How do we solve the Rancid Paul problem?

How do we solve the Rancid Paul problem?

t. bootlicker

>How do we solve the Free Thinker problem?

KYS Neo-con

Lolbertarians are retarded really. The free market won't fix everything.

Captcha was roads.

>Free market won't fix everything

Didn't go to university did you?

How do we solve the Trumpenstein problem?

I have never met a libertarian who wasn't batshit crazy and living in some alternative universe.

What does roads have to do with anything? Have you never heard of private contractors?

DUDE

COMPETITION

LMAO

It sounds good in practice in the same way communism sounds in practice. At the end one company ends up owning everything and it leads to corporate slavery.

>Company sells service at $100
>Other company sells same service at $80
>Everyone flocks to smaller company, it can't keep up
>Needs to get loans from the bank to continue expanding
>Larger company puts economic pressure on the smaller company through many ways: Buying supply chain companies, lobbying the banks, buying out investors of the smaller company
>Big company uses some 4d chess tricks to put the smaller company out of business

Keep going ad nauseum until the big company is so big that it just buys out all the smaller competitors.

Make him president after Trump's done.

You obviously do not understand how monopolies work, and also why they do not thrive in a free market without government interference.

>insulting /ourguy/
You have to go back.

Do you want to pay a toll on every single road you go on? A nickel for side streets, a dime for larger streets, a quarter for major thorough-ways, and a dollar for a highway.

Kill the parasite pretending to be his hair that is infecting his brain

Is that how you would price it out?

Don't forget the problems of having competing road companies building three or four different highways next to each other with different competing toll rates, resulting in thousands of miles of asphalt covering everything.

And then the reverse problem of no roads existing in areas with small populations.

It might just spur on the advancement of an alternative source of transportation, much the same way automobiles did to topple the railroad cartels.

Like what, trolleys again? Flying cars?
You can't just do magical hand-wavery and not propose anything when you want to remove fundamental aspects of how society does things.

>it's an "all libertarians are no-roads ancaps" episode
Fucks sake

Roads are fundamentally how society does things? I suppose then the same can be said of railroads. If the rail cartels controlled the tracks into small towns, then the advent of the automobile freed people from that monopoly through substitution. If roads were privatized and some jackasses turned it into a cartel, then yes people would look for a substitution and push the innovation needed for this substitution.

Yes, roads and railroads are fundamentally how society moves people and things. Are you pretending to be stupid?
And what else would people do? Walk?

They are fundamentally how people move now and how they use to move. This does not mean they will remain fundamental methods of transportation. The issue is what will happen if roads become privatized? Well we have private contractors to build and maintain them, so that issue is solved. So the question arises as to who controls them? Well if they are controlled privately and that party begins to act as a cartel then this will push people to look for alternate methods of transportation. Yes they may even take up walking or riding a horse again at first. At the same time, they will also begin to innovate for other means of transportation as well. This is the beauty of the free market. However, you seem to think that if roads are controlled then all transportation simply ends and the story is over. When people face a monopoly upon their choices they will begin to look for substitutions. What these substitutions are we cannot determine unless we visit /x/ so that we may learn the ability to peer into an alternate future.

That would actually be a great way to get niggers off the streets.

Oh fuck off. Naturally occurring monopolies are so rare they're almost non-existent. All monopolies come from a form of predatory activity. Lobbying is just one externality of a monopoly. Sure, I guess that does count as government interference, but its not the same as what you're talking about.

>if no magical solution turns itself up, then to avoid paying tolls every time they turn onto a new street people will just walk or use horses.
Ancap paradise.

Oh, but how will people walk anywhere when they'll have to pay tolls to use the sidewalk, and the grass is owned by someone?

Cartels are a form of monopoly. Monopolies cannot remain in place without government interference within the market. When they do appear within the market they do not last for long outside of pushing for policy through lobbying like you said or through corruption. Again, it stands that substitutions are one way that the market uses to get around and limit the effect of monopolies. This isn't rocket science, this is simply economics and history provides examples of these actions.