Bush did 9/11

>empire state building
>built in 1930
>has a B-fucking-25 bomber smash into it
>doesn't fall down

>twin towers
>built in 1971
>falls from a commercial airliner hitting it

ummm... xD

Other urls found in this thread:

aerospaceweb.org/question/history/q0311.shtml
youtu.be/IVpSBUgbxBU
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Mmm yes, we all know it was an inside job

...

Mmm yes, we all know it was an inside job

...

tisha bav is on the 9th of the 11th month by the way

9/11 was inside job is a normalfag redpill, I expect everyone on a Sup Forums to know it by now

nice comparison nonetheless

The Empire State Building is a prop building, with few real floors, like the old and new WTC. It will come down when America falls.

...

>Concrete peels out like a banana
>Steel beams turn to dust
>Controlled det does not do this
>Tesla described the effects of his oscillators as literally this, weeks before lab is burned down

>be me, part of AWOL chain of command
>have one job
>assume duty as decision maker during domestic attacks
The one day there is a domestic attack
>unavailable, lmao

This 3 more times

So what would happen to the Empire State Building if the plane that hit it was...
...4x heavier.
...traveling 10x faster.
...full of fuel.

Oh, and imagine the ESB was constructed in a completely different fashion.

I know (think?) you're joking, but it's really not that hard.

aerospaceweb.org/question/history/q0311.shtml
...the building had been constructed in a totally different fashion

...

...

...

(((us)))

youtu.be/IVpSBUgbxBU

...

Fuel in the commercial airliner melted support beams in the world trade center causing a collapse.

...

jew detected

Why bother with silly stuff like this when trying to prove 9/11 was an inside job? How the buildings should have hypothetically behaved by being hit by a plane is irrelevant, if you want to get to the meat of the subject start with the dancing Israelis. Five Mossad agents posing as a fake moving company that got a quater million dollar "loan" who were caught celebrating the first plane hitting and had phone calls go out urging the other members to hurry so they wouldn't miss the second plane hitting. There's and 1800 page FBI document on them and if you're a regular on Sup Forums you should be familiar with this stuff

...

But jet fuel doesn't melt steel beams

They were designed to sit in burning jet fuel for hours and hours. The thing was a controlled demolition.

...

B-25 weighs 9000kg according to google, and a 767 weighs about 180000kg - the comercial plane is 20 times heavier than the bomber. The 767 is also twice as fast as the B-25, so the momentum of the 767 is about 40 times that of the B-25.

...

Ah yes, good ol Lucky Larry

...

>commercial airliner
???

Jet fuel n shiet.

I remember seeing mention of something previously about the buildings needing to be demolished anyway because they were unsafe (building 7 also) so they decided to choose those buildings to save on embarrassment. Any user know anything about that?

...

Premise 1: They were designed to sit in burning jet fuel for hours and hours

Conclusion: The thing was a controlled demolition.

Airtight logic - brought to you by Sup Forums

...

Guess they don't build them like they used to.

>11 and 9 second symmetrical "pancake collapses"

Good one.

If you're referring to this photo, it was taken during construction.