Today, men are getting a lot more cautious about marriage, some deciding to not marry at all. This is because if marriage were to fail, the outcome will almost always favor the woman overwhelmingly. Privatizing marriage would remove the tax deductions, which shouldn't be there in the first place. The couples would make their own contracts, and men would no longer have to worry about being treated unfairly.
Many disasters could have been prevented if marriage was privatized, the JUSTing Brendan Fraser being one of them. Marriage is a ceremony between two individuals, and should remain as such.
Anthony Nguyen
It's a religious ceremony between a man and woman, that's it. The thing you're attempting to combat is the socialized matriarchal state we are trapped in.
Lucas Hill
Can't you just sign a pre-nup so you can keep your things?
Ayden Evans
Quite right, it is a religious ceremony between a man and a woman. But in today's society, you could say it is a ceremony between a man, a woman and the state, and you wouldn't be wrong. Some things should be left out of the state's hands, and I think this is one of them.
Prenups are not a guarantee, and are often dismissed.
Daniel Sanchez
I've been saying this for years but I'm curious as to what tax benefits married couples get in the land of massages, meatballs, and cucks.
Evan Campbell
>additional tax refunds >lower interest rate in shared loans >more household tax deductions >lower taxes on inheritance
Hunter Reyes
Absolutely. This idea of stronk independent womenz just went too far. Egalitarianism was a cruel experiment.
Jace Evans
When, since civilization existed did privatizing anything reduce tax? More your privatize, bigger the tax. Marriage is already privatized, church almost pays no tax, it's a private run Zion organization, also the government is privatized by elite. How can you possibly privatize it more? You have more Christian religions in last 50 years than in 500 years before that. It's because you religious capitalistic privatizing morons that marriage in such state to begin with.
Lucas Anderson
>Many disasters could have been prevented if marriage was privatized,
the disaster was involving government to begin with marriage does not fall under commerce clause
get government out of the marriage business before they start marrying pigs to horses and taking out insurance on the lack of children produced
Nolan Bailey
I'm saying that the state shouldn't reduce tax for married individuals, not that privatizing marriage would reduce tax. Marriage is far from privatized, if it was we wouldn't see such a decline in men wanting to get married today.
