Is the King James Bible the greatest literary and scholarly achievement of the English language?

Is the King James Bible the greatest literary and scholarly achievement of the English language?

youtube.com/watch?v=EVufl8Oy-PQ

Pretty sure that award goes to the US Constitution.

Friendly reminder that Israel/CIA/Shariablue create religious threads in an attempt to cause infighting among us. It's classic D&C (divide and conquer). Ignore religion threads: the OP is NEVER sincere with his questions or points. It all just to start a fight.

In that it is a work of fiction?

The OT that became the Hebrew bible is an Edit of the stories in the Sumerian tablets.

The Sumerian tablets tell the same stories but they give the gods their Sumerian names.

The Jews chose one of these gods to be their Lord and they think that if they are loyal to him and obey his commands then they will be rewarded by him.

The Lord of the OT is the Chief Archon known as the Demiurge. Not the All.

The Demiurge thinks that he is God but he isnt.

Very true Leaf. You are welcome to join us anytime.

> TV, newspapers, the famous, the occultists are all crucifying Christ
>bible based religion is CIA

Try harder, Satan

Sumerian tablets written by Sumerians.
Torah written by Israelites.

By the testimony of two, everything is established. Major events in Genesis is confirmed.

>this infographic
>protties actually believe that
wew lad

there's a certain coding in the OT that gives it the fingerprint of the all.

Yadaboath is the demiurge, Saboath Yahweh is not.

Erasmus, a Catholic priest, BTFO'ed your entire cult when he published the Textus Receptus and (big surprise) the Catholic bible had all kinds of shit in it that is not present in original Greek manuscripts.

It sounds cringy and pathetic as hell

But that's english language for ya

that picture activates my almonds.

Yahweh is described as a Jealous god who says he is the highest god.

This is the same description as Yaldabaoth.

The Demiurge is the Chief Archon and Archon means Lord.

The Lord of the OT is Yahweh. There were other lords of the garden, they were other archons.

if you've really read the gnostic gospels, you would be wise as to note the difference between Yadaboath and Saboath. Yahweh is the son of Yadaboath, and he repented to wisdom, which meant he was made part of the glory of the Father, and the Son jesus Christ, and Christ worked through Yahweh to redeem mankind.

Oh, you mean Novum Instrumentum omne?
365 errors in the first ed. alone?
Later criticized by Magister Erasmus himself?
After he openly admitted his work was based mostly on the scholastic manuscripts found in Basilean monasters?
After he openly admitted he didn't have proper tools to verify the correct age of his sources?
With missing fragments translated from Vulgata?

Erasmus' sources:

Most of the NT (without the Revelation): Minuscle 1eap - 12th century
Revelation: Minuscule 1rK - 12th century
Gospels: Minuscule 2e - 12th century
Acts of Apostles and Catholic Letters: Minuscule 2ap - 12th century
Paul's Letters: Minuscule 4ap - 15th century
Paul's Letters: Minuscule 7p - 12th century
Gospels: Minuscule 817 - 15th century

I think your might be right. Yahweh is the son.

But he is also the most direct Heir to the King. His Father.

So the son is very much like the father, which can make them hard to distinguish.

And no matter how far you go back into the Greek it still doesn't "correct" all of the massive errors in the Latin Vulgate. None of the Majority Text supports your idol worshipping cult.

Really makes you think.

It's shakespear

t. no literary achievements

In the gnostic version of the story Yaldabaoth made Yah and Saboath along with other archons that were his sons. Each of them was given a Planetary personification.

In the Hebrew version El of the Elohim if the father figure and Yahweh is like his son. The other lords that were in the garden are the other elohim / same as archons.

Sumerians know them as the Anunnaki and the father is Anu, his sons being Enlil and Enki.

To the Romans these are the gods known as Saturn, Jupiter or Neptune

And to Greeks these would be the father god Chronos and his sons Zeus and Poseidon.

Magna carta

>tfw you based your nation's cultural bedrock on an ideology so moronic and factually refutable it can be BTFO by a few shitty comedians

Shakespeare isn't a a scholarly achievement though.

>claims Erasmus proven Catholicism wrong by translating original manuscripts
>is proven wrong because Erasmus never even seen such manuscripts
>changes his mind all of sudden and now none of the "original manuscripts" matter as he failed to point out which manuscripts he actually had in mind
>which "massive errors"?
>as opposed to which "original texts"?

The KJV versions of the bible made me stop going to church, because I read them.

The scriptures need an update. They are fucking crazy retarded. All of them from the Semetic religions:

1. The Torah
2. The Old Testament
3. The Qu'ran
4. The Talmud
5. The New Testament (Christianity, where it really all went to shit).
6. The Mormon book, whatever it's called

Take the time to read from cover to cover any of those 'good books' and it is crazy town personified.

The scriptures need an update.

M'lady

You're the exact same wack job who posted in my religious thread yesterday and ended up putting your tail in between your legs.