/lrg/ LIBERTARIAN RIGHT GENERAL - THE NATURAL ORDER

This thread is for Discussion of Libertarianism, Capitalism, Anarcho-Capitalism, and the PHYSICAL REMOVAL of COMMUNIST FAGS from our board of peace. Reminder that this is the Libertarian RIGHT General. Aleppo Johnson-fags, Left-Libertarians, and other Shit-Libs need to fuck off. Voice your complaints to r/libertarian.

>Recommended Reading list
libertarianright.org/reading/

>Vanilla /lrg/ pastebin- CREATE IF YOU DONT SEE ONE IN THE CATALOG
pastebin.com/7K1EJYb8

>Bump for Life, Liberty, and Private Death Squads

>What is Physical Removal?
youtube.com/watch?v=ZJ5zOEkD2Lg

>Based Portugal Has released a new track, check it out!
youtube.com/watch?v=yzrqtCDp-k8&feature=youtu.be
youtube.com/watch?v=yzrqtCDp-k8&feature=youtu.be
youtube.com/watch?v=yzrqtCDp-k8&feature=youtu.be

Other urls found in this thread:

infoshop.org/AnarchistFAQSectionFIntro
youtube.com/watch?v=bYUIAXCiQCI
youtube.com/watch?v=2ELqp4LALkI
mises.org/system/tdf/The Private Production of Defense_3.pdf?file=1&type=document
securitydegreehub.com/30-most-powerful-private-security-companies-in-the-world/
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

...

...

Just cashed out 200,000 USD for some boy for a 2,5% reward. Feels good man. Fuck taxes. Fresh "criminal" notes going into my backpack just make it farmer

>it's another autistic ancaps try to fit in using forced memes thread

Roads are gay

trying to fit into your asshole, fuck off shill.

This BTFOs the AnCap

infoshop.org/AnarchistFAQSectionFIntro

What?

>reading jew written bullshit
Jews have some negroid ancestors down the line, so it's pretty disgusting to read anything by them. Whether Hayek was a niggerkike is debatable

>Implying Slavs are better.

>Anarcho-feminist website
what the fuck are you doing reading this trash.

...

not an argument

...

>Not an Argument
>Begins posting straw man argument memes.

>implyin they are not
Namely Russians are one of the only groups to rival Northwestern Europeans in terms of genetics and human achievements. Jews are disgusting. They are stupid, often insane, they have bad work ethnic. Their ancestors are niggers. They are niggers. Instead of demanding dem reparations for dem slabery, dey scream for muh "Shoah". Yeah Jews are niggers

When you look at someone and you know that he or she has nigger ancestor, you can't help but wonder: "fuck just how fucking subhuman his genetic memerory is?"

Marxism is trash
Class theory is shit
Labor Value theory is literal retardation

You will only ever acheive egalitarianism when we are all equally dead.

>Russian calling other people niggers

>human achievement

your genetics are garbage.

Russians don't have nigger ancestors. Jews do. Jews are fucking useless nigger. Don't be so triggered. Everyone who worked with them or anywhere near financial sector, knows that they are braindead subhumans kept afloat only by ethnic nepotism
America has even bigger white trash problems
>Russia
>world renowned literature
>one of the first to create segregation in Europe
>unapologetically anti-jewish prior to 1917
>crushed Swedish Empire, Napoleonic France and Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth
>composers
>theatre
>ballet
>biggest country in the world
>first man in space
>father of chemistry and pharmacy

>Jews
>some meme plagiariser scientist, inbreeding and getting blacked in SPQR

The difference is Russians sent a man in to space and niggers can't read cursive.

Those are ethnic minorities on the left. If you to post white trash, use at least ethnic Russian one. Trump voting rural and suburban retards not even once
youtube.com/watch?v=bYUIAXCiQCI
youtube.com/watch?v=2ELqp4LALkI

Pic probably has aids.

Would fug. What does this has to do with libertarianism though?

>unapologetically anti-jewish prior to 1917
and dont forget it, your country was overrun with kikes.
>first man in space
Under communist kike rule, you didn't do that shit.
again That wasn't ethnic russians that was the soviet kikes that sent a man into space.

How does a libertarian society defend itself from actual nations?

>That wasn't ethnic russians that was the soviet kikes that sent a man into space.
There should be some source on that, my man.
>when you are insane, nigger and 5'7

And Stalin was cracking down on kikes pretty good. Read a book, suburban retard
That Jews are inferior niggers and reading their insane rumblings is not a good way to spend your time?

The NAP and countries like costa rica don't even have a military and hasn't been invaded by its neighbours. Also people are allowed to own fully automatic rifles in a libertarian society.

thid question gets asked so often, there will be privatized defense. if you want to look into it heres a short read. mises.org/system/tdf/The Private Production of Defense_3.pdf?file=1&type=document

>stalin was a good boy. he was an honarary aryan.
fucking dropped. fuck on outta here.

The average IQ of those, who subscribe to this totalitarian cultist ideology it is even worse than their racial makeup. Usually some mongrel middle class subhuman retards, that think that they would make it in a libertarian society; and not realising, that, we the people with good financial background, find them disgusting looking and subhuman

Who said that, retard? Kikes didn't rule much past 1937. Claim stupid shit - be called out for being a subhuman retard that you are.

Stalin was Georgian subhuman, look up his birth place.

venom slinging and fallacious arguements.

scroll down to see some article about how ferguson was about racist white cops....

really b t f o

Yes he was. Who calls him Russian,"le based" or anything else here? Inbreeding prevents development of the reading skills, kikenigger?

Whatever, faggot. Go peach your love of bolshevism to your friends at the communism general

Well you do got a point, race mixing is fucking disgusting.

I see your point
That's not what totalitarian means though, a totalitarian regime uses all it's countrymen ressources to achieve a common goal, with or without their consent. Ancaps are literally the opposite

...

>the NAP
this isnt a kindergarten
>fully automatic weapons
Some autistic pedos with m16's cannot fight against an actual military
>costa rica
This is not a sutuation that can be replicated in many places on earth, it would mean that al libertarian states need to be irrelevant or have allies with actual millitaries to survive

Ancaps are totalitarian in thinking. It's a fucking prison mind. They will sacrifice practical solutions for the sake of ideology. Personally, I support anything that brings down the eugenic culling and keeps my plentiful shekels safe.
It was you to praise kikenigger communism as some sort of invention inducing system, nog loving mongrel Trumptard

My bad confused you with some other guy

what about a privately owned military don't you get? im not talking about rednecks with guns im talking real military power. securitydegreehub.com/30-most-powerful-private-security-companies-in-the-world/

A few private armies with not even everyone putting money in with paid mercenaries will not be able to defeat a mass mobilized total war industry.

I'll like to see a private military build something as extensive as the Magnoit line then maintain 24/7 all year round. mercenary troops historically suck arse and flee or switch sides the first signs the battles turning the other way

Not to mention each private military company will be under their own "CEO's" leadership therefore diving up the army even more. "I'm not sending my mcdonalds army defense force there you send your kfc troops there"

Are you referring to ancap society, some libertarian societies still have government like a minarchy or libertarian capitalist.

Today wars most of the time aren't worth fighting considering they plunge countries far into debt.

The Iraq war costed the US 6 trillion dollars and still haven't payed it all back and their debt continue to rise.

Only stupid under development african countries will wage war for no reason. People on both sides lose more than gain in war today.

Heil Rothbard.

there are currently multi-billion dollar private militaries that im sure are capable of contructing such a bunker.

The military HAS to be divided up into different commanders, this is historical fact. do you think the world wars were organised soley by the leaders of the nations involved? no they have a chain of command, the military is divided up so it is more manageable by more people moreover just because militaries are divided doesn;t make them incapable of communicating and working together.

Heil Rothbard, we need to have a ceremony to make him an honorary white. he's been proven to be anti-zionist/socialist/globalist and i think its right to consider him a friend to the white man.

>G4S describes itself as “the world’s leading global security and outsourcing group,” specializing “in outsourcing of business processes in sectors where security and safety risks are considered a strategic threat.” The British multinational security giant was set up in 2004 when London-based company Securicor amalgamated with Danish business Group 4 Falck. Currently, G4S employs more than 620,000 people, which makes it the third biggest employer in the private sector globally. In 2012 G4S turned over well over $12 billion. The company offers a range of services, including the supply of security personnel, monitoring equipment, response units and secure prisoner transportation. G4S also works with governments overseas to deliver security.

>620,000 people

Smaller then Israel's,Iraq's,Columbia's,Thailand's and cuba's armed forces. And that's assuming 100% of this are combat troops and not just desk jockeys.

Yeah hiring mercenaries worked out real good for the native Britons just ask the Anglo-Saxons they made real good mercenaries for the Roman/Britons. what's to say the ceo of a military company won't just say fuck your rules I'm king now.

Fucking meme ideology. Hey guys lets call it ancap because anarchism capitalism reminds me of the anarchist part. Yeah anarchism works real good

nigger gene is strong with this subhuman jew. That stupid kike supporting selling kids. He was by far a intellectually bankrupt moron

now imagine you didn't have a national military, you would invest heavily on these companies. they would be larger and less restricted in their weaponry.

>what's to say the ceo of a military company won't just say fuck your rules I'm king.
implying these companies aren't mostly made of citizens of the region they are protecting. I don't believe the foot soldiers would take orders from a CEO to kill their own families and neigbors.

>ancaps are totalitarian in thinking
Can't argue with that
>I support anything that brings down the eugenic culling and keeps my plentiful shekels safe.
You can't have your cake and eat it, a state which supports moral stances such as eugenics is highly likely to have a pretty clear idea of what you can or can't do with your money, that's not what I would call safe

>it's small now therefore it will always be small, forever!!! 11111 xd
Child tier reasoning, grow up

read my words carefully.
If you sell your children, you are a subhuman peice of shit. however it is more ethical to give your child to another caregiver rather than to neglect them. Doesn't matter anyway, Rothbard never sold any children.

>reading and defending a demented shit written by a heavily negroid jew
Top kek

You signed a contract to obey me your commander in chief and chef MC Donald's mc army division.

I can now shoot you in the fucking head for violating the contract, and since I've hired from other parts of the country, or from minorities or from overseas and i pay them the wages which without them they would quite literally starve to death without, their only loyalty is to me. wow great logic just disobey the contract you signed to be apart of the armed forces therefore breaking the nap getting you and your family killed.

A big group of armed people will never oppress the weak or small in numbered. Yeah Anglo Saxons were good mercenaries and army never go and extort other weak people.

Child logic everyone will abide by the nap because i can defend myself against an entire army

>ROADS

>Government is bad because too much power
>The private militarily companies will grow extremely big and influential but they won't use this power to extort from people at all

10/10 logic

I used to be a libertarian, but idk man, stoners ruined the movement. I'm kind of a lot more fascist now, authoritarian capitalist for sure.

The private military's power is derived from their ability to serve their clients. The moment they cease to represents the interests of their consumers is the same moment their consumers jump ship.

I would never agree/sign a contract to kill my own people. You're an idiot.

...

False equivalence, not an argument

This is RIGHT libertarian, not stoner A leppo tier reasoning.

This thread generally advocates a small state to ensure protection of civil liberties, a judicial court of law and defense of the citizens. Not that these Australian shit posters realise that right libertarianism =/= anarcho capitalism.

A big powerful company capable of maintaining expensive forts hundreds of thousands of soldiers,tanks,aircraft,ships logistics including, food,transport,admin,recruitment

No extortion/corruption or abuse of power

Choose one (1)

Then your not getting paid dumbass and the company will hire a nigger or someone who needs the money more.

Why is reddit filled with so many leftists?

Tfw right-libertarian and ancap.

You have failed to grasp my point. The fact that the consumer can seek another provider, or choose not to pay at all makes corruption unsustainable. Corruption incurs additional expenses and leaves the organisation noncompetitive.

>meritocracy
Top shitpost

>right libertarian
No such thing

The upvoting system. The most popular opinions get the most exposer and get propogated.

he didn't support selling kids

he supported selling kid contracts to responsible parents

Then I'll work for the military that doesn't have genociding my people on its agenda

Okay so you cannot have a giant company with no corruption or abuse just like you cannot have a giant state with no corruption as once a monopoly has guaranteed rule and no competition he can jack the prices up and start treating people like shit if he has a guaranteed customer base. That's the whole point of no intellectual rights and a very free market

So now you must have several broken up military companies all vying for power so the free market effect kicks in therefore creating a sub par disunited military, which would lose to a mass conscripted total war economy.

Good to see you guys are still retarded

A society build around individualism and consumerism will never ever be right wing NEVER

>makes some unsubstantiated claim about monopolies potentially forming.
>advocates a guaranteed monopoly.

You're the only retard here mate.

What do you mean by right wing?

We believe right wing = greater economic freedom.So by that definition a smaller state regardless of whatever the values espoused by the culture are is more right wing.

Everyone can start a company, how the fuck is that consumering?

The most important thing you can do for the white race is keep your own life in order. You must be successful, reliable, hardworking, and, above all, happy. Do people in your life trust and respect you? What does your family think of you? Are you capable of raising children? Racial politics doesn’t have to be the only factor of your life. And if you can't achieve these things in your real life, then you are not ready to be a political activist, either online or in real life. Because if you can't make anything of your own, individual life, then how can you think you'll be able to make a real difference for the race, for the lives of many?

Always remember: we live in first world countries and have opportunity that most people born on this planet don't. Take care of yourself. Work your ass off, every day, to build a good life for you, and for your family. Spend your time wisely, and keep your real life priorities in order. Nothing on the internet should ever take away from your real life. Your time on Earth is short and precious. Start planning on making the most of it

Consumerism*

>Implying natural law isn't the highest form of traditionalism.

A big company capable of actually defending against another super power. Has to have dominance. With dominance comes a monopoly and extortion.

The other option

Several smaller companies all vying for control will not be able to defend a country as well as one single entity

>Government is bad because it's big and it's corrupt
>But a big military company won't extort because of non existent other military comparisons because then it wouldn't be a big company.
>And several small disunited ones won't extort because of free market but then it's shitting on the defense of your nation

Consumerism is what happens when you add inflation. An anarcho Capitalist society is by definition not consumerist, but saving money to capitalize.

A state is what creates individualism. When was the last time you needed to interact in order to get job benefits for a group, when was the last time you needed to interact for a mutual insurance? Humans are not individualist, changing our nature would make us so.

>rightwing = greater economic freedom
Never heard something so absolutely retarded. The "right wing" is simply a reaction to the destruction of culture and tradition of the "left wing". Libertarianism stands for these very same principles
Is this supposed to be an argument?

muh natural law

Yeah natural law until someone bigger comes along and fucks your """""natrual""""" laws in the arse. Yeah Ancap Tibet or Ukraine would survive bordering aggressive super powers

Last part was meant for

The only alternative to natural law is animal law, which is what you just described: the biggest and strongest get to do whatever they want.

When you reject natural law, you cannot complain when a nigger puts a gun against your chest and demands your money. He's stronger than you. By your logic, he's perfectly justified to do so.

You're arguing semantics, it's hardly relevant. I'm describing what the consensus here is. You're just being a contrarian.

Make an actual point or fuck off.

>make an actual point
I just did tard

Again you resort to barbarism, decivilization proving you are just valueless leftist scum. My private military will crush your commie uprising you fucking dindu.

No you dumbcunt

Animal law is what we have now to a degree.

The people decided you being a nigger you cannot enter the country. By all means if you had a stronger army you could invade and if you won you could enter the country. We have that right fucking now.

China did not give a shit about Tibet's """""Natural""""" laws. We live in the laws of animals now but they have been somewhat tamed by the government and the people. which even the concept of a government is an animalistic feature. A group of people gathered together and said this is how we are running our land here if you do not agree you get thrown in prison. That is by definition Strong>Weak

The people decided I have the right to shoot a nigger if he points a gun at me, and since the majority of the people support this the people who do not support my "right" to do so cannot enforce it because they are weak and small in number they cannot run the country how they want

So you agree that if my tribe is stronger than your tribe, we get to cuck you very hard?

Sounds like civilization to me.

Now hand over dat cellphone

If your not for autistic no government your a communist. Amazing logic the very definition of a strawman.

Your natural laws exist only as long as you can enforce them yourself. If someone is stronger then you and wants to get rid of your "rights" he can

Yes, the point was that libertarian policies promote entreprenorship and the production of goods instead of being a wageslave and just consuming them, how is that consumerism?

>Libertarianism stands for these very same principles
Leftists are the ones attacking anyone who dares support traditional marriage, or says that transgenderism is a mental illness. Libertarians are the ones who stand in support of personal freedom and the right of free association.

The problem is with you doing that you need to defeat the police force of Australia, and to defeat them you need to defeat the armed forces of Australia and all her allies.

If you do all of that you can shoot me in the head all you want.

If Isis was the strongest in the world they could do what they want to you. Do you disagree with that isis part?

The government for all purposes is just isis they got the police the military and the majority of people to run the country how they want. Communists cannot live how they want because they are weak and we are strong

9/10 libertarianism will be used as license, to think otherwise is wishfull thinking.
>instead of being a wageslave
user..... I......

And yes if your "tribe" aka country was stronger and wished to yes you could cuck me. The problem is you have to defeat our army.

if you defeat our army and make us unconditionally surrender you can do what ever you want