who ever said that jews can't ever be helpful
Spam this in response to KANGZ goyim
Jews were never slaves in egypt, cite one single piece of archaeological evidence of jewish habitation during the period the pyramids were supposed to have been built.
You think goyim could make such great structures at that time?
lower and delta nile egyptians were never black either. what's your point here exactly
...
says so in the bible
>bible isn't evidence
At that time? No way, the inhabitents during the period they were supposed to have been built did not have the capability. An interesting thing happens if you surmise that they may be much older though, and you don't even have to invoke ayylmaos.
To not fictionalize history through Judaic texts
It also recounts the Egyptian's troubles with a mysterious "sea people'. History is full of holes.
there is a documentary called Prince of Egypt you can watch fgt
imagine taking those babies and just spiking them on the ground in front of mr and mrs cuck
yes because fictionalizing history through tweeter and tumblr posts failed so spectacularly, right
when dealing with a jew, you will need to be a jew yourself
Jews are wops
I prefer Tarzan, Phil Collins' best work outside of Genesis.
I can't even read what you're trying to say here, but that might be my fault for being drunk. Try again?
niggers can't figure out how to properly swipe an EBT card let alone design pyramids
>he fell for the jews were egyptian slaves meme
...
cool axes
>implying anyone retarded enough to subscribe to afrocentrism would even know that
You give nogs way too much credit, user
Why is archaeological evidence superior to textual evidence?
uhh
ok
when dealing with a retarded person who is too stupid to realize how idiotic his claims sound, there's no use to using facts and being rational
this is because they'll refuse to accept what you're saying as objectively correct regardless of evidence and just claim you're lying anyway
so
to make idiots listen to you, you must spout a falsehood that's even larger in scope than whatever shit he's trying to say to you
if you do this right, with him being an idiot, he will take what you say as correct and may rethink his stances
or just shut the fuck up about his nonsense, I don't care which
in other words
be a fucking jew
You think a bunch of weak Jews could move the carved limestone. See pic related
Those structures are far far older than that, like 10k years plus, you can even see flood damage at the base of them and the sphynx. Thing is no one want's to believe it because it suggests that humanity has been reset by nature once or twice and whats more may have been smarter then than we are now.
That and ofc -
>muh persecution complex
>muh kangdom
Because any asshole can write a thing and store it in a cave? Finding some ancient stars of david or whatever in Egypt would be some substantial proof, and would actually be fascinating and leading credence to the biblical account.
I try to assume people aren't niggers, for what that's worth;.
I see a large wall of text and I'm not bothering to read it. How's it feel to waste your effort? All you'd need to do is show me some evidence of jewish habitation of Egypt at any point in antiquity, I'd shut up quick.
>humanity has been reset by nature once or twice and whats more may have been smarter then than we are now
Fucking this. The moment you notice the inconsistencies in modern archaeology is the moment you can never go back.
...
then I have your evidence right here you beer gutted piece of shit
Lol sure Shareblue, how racist of me to assume someone who believes in the WE WUZ KANGZ narrative is probably black.
please teach me some Jew tricks
I can't even follow your line of logic user.
I'm white-ish and think modern Egyptians are not the culture who built the pyramids.
lmao at your life
Loan someone money then charge them more then they needed for the service.
topkek this dude took offense
By who?
My belief is that a volcanic fissure formed underneath the center of a massive ice shelf, melting it from underneath and within, until the outer edges couldn't hold back the massive volumes of water and gave way like a dam bursting.
There are places in the US where the land looks rippled like the seabed except its solid earthen mounds 40ft high.
So besides a religious text, there isn't really any evidence the Egyptians kept the Jews as slaves from what I understand. The Egyptians don't talk about it and there isn't much archeological findings to indicate it.
But let's say either one is true for a moment: WE WUZ KANGZ applies equally. The same people would have been in charge.
>volcanic fissure formed underneath the center of a massive ice shelf, melting it from underneath
I had only been considering the asteroid impact idea for the rapid breakup of the ice sheet, but this is possible too if there was an active seam underneath.
I've heard about an asteroid theory but I didn't quite buy it. The heat source would be very very limited, once that rock cools down the water will turn to ice so the heat would have to be massive to do it quickly enough before it cools. If it were that hot it would create a lot of steam which would become rain and not a cascade.
Anything that can generate that level of heat would come in with a huge impact force that would likely smash the shelf to pieces which would allow the water to run off again preventing a cascade. Also at that point the asteroid itself might be enough to wipe earth clean of life anyway.
We wuz kangz jewboi.
You'd need a Yellowstone-scale eruption for what you're suggesting, I think. Not impossible, but there should be geologic evidence to support this.
I am skeptical that they were more advanced than we are now but I can buy the idea that there were plenty of pre-historic civilizations that reached upwards of late bronze age kinds of technology before being brought low. So metallurgy, astronomy, pottery, architecture, agriculture, ectera.
Considering the Native Americans in the US went from places like Urbanized Cahokia with 40,000+ to post-apocalyptic prepper survivalist hunter-gatherers. Also had the Pueblo replaced by primitive hunter-gatherer sorts.
The skepticism isn't from "hurhur we're so much smarter than they are" but more that modern technologies would be pretty hard to miss in archaeological digs. Plastics and highly advanced metallurgy and shit. A more modest and limited kind of fall from grace becomes more possible with less severe (and thus less evident in geology) catastrophes like massive droughts (see what happened to the Harappans) and the like. Hell with the fall of the bronze age for a time Greece for 200 or soc years went back to stone age, forgetting written script among other things. Remember seeing a map of Messenia late bronze age and around 1000-900. The former had something like 117+ archaeological sites for villages or farmsteads. The latter had 9.
But simply put expecting some ancient Finno-Korean hyperwar level of super tech is /x/ we wuz sci-fi. Expecting some lost civilizations to have been up to perhaps Roman or more conservatively late bronze age tech/development is reasonable.
Textual evidence from neighboring kingdoms can help validate it if not just indigenous text. So for instance the first account of an Israel is by Egypt around the 1000s. And it shows there was a people there.
>jewish slaves built the pyramids
That's pretty much the same wewuz level truth-wise
>I am skeptical that they were more advanced than we are now but I can buy the idea that there were plenty of pre-historic civilizations that reached upwards of late bronze age kinds of technology before being brought low.
That's pretty much where I am, I'm willing to accept a Rome-level civilization in the distant past without discounting possible further advancement in antiquity.
>leaf learns to photoshop
>perpetuating the Jews were slaves in Egypt narrative
Can Jews ever not lie
Wew lad 2edgy 4me
I never said we built PYRAMIDS
more like pillars and some granaries in Pithom
that or a smaller fissure over a very long (decades possibly) time frame
Would depend on how old they are, metals don't last long, if say an iteration of humanity that came prior to us was smart enough to not use plastics because they are the embodiment of death and toxic as all hell then we're realistically looking at metals and stone, anything else will be long gone.
Iron in salt water corrodes at a rate of 1mm per year so will quickly be lost at sea, the only metal that doesn't corrode is the currency of god itself gold, only golden artifacts would remain if anything from a time period 14k back.
The only thing that would last over many millennia is stonework, but stone doesn't lead itself to high tech. That having been said today we still build (occasionally) buildings out of stone that might very well be ruinous heaps in 10k years to be rediscovered. From their perspective very little other than maybe our plastic would remain. This could elude them to believe that we were no further along than bronze age.
>Plastics and highly advanced metallurgy and shit.
>and shit
Aside from plastics there is little that would stand the test of 10k+ years.
Again I sometimes see the way we use oil to be a cunt hair away from necromancy. If we start wearing plastic composite armor in battle we'll be wearing armor made of the dead, we already walk on roads paved with it, I don't think its that impossible that earlier human civs might avoid plastic entirely.
Finally I saw a nifty device some guy made, he had taken a specific type of rock that had a weird property. You could tap it and it would sound somewhat like a tuning fork. Anyway some how he managed to find away to use this rock to boil water instantly. Perhaps had we ever been more advanced than now we would use technology that we wouldn't even recognise and would just deem it "stone era dildos" or some such.
You didn't build those either, your sub Saharan slaves did all the work.
All you had to do was Google. But please, stay in your echo chamber and continue to believe that you are never wrong.