Economically illiterate low IQ 1488ers BTFO

economically illiterate low IQ 1488ers BTFO

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_of_association
infoshop.org/AnarchistFAQSectionF
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

>private borders
we have private borders now, how has it helped us against the "refugees"?

>economically illiterate
top wew

bump because i'm gonna need an answer to this:

are you seeing much refugees on private property without the State enforcing it?

the state doesn't need to enforce it, they just need to do nothing while the "refugees" enter our country

That's public(State) property being invaded. And people in the State has enormous incentives to have this propagating because of taxation and the welfare State being economically impossible int he long run.

As for private property, I don't see many refugee's invading private property. And if they try in a normal Capitalist society, you have your enforcement agency, you insurance agency and your own guns to have being physically removed.

>the state doesn't need to enforce it, they just need to do nothing while the "refugees" enter our country

Doing nothing is doing something. To enforce it of letting it happen is pretty much the same thing.

...

There is literally nothing wrong with totalitarianism

>As for private property, I don't see many refugee's invading private property.
yeah, niggers always respect private property

...

Your forgetting the fact that they are where they are because the State provides them with a place to be in the first place either some communist living block or simply squatter rights on public property.

Private property eliminates this issue by defining clearly where people can and cannot go with permission from a rightful owner. No body really owns the public, we assume the State which is the crux of the issue.

>yeah, niggers always respect private property

That why private property should not be chained by the State so in can properly be defended and prevent refugee's from entering what we would call collective borders(borders owned by a cooperation of private owners).

>Your forgetting the fact that they are where they are because the State provides them with a place to be in the first place either some communist living block or simply squatter rights on public property.
Immigrants can buy property too. They may be poor, but that doesn't mean they can't afford to buy or rent a shitty apartment somewhere. Take the Mexican immigrants in the US, for example. I doubt the US government provides them with housing, especially if they're in the country illegally.

>Immigrants can buy property too.

Ok but they have to buy it from someone. And if it is to affect you are your people it has to be close to you.

And being poor how could they afford the price of a high living standard society where the price of living would be way too high.

How are they going to find a job if no adapted industries exist which coincide with there skills.

I wont pay a fucking buck to have camel imported to please them.

If they end up working in manufacturing, well that is actually great because that means they are working and not stealing. They will be learning how to speak and understand the language and as a whole they will add to the local value while keeping the local morality and culture intact.

>They may be poor, but that doesn't mean they can't afford to buy or rent a shitty apartment somewhere.

Assuming they exist and the fact that they are paying tells me they are better people already. But contrary to a State infected society them being close to you doesnt give them political power. specially if they are tenants.

If the engage in communism, aka seizing the means of production or private property they are evicted and physically removed.

Think about how people use the self-deport in mass from the USA. This kept America safe morally because those who hated it or was against it would be thrown out or simply leave.

>divide and conquer of the two main Sup Forums ideologies

Fuck off neocon

All the Irish I saw posted here are left-wing, never seen an Irish ancap or libertarian in Sup Forums

DIVIDE AND CONQUER SHILLS FUCK OFF!

NATSOC AND ANCAPS BEST FRIENDS FOREVER!!

SAGE THESE FUCKING THREADS

>implying actual National Socialists don't hate Capitalists
>Implying we wouldn't throw Natsoc out of a helicopter along with Communists

Wrong!

AnCap would very likely devolve into governments through force.

It think a small government is required to prevent this.

They will not divide us!

this

worked so well in the past

States grew out of anarchy, too.

No m8, Ancaps are seen as worse than communists. They fucking are worse than communists.

>Muh, muh free market will fix every single thing
>n-n-not an argument
>t-t-that argument is old hat so i wont address it

Not a single thing, even hypothetically, works under Ancap. Nothing.

So did love, gods, science, knowledge, murder, theft, etc.

ITT

poor people refuse to git gud

I'm saying humans went from AnCom/Anarchoprimitives to AnCaps, then to states without a single world society staying in Anarchocapitalism suggesting that it's not particularly stable.

>Physical removal
>Non-aggression

Got my noggin' joggin'

Ancap ball meme thread

...

...

...

>I'm saying humans went from AnCom/Anarchoprimitives to AnCaps, then to states without a single world society staying in Anarchocapitalism suggesting that it's not particularly stable.

life is not a game. This is not age of Empires. There is not we went from this to that to this to that. There is not steps towards anything.

AnCapism was never "reached" so was ancom or anprim.

how is the non-aggression principle opposed to physical removal?

Early agrarianism was essentially Anarchocapitalism.

>anarchist capitalists best friends with totalitarian socialists
wew goy

>This is not age of Empires.
Wololo
Ayoyoyo
Wololo

Advocating ideals in direct conflict with the covenant of protecting and preserving private property, such as Communism or Democracy, IS a violation of The NAP.

they were state infected shitholes buddy.

In these societies you could just leave, you were a serf or something that resembled this.

Armies would pillage and lay waste to your shit seasonally and stuff to fuel armed conflicts. Unjustifiable hierarchies were rampant and interest rates and usury were State enforced.

A farming village is not a state.

The Lord that comes by and requires food to feed his armies including your first son as squires for the Nobles is.

You seem to be mistaking 10000 BC for the middle ages.

And a State requires that some individuals in a certain geographical area has the exclusive right to initiate force on other that do not have this right.

As a matter of fact this occurs in farming villages and I scarcely see any free contractual living agreement in primitive societies.

Archeological evidence show that Farming and the emergence of Large State, meaning small state existed prior to this probably nomads. coincide. Meaning that State structures predates farming. Not the other way around.

lord and nobles existed in these times too.

yeah, right. capitalism is top kikery, right up there with communism.

>wrongthink will get you killed in ancap society
>freedom!

A commune could exist within AnCap.

/lrg/ welcomes you all

Listen nigger, i don't wanna take my time going to work, I got a motorcycle and a sleeping bag and ten or fifteen girls. What the hell I wanna go off and go to work for? Work for what? Money? I got all the money in the world. I'm the king, man. I run the underworld, guy. I decide who does what and where they do it at. What am I gonna run around like some teeny bopper somewhere for someone elses money? I make the money man, I roll the nickels. The game is mine. I deal the cards

Rampant consumerism is as bad, if not worse, than Communism. Fuck off kike.

nazis cant have been that economically illiterate considering the economic miracle they performed.

Here's the thing, asking me not to break the rules of society is like telling your kid not to eat candy because it’s bad for him. The kid will continue to eat candy until you take it away, or until you prove why he shouldn’t. You also need to provide substitutes for the candy you have denied that child. I was told often enough what was bad, but I was never given a substitute or the opportunity to try another world until I had already become so defiant and twisted, I no longer cared about someone else’s right or wrong. By then I could not see enough honest faces in the world to pattern myself after. Your Bibles didn’t mean anything to me. A Bible had driven my mother from her home. The people you chose to raise me beat and raped me and taught me to hate and fear. From what I have seen throughout my life, the laws of the land are practiced only by the little guy. Those who have money and success abuse every law written and get away with it. I admit my reasoning comes from the wrong side of the tracks, but once these opinions are formed and reinforced a few times, it is hard to believe otherwise. So even if I don’t shed a tear, I console myself: I had some help in becoming the person I am.

Freedom of association. (Which has been practically banned in many countries)

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_of_association

Discrimination is a right that is logically deduced from property rights.

Let's not do this again.

>thinking capitalism = braindead consumerism
>thinking AnCap = no rules whatsoever
>also thinking AnCap is not "true" anarchy
>unironically believing AnCapball memes

And you guys don't think you're as bad as pinkos... right?

cause the communist state cucked you. fix that and fix your refugee problem.

>ancap pepper sprayed old man at free speech event
oh wait

>ancaps threw people in forced labor camps ran by the state
oh wait

>ancaps blow up villages full of innocent people trying to go to market
oh wait

>ancaps sent millions of white people to die in absurd wars in 20th century
oh wait

protip: if you think "taxation is theft" then your understanding of libertarianism is incomplete.

dont fight us fight the fags and communist shills

>ancaps wanting to throw people out of helicopters for arguing against them

fb pic in your post? i need that saurce

Not an argument

...

That is a meme only spouted by edgy kids.

kek

taxation can't be theft because it implies theft is possible in a world without government

prohint: it's not

>ayncraps thinking they are anarchists.

infoshop.org/AnarchistFAQSectionF

Real free markets have worker control.

>he thinks a manager isn't a worker

Workers can't manage themselves democratically?

wheres the rest of her pictures?

holy fuck people still play StarCraft?

>Degeneracy is fine
>Open borders
Fuck off you amoral filth

of course it is

or are murder and rape not possible either?

Probably not.

Too many chefs spoil the broth.

...

idiot

what defines theft? who defines murder or rape?

and theft implies rights to ownership, which AGAIN, doesn't exist in a world with no government.

Do you know what a fucking war economy is?

>roads

...

>a criminal act in which property belonging to another is taken without that person's consent
ancaps take property rights serioulsy

saying theft didn't exist before governments is borderline retarded

lol you think property ownership exist in a vacuum?

where do those rights come from, god? what would you do if i took the hat of your head and you didn't have uncle sam to complain to?

you are an idiot

>what defines theft? who defines murder or rape?
>an act in which property belonging to another is taken without that person's consent.
> who defines murder or rape?

Are you actually that retarded that you think people just didn't think theft and murder were problems or that they just didn't know what the fuck these things were before governments came along? Have you ever thought maybe people knew what these things were and why they were problems hence that's why there's laws for these things in the first place?

>and theft implies rights to ownership, which AGAIN, doesn't exist in a world with no government.

No, ownership does exist in a world without government. Ownership is defined as control over a resource to sell, possess, etc. Government ultimately interferes with this process via taxes which little more than theft. How can a government claim to protect private property rights whilst simultaneously violating the rights of the citizens inside?

so how would you punish someone for a murder? if someone murdered your brother, how would you find justice?

if ownership exists without uncle sam, how would you keep me from taking the hat of your head? how would you get the hat back?

Going on the website :^)

...

...

>collectivism
>state
Enjoy open borders when nobody cares enough to fight for something greater; hyper-individualism is cancer.

Don't talk shit about Milton, you fucking proxy leaf

>so how would you punish someone for a murder?

You could have private security (most likely funded by the community as a whole) take care of the situation.

>if someone murdered your brother, how would you find justice?

Private courts and private security.

>if ownership exists without uncle sam, how would you keep me from taking the hat of your head?

By blasting yours off.

>how would you get the hat back?

Again, if this would actually turn into a large dispute of sorts then we'd have to rely on private courts or some other third party institution to settle the matter peacefully.

So people just wouldn't form up into their own communities to protect their property, etc? They just wouldn't have a society and that's why people need to be forced into paying taxes for a cancerous and rather dysfunctional institution? I think you're confusing the government for society itself as opposed to something that's actually negatively affecting it.

all land is privately owned so there is nowhere to immigrate to

...

>So people just wouldn't form up into their own communities to protect their property, etc?
Fuck off collectivist commie.
As long as there isn't a state. Nationalism is collectivism, such a stupid bluepill. We need third-world labour, that's the best for the free market? Open up those borders, you aren't a commie, are you? Now let rabbi Wise set up a porno shop, it's the free market! We need more porno to be distributed among the people.

...

If you have 'private border's but you still let refugees in do you really have any borders?

l.m.f.a.o

i;'ll just hire private security to kill your private security

ezpz lemon squeezey

>tfw 100 years ago income tax was introduced as a temporary measure to help in the ww1 fight for europe.

We got got.
Bigly.