Should marriage be privatized?

Today, men are getting a lot more cautious about marriage, some deciding to not marry at all. This is because if marriage were to fail, the outcome will almost always favor the woman overwhelmingly. Privatizing marriage would remove the tax deductions, which shouldn't be there in the first place. The couples would make their own contracts, and men would no longer have to worry about being treated unfairly.

Many disasters could have been prevented if marriage was privatized, the JUSTing Brendan Fraser being one of them. Marriage is a ceremony between two individuals, and should remain as such.

It's a religious ceremony between a man and woman, that's it. The thing you're attempting to combat is the socialized matriarchal state we are trapped in.

Can't you just sign a pre-nup so you can keep your things?

Quite right, it is a religious ceremony between a man and a woman. But in today's society, you could say it is a ceremony between a man, a woman and the state, and you wouldn't be wrong. Some things should be left out of the state's hands, and I think this is one of them.

Prenups are not a guarantee, and are often dismissed.

I've been saying this for years but I'm curious as to what tax benefits married couples get in the land of massages, meatballs, and cucks.

>additional tax refunds
>lower interest rate in shared loans
>more household tax deductions
>lower taxes on inheritance

Absolutely. This idea of stronk independent womenz just went too far. Egalitarianism was a cruel experiment.

When, since civilization existed did privatizing anything reduce tax? More your privatize, bigger the tax. Marriage is already privatized, church almost pays no tax, it's a private run Zion organization, also the government is privatized by elite. How can you possibly privatize it more? You have more Christian religions in last 50 years than in 500 years before that. It's because you religious capitalistic privatizing morons that marriage in such state to begin with.

>Many disasters could have been prevented if marriage was privatized,

the disaster was involving government to begin with marriage does not fall under commerce clause

get government out of the marriage business before they start marrying pigs to horses and taking out insurance on the lack of children produced

I'm saying that the state shouldn't reduce tax for married individuals, not that privatizing marriage would reduce tax. Marriage is far from privatized, if it was we wouldn't see such a decline in men wanting to get married today.

>marries though church
>cuts his dick
blames public ownership
Why do you marry though Christian church and not though Buddhist temple? Because you made oligarchy out of religion. How many people even marry outside of Christian church in USA? Almost nobody, you are privatized by Zion moron. You wrote: "in god we trust" on your money, your Zion has privatized your government. Can you morons realize what you done? No, you are just another retarded Christian, lowest scum IQ on planet, even monkeys are more intelligent.

Who owns the state? Do i public owner own it or don't i participate in its decisions. If i don't participate and political party decides everything then it's privatized you huge Christian faggot. You are begging strangers, may it be private companies or private government to do shit in your favor. You are begging, therefore you don't control it, so it can't be non-privatized.

What we mean by privatized is that the marriage, and all the advantages and disadvantages that it brings, should be kept between the two individuals that engage in it.

If the government can step in and decide that you should have additional benefits, and decide who gets to keep what were the marriage to fail, it can not be considered a private ritual anymore, and thus, marriage is undoubtedly within the public sector.

Furthermore, you seem to have lost your composure.

church or no the marriage is filed with the state, all you need to be married is agreement between the couple and one parent usually father of the bride

why involve god or state?

but this is an old issue, isn't this what Cain and Able is about? the child you sacrifice to the state

all of that is horseshit, let people be and don't involve the state in their business, the church is just an older version, it wasn't too long ago the church was the state and you could argue it still is in many places

>Who owns the state?

your owner goyim, 7 wealthy families who finance your government own it

public ownership = the public is owner, therefore the public decides the fees, the laws, the inflation.
private ownership = private church owner decides shit, private owned political parties decides every shit.
What do we have? Church completely owns every shit and on top of that you need to pay for lawyers. Are lawyers not private companies?
How the fuck will you reduce tax of church if Christian church is already a private company that controls all fees. Government is just a company in capitalism, just a big company, same shit as Christian church and they both have same owner, the Zion. Who even decided that we need to marry through church if not the Zion. I don't want to marry though rotten church and abide their rotten laws/fees/contracts. It's the lawyers that will fuck you and church itself will fuck you, they work together with media and that will again fuck you. All of them Zion who's mission is to extract money from you. It's no longer priority to keep marriages lasting, since capitalism demands re-marriages, to extract money from you many times. Why would a fucking private owner work in your favor? How is it public if i completely decide nothing, i don't decide the laws, i don't decide where churches are build, nothing. You Christian maggots destroyed marriage, when it was controlled by public during Socialism it had very little divorces. Now you tell me you will fix it, when all you do is lie every day in church and fuck children on the side.

Public doesn't owns anything. Stop bullshitting me that it's public ownership. If you are the owner of company you decide stuff, i don't remember public deciding what church does or how marriages should work.

Yes, it has nothing to do with the state it should either be religious or a private contract

If you are going into a marriage worried how stuff should be split up should you guys leave each other, then you shouldn't get married in the first place. I was with my girlfriend for 5 years before we got married, our relationship was never about money, never about who has the power or not.

This is the problem with society these days, faggots who don't even know each other, never lived with each other decide to get married, and then they get a divorced not much later.

Like my brother, if you wanna talk about stupid shit, he got married after being with a girl for 2 months! On top of that he got her pregnant, so she had a kid with him and they got a divorced, now they gotta juggle ht ekid back and forth every other day. The total time they were with each other? Not even more than a year and a half.

Some people just aren't right for marriage, people are too self centered for marriage these days ,it's all about themselves and their needs. Obviously a marriage for them will not work.

I really thank God everyday for finding my significant other, I really am, I never take it for granted.

It should, but it won't be. Politicians can't govern who gets married, when, and how unless it's government controlled (and directly linked to religion to reinforce that control through moral shaming.)

If it was privatized, you'd have 10x the moral shaming but the government would no longer be in control and they hate that.

>stronk independent womenz

I just can't believe anyone could ever say that with a straight face.

Yesterday, I heard some song with a woman breaking up with a guy and catching him doing all these bad things like she was on the offensive. When you know she was balled up in a fetal position crying for a week because the guy dumped her for a hotter piece of ass.

Everytime I hear the phrase "strong independent woman", my mind immediately pictures them crying like a bitch while 2 friends console her on each side because she stubbed their toe

What a fucking joke.

>losing all of the benefits because your wife "needs space" after 5 years and takes the children and your house, dog, car, and 50% of what you earn for the rest of your life with her.