Just a reminder that the second amendment, just like the rest of the constitution, was only meant to apply to affluent...

Just a reminder that the second amendment, just like the rest of the constitution, was only meant to apply to affluent, well socialized, white land owning males. That means
>Autists
>Women
>People who rent houses and apartments
>people who don't have a gf
>people who have less than 1000 facebook friends
>people who see a therapist more than once a year
>people who don't have cars
>niggers
>5 foot tall mexicans

Cannot and should not be allowed to own guns. If you fall into any of these categories than according to the second ammendment you need to turn in your guns m8. Hey it's just what the second ammendment says bruh

Except you're forgetting that over two centuries, the concepts of citizenship and personhood have extended to include everyone in the species homo sapiens, and even corporations, so that they all have legal representation, and hence these rights. Your argument is invalid, get back to reading Atlas Shrugged and stick to Sup Forums fgt.

>was only meant to apply to affluent, well socialized, white land owning males.
Glad we have you to divine the irrelevant will of dead people who are several hundred years removed from our culture.

>you need to turn in your guns m8.
Commies get off my board.

>mfw minority who always keeps cool to his elders
Can I at least keep the break open shotguns?

>people who don't have a gf
my guns are my gfs
checkm8 athiests

>irrelevant will of dead people
so you are basically saying that the 2nd Amendment is irrelevant. Therefore "SHALL" doesn't work anymore does it?

The only thing relevant is the document itself, not the context and intentions of the writers. Jefferson isn't around to tell us, "no no no, what we meant by citizen is..."

back to pol you go
stop shitting up our board you commie fuck

so you really think that people who can't even scrape enough money together to own a house or a car should actually own a gun? we can't give guns to useless bums who can't even look after their own lives. parasites who cannot amass a personal fortune. Nor autists who might shoot up a gamestop if sonic the hedgehogs shoe color changes to the wrong hue.

Even if the second amendment did just apply to land owning white males that still doesn't mean other people are banned from owning guns, just that the right is not constitutionally protected and laws could be passed about it.

There is no constitutionally guaranteed right to walk outside, doesnt mean you cant walk outside.

Chris Chan hates guns though.

“A well-regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of well educated socially normative white men with significantly valued estates to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed."
Wtf I just re-read the 2nd amendment and I think OP is right!

No but context manners and the point of guns is for those who have fortunes and those who own guns to protect their earnings from the hordes of lazy bums who think they are owed the fruits of our wealth just by merely existing. They demand welfare. We pay them in bullets.

>>people who have less than 1000 facebook friends
I find that normie white people usually have around 200-500 Fb friendos

1k is shit like I find here in the Philippines because everyone here is addicted to social media and add random fucking strangers as friends.

Supreme Court has consistently ruled that The People of the Constitution refers to all voting-eligible citizens.
But yeah, the Constitution was built around an oligarchy.

...

farming blacks can have bolt actions, pump actions and break actions for hog swaddlin. Niggers get nothing. Condoleeza rice can have any gun she wants. In fact I'd like to stick my bolt carrier group in her receiver
>commie
On the contrary I'm an economic elitist. I think capitalism is the best interpretation of the divine will of God and that a fair government is one that keeps the division between the winners and losers of society as sharp as possible. The one problem is that the bums always get restless, instead of trying to improve themselves they throw a hissy fit and try to take the wealth of those who earned it. That is what guns are for. To defend our god given wealth against the bums who seek to take it from us.

you aint a capitalist. Your a closet commie.

Its time to get out.

>capitalism is the best interpretation of the divine will of God

HAHAHAHAHA
This is how commies interpret the capitalist mentality.

>1000 Facebook friends
I know a lot of affluent people who do not have 1k Facebook friends. It's on a decline anyways, so that's a poor representation. While the concept is applicable, the measurement has to change. Back in 2012 this could be considered valid.
>People who don't have a gf
Ehh, I guess. I'm curious as to why this would be a point though.

Aside from those, you have a pretty good list m80

White, land-owning, gainfully employed, married, male here. I win.

do you have over 1000 friends on facebook?

>well educated socially normative white men

>this is the exact definition of "Well-Regulated Militia" :^)

Blacks were not guaranteed the same rights when the Document was written. They could not be trusted to care for themselves, they were chattel like women.

>the slippery slope wasn't a real thing, they said
>mfw
Friendly reminder that gun control only got a proverbial "foot in the door" in the USA because of pearl-clutching sensationalism like this (e.g.: wul maybe we shouldn't let "them people" own guns).

This is not up for debate or discussion, if you disagree with me you are disagreeing with objective historical facts.

what faggot board did this come from?