PRESIDENT DONALD J TRUMP
whitehouse.gov
donaldjtrump.com
DAILY SCHEDULE (WH Press Corps)
publicpool.kinja.com
Trump Playlist
pastebin.com
APPEARANCES
>Pres Trump & King Abdullah II Press Conf 4/5/17
youtu.be
>Pres Trump meets King Abdullah II of Jordan 4/5/17
youtu.be
>Pres Trump remarks at 2017 NABTU Conf 4/4/17
youtu.be
>Pres Trump @ CEO Townhall 4/4/17
youtu.be
>CEO Townhall on American Business Climate 4/4/17
youtu.be
>Pres Trump meets a sissy 4/3/17
youtu.be
>Pres Trump Weekly Address #10 3/31/17
youtu.be
>Pres Trump signs EO on Trade 3/31/17
youtu.be
PREV APPEARANCES
pastebin.com
NEWTRUMP NIGHTLY NEWS
pastebin.com
WH PRESS BRIEFINGS
pastebin.com
FUN STUFF
>March in the Trumpenreich
youtu.be
>TrumpWave S P A C E
youtu.be
>The Story behind MAGA hats
youtu.be
>God Emperor Trump Was Born To Rule
youtu.be
>Donald Trump Emperor of America
youtu.be
>TrumpBot vs Mexico
youtu.be
>Shadilay
youtu.be
INSPIRATION
>MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!
youtu.be
>Hold Back The Night
youtu.be
>Inauguration of Fire
youtu.be
>#TrumpTheEstablishement
youtu.be
>American Hero
youtu.be
>TRUMP - MAGA
youtu.be
>Trump Triumphant
www.dailymotion.com/video/x4ulway
>We Are The Silent Majority
youtu.be
>American Comeback Story
youtu.be
OP pastebin: pastebin.com
prev
/ptg/ PRESIDENT TRUMP GENERAL - ONE ANSWER EDITION
Other urls found in this thread:
nytimes.com
dailycaller.com
archive.is
youtube.com
mega.nz
twitter.com
MOVEMENT
AWOO~
The reason the prior abuse of the foreign-intelligence surveillance apparatus is clear only now is because the Russia campaign has illuminated it. As The New York Times reported last month, the administration distributed the intelligence gathered on the Trump transition team widely throughout government agencies, after it had changed the rules on distributing intercepted communications. The point of distributing the information so widely was to “preserve it,” the administration and its friends in the press explained—“preserve” being a euphemism for “leak.” The Obama team seems not to have understood that in proliferating that material they have exposed themselves to risk, by creating a potential criminal trail that may expose systematic abuse of foreign-intelligence collection.
...
As you noticed, shills are hard at work today and everyday.
They seem to forget that the left is watching the most powerful republican legislature ever and in 2018 they will have over 20 senators at the chopping block vs. 8 from the republican side.
Here is my answer: to rub salt on their wounds and remind them of who has all the power
Isn't it sad that Trump detractors like the shills in this very thread have nothing else left but fortune telling and wishing for him to failure?
Think about it: for this whole campaign those guys at least had hope
> polls were at their side
> media was at their side
> betting houses were at their side
> pollsters were at their side
> celebrities were at their side
And yet, their side (meaning the anti trump side) lost and lost big.
Trump now has
> the presidency
> a red senate
> a red congress
> a supreme court pick to be done weeks after being innaugurated
> probably two more to fill before the end of this first term
> not impossible two more right in the middle of his second term
> all but one state legislature needed to start constitutional changes
And now here they are: fortune telling
> Trump won't such and such
> Senate won't confirm such and such
> Congress won't pass such and such
And every step of the way, much like in the election, they get proved wrong by the facts on the ground (when Trump delivers) and then they move the next fortune telling and the next wish for things to go wrong
It is sad, really. Most of the people on this board and on this general are having the time of their lives and their presence here makes them even happier for knowing someone on the other side is here to witness it
Shills: I salute you. Keep it up tho, I'm saving this text as pasta (so I can repost it often) and let what I just said sink in.
> you have no hope left other than wishing for other people failure.
> you have no power and no hope
Think about it
The kicker about these shills is, they all vanish at the same time like their shift is over. Kinda ruins the atmosphere they're going for...they don't even know how to run psyops..maybe brock can make them stay later, after they blow him of course.
ლ(=ↀωↀ=)ლ
>tfw i can only be myself talking to you guys
>tfw it my only means of catharsis
I love you all
When is all this boring back and forth nonsense going to end. It all amounts to nothing, just a bunch of pawns moving on a chess board. When is Trump going to force a checkmate?
This is familiar territory. In spying on the representatives of the American people and members of the pro-Israel community, the Obama administration learned how far it could go in manipulating the foreign-intelligence surveillance apparatus for its own domestic political advantage. In both instances, the ostensible targets—Israel and Russia—were simply instruments used to go after the real targets at home.
Also, in case anyone missed it, the (((NYT))) did an interview with Trump recently, the whole thing is worth a read despite the source.
Sweetheart, thats not how this works. You remember the massive conflicts of interest over things like Lynch and Clinton meeting in Phoenix? We can do that too.
Really makes you think
Where's that lazy faggot Newswire gone
>that fucking dilbertman rusemanship
Anyone else catch that? That was some top kek shit.
Now, since I last made this series of posts many things changed. For starters, Trump is President.
Did you guys notice what techniques they brought to our humble congolese command and control bulletin board?
1) Forum sliding: any given time, specially when there are bad news regarding the democrats or anything at all that goes against their groupthink they they go overboard with it
2) Consensus cracking: see the "I voted for him but those remarks by his cabinet / this temporary setback / this MSM allegation will really get him impeached / such and such should be fired" that people are bringing here. I'm fairly sure the first time it arrive people actually felt the need to believe it but now it is probably just shills shilling shills
3) Topic Dilution: on Sup Forums in general (doubles as sliding): in general, wild gooze chases, on /trumpgen/, gossip, pitting groups against each other.
4) Information collection: seen only rarely in here, "let's make a lions guard for Trump / lets make ANTICOM" and "what would you do if Trump is impeached / is killed". Also "let's access this site / app / plugin for more info". Don't fall for it folks.
5) Anger Trolling: our bread and butter, just see any post with a Finland flag beside it. Actually, it is our main weapon too so it is all fair games in this matter. Just don't answer the trolls.
6) Happened on many boards on Sup Forums when the happening and GG broke out. I don't know about Sup Forums but Sup Forums and Sup Forums, for instance, that's a given. We are not very susceptible, being an anonymous chan anyway but on reddit, oh boy, I wouldn't touch that mess with a 100 feet pole covered in insulant and fire retardant. Social media in general, ever worse. Honestly, a mod got recently fired (in the rwss debacle) for politicising his enforcement of the rules so we are not immune to that either
Stay smart, stay safe, stay beautiful and stay out of trouble.
Welp, the illuminati just killed Scott Adams. RIP.
> There are several techniques for the control and manipulation of a internet forum no matter what, or who is on it. We will go over each technique and demonstrate that only a minimal number of operatives can be used to eventually and effectively gain a control of a 'uncontrolled forum.'
> Technique #1 - 'FORUM SLIDING'
> If a very sensitive posting of a critical nature has been posted on a forum - it can be quickly removed from public view by 'forum sliding.'
> In this technique a number of unrelated posts are quietly prepositioned on the forum and allowed to 'age.' Each of these misdirectional forum postings can then be called upon at will to trigger a 'forum slide.'
> The second requirement is that several fake accounts exist, which can be called upon, to ensure that this technique is not exposed to the public.
> To trigger a 'forum slide' and 'flush' the critical post out of public view it is simply a matter of logging into each account both real and fake and then 'replying' to prepositined postings with a simple 1 or 2 line comment. This brings the unrelated postings to the top of the forum list, and the critical posting 'slides' down the front page, and quickly out of public view. Although it is difficult or impossible to censor the posting it is now lost in a sea of unrelated and unuseful postings. By this means it becomes effective to keep the readers of the forum reading unrelated and non-issue items.
(continues)
NUNES HIMSELF WAS UNMASKED
HE IS A WITNESS
THIS IS WHY HE SHAT HIS PANTS ORIGINALLY
THIS IS WHY GOWDY AND FRIENDS ARE TAKING OVER
‘At some point, the administration weaponized the NSA’s legitimate monitoring of communications of foreign officials to stay one step ahead of domestic political opponents,’ says a pro-Israel political operative who was deeply involved in the day-to-day fight over the Iran Deal. ‘The NSA’s collections of foreigners became a means of gathering real-time intelligence on Americans engaged in perfectly legitimate political activism—activism, due to the nature of the issue, that naturally involved conversations with foreigners. We began to notice the White House was responding immediately, sometimes within 24 hours, to specific conversations we were having. At first, we thought it was a coincidence being amplified by our own paranoia. After a while, it simply became our working assumption that we were being spied on.’
memes and pasta memes and pasta
> Technique #2 - 'CONSENSUS CRACKING'
> A second highly effective technique (which you can see in operation all the time at www.abovetopsecret.com) is 'consensus cracking.' To develop a consensus crack, the following technique is used
> Under the guise of a fake account a posting is made which looks legitimate and is towards the truth is made - but the critical point is that it has a VERY WEAK PREMISE without substantive proof to back the posting.
> Once this is done then under alternative fake accounts a very strong position in your favour is slowly introduced over the life of the posting. It is IMPERATIVE that both sides are initially presented, so the uninformed reader cannot determine which side is the truth.
> As postings and replies are made the stronger 'evidence' or disinformation in your favour is slowly 'seeded in.' Thus the uninformed reader will most like develop the same position as you, and if their position is against you their opposition to your posting will be most likely dropped.
> However in some cases where the forum members are highly educated and can counter your disinformation with real facts and linked postings, you can then 'abort' the consensus cracking by initiating a 'forum slide.'
(continues)
>FOX NEWS
>AWAITING GORSUCH VOTE
I thought it was tomorrow?
Family
> Technique #3 - 'TOPIC DILUTION'
> Topic dilution is not only effective in forum sliding it is also very useful in keeping the forum readers on unrelated and non-productive issues. This is a critical and useful technique to cause a 'RESOURCE BURN.'
> By implementing continual and non-related postings that distract and disrupt (trolling ) the forum readers they are more effectively stopped from anything of any real productivity. If the intensity of gradual dilution is intense enough, the readers will effectively stop researching and simply slip into a 'gossip mode.'
> In this state they can be more easily misdirected away from facts towards uninformed conjecture and opinion. The less informed they are the more effective and easy it becomes to control the entire group in the direction that you would desire the group to go in.
> It must be stressed that a proper assessment of the psychological capabilities and levels of education is first determined of the group to determine at what level to 'drive in the wedge.' By being too far off topic too quickly it may trigger censorship by a forum moderator.
(continues)
Well is that good or bad for us?
I wish I could bury my head in the sand like you guys. Eventually you'll have no choice but to face truth.
As soon as Trump is gone, whether he finishes his term or gets impeached, it's right back to business as usual. The uniparty is already dictating policy. Oh well though.
AWOO! Shills in serious panic mode! They're plentiful, but breaking!
They either find Nunes commited Treason or Rice is in deep trouble
> Technique #4 - 'INFORMATION COLLECTION'
> Information collection is also a very effective method to determine the psychological level of the forum members, and to gather intelligence that can be used against them.
> In this technique in a light and positive environment a 'show you mine so me yours' posting is initiated. From the number of replies and the answers that are provided much statistical information can be gathered.
> An example is to post your 'favourite weapon' and then encourage other members of the forum to showcase what they have. In this matter it can be determined by reverse proration what percentage of the forum community owns a firearm, and or a illegal weapon.
> This same method can be used by posing as one of the form members and posting your favourite 'technique of operation.' From the replies various methods that the group utilizes can be studied and effective methods developed to stop them from their activities.
(continues)
Amazing more flames to the democrat dumpster fire.
>we didnt spy on anyone
>spied on the fucking intel chairman
More Gowdy is always good.
> Technique #5 - 'ANGER TROLLING'
> Statistically, there is always a percentage of the forum posters who are more inclined to violence. In order to determine who these individuals are, it is a requirement to present a image to the forum to deliberately incite a strong psychological reaction.
> From this the most violent in the group can be effectively singled out for reverse IP location and possibly local enforcement tracking.
> To accomplish this only requires posting a link to a video depicting a local police officer massively abusing his power against a very innocent individual. Statistically of the million or so police officers in America there is always one or two being caught abusing there powers and the taping of the activity can be then used for intelligence gathering purposes - without the requirement to 'stage' a fake abuse video.
> This method is extremely effective, and the more so the more abusive the video can be made to look. Sometimes it is useful to 'lead' the forum by replying to your own posting with your own statement of violent intent, and that you 'do not care what the authorities think!!' inflammation.
> By doing this and showing no fear it may be more effective in getting the more silent and self-disciplined violent intent members of the forum to slip and post their real intentions. This can be used later in a court of law during prosecution.
(continues)
Impeached for what?
Yes, exactly. The reason why he stayed so long was because he was waiting for the info to be released to the whole committee. Before that, he was the only one who could view it, so he probably feared if would be buried if he recused earlier.
>Everyone spamming their wall of text copypastas that no one reads in every thread
This isn't helpful.
What happened? I stopped getting notifications for his periscope son i never know when he's on
They always come when they think they have some victory, proceed to get blown out and then slink away and wait for their next narrative
> Technique #6 - 'GAINING FULL CONTROL'
> It is important to also be harvesting and continually maneuvering for a forum moderator position.
> Once this position is obtained, the forum can then be effectively and quietly controlled by deleting unfavourable postings - and one can eventually steer the forum into complete failure and lack of interest by the general public.
> This is the 'ultimate victory' as the forum is no longer participated with by the general public and no longer useful in maintaining their freedoms. Depending on the level of control you can obtain, you can deliberately steer a forum into defeat by censoring postings, deleting memberships, flooding, and or accidentally taking the forum offline.
> By this method the forum can be quickly killed. However it is not always in the interest to kill a forum as it can be converted into a 'honey pot' gathering center to collect and misdirect newcomers and from this point be completely used for your control for your agenda purposes.
> CONCLUSION
> Remember these techniques are only effective if the forum participants DO NOT KNOW ABOUT THEM.
> Once they are aware of these techniques the operation can completely fail, and the forum can become uncontrolled. At this point other avenues must be considered such as initiating a false legal precidence to simply have the forum shut down and taken offline.
> This is not desirable as it then leaves the enforcement agencies unable to track the percentage of those in the population who always resist attempts for control against them.
> Many other techniques can be utilized and developed by the individual and as you develop further techniques of infiltration and control it is imperative to share then with HQ.
Source? For now I only saw a tweet from a maga account
How are democrats able to lie right through their teeth without flinching?
>They either find Nunes commited Treason
Doubt it
>THIS IS WHY GOWDY AND FRIENDS ARE TAKING OVER
Here is the list of candidates for 2018
tl;dr: Democrats have 23 senators up on the chopping block, with 2 Independent and only 8 republicans.
> At the absolute worst case scenario (all republicans lose their seats) democrats achieve a 54-2-44 majority, barely over what republicans have now.
> At the absolute best case scenario democrats lose all 23 seats plus the 2 independent and we are left with a 77-23 majority for the republicans
> my estimate is that democrats lose at least 6 seats, that republicans will have to defend vigorously AZ and NV and that Angus and Manchin may flip to R. Not too far from a majority
Democrat
> Dianne Feinstein (California, since 1992)
> Tom Carper (Delaware, since 2000)
> Bill Nelson (Florida, since 2000)
> Debbie Stabenow (Michigan, since 2000)
> Maria Cantwell (Washington, since 2000)
> Ben Cardin (Maryland, since 2006)
> Amy Klobuchar (Minnesota, since 2006)
> Claire McCaskill (Missouri, since 2006)
> Jon Tester (Montana, since 2006)
> Sherrod Brown (Ohio, since 2006)
> Bob Casey (Pennsylvania, since 2006)
> Sheldon Whitehouse (Rhode Island, since 2006)
> Bob Menendez (New Jersey, since 2006)
> Kirsten Gillibrand (New York, since 2009)
> Joe Manchin (West Virginia, since 2010)
> Chris Murphy (Connecticut, since 2012)
> Mazie Hirono (Hawaii, since 2012)
> Joe Donnelly (Indiana, since 2012)
> Elizabeth Warren (Massachusetts, since 2012)
> Martin Heinrich (New Mexico, since 2012)
> Heidi Heitkamp (North Dakota, since 2012)
> Tim Kaine (Virginia, since 2012)
> Tammy Baldwin (Wisconsin, since 2012)
Independent
> Bernie Sanders (Vermont, since 2006)
> Angus King (Maine, since 2012)
Republican
> Orrin Hatch (Utah, since 1976)
> Bob Corker (Tennessee, since 2006)
> Roger Wicker (Mississippi, since 2007)
> John Barrasso (Wyoming, since 2007)
> Dean Heller (Nevada, since 2011)
> Jeff Flake (Arizona, since 2012)
> Deb Fischer (Nebraska, since 2012)
> Ted Cruz (Texas, since 2012)
Agreed. Them messing with Nunes is backfiring, with Rowdy Gowdy now on the case.
Do what? That was flagrant collusion and abuse of power exposed by a disgusted SS agent and it was stonewalled and went nowhere. We PREZIDEN nah, your worst nightmare has come to pass and you can't wake up for eight years (you're going to wake up into a deeper level of nightmare too).
WE FUCKING GET IT ALREADY
source.
>r/the_donald redditors unironically want to help Al Nusrah and Islamic State ged rid of Assad
The left never ceases to impress me
republicans, 2008
> put forward a weak candidate, gets creamed.
republicans, 2010
> grassroots faction within the party goes rogue, organize and wrestle bits of power from the establishment, gets congress representation
republicans, 2011
> grassroots presents not one but two factions (Ron Paul and Tea Party) as alternative
republicans, 2012
> establishes forces forward weak candidate, chokes out an easy victory
republicans, 2012 aftermath
> performs a thorough analysis of the result, proposes changes
republicans, 2015
> grassroots presents not one, not two but three candidates (Ted, Rand, Trump)
> outsider defies orthodoxy, runs a wild campaign, takes it home in a massive victory
Now, let's see what the democrats are doing
democrats, 2016
> grassroots present a candidate
> establishment forces forward weak candidate, chokes out what should be a coronation
democrats, 2017
> having learned absolutely nothing, doubles down on said weak candidate, platform and continues crushing internal innovation
2018 won't be pretty for democrats
Today is when the cloture vote is defeated by 41 votes. Then there'll be a rules change and the up-or-down vote on Gorsuch will be tomorrow.
Yeah okay, then why don't you just go cry about it somewhere else until it actually happens instead of shitting up the threads with your concern whining.
You've been on it for like four threads now.
Can I get a picture of Tucker looking bewildered or making his signature face?
The account is /our guy/ in the administration
But don't tell anyone
Also, looking beyond 2018 and into 2020. Who are the senators that will be on the chopping block at the same time Trump is running for reelection?
Democrats
> Jack Reed (Rhode Island, since 1996)
> Dick Durbin (Illinois, since 1996)
> Al Franken (Minnesota, since 2008)
> Jeanne Shaheen (New Hampshire, since 2008)
> Tom Udall (New Mexico, since 2008)
> Jeff Merkley (Oregon, since 2008)
> Mark Warner (Virginia, since 2008)
> Chris Coons (Delaware, since 2010)
> Ed Markey (Massachusetts, since 2013)
> Cory Booker (New Jersey, since 2013)
> Gary Peters (Michigan, since 2014)
Republicans
> Thad Cochran (Mississippi, since 1978)
> Mitch McConnell (Kentucky, since 1984)
> Jim Inhofe (Oklahoma, since 1994)
> Pat Roberts (Kansas, since 1996)
> Susan Collins (Maine, since 1996)
> Mike Enzi (Wyoming, since 1996)
> Lindsey Graham (South Carolina, since 2002)
> Lamar Alexander (Tennessee, since 2002)
> John Cornyn (Texas, since 2002)
> Jim Risch (Idaho, since 2008)
> Dan Sullivan /Alaska, since 2014)
> Tom Cotton (Arkansas, since 2014)
> Cory Gardner (Colorado, since 2014)
> David Perdue (Georgia, since 2014)
> Joni Ernst (Iowa, since 2014)
> Bill Cassidy (Louisiana, since 2014)
> Steve Daines (Montana, since 2014)
> Ben Sasse (Nebraska, since 2014)
> Thom Tillis (North Carolina, since 2014)
> Mike Rounds (South Dakota, since 2014)
> Shelley Moore Capito (West Virginia, since 2014)
> Luther Strange (Alabama, since 2017)
Pic related. What is your take on it guys?
IMO if it plays like it should democrats could have trouble in MN, NH, NM, MI while republicans in CO, IA and NC
The rest should be pretty safe because of seniority of the senator or lean of the state
Now Lindsey Graham is fucked because he will be campaigning for reelection at the same time of Trump and, going by what Trump did in OH he could pretty much get primaried
Also assuming 2018 keeps the senate it doesn't seem like they would lose it in 2020 meaning Trump could have both houses both terms
Just click 'hide' you dullard. It's for the people who HAVEN'T read it a thousand times already
They have to vote for cloture - a vote to end all debate.
This is where the nuclear option comes in - you need 60 votes to end debate and vote on the issue.
So if they never vote to close discussion, they will talk forever and the Judge will never be confirmed.
They gotta go nukey nukey to even get to a confirmation vote.
FACTBOMB
Dude
Fuck off
it's easy enough to archive
1. go to archive.is
2. paste article into first bar
3. copy resulting link
Too many bogies on our six.
...
You mean it's an (((insider source)))?
How legit is he?
Mike Conway
Trey Gowdy
Tom Rooney
Three republicans stepping up to handle leadership in the committee, was just on fox.
...
Let me tell you how this plays out. Gowdy in on the ethic committee he will step down under pressure because he can not judge Nunes. The Ethics committee finds Nunes violated the law he resigns or is sidelined from the Russia commitee. Now the Russian committee is free to find Trump broke the law or let an "independent" investigation. Then they recommend impeachment at that point you know what happens after that.
I gave you the whole ball of wax you are welcome. You can't stop it because establishment Republican and establishment Democrats have agreed to this to cover up the political spying of the deep state that goes right to the top of the Obama and GWB administrations.
The Gang of Eight is my proof every scandal of GWB or Obama involved the Gang of Eight being read into the intelligence. To convict Obama or GWB would mean exposing themselves as being involved as well. That is why every investigation goes nowhere
Nunes was the only new Gang of Eight member that had nothing to do with anything in the past. Now look where he is at for actually exposing the political spying on elected officials and how up it went.
That is my proof.
Do you see it now?
>The MSM lied again
Shocking
It's almost like this thread is actually full of Trump shills who cant handle any criticism so just spam walls of text as if it's a victory
Pro-tip; you look like retards to the lurkers you say it's important to formulate aargumens in front of
...
Shh, that maga account is from Trump's legal team and a literal WH insider who already knows what's in the transcripts. Where do you think we get all our insider info from?
WHEN DOES THE ROWDY GOWDYING COMMENCE AND WILL IT BE TELEVISED?
Can someone redpill me on nunes? Seems like 2D chess to me?
the idea of using the nuclear option to pass an obamacare repeal has already been thrown around.
Dumb Democrats should have voted for Gorsuch.
Going nuclear on healthcare... bwahaha!
sorry Ahmed, we can't all let you into our countries
It seems to be working or they are regrouping. The proportion of posts which are automatically filtered and the proportion of shill posts which recieve more than 2 genuine replies has tanked.
The informetrics are looking great after a little pounding.
He's got pretty eyes. (Pls don't get the jumper cables.)
?
He works for Trump
IT MEANS THE DEMOCRATS ILLEGALLY SPIED ON EVERY POLITICIAN AND ANYONE MARGINALLY RELATED TO POLITICS IN THE FUCKING COUNTRY YOU DIPSHIT
IT MEANS WE WERE LIVING IN SOVIET AMERICA FOR THE LAST EIGHT YEARS
Some senate fun
youtube.com
>>that fucking dilbertman rusemanship
>Anyone else catch that? That was some top kek shit.
What are you referring to?
>free to find Trump broke the law
The proofs? Where?
Damn they really had me going that time!
I have NEWSWIRE's MEGA link.
GASLIGHTING, DISINFORMATION, AND SHILLS
Shills do exist, and the come here very often for a variety of reasons from a variety of places.
There is endless disinformation about the existence of shills and what shilling is, but the above statement is true.
A "shill" is a word for someone who has an outside interest or who is from some place other than here promoting something or another. This sounds nebulous but it is an effective catchall to term people who are working against this board and these threads.
For example, a shill is someone who:
Comes here to spam the place
Comes here to demoralize anons, or distract from things
Comes here as someone who is not a supporter and who is vehemently against the administration and Trump in general.
Comes here with the explicit goal of destroying this place, or at least harming it.
Comes here as part of an outside group with outside interests.
These things constitute what a shill is. They both exist and are here almost all the time. Trolls are assholes who bleed into these categories or are simply just assholes. Both deserve derision.
You should never respond to either, as doing so more often than not feeds into their goals. Do not respond to or acknowledge either groups.
They think the opposition is so evil and depraved that any action against them is morally justified. "Right side of history" is an insidious narrative because it gives you moral permission to do great evil and praise yourself for it
Thank you for the analysis user, you are spot on. MAGA
There was already reports minutes after he news broke that he decided it himself why is drudge pushing fake news
ConAway, not Conway; no relation to /our girl/
These are great. Thank you.
Yeah, sad to say but Trumpgen is compromised. Can't wait to see the mental gymnastics when the great border wall is a fence and all DACA recipients get amnesty
We love our based black and legal hispanic Trump supporters right fellow pedes?
I think kek screwed us lads I worked harder then the Russians at trying to influence Americans to vote for Trump. I did it for chaos. The only Chaos is shills telling me to get off my echo chamber. do shills think I don't cable? Why have you forsaken me kek?
Trump won't even hang obongo i bet like why even live?
B-b-but muh Amnesty Don!
>14 posts by this ID
everyone please join me in reporting (((him)))
Could you make a pastebin for your copypasta instead of spamming them?
OH FUUUUUUUU
ON
THE
RUN
I thought Trump was getting impeached, why would they impeach him if he's already "compromised"?
>Spy on Roberts, blackmail him on Obamacare case
>Spy on Congress, blackmail them on Iran deal
>Spy on Trump, try to derail his admin
Obama's legacy is not as the first Black President, but as the flagrant spying and blackmail President.