Can this actually be said to be a bad development...

Can this actually be said to be a bad development? Women are more attracted to men with beneficial evolutionary traits so the men with good genes will get laid more, ensuring a strong next generation.

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=dqYZS8Z5cZQ&t
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hybristophilia
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

It wouldn't be bad if I was in the top 20% that gets ALL the women but I'm not

>beneficial evolutionary traits
You're talking about benefits that will necessarily not manifest until many thousands of years after my death. How can you possibly expect me to care about that?

They're not really attracted to men with "good" genes they're attracted to ones with primal genes and wealth. Even drug dealers have wealth but each drug dealer also has a harem of girls. Do you think Bill Gates had many girls? Nope. Would you call his genetics bad?

Women hate intelligence.

Yes, because without the lower 80% of men satisfied and cooperating you get anarchy.

i kno that feel

When you know what genetic recombination is your argument falls apart OP

You're a retard.

I know several Chads and all of them are the stupidest motherfuckers on earth. The only thing they know about is how to get laid and Gym related stuff. Literally all of them dumb as a brick.

What ruined it was making literal average looking women worth shit feel like they are 8/10+ so they feel entitled to at least the same level of man. Couple that with the fact that men, no matter how good looking, would dick any woman not completely obese or ugly and you have OPs pic related.

This only works because women now are aware of the benefits online "dating" brings them (countless men of any kind trying to fuck them without ever doing anything for you to deserve it). This has always been the case but women are weak and stupid so they didn't know this unless they were so extraordinarily hot that every guy would approach them anyway.

So to speak, women have become redpilled about men and abuse it.

Because if we were taking an evolutionary psychological approach we'd just restart eugenics and start sterilizing the mentally ill, latinos, and blacks.

Do you want that, Sven?

>They're not really attracted to men with "good" genes
They are.

Why the fuck do you care about what women want?

You are a man and what men want is the only issue of importance, only cucks care about what women want.

>wealth and high social status don't imply intelligence
Very blue-pilled

>many thousands of years after my death
What? If you have really good genes, your son would have good genes, it's not thousands of years.

>beneficial evolutionary traits
Dependent on the state isn't a good long term evolutionary trait. What they're doing is called a local maximum. Once the state collapses, those societies that have evolved into matriarchal utopias will quickly fall. But yes, for the moment being a parasite on the state is an evolutionary adaptation.

Ivan as someone who had a large amount of friends born into wealth, it really does not guarantee intelligence.

When you're born that rich, you don't feel like you have to apply yourself to learn.

Learning doesn't change your genetics. If you're born into wealth, most likely you have very good genetics, cause your father managed to ensure more than just his happy existence.

beneficial traits like what? giving women attention and deovting lots of effort towards hookin up with women?

sluts dont just gravitate to tall, good looking and intelligent men. they just go for the loud, brash and normal looking and dressed men who shovel attention their way.

OP is a (((fag))).
Standard JIDF narrative destroying the family and destabilizing goy culture.

>Women hate intelligence.

M'lady.

that's a problem of him not pursuing girls. If he really wanted he could have a whole harem of ladies

that's a problem we solve with sex bots

>sluts dont just gravitate to tall, good looking and intelligent men. they just go for the loud, brash and normal looking and dressed men who shovel attention their way.


Bologna. Women will act on physical attractiveness just like men will. They simply have higher standards than men.

but your genetics determine your predisposition and potential for learning, retard. do you really think smart people are simply overachievers?

This chart is correct. I have fucked a couple of hundred women in my 47 years. Good looks and style will get you 80% of the way there. The other 20% is charm.

If you can't dress and look average, you need money.

If a woman has ever asked you to wear a condom you're a beta bitch boy not an alpha stud stallion.

>Can this actually be said to be a bad development?
Yes because by and large they are producing no offspring. There is no point in alphas getting laid if they aren't spreading their genes at roughly the same rate.

>but your genetics determine your predisposition and potential for learning
This is literally what I imply, did you read my post?

My point is just because a boy from rich family doesn't learn, it doesn't mean his intelligence is bad, most likely it's very good, since his father already demonstrated he can ensure not only his survival, but happy existence of his child. I agree that this quality would degrade after a few generations though.

No, you're a disease ridden man whore.

What-the-fuck-ever at this point mate. Women are so unprincipled and willingly to fuck anything that walks that ensuring a future for the white race is an impossibility at this point. Genocide and a new society is the only option. Our women will keep being degenerate and unfaithful until
A. All niggers and shitskins are wiped from the face of the earth
B. Kike propaganda and porn is destroyed without any trace
C. We cuck white females for an entire year. Let no white females fuck anyone for an entire year and make them watch white men fuck Arab and Asian qts. Then, they will know pain and they will join us. Too bad it's impossible

Says the beta bucks. So mad and jelly

thats bullshit. they have lower standards than most men, when you are being as objective as you can. at the end of the day its qhoever tries for the woman, and rarely do beneficial genetics necessarily make a man horny like that.

its why even if you are tall rich and good looking, you will not get laid if you are socially retarded or too anxious. it just doesnt matter

Really just boils down to two things causing this:

Guaranteed support for single mothers. In a just world, if someone was stupid enough to get knocked up by chad, they'd starve to death in a gutter. Instead, we have situations where women are supported no matter what stupid decisions they make, and then the media insists it's wrong for a man to pass on some slut that's already had a child with another man.

Society's degeneration into one where single mothers and loose women don't have to suffer being ostracized by the community. From the women's point of view, there are NO downsides to just sleeping with whoever they want. They'll get support from the state, and the state will also force whoever knocked them up to pay for the child.

t. tor tordenkuk
if the betas dont have something to work for the civilization will fall. in norway almost 1/3 of people born in 1970 havent gotten a child by the age of 45.

>its why even if you are tall rich and good looking, you will not get laid if you are socially retarded or too anxious. it just doesnt matter

I agree with this. Personality matters a lot, even when seeking casual encounters.

The people these sluts are fucking are not "alphas" in anything but a shallow sense. They either have money, or physical attractiveness. The average guy that is fucking women left and right are about as dumb as a box of rocks, black, or strung out on drugs. Or ya know, all of the above.

Those arrows represent sex, not babies.

Wealth is not a good indicator of intelligence. If anything, it's a good indicator for being a sociopath that doesn't hesitate to abuse everyone around them to get ahead. Exactly the sort of traits the gene pool needs.

>strong next generation
>raised by single mothers

t. swedecuck

it never was like the first one

>to men with beneficial evolutionary traits
by that you mean niggers?

Before I met my wonderful lady, I fucked some 30 women, none of which were ugly. Now I am to marry a great 8/10 woman.

I have never had trouble getting women, but the funny thing is that after I started out with her, women who have known me a little but not really cared for me are now throwing themselves after me. And the longer I have been with her, the more women I knew in high school and growing up hit on me. Like, they're not even subtle about it.

My buddy, who has been in a relationship about as long as I have, has made the same observation.

I only want my woman, but it feels good knowing I am in demand.

I'm pretty unattractive and a woman was hitting on me on Friday. The joke's on her, I'm a 23 y/o kv, so she chose the wrong dick.

Yes. Not enough whites in white countries means
>low white birthrate
>old people vote for immigration of shitskins
>white minority in every country globally
>whites losing positions of power globally
>shitskins and jews who have power nkw using previously white countries to further white decline in population
>no end in sight
All preventable if we kept Christianity and prevented the 60's (((love))) movement out of our institutions. It's almost ogre now though

genes suitable to evolutionary development =/= genes suitable to development of civilization

Sugar daddies are the worst

Forgot one point.
>old people invite shitskins in to pay for their social security and for cheap labor because the generations following them were smaller and weren't going to be able to pay for everything by themselves

the left side never happened. there has always been selection

>Can this actually be said to be a bad development?

How can nature be 'bad'

No one owes you a woman

Seriously? You could have fucked a future First Lady.

a bijective function turned to shit

The top four men on the right side should be blacks, Muslims, and refugees and the bottom 4 men should be white men for this pic to be accurate.

>20% that gets ALL the women but I'm not
You're fucking retarded if you think thats how the world works. That would mean 80% of men would be single and atleast half of women would have the same baby daddy as another woman. This is not only 100% false but it really only happens with niggers

The overwhelming VAST majority of women who have babies are in a relatonship with the father. That doesnt always last, but the idea that somehow 20% of men are having all the sex is beyond retarded and you have to be a next level beta faggot to think this.

Life is not one of your harem animes.

You mad short bois?

How can short bois even compete?

It literally is. If you are not in the top 20% you are playing time until she jumps the vine. Women simply are NOT loyal anymore.

Hah, you're funny. Overwhelming majority with kids are in a relationship with the father? Bullshit.

The majority of the last few generations rode every cock they could find, got knocked up, then in their mid 20s realized that their looks would not last forever. Proceeded to saddle some poor beta with kids that were not even theirs, and refuses to have a child with the male that is taking care of her and their probably shitskin babies.

There are exceptions, but there is a reason finding a woman that isn't a single mother to date is so fucking hard past like 20.

>drug dealers have wealth but each drug dealer also has a harem of girls.
they just want freebies and to be bad for a while
then they go to rehab secretly, shift into mainstream culture, pretend they were never doing drugs, then get married to a dorky normie way under their league but the thrill of
being bad never leaves so they cheat on him all the
time.

I knew a bunch of girls like btw.
wouldn't blow up their spot cause I think it's funny.

meh, I'd rather dick this other girl that I think has a thing for me, but I'll never know because of my autism

take that back i don't think it's funny that they cheat
but more funny that it happens so often in the exact
same way

Lord Farquaad here I got cucked by the nigger shrek women are such whores we need to bring back forced marriage and the clan system also pedofilia to bring up the white birth rates
DEUS VULT PRAISE KEK

>It literally is
100% false. Show evidence that only 20% of men are having sex.

>Bullshit.
Prove it

Most people are born in india and china where the family unit is very important and sluts are shamed into the ground

It really depends. The percentage of men having biological children isn't as distorted as the proportion having sex. Sex, especially casual, is very much 80/20. I'd say that maybe 40% of men however are having 80% of the children in comparison. A lot of "beta bux" have children after women hit 30 and need someone "to settle down with".

I'm 5'7" and I have a gf that puts out everyday. Not really worried desu

>beneficial evolutionary traits
Not beneficial to a technologically advanced society, beneficial if we want to devolve into spear throwing savages.

also guys do this as well

>Sex, especially casual, is very much 80/20.
Prove it

Spear chucking savagery is a high aryan virtue. Ur just mad because tall and strong people are usually also intelligent.

>Women are more attracted to men with beneficial evolutionary traits
Maybe if you're a caveman in a tribe.
High intelligence people are less likely to have sex and have less kids on average.

That's called pre selection, women want men that other women have already chosen.

>excuses

youtube.com/watch?v=dqYZS8Z5cZQ&t

I chuckle everytime I hear some dumb cunt talk about how she loves sapiosexuals but all her past lovers were chads.

I chuckle every time some beta virgin on Sup Forums unironically uses the term chad.

>This is how sven legitimises being cuckolded to himself

>beneficial evolutionary traits
"Bad boy" is not a beneficial evolutionary trait.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hybristophilia

Go back to England faggot. I've never seen a leaf use "chad" before.

kys please

>Women are more attracted to men with beneficial evolutionary traits
But women are attracted to black men.

There are no primates where the woman decides who breeds at all, meaning we should not ever let women control our breeding thus enabling female hypergamy is a terrible idea.

>Can this actually be said to be a bad development?

Have you seen anything good come out of the generations born after 1960?

Because I haven't.

my man

This

Women didn't evolve to choose their partners. Women always were taken as objects by the winning tribe or had arranged marriage

They don't necessary choose the best people, in fact they preffer criminals over cientists

High intelligence women and men have less kids but invest more resources in their few children.
The rest have more kids but invest less in each.

This is just another aspect of the separation of society into poor under class and smaller high skilled class who will work for the wealthy aristocrats.
Businesses, economist, etc see the writing on the wall for awhile now.

>Have you seen anything good come out of the generations born after 1960?
in what way

this

There is natural selection, and there is sexual selection

Natural selection selects useful traits, its a near singular force exerted over the a large group all at once

Sexual selection does not necessarily select anything, its sum of individual preferences which effectively cancels itself out 99% of the time, and the 1% is not guaranteed to be useful

How would you know?

t. member of the 20%

Beneficial evolunary traits according to the vagina:
Sociopathy
Callousness
Impulsitivity
Hyper Agressiveness
Ruthlessness
Manipulativeness

You starting to see a pattern user?

the ONLY way you can have the image on the right, is if you have extreme oppression of women. Oppressed women raise slaves, and slaves don't have time to reach for the stars.

Did this board merge with /r9k/ today?

>physically superior
>smart enough to get becky in bed whereas you are not

???

Umm, no, I was saying that if you select just on the basis of strength & violence, society will regress back into the stone age, we need scientists & innovators & intelligent people.

Women dont hate intelligence, intelligent men are often pussies, intellligent sociopaths like most world leaders and business owners have women throwing themselves at them.

...

Prove
It
I have sex with my gf on a daily basis and i would be considered a beta loser by Sup Forums standards because im a trap

>that video

Does she go in dry?

Fixed it

what's a cientists?

...

Those are the genes that are good for success in society. They find assertive, dominant, selfish, low empathy men attractive because these men will do the best in society. The drug dealer's wealth is proof of that.

scientists

whoopsie

Are you dumb or just a woman? Men are the very bottom are literally ugly in a manner they make humans freak out just seeing their faces, most pollacks are meh or cute in facial attractiveness so they wouldnt be on that level at all.
Women dont care about society all they care about is sexual pleasure that is why they ruin civilization because they want fun over order and structure.

Massive coordinated raids

>most pollacks are meh or cute in facial attractiveness


This nigga right here