UK Police Announce There Are So Many Pedophiles, They Will Stop Arresting Them

rt.com/uk/378882-pedophile-jail-police-bailey/

>Pedophiles who view indecent images but do not molest children should not be jailed, a leading child protection police officer has said.

Are UK going to legalize that for sharia? ?

It is already decriminalized for brown people in the UK and EU.

I cannot give a fuck about your country if you do this to yourself.

Muh anglosphere.

There is no reason to arrest people who are not hurting people.

It should be a gross misdemeanor or equivalent with a stiff fine to have CP because it IS someone else's image who was too young to consent, but it shouldn't be a felony.

same reason they're making public urination legal in jew york

Funding and creating demand for someone to create this kind of content

>tfw recently visited a pedo chat site on the deep web with JavaScript enabled

Honestly officer, it was an accident.

There should be Britain YES! threads at this point, they're going full Sweden recently

Figured this would happen eventually. When you make it illegal to have sex with teenage girls at peak fertility men have to get their rocks off somehow.

>Funding

I guess. I wonder how much CP is created for money though and how much is just peoples amateur shit that they would have made anyway.

Either way, anything not involving a real child isn't CP, and pedophilia child porn should be handled separately from hebephilic and epihebophilic child pornography, since the level of immorality is correspondingly less.

Only a pedo would defend this. Start checking this fucker's internet searches.

does this mean you can look at loli now?

“Let’s be really clear: somebody going online and using their credit card to direct the abuse of a child in the Philippines should be locked up, categorically.

“That individual who is not in contact with children and doesn’t pose a threat to children and is looking at low-level images… when you look at everything else that’s going on, and the threat that’s posed of contact abuse to children, we have to look at doing something different with those individuals.”

I agree with the cop from the article actually.

If you pay money for CP it should be a felony, otherwise gross misdemeanor and possibility of a reverse class action civil suit.

They already allow brown people to rape children. It would be hypocritical to not allow others to do it as well

AHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAAH
Just nuke Europe holy shit, hope Russia invades so we can really turn Europe into the new Middle East after we bomb the shit out of it.

the problem with cp is that its basically rape on tape, since kid cannot consent, they do not grasp what they are doing. That means they will regret it later and just remember it as a fucked up thing.

Are real rape videos illegal? I dont see them on the net at all so I guess they are too, on the same basis as CP.

If you could find a very young looking 16 year old pornstar, that would be 100% legal "cp".

Maybe he means loli porn? That's the only thing i can think of that constitutes as low level images. That or bathing suit images.

Besides that it's easier to execute them than it is to arrest them, if only bongland wasn't so cucked.

Not likely, people in Britain are hysterical when it comes to pedophilia, especially after the jimmy saville revelations.

Looking at someone underage for more than 5 seconds is considering a crime, this is happening only because of lack of funding for prisons and they're getting shitted on by everyone.

>Funding

>hysterical when it comes to pedophilia
>Rotherham

excepts when it comes to muslims it seems

They should make CP legal, seriously.

Arrest and charge the makers but dont mess with the ones that only download. Waste of resources.

There's nothing wrong with that. Jails and prisons are full as it is with nonviolent offenders who's only crime was hurting someone else's feelings.

This is a better idea.

of course kids can consent, wtf. do you not think kids fall in love with each other and with adults too? were you never a kid, man?

>funding

You realize pedos in places like tor just download this shit for free, right? Those who demand money just get their stuff leaked anyway.

Open season boys!

AHEM........traci lords

15 yo when started making porn

>Looking at someone underage for more than 5 seconds is considering a crime

It's like you guys are just a shittier version of the U.S.

>decriminalise

It's because for years having a picture of Lisa Simpson naked on your PC held you as accountable and the police treated it the same as if you fucked a kid.

Now they are deciding to stop chasing and arresting the lolifags and instead just go after actual pedos due to the fact a drawing is harmless.

If you get caught with IRL loli porn pictures then I guarantee you will still be hung in the streets or arrested. It was Labour who forced through the MUH CHILDRUNZ shit before allowing pakis in en masse.

>rape on tape
The problem with that is that rape on tape is legal(at least in the US), and any other action that is illegal is legal to have on tape. Hollywood would collapse if simulated murder on tape wasn't legal anymore, and it's also legal to film and have film of any crime, otherwise all these dash cams would practically be illegal.

Loli/shota has been banned this whole time?

What a shithole of a country lol

yeah, I remember being a kid.
everything was really "sheltered". nothing was really serious. as soon as something got serious, every kid was crying in panic and fear.

sex is serious, in a way kids dont grasp. thats why they cannot consent.

No. The decriminalisation will primarily be decriminalisation of viewing drawn images. Infact it wasn't even remotely illegal until Labour decided that nude pictures of Lisa Simpson were infact offensive despite them being in Ladz magazines at the time like Nuts as joke columns.

Arresting people over possession or evidence of a drawing that contains a drawn image shouldn't be illegal. At worst you should be put on a watch list incase you actually obtain/visit/purchase shit that's obviously IRL loli/pedo shit but it's way too much effort to arrest people over cartoon porn when it's easy to access and wide spread.

They'll just go back to the 90s way of targetting actual pedos and people with real child porn since it was more effective. The term pedophile has been horribly bastardised over the years to include anything including underage teenagers to mentally deficient 30 year olds being mentally children.

if rape vids are legal please show me a porn site with those kind of things. real of course, not this gay fakes from some crackwhore studios

is that girl in the middle below 18?
then that girl need to be cencored in UK

It's banned in the US as well. Just take your PC to a police station and ask them to review your search history/files after visiting some website involving Loli and you'll get arrested for it. It won't be a jail trip ofc but you'll be on some sort of sex offenders register at the very minimum.

>if rape vids are legal please show me a porn site with those kind of things.

Yes. For research purposes.

Loli is perfectly fine in the US, cuck. It's protected as art.

There's nothing morally wrong with just looking at videos of a crime if you're not paying for them and studies show that loosening porn/cp regulations causes a fall in sex crimes/child molestation.

rape video's arent' illegal. but the rape is.

That is why you don't see rape videos. The person would be fucking incriminating themselves.

Dont' be stupid.

Not that easy. It's a grey area that nobody really wants to touch.

If you get a good lawyer, you'll get off easily. Money talks in this country. And thankfully we still got SOME semblance of freedumz to protect us.

Did you actually cap your own posts ?
Brah, what's the logic in legalizing real child porn to decrease molestation... that's just fucked up

Why is UK police so busy? Too much muslims to take care of?

They are also pedophiles, just shoot them.

Why can't they just sterilise these people. If you can't lock them up, surely this will keep children safe. Fucking liberals.

Dont expect facts to get past most peoples initial disgust reaction

>Funding

You might as well abolish all laws then since it's a waste of money

At the least you have to say that the laws surrounding age of consent are kinda wacky. Age ranges from 14-21 in various parts of the world. Would I suddenly be unable to handle a sexual encounter if I crossed the wrong country lines? Not to mention the difficulty of "17+364 days will get you ten years for statutory rape, but wait 24 hours and you'll in the clear."

Add that on somehow 18 was the age to consent to porn means some really weird situations where fucking a 16 year old is completely legal, but videotaping you doing such is illegal because "the minor cannot consent to the action undertaken".

Yeah, so hysterical they allow pakis to rape and impregnate their children. It's safer to be a pedo than a racist here.

No, bro. She's 25

Fact? On my Sup Forums?

>thinks putting people in prison for downloading and masturbating to pictures is the same as imprisoning someone for murder or stealing

And the next step will be SJW's arguing they were born that way, and that a person's "age expression" doesn't need to match their chronological age, and that time is a social construct, etc.

>implying creating a demand for child rape isnt worse than murder
KYS pedo faggot

Don't arrest people that buy stolen goods it's a waste of money because they weren't the robber. Though no doubt you'd agree to that sentiment

There's was a lot of people trying to say that violent video games makes kids more violent, but there's been almost no facts to back that up, and some to say that the video games provide a cathartic release.

It's well established that when you have more internet into a given area, the rate of adult rape goes down. People would rather jack off to pixels than go rape someone.

>Bill 89
>UK maybe in favor of cp

Everything little thing's going to be alri~ight

>Pedophiles who view indecent images but do not molest children should not be jailed, a leading child protection police officer has said.

Brits on Sup Forums are safe for now.

>not paying for infinity copy-able pictures is the same as paying for physical goods

This is my main gripe with liberals. They always get kids involved, whether it's liberal messages in cartoons or having them be transgender or in pride parades. Why the fuck are they so obsessed with enforcing their beliefs on everyone? As a conservative, I don't care if someone is left wing. But liberals literally can't handle someone being right wing. They literally want to dominate the world with this shit.

>Look at a picture
>Go to jail

10/10 law

This is where the shit becomes ridiculous. If I had taken a photo of my dick the day before I turned 18, I could be arrested for having "child pornography".
Anyone past their puberty should be aware of the implications of sex and be able to give consent or not. Also, it's not like kids aged 14 or even younger weren't fucking each other as we're speaking.

Yes the same logic was applied to illegal drugs 50 years ago and now people today are wondering why illegal drug use has increased

>download and pleasure yourself to a child being raped
>go to jail
Seems more reasonable when you describe it realistically

The weebs of the world should unite to make pedophilia and ephebephilia socially acceptable. Jap cartoons should be real.

It's alright!

But they actually are born that way.

>Demand for child rape

Have the Jews taken over this board?

>download and enjoy looking at a video of a man's face being bashed in with a hammer
>don't go to jail because you're not the one hurting anyone
Really gets the noggin joggin'

>You are 16
>Your 16 year old gf sends you a naked photo of herself
>Go to jail

>Raped

Try again, faggot. They enjoy it most of the time.

>Have the Jews taken over this board?

This is a Jap cartoon board, and the highly refined Japanese culture does just fine with pedolatry.

That's not the same as what you want to happen though is it
You do go to jail for that here
No they aren't. You are not born a pedo, and you aren't born gay, you grow up and your mind develops. Many pedos tend to be rich people obsessed with control.

But this should already have been the law

Looking at images shouldnt be illegal

As you can see they will still arrest molesters

>Oh man, I normally wouldn't rape this little kid but because some guy downloaded CP I know he really wants me to
>Guess I have to rape this kid now, because of the demand for it

This is literally your argument
The people who would rape kids will do so regardless of a 'demand'

Prove this

I would be very happy with this

Paying money for CP should be a stiff fine/maybe some jailtime/go on record

Looking at free images? Totally legal

Videos or images of all crimes should be legal to view

>You do go to jail for that here
>britcucks go to jail just for watching a murder they didn't commit

>>Demand for child rape
>being so underage he doesnt understand supply and demand
Fuck off back to stormfront you faggot

>Not paying for something means you're creating demand

???

so this is the power of the brexit... wow

The UK truly is a shithole, why havent you moved here?

It's sad that the US is honestly so much better, I always thought your country was based and superior to my own because of culture

But fuck every day I feel like it is a poison to humanity for the UK to continue existing

You retards know that there is not only just creating and watching right? There is sharing and distribution. If it's legal to watch it, what's to say they wouldn't distribute it?

Go to the ends of the earth to make sure people are paying to watch BBC. Invest in million dollar propaganda campaigns to scare perpetrators. Buy surveillance vans to scout out neighborhoods where heinous people may be watching easterners fires of charge.

Pedos diddling children???

"We simply don't have the resources."

You motherfuckers need a violent revolution soon or you're all fucked.

Romeo and Juliet law

>not paying for music is killing the music industry
>not paying for CP is fueling the CP industry

Why would you not? It being watched is why it is made. It's degenerate

>It's legal to fuck her
>It's not legal to take pictures of you fucking her

The 'demand for child rape' argument is so incredibly retarded

No one rapes kids because other people want them to
If you ask normal people to rape kids, even if you offer them money to do it, 99% of the time they'll say no

The 1% are people who already were okay with raping kids and would have done so anyway

Make paying for CP illegal, since then you are supporting them in their crime
Keep the rape of kids illegal
Viewing free images should never be illegal

>it IS someone else's image who was too young to consent

What about all the creepshots and things? Those people didn't consent either

This

13+ Should not be considered CP

She's got tits, ass, and hips
She can have kids
She's probably been masturbating for 2 years already and fantasizes about her hot 30 year old teacher

But we're going to charge this like she's a five year old

Oh fuck off. Hollywood? You have far more pedos getting off scot free than us. Your country is far, far more corrupt and unjust, don't pretend otherwise. The rise of the US poisoned the culture of the entire world.

Pakis already dont get arrested, even when they fuck kids for 20 years and the police and government know about it. It's called multiculturalism you insensitive clod!

Also celebrities are immune from prosecution until very recently, still they had a good run, 50 years or so in the case of BBC employees.

I see you're illiterate

They're not making diddling legal
They're making the images and videos of it legal to *watch*

Its disgusting how easy it is to get child pornography. Just ask some spicks for a porn chat and you'll get videos and pictures in no time.

>>Not paying for something means you're creating demand
>i literally dont understand how ads work: the post

see above. You are paying for it indirectly.

And?

>probably probably probably
not evidence

NORMALIZATION

GOOD WATCH PEDO PORN WE WON"T CATCH YOU

>If you ask normal people to rape kids, even if you offer them money to do it, 99% of the time they'll say no

I take it you havent been to Bradford, Leeds, Rotherham, Sheffield, Manc...

Then ban people putting ads on it

problem solved

>17 years, 11 months, 29 days old
>YOU SICK PEDOPHILE!

Until that point you are still funding child rape