Must sting eh Sup Forums? Pack up your bags, idpol is around the corner

Must sting eh Sup Forums? Pack up your bags, idpol is around the corner.

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_ownership
youtube.com/watch?v=hphgHi6FD8k
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

key words "have to"

I dont know what the last two are but the first one is a taxi service right?

My dad used it once in america and the guy driving him was a trump supporter. What point are you trying to make here?

Under communism, the state owns all those things and you don't earn any profit
uber, lyft, arbnb are all driven by capitalism (individuals using their assets to create personal wealth)
also sage

I honestly dont understand how anyone could unironically make this comparison.

all of those services involve an exchange of money.

Under capitalism the upper class owns everything and forces you to work low wage jobs just to survive.

>communist teenagers think you wouldn't have to work to survive in a communist society
>everyone would be fed by magic and fairy dust

>using your private property to gain profit at your oun will and leisure
>somehow communism

Indeed, who is profiting from Uber, certainly not the sub minimum wage drivers, the wealthy share holders are though, you know, the ones who are already rich.

>personal taxi service
>personal taxi service but cheaper
>people selling at rooms as a personal hotel

Did I hit that on the head, that's what I think these logos are for anyway.

Holy shit, leaf BTFO

Whats the point?? at least i make money from it

>be forced to share your house for free
>have the option to share your house for money

Holding a gun to someone's head and demanding money is not fundamentally different than withholding food from their children and demanding labor.

/thread

>have to

See
Stop it with you 'voluntary' bs you praxeologist

Under communism the politburo owns everything and forces you to work low wage jobs.

>Dictator forcing me by gunforce
or
>Free market providing me with the service when I need it

Yes, it is

I have never used any of those services

A

FUCKING

LEAF

fpbp

>withholding food from their children
Growing your own food isn't forbidden in capitalism

But yeah, there is a difference. One is taking something and the other is not giving something

LEAF

the fuck is 'idpol'?
also, everyone knows the current model of capitalism is fucked. but the socialist alternative is even worse. we need a new model going forward

So the free market brought us socialism? Did the free market finally fix it?

>Stop it with you 'voluntary' bs you praxeologist
Who the fuck is forcing you to take an uber?

>Muh feed me daddy state

Also, you can grow food in your private property if you're too lazy to work

The market

this is a troll thread don't reply to the trolls. those apps are pure capitalism providing a service for pay. and capitalism dosent force anyone to work low wages, you can choose to build your own business or do anything you want thats the beauty your failure is on you.

Not take an Uber, WORK for Uber you fucking idiot.

But you need land to start growing. And if you don't have capital you cannot buy land, you will literally starve to death or get shot for stealing an apple on somebody's private property.

Op keep posting so it's probably leftie pol

Rent != Share

Compulsory != Mandatory

I am not a die hard fan of capitalism, but communism is pure cancer

nobody is forcing me to work for uber

I can work for anybody I want

under shit ass communism I would be forced to work whatever job some commie prick told me to do

That is socialism.

But seriously all three services don't really do that and undercut actual businesses and the people using it

*must share

How many people were systematically worked to death without pay? Thanks communism!

/thread

ok then you kneckbearded fucks, if wealthy investors are ripping off the drivers, why dont you start your own app, pay the drivers better and still keep a cut for yourself?

I actually drive for uber. I can usually make $100 in 2-3 hours. This is after gas money.

Thing is I have a regular 9-5, so only dribe during times when I can absolutely max the the time/money ratio.

If I used it as a sole source of income however it wouldn't be worth it. So if anyone is thinking about driving for one of these programs get a regular job and do it on the side.

fpbp

I earn a great wage

>people are being forced to work for uber
>no, you're the idiot

/thread

>the market
So you mean reality, because life forces you to have to eat

Surely the person who made that wasn't serious?..people really aren't that dumb are they?

>Being forced to
vs
>Choosing to for money

OY VEY

Yes it does.

Came here to post this. Fpbp.

I mean, it's really hard given how pathetic most strawmen attacks against capitalism are to determine which ones are jokes and which ones are real.
It's like those pro-feminism ones. I honestly thought the gender wage gap thing was just a joke for a long time.

The picture makes no sense

Ahmed, I know it's hard to believe, but there's enough land in america that you could go somewhere that's either unowned or not guarded.

in communism you would probably starve to death as well.

No, that is quite literally how all communist countries have and always will operate. Capitalism at least gives you some sort of self-determination.

FPBP

People are forced to work Uber for extra income you idiot. If they don't, they die.

You've never heard of hunting, fishing or raising cattle? Actually, it's leftists such as yourself who seek to regulate these activities into nonexistence. Really makes ya think!

Capitalism: Under capitalism you could share your house or car and a jew will pay you less than minimum wage for providing you the service of finding customers, and get paid in fiat debt that means nothing and is based on speculation.

Communism: Under communism you'd have to share your house and car, or get sent to Siberia.

National Syndicalism: Under national syndicalism you could share your house or car and make money off of it, or you could join a syndicate and put work in and good good living out, free from international jewry.

Whats the TRUE redpill here, eh?

The whole point of those companies is to gather as much people they can.
In the startup world, people are encouraged to think big and to think broadly (because of the amount of money they can earn from having a vast audience). It has nothing to do with communism.

BUMP BUMP BUMP

Oh well. My exploitative low wage job still affords me better living conditions than 90% of humanity, including kings and queens of old, ever had.

>flag

Lel

>Under capitalism the upper class owns everything
But there's the fact that anyone can become an upperclassmen no matter how bleek the outcome may be. In communism theres no hope for success.

I would also concede that there's jewry in capitalism which is why you need some regulations to keep that in check to ensure success of all people
>and forces you to work low wage jobs just to survive.
Only true for those who have no skills or the right skills. Under a pure capitalist society this would be true but not ours

>If you don't give me free stuff, you're basically shooting me with a gun

whoa

>if they don't work for Uber, they die
>in Canada
honestly fuck you, go do your social studies homework

How are commies this fucking dumb. They are literally bitching about capitalism by using an argument that shows are market mechanisms can create their "sharing economy" ends more efficiently and ethically better than collectivism ever could dream of

All commies deserve a shallow grave.

Its not in a pure capitalist society but we're not anarcho capitalists, so theres no point in saying this. You have to understand that having an incentive into doing something is biological and drives us forward. So clearly you give some so you can reap the rewards of your contributions

At least under communism I'd have a car a house and a toothbrush even if it was shared.

Under Communism the government owns everything and forces you to work low wage jobs just to survive

This.

If everything were free we'd run out of resources pretty fast given the amount of space and time it takes to produce stuff.

yea under this shitty capitalism all I have is all of those things which I share with no one alongside hundreds of other luxuries which I enjoy every single day

fuckin sucks man, communist revolution when???

this tbqfhfam

What do you think 60% of us do now dickhead.
At least the government might give me bread. 35% of us don't know when next meal is.

Both systems take. Just one is up front about it.

this

capitalism is a joke that only benefits the corrupt, the privileged and the corporation

>the upper class owns everything
source. this isn't true at all.

Shit, is the government going to come for me because I don't voluntarily get paid to be a taxi with Uber or Lyft?

Mr. Rockefeller would like a word with you.

Nope, by Communism's very definition it's a stateless society. Private property only exist with a state and capitalism requires that (which is also by Ancap is an oxymoron)

forced vs voluntary

learn the difference it may save your life

- posted from your internet connected computer in your cozy air conditioned/heated apartment/house with a refrigerator full of food as well as countless other non-essential luxuries that you were able to pay for with your job that requires almost no skill or intelligence

Dang, capitalism sure only benefits the elite few huh?

kill yourself you fucking ungrateful swine

...

this tbqhwyfoimlttyttfam

Capitalism is perfectly compatible with voluntary communism. Of course, since communism is less about communal ownership and more about taking other people's shit, it's never implemented in a voluntary way.

Under Communism everyone owns everything. That's why it's called COMMUNism.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_ownership
This, Communism doesn't actually entail any wealth redistribution via taxation, that's social democracy. Socialism and Communism entail virtually no such thing, North Korea doesn't do any wealth redistribution and look what shit they are compared to the US and other western nations that have some wealth redistribution with social insurance programs and discretionary spending.

I earn enough to be happy and I wasn't born into the upper class. I don't think anyone is happy under communism besides the upper class, but some will always complaIn.

Exactly. Why are there so many rustled jimmies in this thread?

There hasn't been a Communist country and there can't be. Communism entail a stateless society with no private property ownership whatsoever. Those countries you're referring to were not Communist.

You mean with shit wages and a small group of owners becoming billionaires?

i'm literally 2 months from being homeless

>have to
vs
>can if you want to

Saged.

The people in this thread shilling for capitalism are the embodiment of dumassery. They'll constantly bitch about rich kikes subverting western society with their money but whenever anyone expresses anti-capitalist thought or dare suggest wealth redistribution it's "fuck off commies". They're literally defending the very system that allows rich kikes like Soros to persist with their subversion.

Western nations like America, Canada, UK, etc. are so wealthy every citizen could live what is now considered a middle class lifestyle. The problem is kike-tier greed and desire for power grabs that lead to drastically unbalanced capital accumulation. It's why the wealth gap has grown so tremendously and will keep growing, It's why wages have stagnated for so many people over the last decade, it's why poverty still exists in rich western nations, etc.

youtube.com/watch?v=hphgHi6FD8k