all scientific developments were done by defecting German researchers after the war. NASA and rocket technology, advancement of broadcasting devices and electronics, and the freaking highway system are all German inventions.
Henry Thomas
>America probably would never become a superpower in the first place. Oh no, are you saying they wouldn't have had the capability to destabilize the middle east to apease their zionist overlords? Oh noooo, that sucks...
Liam Brown
>no option for "It didn't happen but I wish it did" Supposed to be a serious survey. Of course it should've happened, that's a given
Christopher Myers
I know, I was obviously talking about a purely hypothetical situation. One could argue that the slave trade was destined to happen as well. History is pretty deterministic.
Isaac Wright
No, I meant that they would simply be there, and stagnate.
Also, a fun fact: Hitler got the blond hair, blue eyes idea form Americans. While he was in prison he heard of the eugenics program in California, and took a very direct example from it.
Xavier Bell
They probably wouldn't have become the globe-dominating superpower that they are today, but even without WW2 it's hard for a country as naturally well-off as America to not become a superpower in some regard.
Blake Green
>One could argue that the slave trade was destined to happen as well Sure, might makes right. So yeah, history is deterministic in that sense, if there's a weaker society that can potentially be dominated, you can bet your emu-lovin' ass that it will at some point. >Also, a fun fact: Hitler got the blond hair, blue eyes idea form Americans. I did not know that - how ironic considering the genetic makeup of 56% land today, (no disrespect to white burgers)
Jose Price
If only they had the foresight to realise what suffering they would be bringing upon their children...
Adrian Anderson
...
Jose Nelson
>If only they had the foresight to realise what suffering they would be bringing upon their children.. Seriously... No possible level of economic growth is worth this. Massive immigration from non-white countries just to stay afloat? To pay interest payments to the financial jew? No fucking thanks. I'd return to a barter-based economy in a heartbeat if it meant an all-white country. I may be alone on this.
Kayden Howard
...
Adam Robinson
The masses are deliberately kept short sighted to avoid this kind of thinking. We will wake up only when it's too late, I'm afraid.
Andrew Hughes
I suppose at the time they weren't aware of what bringing masses of blacks into their society would lead to. They would have been under the impression that blacks would remain as slaves forever and wouldn't have any influence outside of being essentially tools or machinery. We at least have the benefit of hindsight.
Tbf though, I wouldn't even want non-white slaves in my country. I just don't want a single fucking one, especially niggers.
Christopher Walker
>88 Best Dvbs >We will wake up only when it's too late, I'm afraid. The tides are turning in some respect - image board culture and the (((alt-right))) have done more in the recent 2-3 years to raise awareness on the dangers of enrichment in general (although the jewish question is still taboo) than i could've ever thought possible. Combine this with the fact that shitskins don't intend to stop spreading "peace" all across Europe anytime soon. Far-right politics are doing better today arguably than at any point in my lifetime at least so there's hope my baltic friend.
Leo Smith
Fantastic Thread, been seeing many more of these recently than I have before. In the face of an increasingly shill filled board, these threads are a great and genuine refuge from them and their retardation
Henry Powell
>I suppose at the time they weren't aware of what bringing masses of blacks into their society would lead to. Clearly not. This is another example of why civic nationalism is such a non-starter - They free the slaves, whites killing 100s of thousands of whites (although slavery wasn't the main reason for the civil war) and then they give them equal rights, political representation, and 50 years later it's even shittier than before. It would have been hard to predict what the rise of liberal academia and victimhood culture would do. That being said, if BLM wasn't continuously propped up by a hungarian merchant they most likely wouldn't have the clout that they have... >n the face of an increasingly shill filled board, these threads are a great and genuine refuge from them and their retardation Truer words have never been spoken. It's a well kept secret that /nsg/ is actual one of the more civil threads, as hard as that may be to believe for some
Xavier Powell
In some aspects, you are right. The Alt-Right has made great strides towards enlightening people about whats happening. But as GLR said "Between us and them is the great mass of non-fanatics", the apolitical ones, who simply think that they have the luxury of not picking a side in this. They are the ones who are making things difficult, even more than (((they))) are.
Michael Torres
>They are the ones who are making things difficul Yup. Not too scientifically minded, but it's like inertia - it takes energy to move a stationary object, whereas you just need to give a moving object a tap and you can steer it in a given direction. Those who are dead weight are diificult to sway. My brother is the most blue-pilled "live and let live' guy of all time and i often told him "You'd better start being interested in politics, because politics is interested in you" or however the saying goes.
Dominic Price
...
Owen Baker
roll
Dominic Hernandez
>(((Alt Right))) How is the alt right a jewish movement?
Hunter Edwards
>How is the alt right a jewish movement? Just a meme - referring to the idea that it's harmless controlled opposition, more preoccupied with frogposting and other ebin maymays that anything else. Take a look at its' supposed figureheads to get the idea
Jose Lewis
...
Ryan Walker
Make sure to post it here when you're done ;^)
Dylan Diaz
Have you actaully listened to Richard or Jared?
You haven't explained how it's controlled opposition. If anything it's the Alt Light Civic nationalists that are controlled opposition.
Robert Long
Bampen
John Gonzalez
Bump
Samuel Barnes
Don't take it to heart. It's probably because they don't openly acknowledge the JQ. They simply can't, if they would, the media would smear them so badly than nothing would be left of them.
Joseph Jackson
>Make sure to post it here when you're done ;^) I will - already had an idea: "The national question" about how europe's colonies can forge a natsoc state based on pan-european identity as opposed to a homogenous national identity, like say france or the netherlands. >Have you actaully listened to Richard or Jared? see Any notion of white nationalism without mentioning the jewish question is just pillow talk
Brody Fisher
Openly denouncing jews is political suicide these days, sadly. Richard is trying to create a political movement.
Sebastian Hall
You got weapons training - I"m assuming you'll be at the shooting range tomorrow morning?
Dylan Harris
That's a great idea, and it's a question I've never been able to answer myself. I'm pretty bipolar on the issue, I regularly go back and forth in believing in a purely "Australian" identity as the basis of our nationalism and believing in a pan-European one. I would like to see your take on it.
Jonathan Ortiz
Nah, I rolled 4
Gabriel Young
And destroy the divers cultures of Europe?
Jace Stewart
>europe's colonies
Easton Sanders
Lol nevermind I misread your comment.
It's an interesting idea, I don't know if European new world colonies are culturally similar enough unite. Hell Southern, New England, Midwestern and Cascadian culture within America are different.
Ryder Bennett
Yeah I misread the comment. Give me a break it's nearly 5:30 AM here
Jayden Edwards
so how are you guys gonna install national socialism? are you just gonna wait around until someone alpha enough with your veiws ermerges in the political scene and hope he seizes the states power?
Chase Butler
>install national socialism It's not that simple. There needs to a complete societal breakdown for a change so drastic.
Camden Russell
>rolled a 4 You got the easy one kek. Doesn't even specify how long you have to exercise for >I regularly go back and forth in believing in a purely "Australian" identity as the basis of our nationalism What would the definition of an "aussie" identity be though? I know you guys have at least as much of a culture as we do, but what makes an Australian national socialist "australian" ? A shared british-irish-scottish(?) heritage? Our countries were built, in a way, on civic nationalism, and the definition for what is "aussie" or "a leaf" has broadened to mean pretty much anyone who is legally a citizen. Just my take. The idea is that colonies are very much their own thing, but the pan-european heritage enables SOME inclusiveness to permit descendants of poles, wops, ukrainians who ahve fully assimilated to participate, whereas that mentality might not have worked in the 3rd Reich which was quintessentially german. no worries. >Hell Southern, New England, Midwestern and Cascadian culture within America are different. True. But are these areas' fashy goys that different from one another? In germany there was and is multiple dialects and subcultures - high german, low german, bavaria etc, and they still managed to beunited under the reich
Cameron Thompson
ok, care to explain the societal breakdown?
Dylan Young
This. I don't even feel alarmed by anything anymore. All we have to do really is sit it out until things reach Weimar level and then it will be time to swoop in for the kill.
Liam Turner
>install national socialism? >install this isn't windows xp we're talking about - there needs to be a convergence of factors, and the overton window needs to be shifted quite a bit more before that's remotely feasible. Fortunately that's one area where image board neckbeards have an edge
Oliver Watson
The Australian identity is actually pretty well defined. We might not have a very well developed "superficial" culture (i.e. food, clothing, dance, music, history etc) which gives off the impression of a lack of Australian identity, but when you compare an Australian to a non-Australian we are actually really quite different. I think it does partially stem from a shared British Isles heritage as you say, however, it is pretty unique. As I said though, I'm not sold by either side yet.
Liam Baker
Look at Weimar Republic as an example. It has to get so bad that the currently existing system utterly fails, only then you can have A CHANCE of going National Socialist, or anything else that differs from the previous one bu such a margin.
By the looks of it, you're right.
Landon Campbell
>bu by*
Bentley Lewis
I prefer a " AUCANZAM" then Balkanization, which would be the only other option, if only to keep a strong western power to balance against China.
Elijah Reed
So you guys don't have an actual plan? you're just gonna hope that when society collapses that theres enough NatSoc minded people to rebuild?
Easton Anderson
Balkanization allows Russia, China, and other powers to bully, even annex, New World countries.
Bentley Turner
Welcome to the world of politics.
Evan Hall
Salutations
I am Pascal " Die Panzer " Pashwara I am an SS officer of the 5th IndienKorps.
Grayson Green
>So you guys don't have an actual plan? Threefold: Education - Awareness - Action. Don't confuse "consolidating one's power" for merely "waiting".
