Daily reminder that holocaust is, by far, the best substantiated genocide in history, and the only people who deny it do it because of preconceived views on jews.
Here are some things that deniers will never address:
>1- How did the jews managed to involve millions and millions of people in their so called conspiracy, be them nazis, americans or soviets, coordinate them to produce a lie that offered no benefit whatsoever to them (nazis, Allies and Soviets), and nobody ever found any shread of proof for this.
>2- If the jews weren't killed, where are they now?
>3- Posen speeches youtube.com/watch?v=mRO04q_lQi4 Deniers will just prance around the word ausrottung, and claim that the speeches are fake without substantiating
The holohoax is a myth and even the ADL admits that 44% of youth don't buy it. Only baby boomers buy a giant lie built on widely disparate and contradicting stories (many proven false) and the idea that all physical evidence and the lack thereof should be excluded from the conversation on penalty of prison.
I still prefer to argue that internment was more than justified. I bring up the 1918 German communist revolution where 90% of the leadership was Jewish, kike Lenin and his kike NKVD murdering any halfway intelligent ethnic Russian after the civil war, Jew NKVD head Yagoda and his merry band of kikes famining 6,000,000 European Christians around the Black Sea in the 1930's, etc. etc. etc.
Thomas Scott
...
Michael Bailey
...
Sebastian Price
Oh boy it's national view Your Irish buddy posted a thread and I BTFOd him Aaron Richards posted a thread and I BTFOd him and his conspiracy blog.
Bring it, no copypastas.
Ryder Murphy
Just look at America. They let the inbreds in with open arms and it took less than two generations for the majority to turn on them.
Aaron Hernandez
When looking at this and society in general we must remember they are 1-2% of the population. Only when looking at the sheer odds can we understand the level of subversion and nepotism.
>One Jew is.. 1:50 >Two Jews in a row without nepotism is.. 1:2500 >Three Jews in a row without nepotism is.. 1:125,000 >Four Jews in a row without nepotism is.. 1:6,250,000 >Five Jews in a row without nepotism is.. 1:312,500,000 >Six Jews in a row without nepotism is.. 1:15,625,000,000 >Seven Jews in a row without nepotism is.. 1:781,250,000,000
Luis Hernandez
>this fag again
Hudson Collins
HURR LOOK AT THIS POAST AARON MADE IN NOVEMBER ABOUT SKIN LAMPSHADES POL BTFO archive.is Sup Forums167364
LOL LUK AT DIS IMGUR ALBUM PROVES GAS VANS AND BODIES BURN ON THEIR OWN LIKE WOOD imgur.com/faggot
MARCISM IS GOOD FUG DRUMPF
Easton Gray
>prove something that didn't exist What a Jewish post but i'll give you four good ones that come to mind. I want to believe but it's so hard.
1) Where did the 24,000,000lbs+ of ash go?
2) Why on all of the aerial photos of the war are there no massive coal piles at the camps, massive coal trains, or massive coal mines that are surely required to torch 3k bodies per camp per day?
3) How did IG Farben produce hundreds of tonnes of hydrogen cyanide from what in 1942 was their remaining chemical plant with virtually no ammonia and why didn't they just use a simply ammonia/bleach combo which is far more deadly than hydrogen cyanide but notably doesn't kill lice?
4) Why did Germans use the most inefficient and costly methods available with the Jew when they had hundreds of state of the art industrial slaughterhouses and were low on fertilizer? Why didn't they make a nice Jewish paste to spread on the fields next spring?
Again I want to believe but it's so fucking hard sometimes.
Kevin Rivera
Holohoax stories dump incoming :)
Isaiah Anderson
...
Jaxon Long
>Aaron Richards posted a thread and I BTFOd him You don't have to lie. Everyone can check out for themselves:
You can't delete your threads when they go south anymore. Oops.
Hunter Baker
you're right. I only deny it to piss people off. the holocaust didn't happen and it was great. Hitler was a secret zionist and the holocaust was one of his biggest accomplishments. He wasn't efficient enough, only killing 300,000 and I wish it wasn't only 6 million that died.
Jose Taylor
(((You)))
Xavier Lopez
...
Lucas Brown
>How did the jews managed to involve millions and millions of people in their so called conspiracy They didn't. It's just a legend that's built up over slow accretion and specious evidence. There's no conspiracy, just lies and half-lies that have been embellished into a tale that can't be proven either way any more. If you watch a lot of film and read books from the early post-war period, including material written by Jews, they don't even mention the lolocaust. In fact the Nazis themselves were seen more as like your brother who'd turned bad than the living embodiment of ultimate evil.
Julian Walker
...
Ryder Rivera
...
Justin Thompson
Anne Frank
She existed
Then the nazis came
She did not exist anymore
>B-B-But it was typhus!!!!
Changes absolutely nothing
William Gray
...
Colton Hall
...
Jaxon Gutierrez
It was real in my mind goy
Lincoln Moore
came here to post this
rememeber to sage friends
Michael James
Who killed Barney????
Gabriel Johnson
Most people accept that yes, the Germans killed a massive amount of people. The did shoot people, and did purposely get rid of undesirables, but so did the allies.
Most people disagree with the figures, and how way more non jews died, but the JEW 6 GORZILLION is all people talk about. Hell over 1 million Russians died at stallingrad, just 1 battle.
So yes germans killed people, but not nearly the amount of jewd accepted as fact by (((historians)))
Liam Brooks
If the holocaust happened, why do we still hear about it? It's like stopping an antibiotic course before finishing all the germs off; you just make them stronger.
Juan Morgan
Germans didn't murder anyone.
Grayson Gonzalez
>f you watch a lot of film and read books from the early post-war period, including material written by Jews, they don't even mention the lolocaust. The term Holocaust was only popularized during the 70's
So it's normal that we don't see holocaust mentioned before the 70's.
But the Holocaust was mentioned indeed, hust by other words
> Tired of being singled-out for vitriolic hate, contempt, and threats of annihilation?
> We reject any philosophy that sentences millions to humiliation, slavery, and death merely for the accident of their birth
> Evil must be fought: all it takes for evil to win is for good men to do nothing
JOIN US IN THE PARTISAN RESISTENCE /jpl/ - Jewish Sup Forumsitics thread:
Jonathan Allen
>but so did the allies. Except this is not actually true. What undesirables are you talking about?
>If the holocaust happened, why do we still hear about it? It's the largest genocide in history. And it sells
Ryan Scott
Hmm. I'm conflicted. I could argue how Jewish refugee families that fled prosecution for their crimes in Imperial Russia had no right to Germany and they should have been removed after their 1918 revolution or after the Germans watched 6,000,000+ European Christians get famined by the Judeo-Bolsheviks. Or I could argue how your holohoax is a total fabrication and a few hundred thousand died max. Hmm.
Writing in Latin, Jerome Latinized the Greek word as a neuter noun holocaustum, using it to translate references to the Jewish burnt offering in his translations of Exodus and Leviticus.[22] In his Chronicon de rebus gestis Ricardi Primi (1192), Richard of Devizes, a 12th-century monk, was the first person to use the term holocaustum specifically in reference to a massacre of Jews.[23]
Right from your own wikipedia. I can link to all the nyt archives if you wish. I have most of them saved.
Anthony Bell
...
Dominic Price
Kek. Haven't seen this dude in awhile though.
Adam Myers
Germans were not murderers.
Ethan Edwards
There are countless references from way back in the 12th century.
The earliest use of the word holocaust to denote a massacre recorded by the Oxford English Dictionary dates from 1833 when the journalist Leitch Ritchie, describing the wars of the medieval French monarch Louis VII, wrote that he "once made a holocaust of thirteen hundred persons in a church", a massacre by fire of the inhabitants of Vitry-le-François in 1142. The English poet John Milton had used the word to denote a conflagration in his 1671 poem Samson Agonistes and the word gradually developed to mean a massacre thereon.[24][25] The term was used in the 1950s by historians as a translation of the Jewish word shoah to refer specifically to the Nazi genocide of Jews.[26][25] The television mini-series Holocaust is credited with introducing the term into common parlance after 1978.[27]
Camden Jones
Your entire shitty argument claims that the holocaust didn't exist until after the war, yet it was used by the NYT all the way back in the early 1900's and made the Oxford dictionary in 1833.
Right from your own (((wikipedia))). You inbred rats assume people won't click the links.
Adam Bailey
The term Holocaust in relation to the German war crimes against jews (and not only) only got popularized in the 70's.
Obviously it existed previously.
Jack Myers
>Can't we just be thankful that jews did die? Not enough of them did. Jews are cockroaches.
Jason Evans
>But the Holocaust was mentioned indeed, hust by other words What evidence is there for this?
Lucas Campbell
Yeah it was in reference to a massacre, that's why the fact that NYT has claimed 6,000,000+ Jews died multiple times is a problem. You say it couldn't happen because the term wasn't invented, yet it made the Oxford dictionary in 1833. Filthy lying rat.
Liam Johnson
Agreed, communists and their financial backers declared war on Germany and Hitler in 1933 much like the American left has declared war on Trump. But, I can still be thankful that their numbers were reduced.
Isaac Long
My preconception was that the establishment narrative was true. Too many lies have been told for a rational mind to not question it.
Cooper Fisher
After winning the war, the americans had to win over the germans, so they executed a few of their Camp interns and told the rest to play along.
They showed the germans the massacre that they had apparently commited, and that's that.
Hunter Hill
Not only does that prove you have contact with the dude OR autistically follow him when you can
but I made child's play of Mr Richards and his blog.
Don't give me that >adding water and mass to a fire makes it burn faster XDDD shit again Nat.
Everytime you chuckleheads make a spam thread like this it pushes more people towards our side.
Joseph Ortiz
I suggest you do more research yourself. Asking Pol and expecting you'll agree with us, with YOUR preconceived notions of 'muh Holocaust is non refundable.
Ethan Sanders
There are plenty of historical works detailing on the holocaust before the 70's.
We also have Nuremberg trials>that's why the fact that NYT has claimed 6,000,000+ Jews died multiple times is a problem. Except it didn't.
The big redpill is the holohoax is a giant distraction for the jewish revolutions and their famine of 6,000,000+ European Christians around the Black Sea.
(((Gengrikh Yagoda))), (((Lazar Kaganovich))), and Vyacheslav Molotov, yeah that molotov, which wasn't Jewish but sure enough was married to a very prominent kike. I can thank the ukes out west for making our teachers teach us this shit.
Owen Moore
>Daily reminder that holocaust is, by far, the best substantiated genocide in history Stopped reading there (You)
Angel Roberts
Nazis were fighting a war of self-defense against globalist Jews ultimately won. Indigenous Europeans are being invaded and soon will be annihilated .
Owen Sullivan
>Nuremberg Every time. How does it feel being the biggest NEET failure in Portugal?
Thomas Gutierrez
>Anne Frank >She existed >Then the nazis came >She did not exist anymore Anne Fransk diary is a proven fraud, significant parts were written in a ball point pen that didn't exist yet and the hand writting is consistent throughout the diary. It's complete bullshit and chances are she never existed. This was all proven in court.
Jayden Rogers
I prefer to argue you deserved interment and a few hundred thousand died but i'll bite. i'll give you four good ones that come to mind. I want to believe but it's so hard.
1) Where did the 24,000,000lbs+ of ash go?
2) Why on all of the aerial photos of the war are there no massive coal piles at the camps, massive coal trains, or massive coal mines that are surely required to torch 3k bodies per camp per day?
3) How did IG Farben produce hundreds of tonnes of hydrogen cyanide from what in 1942 was their remaining chemical plant with virtually no ammonia and why didn't they just use a simply ammonia/bleach combo which is far more deadly than hydrogen cyanide but notably doesn't kill lice?
4) Why did Germans use the most inefficient and costly methods available with the Jew when they had hundreds of state of the art industrial slaughterhouses and were low on fertilizer? Why didn't they make a nice Jewish paste to spread on the fields next spring?
I have another 20+ questions I can ask after you answer these. Again I want to believe but it's so fucking hard sometimes.
Hunter Adams
Anne Frank died of typhus. It's public info on Wikipedia holy shit
Samuel Barnes
Holohoax, get out of here kikes. Holohoax never happened !
Sebastian Thompson
>were written in a ball point pen that didn't exist yet
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ballpoint_pen >The first patent for a ballpoint pen[6][7] was issued on 30 October 1888, to John J. Loud,[8] who was attempting to make a writing instrument
????
>4 posts >only ad hominem
AHHAHA
Robert Myers
65 replies no proof for a single German murder
Dominic Long
They supposedly used coal coke which is even less efficient lol Like you burn one body and you have to clean it, dry it, and then put more in. And don't forget after a few thousand bodies you'd need to replace parts.
You've been BTFO a thousand ways over a thousand of these cookie cutter threads. I have the total right to ignore your incompetent non-arguments and insult your intelligence.
James Richardson
He never gives actual evidence. And when his "evidences" are disproven he doesn't respond to the dude who disproves his bullshit. Nat's only function is spamming shit someone else in his Skype group types up for him.
He used to have an American dude with him but I guess Americano got bored and left the group. The entire group are just retards who spam the same shit and never adapt to answer criticisms.
Aaron Nelson
>Oy Vey we must of made a mistake Here's some numbers for you Schlomo Estimate world jewish population 1933: 15.3M 1938: 15.7M 1948: 15.7M
Source: jewish almanac
Chase Walker
He'll either not respond or Aaron will tell him to say >WELL JEWS ARE STOOPID FUCK OFF IDIOT ALMANACS AREN'T REAL WTF NOT AN ARGUMENT
Isaiah Allen
>Source: jewish almanac lol
Show us the 1949 number.
Don't be deceptive little rat kikes please.
Blake Thomas
Always on time, without fail.
Cameron Jones
The South African that also spammed /nsg/ was the guy that pushed me to finally start making propaganda. We have a loosely knit team now and we've gotten 700k+ views in less than a year. You've no doubt seen our stuff. Shills aren't all bad.
Aiden Russell
POst your face
Justin Flores
>jewish sources are fake >except when they agree with me, then they are super duper reliable
Eli Foster
>Don't be deceptive little rat kikes please. I think we converted him.
Aaron Wilson
Speaking of Jewish sources..
Chase Jackson
Gas the kikes.
Angel Gutierrez
Yeah they've been here since just after I started lurking. There used to be a lot more tripfags and cancer raid groups like these chucklefucks such as Art Admirer who kept making pedo defense threads. Hell I bet Art Admirer is one of Aaron's buddies.
Also LOL they never learn do they spamming /nsg/ with bait just earns them more enemies. What fucking idiots.
I could point out how 90% of the 1919 German communist revolution leaders were Jewish, how affirmative action was a Jewish creation in both Canada and in the USA, how they were the driving force behind opening our borders, how the lawsuits that allowed near unrestricted abortion in our countries were both lead by kikes or hell I could lay out the thousands of hooked noses behind the drug/porn/tranny degeneracy they target our children with. But I won't.
Rather i'll ask that whenever someone in this thread witnesses societal/political rot ask yourself, and don't be afraid to do some digging if necessary, if a certain sunken eyed inbred tribe is behind it.
Brody Gutierrez
trust a Sephardi to start a thread like this ahahaha
Jayden King
OP used to be the Tripfag "Nationalist View", a kike from Portugal shilling his shit nobody cares about.
Gabriel Mitchell
>get's BTFO >moves the goalposts
typical
Austin Miller
...
Leo Young
Anyone can click the link and see for themselves that 90% of the '''German''' communist revolution leaders were Jewish you little inbred rat. I hope they check out the Young Turks revolution too. I've also seen hate memes from Romanians and Hungarians laying out the judeo-communist connection.
Marx the founder of communism was a kike, Lenin the founder of the soviet union was a kike, and Lenins chosen successor Trotsky was a kike. You filthy rats hope people won't click the links. Even (((wikipedia))) can't hide this shit because they teach it in Canada thanks to the ukes.
Nathaniel Gutierrez
That picture looks like something some "9/11" truther would draw over an infograph regarding 9/11.
>FAKE FAKE FAKE >HE WAS ONLY THERE FOR 10 WEEKS HE DINDU NUFFIN >NONE OF THESE GUYS CAN BE LEADERS BECAUSE UH YEAH >THE REVOLUTION IS A LIIIIEEEEEEEE >SOVIETS DINDU NUFFIN
You can't factually disprove any single point in any of those links
Landon Howard
>???? >A scientific analysis of the manuscript purported to be the original diary of Anne Frank, a Jewish girl who died in a German concentration camp during the Second World War, has revealed that the manuscript could not have been written before 1951, six years after the end of the war. >What is known as a fact is that one Otto Frank, a Jewish merchant, formerly of Frankfurt, who had been arrested in the Netherlands and interned in the Auschwitz concentration camp during the war, began visiting publishers in 1946 with what he claimed was a diary written by his young daughter during the time the Frank family was hiding from the German police in occupied Holland. The girl later perished at Auschwitz, Frank said. >The report of the technical experts was given to the court in April of this year, and it contained a bombshell: large portions of the alleged “diary” were written in ballpoint pen ink — which was not manufactured prior to 1951! >Were it not for the previous testimony of the handwriting experts that the entire diary, including the portions written with ballpoint pen, is in the same hand, the father might have claimed that he only “edited” his daughter’s work, “clarifying” passages here and there. But the evidence was quite unambiguous.
Aiden King
>here read a blog and if you don't read it you're dumb and gay and I'M RIGHT
TRANSPOSE YOUR FUCKING ARGUMENTS AND SOURCES
WRITE OUT POSTS WITH YOUR CLAIM AND YOUR SOURCE STOP LINKING YOUR FRIEND'S FUCKING BLOG. And tell HIM to stop doing that.
Samuel Reed
>prove something that didn't exist What a Jewish post but again i'll give you four good ones that come to mind. I want to believe but it's so hard.
1) Where did the 24,000,000lbs+ of ash go?
2) Why on all of the aerial photos of the war are there no massive coal piles at the camps, massive coal trains, or massive coal mines that are surely required to torch 3k bodies per camp per day?
3) How did IG Farben produce hundreds of tonnes of hydrogen cyanide from what in 1942 was their remaining chemical plant with virtually no ammonia and why didn't they just use a simply ammonia/bleach combo which is far more deadly than hydrogen cyanide but notably doesn't kill lice?
4) Why did Germans use the most inefficient and costly methods available with the Jew when they had hundreds of state of the art industrial slaughterhouses and were low on fertilizer? Why didn't they make a nice Jewish paste to spread on the fields next spring?
I have another 24 questions here when you're done answering those. Again I want to believe but it's so fucking hard sometimes.
Henry Watson
hey (((natview)))
Adrian Bell
And this is taken from your own wikipedia link you fuckwit. >The first patent for a ballpoint pen was issued on 30 October 1888, to John J. Loud, who was attempting to make a writing instrument that would be able to write "on rough surfaces-such as wood, coarse wrapping-paper, and other articles" > Although it could be used to mark rough surfaces such as leather, as Loud intended, it proved to be too coarse for letter-writing. With no commercial viability, its potential went unexploited and the patent eventually lapsed >László Bíró, a Hungarian newspaper editor frustrated by the amount of time that he wasted filling up fountain pens and cleaning up smudged pages > He decided to create a pen using the same type of ink.[4] Bíró enlisted the help of his brother György, a chemist,[4] to develop viscous ink formulae for new ballpoint designs. >Bíró's innovation successfully coupled ink-viscosity with a ball-socket mechanism which act compatibly to prevent ink from drying inside the reservoir while allowing controlled flow.[4] Bíró filed a British patent on 15 June 1938. >In 1941, the Bíró brothers and a friend, Juan Jorge Meyne, fled Germany and moved to Argentina, where they formed Bíró Pens of Argentina and filed a new patent in 1943.
Adrian Jackson
>let me post the same old memes that get posted in these threads every time so I don't have to think.
