Thoughts on this quote?

Thoughts on this quote?

[Hitler] has grasped the falsity of the hedonistic attitude to life. Nearly all western thought since the last war, certainly all "progressive" thought, has assumed tacitly that human beings desire nothing beyond ease, security, and avoidance of pain. In such a view of life there is no room, for instance, for patriotism and the military virtues. The Socialist who finds his children playing with soldiers is usually upset, but he is never able to think of a substitute for the tin soldiers; tin pacifists somehow won’t do. Hitler, because in his own joyless mind he feels it with exceptional strength, knows that human beings don’t only want comfort, safety, short working-hours, hygiene, birth-control and, in general, common sense; they also, at least intermittently, want struggle and self-sacrifice, not to mention drums, flag and loyalty-parades. However they may be as economic theories, Fascism and Nazism are psychologically far sounder than any hedonistic conception of life. The same is probably true of Stalin’s militarised version of Socialism. All three of the great dictators have enhanced their power by imposing intolerable burdens on their peoples. Whereas Socialism, and even capitalism in a grudging way, have said to people "I offer you a good time," Hitler has said to them "I offer you struggle, danger and death," and as a result a whole nation flings itself at his feet.

--George Orwell

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mefo_bills
rickandmorty.wikia.com/wiki/Rixty_Minutes/Transcript
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran–Contra_affair
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran–Iraq_War
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_support_for_Iraq_during_the_Iran–Iraq_war
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Cyclone
michaelparenti.org/afghanistan_story_untold.html
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/POUM
youtube.com/watch?v=GEzOgpMWnVs
twitter.com/AnonBabble

He is mostly right.

It is not hard for any intelligent person to make a coherent analysis. The problem is such analysis is never complete. Reality is way too complex.

That's why I laugh when people asks me who is right and who is wrong. The truth is every intelligent person is partially right, but nobody has the absolute truth. Reality can't be reduced to human language, not even to human logic.

> The truth is every intelligent person is partially right, but nobody has the absolute truth.

Because truth doesn't belong to any ideology or system. And it's dangerous because "being partially right" is worst than "being wrong"

> Reality can't be reduced to human language, not even to human logic.

Because truth isn't a possession, but an expression. That's why most esotericism is heavily tied with metaphores, symbolism and things like religion.

Daily Reminder that Orwell was a leftist anarchist

> Democratic Socialism

Basically, South America Politics.

Daily reminder that politics 70 years ago was different and people who held particular views would not neccessarily hold them today, nigger faggot.

Or revolutionary Catalonia, the revolution he fought for, where successful democratic socialism was implemented, crop yields increased by as much as 50% according to some sources.

Although yes, attempts at democratic socialism were implemented in South America, in Nicaragua (the christian socialist sandinistas), Guetemala and Chile for example. All of these were attacked by covert CIA wars simply for being successful socialist countries. Reagan even sold arms to Iran to fund the Contas in Nicaragua, at the time the US was giving billions of dollars to Saddam in the Iran/Iraq war, so you can see these invasions by the CIA were criminal operations, the sale of cocaine was also used to fund these CIA sponsored groups, much like the Mujahdeen (again CIA sponsored) sold heroin in Afghanistan

you're right the man fought with a rifle in his hand for democratic socialism and researched and wrote extensively on the struggles of working people but I'm sure if he had seen 4/pol/ he would think just like you guys...

Right that's why communism and socialism doesn't exist

It exists currently in Rojava, Chiapas, Honduras, it has formerly existed in Ukraine, Catalonia and Korea

any business that runs as a worker co-operative runs according to proto anarchist principles.

You'll notice how co-operative products are generally not full of shit and their workers get a decent wage.

I'm talking actual co-operatives also, not consumer co-operatives like the co-op in bongland which has a CEO

I mean it doesn't really matter anyway, the problem with national socialism is that it was based on printing money, whose value lay only in the promise of military expansion.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mefo_bills

Essentially a ponzi scheme. These bills entered circulation the same way the British pound and the dollar did, by distributing to the military and financing wars

>if he had seen 4/pol/ he would think just like you guys...

>Implying I ever implied such thing.
I doubt he would be a Starbucks coffee sipping anarchist with iPhone in his hand who's busy informing his comrades on Facebook about how revolutionary he is, though.
Maybe anarchism used to be a thing back then when you had nazism and communism around but it's a joke nowadays.

Orwell had pretty unique political beliefs. I often wonder what he'd think of Britain today.

Kind of like, Damon Albarn of Blur and Gorillaz fame, really. How interesting is it that Albarn used to be "quintessentially British" through the popularization of Britpop, the British way of life, and is even on tape saying things like, "There is no place quite like those two British Isles," etc. But, as time progresses, it seems like he is becoming more and more cucked (see Hallelujah Money or Ascension by the Gorillaz).

In terms of Orwell's quote though, I'd say he is mostly right. People yearn for more out of life.

E-Eric?

No, it exists currently in Rojava, Chiapas and Honduras,

For most anarchists, Rojava is considered the Catalonia of the modern age. If Orwell were alive, most likely he would be there with an AK47 in his hand.

except what we are living through is progressive hyper capitalism with token socialistic gestures such as a token negro.

there is even a company set about to mock the public over this called "progressive" insurance by the ((((banksters))) and it is constantly advertised on the cia mind control programming network adult swim which is owned by the cohens (betty cohen started adult swim along with the turners).

if you look carefully the same nihilistic,hedonistic atheistic crap is put in pretty much every show.

The topics of abortion/population control,homosexuality,drugs and so forth come up ALOT.

"'''Jerry'''
All this time, you've been thinking, "What if that loser Jerry hadn't talked me out of the abortion?"

'''Summer'''
Um--

'''Jerry'''
Well now you know: you'd be a doctor. [''circles finger''] Whoop-dee-doo. You'd also be drinking wine, alone in a house full of exotic birds. And I'd be on DiCaprio's yacht-- [''holds up device''] ''banging'' Kristen Stewart!

'''Summer'''
You thought about getting an ''abortion''?

'''Beth'''
Everyone ''thinks'' about it. Obviously, ''I'm'' the version of me that didn't do it. So you're welcome.

'''Jerry'''
Yeah, you're welcome.

'''Summer'''
Yeah, thank you guys ''so'' much. It's a ''real'' treat to be raised by parents that force themselves to be together instead of being happy.

'''Rick '''[''walking to the cupboard'']
Hey, do we have any wafer cookies? [''grabs cookie box. eats cooke and starts walking away''] Mm! [''stops and looks back at Jerry, Summer and Beth''] Oh, boy. Looks like you guys have been checking out alternate lives and realizing you don't have it as good, huh? That's too bad.

rickandmorty.wikia.com/wiki/Rixty_Minutes/Transcript

He is right, people may live a good life but it's when they struggle when they try to make the best of it.

It makes me wonder though how can the author of 1984 praise Stalin here.

Orwell was a great thinker. from that same essay he had quite a few insights of Hitler's mind, and predicted very accurately how he would behave later on.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran–Contra_affair

CIA sells cocaine and arms to Iran to fund the Contras 1985-1987

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran–Iraq_War

Iran Iraq war 1980-1988

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_support_for_Iraq_during_the_Iran–Iraq_war

United states funds Iraq during Iran/Iraq War

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Cyclone

CIA sponsors Mujahadeen

michaelparenti.org/afghanistan_story_untold.html

Mujahadeen sell herion

These are all facts

Yes, I'm on the same page as you.

I'm asking if your name is Eric you pseudobong.

Orwell was an anarcho-communist, and fought for the anarcho-syndicalist FAI in Spain. There are still a lot of people with those same views

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/POUM

Orwell's party in the Spanish Civil War. Yes thats "THE PARTY OF MARXIST UNIFICATION"

lol nope

If you say so m8. See you around kek.

It's true. Note that suicide is much more prevalent in the richest countries than the poorest

Material strife keeps away the existential strife

People would rather be poor individually while the group they identify with does well, than rich individually while their identity group falters

shut the fuck up philosodork.

Here is the book George Orwell wrote about fighting alongside the anarchists and communists with his "Party of Marxist Unification" Regiment.

Daily reminder that if you aren't a leftist libertarian you support such a society as pictured in 1984

Absolutely right
It's not like the ones behind the American government don't realize it either, with anti-terrorism propaganda and all. It just doesn't have the same effect because people start to see through these petty conflicts for what they are instead of nation-defining struggles.
And so you see all sorts of comfortable people trying to manufacture conflicts and crusades in lieu of being offered external ones. They started as modest social movements and became more assertive and even violent.

This sort of clarity is rare to see in these trying times.

It seems somebody needs a heli ride.

Hitler was right about everything.

...

How is life being ass ravaged daily by Erdogan you hairy islamist fuck? Don't you have an uber to sexually harrass women in or something?

Don't you have ISIS to fight? Oh no wait you just buy their oil and actively fight groups like the YPG who actually are fighting ISIS.

Only the boot for roaches

Rojava is ISIS for brainwashed leftists and a based ethnostate for hard core K*rds.

but it is a cia backed paper tiger for libtard anheroing against isis for gains.

the state will taken back by the turkroaches anyways so its futile, besides mosul kurd state in iraq is defacto kurdistan anyway.

thank you

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mefo_bills nope he was just a buttblasted kike wannabee

Like avoiding Moscow to attack the caucuses? Or the decision to ally with Japan and declare war on the USA?

Lol, Kurds are a DoD pawn you stupid nigger. They are literally fighting for American imperialism.

This is how dumb anarchists are in current year.

Yes, both were correct decisions.

>Rojava is ISIS for brainwashed leftists

yup, the system based on co-operative democracy is totally the same as the system based on sharia law...

The ONLY SECULAR AREA IN THE WHOLE REGION NOW THAT ASSAD IS KILL

is completely the same as the islamist militants.


No you're a fucking moron

He's absolutely right. We humans crave conflict in any way shape or form, it's in our nature. If it weren't, we may have achieved world peace centuries ago. And it's why the current promotion of universal tolerance has lead to prejudice against the percieved oppressors, the white male.

You realize the Americans have been supporting them only very recently and their struggle has been going on since the 70's yes?

Doesn't refute the fact that they are pawns of American imperialism.

>We humans crave conflict in any way shape or form, it's in our nature.

yeh, I mean the vast majority of people go into work every day looking for conflict, when they get home and ask their kids how school was, they are also looking for conflict. When they tuck them in after the bath, hoping to get a restful nights sleep to make the most of the next day, they are definitely looking for conflict.

Nope, you're just a fucking nigger, most people want peace and family

No, they are tactically accepting support from the US because it helps in their struggle. Notice, it wasn't the US who created and funded and trained this group, like the Mujahadeen or Contras, they don't run the YPG in the same way, the YPG run themselves and they only work with the US where agreeable, as Turkey is a Nato member, this means specifically against ISIS.

> We humans crave conflict in any way shape or form, it's in our nature.

We creave for power which leads into conflict. It's different.

> And it's why the current promotion of universal tolerance

Universal Tolerance is merely pretending. Peace remains as an ideal because in harmony with someone which is different from you requires a great wisdom of only few actually possess it.

crave*

>No, they are tactically accepting support from the US because it helps in their struggle
Lol, retarded anarchists believe this. Good job faggots. American empire thanks you for your "struggle" kek

lol these are the best insults you can find? lmao.

For ypg part those idiots are securing oil for American companies. American or Turkish soldiers are much more valuable than k*rdish monkeys. When US doesnt need them anymore you will see in the news how rojava wasnt actually a socialist paradise. But if you had a brain to understand this simple shit you wouldnt be a socialist.

Do you really think that US is training and helping a military force for democratic green feminist veganist socialist paradise?

The left have been the most useful idiots for capitalism in history, so it should not be surprising they continue as shock troops for American corporations.

Why'd he shoot that poor elephant?

Right, yet you have presented not one argument presenting the actual circumstances which would deny what I am saying,

just

>lol anarchist are dumb

ad homing ad nauseum.

>For ypg part those idiots are securing oil for American companies.

Their entire system is based around democratic public ownership. Their leader has been in prison for years and used to be a leninist. You are deluded if you think companies are getting in.

Nonetheless, Turkey are actively buying ISIS oil so you can hardly talk can you.

> American or Turkish soldiers are much more valuable than k*rdish monkeys

Is that why you have been utterly BTFO by the Kurds who now have their own autonomous region?

>When US doesnt need them anymore you will see in the news how rojava wasnt actually a socialist paradise

and yet their fight has been going on much longer than the US has been involved.

and your proof of this is where exactly? and what exactly have the consevatives done to stop the power of corporations? You faggots actively argue for American imperialism, but suddenly now you're all anti corporation.

>peace and family
desu I just want to

SINK
THE
CHINKS

>You are deluded if you think companies are getting in
You are deluded if you think they aren't.

>and what exactly have the consevatives done to stop the power of corporations?
Nothing. Conservatives are trash.

>You faggots actively argue for American imperialism
>implying I'm conservative
>implying I'm not anti-American

Anarchists love America, because America is leftist just like them.

>The truth is everyone is right and wrong at the same time, so nothing matters really.
Fuck off relativist scum.

>You are deluded if you think companies are getting in.
ahahhahahhahahahahhahahahahahahahahahhahahahahhahahahahahhahahahahhahahahahahahahahahhahahahahha


>Is that why you have been utterly BTFO by the Kurds who now have their own autonomous region?
In where? In Turkey? hahahah they couldnt control single village in Turkey in past 30 years. How can Turkey prevent autonomous region in Iraq? Actually Barzani is Erdoğan's ally. He had came to Erdoğan's rallies. More than 50% of Iraqi k*rdistan's imports are from Turkey.

Eastern Anatolia is mountainous area so it is very easy for guerilla warfare. Same with Afganistan. America couldnt wipe Taliban out. Because 10 men can hide in caves for months then they can strike. It doesnt mean k*rds are gaining land. It doesnt mean k*rds are getting independence. They need full assault to the cities. Then they need to attack with their AKs to modern tanks.

>Nonetheless, Turkey are actively buying ISIS oil so you can hardly talk can you.
Erdoğan is a son of bitch. He does that. I would kill him if i could. I dont support him. Do you know who is supporting Erdoğan? Vast majority of k*rds. They dont tell ya but k*rds are the biggest enemies of secularism in Turkey. Even in pkk there are people fight for sharia.

george orwell is literally redit the author


captcha:
select the vehicles
selected all the squares with vehicles
try again!

do this over and over

captcha is fucking gay

>America is leftist

yeh thats why they spent the 60's murdering leftist leaders like MLK and Martin Luther King and Fred Hampton and made it illegal to be a socialist leader of a trade union with the taft-hartley act, thats why the the US funded a global anti communist war that spanned every continent of the earth, most notably however in Latin America, the MIddle East and Southeast Asia

>america is leftist

you are a complete retard if you actually believe this

*malcom X and Martin Luther king

seriously learn the smallest piece of history before you post

>hahahah they couldnt control single village in Turkey in past 30 years. How can Turkey prevent autonomous region in Iraq?


this is literally just denial of straight facts. I'd expect nothing less from an Erdocucked Islamist Turk Roach who prefers ISIS to democracy, you can tell because they buy products from one and fight the other

>this is literally just denial of straight facts
Name one village pkk controled in Turkey. De facto rojava is direct consequence of Erdoğan's stupid foreign policy. If we didnt supported moderate headcoppers Assad wouldnt lost northern Syria and America wouldnt support "ANARCHIST SOCIALISTs"

Can you read? I would kill that son of bitch i could. Do you read anything aside from terror propaganda. Do you really think every single citizen in Turkey Erdocucked Islamist Turk Roach who prefers ISIS to democracy?

You are braindead.

>you are a complete retard if you actually believe this
It is. From the viewpoint of traditional right, it is extremely leftist. America is the vanguard of leftism in the world and always has been since it was created.

For the record, capitalism is leftist as much as anarchism and communism. Only historically illiterate anarkiddies believe otherwise.

>capitalism is as much leftist as anarchism and communism

Okay buddy, i mean sure, Marx said that capitalist was necessary before anarchism or communism could come about and it is better than feudalism, but no, it is not leftist

>murdering leftist leaders like MLK
MLK was actually a CIA asset you dumb faggot. Anti-racism and integrationism was created by the CIA as a cold war strategy, so they could appeal to third world. Leftists are so uneducated it hurts.

>socialist leader of a trade union with the taft-hartley act, thats why the the US funded a global anti communist war that spanned every continent of the earth, most notably however in Latin America, the MIddle East and Southeast Asia
America was anti-soviet, not anti-leftist. Big difference. America was the world power of the anti-Stalinist left (Stalinism was actually a relatively "right wing" political movement in historical context).

Orwell was 110 right about fascism and I say that as someone who doesn't really care for him.
It's a crank ideology

>but no, it is not leftist
Yes, it is. You agree 99% with what America stands for. You are peas in a pod. In fact, you only take leftist American values and try to make them more consistent. You leftists are American radicals, realizing the enlightenment dream of America in its truest manifestation.

I, on the other hand, reject America and everything it stands for. This is what right wing means. That is why your anarchist buddies are bffs with the American DoD and your activists and given money and training by the state while true right is suppressed.

in this thread, burrito takes several lines worth of bandwdith to say that nobody knows anything.

yup and thats why they killed him along with every other major black leftist leader.

and I'm the uneducated one

>America was anti-soviet, not anti-leftist. Big difference. America was the world power of the anti-Stalinist left

Nicaragua, Guatemala, Chile, Honduras, El Salvadore, none of these places were Stalinist. Please do not pretend to know about things you utterly do not

>>thus implying they would share yours

>>being a dumb kurwa

You are on the board which supported Donald Trump and ascribe to all the ideologies he does only more radically but I am the one who doesn't oppose America, even though fundamentally I oppose its global dominance and economic hegemony, as it is based on private property and not democracy.

Sure whatever your say.

>You agree 99% with what America stands for.

Funny last time I check Trump was in power not a Anarchist Communist free territory based on direct democracy and without private property. I could be wrong about that though

>and ascribe to all the ideologies he doe
Lol, no I don't. I am anti-American to the core and want to see all history and trace of America wiped out.

>even though fundamentally I oppose its global dominance and economic hegemony
Yeah that's why you support their Kurdish troops kek. Keep telling yourself that dumbass.

>Funny last time I check Trump was in power
Trump is a leftist.

>not a Anarchist Communist free territory based on direct democracy and without private property
All of these are extensions of American ethics, dumbass. You agree 99% with Americanism because you agree with the entire philosophy underlying it. You are only in disagreement in minor details (private property vs collective property, etc.). It is still entirely the same worldview though, springing from the same philosophic assumptions.

He didnt know about tumblr-ites.

>yup and thats why they killed him along with every other major black leftist leader
They didn't kill him. This is some nigger myth. He was killed by normal whites who wanted to resist the CIA-imposed program of racial integrationism.

>Nicaragua, Guatemala, Chile, Honduras, El Salvadore, none of these places were Stalinist
But they were aligned with Soviets. These minor nations are not entities into themselevs. They are only understood in global political context. Just like your rojava idiots can only be understood within global political context. Doesn't matter if they "believe" in "democratic confederalism" when the realpolitik is that they work in advancement of American empire. Just like it doesn't matter what those South America places you referene believed because they ultimately advanced Soviet objectives in global political context.

>In addition to this there is the horrible — the really disquieting — prevalence of cranks wherever Socialists are gathered together. One sometimes gets the impression that the mere words "Socialism" and "Communism" draw towards them with magnetic force every fruit-juice drinker, nudist, sandal-wearer, sex-maniac, Quaker, "Nature Cure" quack, pacifist, and feminist in England.

t.George Orwell

Oh he knew all about them

> I am anti-American to the core and want to see all history and trace of America wiped out.

Right and leave what exactly in its place?

> their Kurdish troops

Again, the Kurds have been fighting their war for a lot longer than they have agreed for america to air strike some ISIS targets in coordination with them

>Trump is a leftist.

Trump believes in private property and is therefore not a leftist.

>All of these are extensions of American ethics, dumbass. You agree 99% with Americanism

You mean, the America that was built on the idea that people could own slaves and that only the propertied class should vote? No its entirely the opposite of that.

>It is still entirely the same worldview though, springing from the same philosophic assumptions.

No liberalism and anarchism are a clear split in philosphical discussion, the liberal believes the state can be used to enforce and protect freedom, the anarchist does not

sounds like you have been tricked by the postmodern jew

>him

what one of the 5-10 black leaders killed under suspicious circumstances within 5 years of each other all with murky circumstances surrounding CIA agents?

All of these people espousing anti racist and anti capitalist views.

Yes I am sure the CIA, who was at the same time engaged in anti-left wars the world over, would have totally supported these people.

Name for me one time the CIA has overthrown capitalism and left socialism in its place? Never,yet it has done the opposite on countless occasions.

>But they were aligned with Soviets.

No, most of them were specifically anti soviet and soviet was anti them, viewing them as Trotskyists and counter revolutionaries. Even Cuba, which was leninist, remained independent from the USSR right up until it was forced to co-operate with them after US trade embargoes.

basically what whole bottom part of your post fails to understand it actual history behind these places and failure to see them in their own context.

In these places, Guetamala, Chile, etc, the people had enough of capitalism and carried out revolutions, successful revolutions. Seeing this, the US wanted to stamp it out. The Truman Docrtine, etc.

Why did the US implement the Taft-Hartley act if it was pro leftist?

"All of humanity can be divided into group A, B and C. Group A is made up of those people who live principly off stock dividends, interest payments on their bond investments, royalties on their land and mineral holdings,rents on their properties, thats group A. Group B and C make up the other 99.5% of humanity and they live off wages, salaries, fees,commissions, tips, pensions. Group C is made up of tens of millions of people who don't even get that. They live in utter destitution from hand to mouth, from whatever hands outs or whatever charity bits or whatever fragmentary incomes they can scrounge. The thing that the people in groups A and B have in common is that they both live off the labour of group B. The people in group A don't just do this, they have an active element. We can call them the owning class because they own almost everything in the world. They own most of the land, they own the factories, the industries, the banks, the media, they also own a lot of the state. That is, their representatives, the politically active elements from their ranks move in and become the secretaries of defence, secretaries of state, CIA directors...."

youtube.com/watch?v=GEzOgpMWnVs

The church teaches similarly that suffering should not be avoided and should be handled gracefully

This Spaniard knows what time it is. God bless.

Kinda wish that pic had a Pokemon on it as if they were playing it, as further disrespect.

But i do want this
>comfort, safety, short working-hours, hygiene, birth-control and, in general, common sense

so nazi/commie death cults, their "muh flags, drums and glory" can fuck right off. Nazicucks and Trumplets shills can also fuck off, no one needs these sycophants here.

He knew that Armenians were subhuman rats and that is a virtue of intellect for a former socialist

>He typed with his rotten fish smelling fingers from a homogenous nation

Taiwan must embrace African, Seanigger and Middle Eastern migration or it won't survive

>"I offer you struggle, danger and death,"

and he kept the promise!

Not true by the way

>Yes I am sure the CIA, who was at the same time engaged in anti-left wars the world over, would have totally supported these people
They did support them. It's a fact. Integrationism and anti-racism were imposed from the top down, backed by media, corporations, and federal government against the wishes of locals. There is no mysterious circumstances around these people. You are just seeing what fits your false narrative.

And America did not have anti-leftist wars. They had anti-soviet wars. But Soviets were relatively "right wing" when compared to USA.

>No, most of them were specifically anti soviet and soviet was anti them, viewing them as Trotskyists and counter revolutionaries
Again, what they believe doesn't matter. They were de facto aligned with Soviets, as your Kurd friends are de facto aligned with American imperialism. It is about power. This is real politics. Ideology is babby-tier politics and doesn't matter except at the highest levels of power.

>Why did the US implement the Taft-Hartley act if it was pro leftist?
Because this was an anti-soviet measure (which again, Soviets were the relatively right wing compared to USA).

'In late 1979, the seriously besieged PDP government asked Moscow to send a contingent of troops to help ward off the mujahideen (Islamic guerrilla fighters) and foreign mercenaries, all recruited, financed, and well-armed by the CIA. The Soviets already had been sending aid for projects in mining, education, agriculture, and public health. Deploying troops represented a commitment of a more serious and politically dangerous sort. It took repeated requests from Kabul before Moscow agreed to intervene militarily'

Sound familiar to another middle eastern country currently struggling against CIA meddling?

>WAAH LEAVE MY SAFE SPACE, YOU'RE TRIGGERING ME!
""""libertarians"""" never fail to entertain me

Care to explain?

Best and worst days of my life were at war.

care to expand on that?

which war? have any stories?

Perfect quote

/leftypol/ can leave

>