Tell me why neo-liberalism isn't the best economic system ever created?

Tell me why neo-liberalism isn't the best economic system ever created?

Neo liberalism is what lefties call Ronald reagans fiscal policies.

Fiscal libertarianism is the way to go

Btw, how is life in chile?

Jews. Entire economy is a worthless fiat interest usurious ponzi scheme

It's pretty chill

FedEx is not run by the government btw

>Idc what the name says
>used to work there

Sure if you are greedy RICH person who hates your own government and taxation and don't give a shit about workers

That's the point, the privately owned companies have way nicer shit than the government services

That's the point...

I've heard it's great for the white man may flee their if Europe and America go to shit

Depends. There are poor and decent places in every country. But here you don't see the shit you see in Brasil, Mexico or the rest of the South America.

Globalism

To my eyes shitskin countries like America are 3rd world countries. Here we have advanced society with large public and we have least corruption in the world.

Public sector*

It's literally what's behind all of today's problems. Cutting taxes and regulations of the rich didn't incentivize them to invest more as anticipated which is why Reaganomics failed. Bill Clinton's administration was also neoliberal and that gave up NAFTA, gutting welfare, and loosened banking and futures trading regulations that have had bad long term effects. The Bush tax cuts combined with the high defense spending after 9/11 is why the national debt is to high when it was at a surplus when Clinton left, and the only reason for that surplus was the tech bubble.

>american intellectual

You can thank based Nixon for Pinochet, Chilebro

You and your liberal country are the cancer of this world. Cut the disease and the world will heal.

Why would anyone waste money replacing a old mailbox if it still works? They aren't trying to advertise anything. It serves it's function. That is all it needs to do until it completely rust out another 20 years from now.

Tax cuts and deregulation are great, as is getting a hold on welfare and social security. What went wrong in America is that these ideas got irrationally tied to some of the most harmful policies we've ever had: "free" trade, bailouts, massive military spending. On top of that the only type of deregulation pushed became banking and environmental, and tax cuts usually focused on the rich. Before Trump for a while if you promised low taxes and deregulation people would expect you to also favor globalism and works-policing, and if you didn't you would face political retaliation.

*world-policing

That macro is unbelievably stupid. Mass duplication of the same service in the private sector versus investing in a single public service. The best part is the private sector invariably consolidates into monopolies anyway.

Having a single government run company in an industry actually does wonders for the industry. It creates a non-artificial quality floor. So long as we have the post office, we will always have private carriers that are better than it, and one shitty option that's more resilient. A great market smoother.

If we had a government run insurance that was voluntary and shitty, every other insurance would have to be better than it. It should only happen though in industries we believe are absolutely vital to society. A government health group would probably be better than a government insurance. It would be really awful, but it would really drive down health care costs, in turn making insurance cheaper too.

It's also great from a political theory angle too. It lets voters have a direct hand in saying what they think minimum quality should be.