In the Quran, there is a story that essentially says: You can beat your wife.
The story is about Muhammad beating his wife for disobeying him.
We should act like we're muslims and get this trending on Facebook with the message: "remember the role of the women in the family." Or some shit relating to Muslim strong family values.
MASSIVE B8 for feminists!
Here's the link: thereligionofpeace.com
>slowpoke.jpg
:^) nice find user
Kek
Still we should spam it
not your personal army nigger
Why make them read?
This isn't "al Qaeda TV" or something. Most Muslims actually believe this.
bump
The problem, OP, is that you think they can be persuaded by words coming out of Islamic scholars' own mouths.
This is actually a great idea. Why don't non-muslims use islam to justify barbaric behavior?
I mean, it's divine law, right? One doesn't have to actually BE muslim to follow it, right?
So if white men start acting like muslims as a joke it might wake people up.
Awesome. Shit like this is what pol used to be about. Now we're just cucks and filled with shills.
They know this information is out there, in a compartmentalized part of their brain. If they were interested in "truth" they would have already read it. They're not arguing in good faith because they believe something. They're arguing to defend an ideology that they think will result in the Greater Good for the Greater Amount of People, even if some women wind up dead because of it.
I might make a fake Muslim account and make the post, and then use my real Facebook to share the post and "condemn" it (acting like I'm on the side of the feminists)
Oh wow, Americans never thought of that argument?
Guys... Come on.
>his wife for disobeying him.
ya mean the kid?
We've all thought of it, but we've never made it go viral, Ahmed.
So compile the information and you might be able to pick off the 5% who wandered into it and will wander out. You'll plant the seeds for others who will walk away from this insanity later. But the vast majority will pretend they don't see it. Religious scholars here are offering scripture from the Koran about how often and how hard you should beat your wife, but they'll make you answer for every drunk bubba that ever gave his woman a shiner. Read Rules for Radicals and internalize it because that's what they're doing to you.
>they'll make you answer for every drunk bubba who gave his woman a shiner
But they can't, because we already condemn that behavior. Also, we don't have a religion that condones this type of behavior.
You could find the video of that indonesian woman being beaten in public.
There is also that Saudi scholar who explained what stick to use and how to use it.
I believe it was MemriTV
And?
>Beating whore wives
How is this a bad thing?
We're using it as a wedge to separate Islam and feminists, leaf.
What you say is true. What you don't understand is that they're not interested in "truth." You're giving them the benefit of the doubt, because YOU are interested in the truth, that they don't know or don't understand.
Don't try to "enlighten" them. Expose them. Accuse them of supporting female genital mutilation. Accuse them of supporting these barbaric passages from the Koran. Give them no benefit of the doubt.
B U M P
U
M
P
ooh I got a strange ID
That's probably a good point.
Here, for instance, is the most effective counter-radical (peaceful!) campaign organized in the 1970s, by Phyllis Schlafly against the Equal Rights Amendment.
You see references to it in movies & TV shows from the '70s. Look at the name: "Equal Rights Amendment." Who could be opposed to such a thing?
en.wikipedia.org
Schlafly did by painting the supports as hairy-pit dykes who wanted to destroy the family. They wanted to send women off to war. They wanted to completely eliminate all female protection in the workplace, including equal pay laws (a woman who could not lift as much would therefore legally make much less than a man). Women themselves turned against the ERA because the leaders behind it were exposed as man-hating lesbians who just saw it as the first step of remaking society. They had more in common with the housewives and daughters in Schlafly's counter-movement.
Assume that the person you're talking to knows exactly what they're doing and why they're doing it, and that they're prepared to lie and be dishonest to save face. Because they're not out to learn something, they're out to destroy you.