Study Shows Evidence Female Justices Interrupted Three Times More Than Male Colleagues
That number is skewed due to the moribund Ginsberg.
>Female Justices Interrupted Three Times More Than Male Colleagues
That's because women cannot make a coherent and consitent statement, duh!
If they don't want to be interrupted, maybe they should think before they start yapping.
I would guess this. You only get half an hour to present your case and Ginsburg talks at 20 words a minute.
that's because the males are capable of shutting up
If women weren't so fucking stupid this wouldn't happen.
ever listen to scotus audio, those bitches never shut up. They also ask some of the stupidest questions. Sandra Day O'Connor was a one in a million best woman to ever sit on the bench and probably the last good one
I stopped listening after Scalia died. I look forward to Monday though.
we shall see. i have no faith in gorsuch. once he makes some solid decisions it will ease my mind. im old enough to remember other repub appointees that became turncoats. reagan had kennedy bush 1 had souter and bush 2 had a chief justice that gave us obamacare.
FAKE NEWS
> study shows
ummm...hmmmm
of course they get interrupted, women never shut up and will keep restating points instead of making new arguments
Because women never shut their fucking yaps
That's because they talk 3 times as much as men
>"I would not look to the U.S. Constitution, if I were drafting a Constitution in the year 2012. I might look at the Constitution of South Africa," says Ginsburg, whom President Clinton nominated to the court in 1993. "That was a deliberate attempt to have a fundamental instrument of government that embraced basic human rights, had an independent judiciary. … It really is, I think, a great piece of work that was done. Much more recent than the U.S. Constitution."
abcnews.go.com
they believe the constitution is a living breathing document that some how changes with time.
Sandra day o Connor was fucking awful. She voted with the progressives all the time limiting free exercise of religion and expanding rights to abortion
Study shows evidence that female justices speak three times longer then their male counterparts
>O'Connor was a vigorous defender of the citing of foreign laws in judicial decisions.
>The impressions we create in this world are important and can leave their mark ... [T]here is talk today about the "internationalization of legal relations". We are already seeing this in American courts, and should see it increasingly in the future. This does not mean, of course, that our courts can or should abandon their character as domestic institutions. But conclusions reached by other countries and by the international community, although not formally binding upon our decisions, should at times constitute persuasive authority in American courts—what is sometimes called "transjudicialism".
Maybe they should shut the fuck up.
Everyone knows how women loves droning on and on about nothing.
Maybe because women are 1/3 of the SC so theres more people that will be wanting to interrupt them by numbers alone?
any justice that doesn't sit there stoically like Thomas should be interrupted, god knows women cannot do this
Scalia could never shut his yap either
>someone makes a good argument that doesn't conflict with US law
>let's not listen
honestly she's right
they all play for the same team, they're there to fuck you just some can announce it and others are hired for their ability to hide it
they whacked Scalia because he fucked them over and pretended to play along but his moral compass fucked over their schemes
But they are no argueing within the context of our laws
>O'Connor once quoted the constitution of the Middle Eastern nation of Bahrain, which states that "[n]o authority shall prevail over the judgement of a judge, and under no circumstances may the course of justice be interfered with." Further, "[i]t is in everyone's interest to foster the rule-of-law evolution."
Did they study the average length of time that a Justice spends talking once they start talking?
It wouldn't surprise me if women are longer. And if you're endlessly talking/rambling more, you're gonna get interrupted more. Basic logic.
Not surprising. Women have characteristics that people perceive as diminishing their authority and leadership. They are shorter, physically smaller, narrower shoulders, have higher pitched voices. There is less inhibition to interrupt them. Their words are disregarded more, and reckoned to carry less weight than a man's. None of this is wrong or bad, it's just human nature. Some of this nature can be seen in more primitive creatures. The big monkey has a bonus to leadership and more often than not, will lead the troop. Apparently this has helped humans survive and succeed. The dominant male nature is part of that success and so is the subordinate female nature. Someone has to take the lead or have the final say in a family and generally it's the man. The tendency of women to be conformist or let's say, highly malleable makes them better wives and steers them to roles where they are followers, not leaders. It's also why they are extra susceptible to advertising and propaganda. Add to this the fact that their instincts are disastrous when applied to the scale of a nation and it's clear they shouldn't vote. The right unit of democratic participation isn't the individual, anyway. It should be one vote per family. Men and women shape each other's thinking (asymmetrically of course) and out of this interplay, decisions get made.
No she's not. I hope you understand that this quoted text from her was part of what helped in mandating that gay marriage be legalized across the US. In the Obergefell v. Hodges case (gay marriage case), the court leveraged O'Connor's position to cite a law from Denmark (fucking Denmark) to justify making it illegal for a state to ban gay marriage.
It is not her fault our legislature cannot do their jobs properly.
Maybe it's because they say more inane bullshit and constantly go out of their way to "assert their dominance" to make up for their insecurity.
>It is not her fault our legislature cannot do their jobs properly.
It was doing its job properly, both on the federal and state level. States like California or New York that really like gay marriage had made it legal, and there was no problem. States like Utah or Indiana, where almost no one wanted it ,decided not to do so.
The realm of marriage was a state's rights issue at the time the Constitution was founded, so that should really end the discussion. But even ignoring that point, if we assume that it should be in the federal realm, the majority of Americans (and certainly not the majority of states) actually did not support gay marriage at the time of Obergefell, so the federal legislature was in fact doing its job properly.
>its the legislative branch's job to pass laws that are in harmony with humanist values
neck yourself
I can't wait for this kike to die. She already seems like she's just running on fumes. She can't have much time left
>It was doing its job properly, both on the federal and state level.
It was not. A plain reading of various laws and amendments cannot be slipshod patched up by saying after the fact, "we really meant something different LOL".
I hate faggotry and gay marriage but unfortunately legislatures cannot write clear laws to save their lives, leaving
1) activist judges enough room to drive a tank through
2) conservative judges enough room to say nothing the government does is against the law
How was the law unclear?
Because they meant
>we can deny rights if they're gay
but they said
>cannot be denied without due process
And the conservatives are ALWAYS this dumb. They will go on and on about "important institutions" like marriage, hell, call them "fundamental institutions" and then libshits finally go,
>oh, yeah, they are fundamental :^)
And righties try to backpedal, "Oh we didn't mean fundamental LIKE THAT. We didn't mean niggers and whites! We didn't mean men with men!"
Libshits always do this and conservacucks never fucking learn.
>>cannot be denied without due process
People never were denied any rights for "being gay"
women can't compete against men
Probably cause they're talking shit
Women? Interrupt? Fucking non stop talking? Noooooooooouuuuu waaaaaaeeeyyy duuuude
This