How much do Tomahawk missiles cost?

>The cost of each Tomahawk missile varies, depending on the type of missile. More simple versions of the Tomahawk missiles cost $500,000. According to preliminary reports by Brian Williams of NBC News, it appears that the missiles used in the Syria attack cost around that much.

>However, the Block IV versions of the Tomahawk missile, which are more complex and can hit moving targets, cost up to $1.5 million each.

>The total cost of President Trump’s attack on Syria, then, is between $30 million and $100 million.

Add to this the fact that every trip that trump takes to mar-a-lago is costing the tax-payer 3.1 million USD and the cost of the security detail for his wife and child in New York is between $127,000 and $146,000 EVERY DAY.

Other urls found in this thread:

rt.com/news/317864-russian-warships-missiles-launch/
youtube.com/watch?v=d9CJ1AYBmic
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

Yah but we already paid for the missiles in the first place so why not use them every once and a while.

>you pay for the missiles when you use them

how retarded are you OP? These were paid for years ago most likely.

The context you use them in is what is important.

>military weapons testing
Sure.
>national defense
Sure.
>neocon meddling in the affairs of other countries
Nah.

Yes, stuff do cost. We know.

>hurr durr we payed for them so why not waste it who cares it's just tax payer money

Next time you go to the supermarket and you check out just tip over your cart, just tip it over and leave it on the ground.

who cares It was already payed for amirite?

We used them fora very good reason imo

We just reestablished that US threats are credible again. We also scored a moral victory stating that banned weapons will not be tolerated. We also just showed the World that US power and Force projection is very much alive and that it has not diminished at all.

This is honestly a win win for the US

The missiles were used for their intended purpose you fucking retard. If we dumped the tomahawks in the ocean your analogy would make sense.

We have the single strongest military in the world. That we pay billions to maintain and service why not use it?

>intended purpose
Murder has no purpose, lib-scum

>1.5 mil for a cruz missle
BULLSHIT

why dont we use the missiles to bomb the reddit servers and save the internet?

remember when obama bombed egypt and people were doing this cost comparison crap then

same shit different day, but now its the big bad republican instead of the big bad democrat

>$30 million and $100 million
WORTH EVERY PEENY
CHAOS ISN'T CHEAP
PRAISE KEK

23 out of 59 hit the target. Kek burgers BTFO

Wait do you mean libertarian scum or liberal scum?

>tfw only slightly annihilating the enemy from 1000 miles away
feelsbadman

I AM NOT A LIBERAL YOU BRITISH FUCKKKKK

According to russian state media

Because the USA military will use 10 missiles and then BUY another 10 missiles.

>oh but I already bought all this food so it is okay to throw it out
Of course, as long as you stop eating thus not wasting more money on new food.

rt.com/news/317864-russian-warships-missiles-launch/
indeed feelsbadman

U.S military officially announced only one missile malfunctioned. The rest hit their target.
You're getting your fucking info from RT.

the stockpile was hardly diminished we don't need ten more missiles because we already have a thousand sitting in the warehouse.

75 gbp per missile.

Spot on mate. You wouldn't buy a car and never drive it.

sure m8
>58 missiles
youtube.com/watch?v=d9CJ1AYBmic

What you really have to ask yourself is why a mass-produced glorified bomb costs more than an MP4-12C or Aventador.

And that's why Aus and the US will always be Bro's.