Why can't Sup Forums accept that there were black kings in Egypt?

Why can't Sup Forums accept that there were black kings in Egypt?

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Swabia
archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/111523718/
scotsman.com/news/world/stalin-s-half-man-half-ape-super-warriors-1-686693
youtube.com/watch?v=pe6DN1OoxjE
youtube.com/watch?v=1c_dZVoSbHU
youtube.com/watch?v=kx3R64G6-Rs
youtube.com/watch?v=grfW1aQQwb8
observationdeck.kinja.com/no-egyptians-arent-white-but-they-arent-black-eithe-1665322870
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

why wont you except that whites are the bringer of civilization. There are cultures from all around the world talking of blonde haired, blue eyed people with white skin that came over the sea and brought civilization, including the sumerians. where did those come from when the sumerians where the first, and why are the people discribed always the same if they were just made up?

maybe it's because there weren't

...

>There are cultures from all around the world talking of blonde haired, blue eyed people with white skin that came over the sea and brought civilization, including the sumerians.
Proof?

The Black Egyptians had greater technology then we had now until natural disasters (and the white man) took it all away from them.
We will reclaim our glory.

...

Lets say you were kingz and sheit.
What the fuck happened? Closet way for you niggers to be kingz now is stuffing your face at Burger King in some crime infested ghetto

his proof probably is "we wuz aryan and shiz"

I used to ridicule the "We Wuz Kangs", "edurcate yer Chilluns" type Africans.

I mean, they're living in a fantasy land so blatantly fictional they might as well claim to be from a space colony that specialised in faster than light travel which they also invented.

Here's why I stopped shitting on them though: it gives them an aspiration. It gives them something bigger to look up to and work towards.

What is the alternative? They start to long for their spear-chucker Zulu origins?

Africa is a massive place and the people from there are all vastly different, different cultures, languages and customs. One thing they have in common is they're dumb - I mean they're fucking dumber than a box of rocks.
They're dumb, violent, superstitious shitbag excuses for Homo sapiens. They're the under-achievers dragging down our average.

As much as I detest them for these reasons, I don't want to take away a man's goal to better himself.
I see the Kangs shit as a crude and rudimentary path to betterment. Certainly better than gangsta crap or worshipping spear throwing dipshits.

Did you hear about copts, nikka?
They are dark, but not negroid.

...

This drawing is stupid
Not because nigger Egyptians but the idea that a nigger would ever accept a child as his without going to the maury show

...

...

Just because there were a few Nubian Pharoes, doesn't mean you are descended from them, nor does it mean ancient Egyptians were black.

People who believe the we waz kangs bullshit make me more racist.

They were, but were most likely heavily racemixed with middle easterners. Much like how italians are "white", egyptians are "black".

The lies are going to far

google myths of ancient cultures, the sumerians believed the blue eyed white people where gods, the aztecs as well, and describe them from coming over the sea with a ship that moved on its own. the chinese talk about blue eyed and blonde haired people who created the first civilization and ruled in the early time. a lot of egyptians mummies are shown to have had blonde hair etc. the we wuz kings stuff was just created to rob whites of their heritage
diving a bit into /x/ territorry here. why is it that the jews are so angry at the whites. they were kicked out and hated by everyone across the course of time, why do they hate the whites of all the ethnicities so much?
Hitlers Ahnenerbe tried to find out about the origins of the white people, and maybe he did find out something (((they))) absolutely fear.
Later on Hitler went to antarctica, created New Swabia (which by the way seems to be still claimed by Nazi-Germany while Norways claim ended in 1945 en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Swabia ) and again a lot of cultures speak about i realm beneath the earth, like shangri la for example, and civilization is said to exist there as well.
Another interesting thing is that "Paradise" in the bible originally came from the word meaning "walled enclosure" which would be pretty much fitting into the inner earth. Did Hitler find out that the whites came from the inner earth, the biblical paradise, and from there spread their knowledge with others. is this why (((they))) want to get rid completely of the white people?
the nordic gods, thor, odin, all blond and blue eyed, and (((coincidently))) asgard is on a map that supposedly shows the inner part of the earth

>we was never proper grammar

not the egyptians, those before them had. but they dissappeared for whatever reason. the pyramid and sphynx werent build by them

Wouldn't this mean that blacks ENSLAVED the Jews?

They were not anymore related to Zulus than they were to Egyptians. There closest African cousins are haratins and Fulani.

This is why (((they))) are pushing so much of this flat earth shit.
inner earth is the /goldpill/

Black Americans are also heavily race mixed.

yes
archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/111523718/
the OP goes on for 7 posts, if you want to look into hollow earth, the role of the nazis and so on, i suggest you look here

Either blacks were enslaving people long before the white man ever did, or they deserve reparations for the time they were enslaved. They can't have both.

...

>archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/111523718/
thanks for the link I'll go into it.

user what do you think of supersoldier theory?

schrödingers logic
they can have both until someone proves either of those

>(and the white man) took it all away from them.
I'd still love to hear an explanation for this

...

There unironically were. Didn't go too well though.

which one? i just know about stalin wanting to create ape-man-hybrid supersoldiers.
scotsman.com/news/world/stalin-s-half-man-half-ape-super-warriors-1-686693
youtube.com/watch?v=pe6DN1OoxjE
this guy talks about the human origin, and the gaps in the current theory. he goes into the annunaki=aliens stuff, so that makes it always seem uncredible imo, but one of his topics is that the bigfoot, yeti, and similar sighting were from early primeapes the humans pushed into the deep forrests or mountains etc.
there is one part about a russian female bigfoot that allegedly was abused as sexslave, and where he told about her giving birth to multiple hybrids (1:03:10). i instantly had to think of this
ape-man hybrid thing
maybe this story inspired him to do so. maybe this is the origin of the story. maybe stalin actually let some people fuck such bigfootfemales and tried to create as many of them as possible. who knows

Egyptians aren't black though.

saged faggot

this

Yes they are, Americans, no, but black, yes, have you ever been to Egypt?

theme song youtube.com/watch?v=1c_dZVoSbHU

youtube.com/watch?v=kx3R64G6-Rs

stuff like this. it is currently happening.
deep underground military bases and projects stemming out of project monach

youtube.com/watch?v=grfW1aQQwb8

...

Egyptians have more nigger dna now than they ever did in the time of the Pharoes...

WE

Because there's zero historical evidence for it. Plus it's a pro-black statement, not a conclusion of any research (which is what statements should be)

Because there weren't

>black people claim they were the original jews
>black people clam they were Egyptians
>black people enslaved each other

The Egyptian progenitors were Eurasian... the ones who founded the culture, Empire, and built the pyramids.

These same people then occupied and colonized Nubia where they bred with negresses producing mulattos.

Eurasians colonized North Africa before the advent of writing.

Why won't school show images like this?

Because the students want more than a diploma

can you give me a quick rundown on the video? i saved it for later.

top kek

>king Tut was Caucasian lol

Ehh sounds reasonable but I think WWKz does more harm than good. Who can take away a kang's kangship? A bigger kang. WWKz excuses black failure and justifies antiwhite hatred. They would be kangz, but Whitey stops them. Better just complain and break shit.

The reality is that slavery made them considerably more kangly, what with the higher genetic IQ (1/4 white blood) & higher Flynn effect IQ (education + nutrition) leading to higher levels of black economic and cultural achievement in the USA than anywhere else. Jazz was not a coincidence. (Nor is it anywhere close to as good as classical music).

>blacks and white
Egyptians aren't from the negroid race. Yes they are darker than europeans but that's because they are semites.

who gives a shit desu

there may have been black pharoes but what niggers dont understand is that pharoes didnt exist when their ancestors were taken from africa

t. morrocan

No. The original Egyptians probably looked Turkic because of Tut's R1b and the R1b in Chad. They may have also had men that looked Iranian and Arab because they could have been J1 and J2 men who followed them when they crossed pre-Mesopotamia.

Haratins and Fulani are probably more closely related to Berbers.

Because apart from the one dynasty of Nubians, they weren't.

Here are some ancient myths that suggest human histories different to the one taught to us by the academic orthodoxy:

* The Pima tribe of Arizona speak of how their ancestors came from an island at the centre of the world before that island sank beneath the ocean. Leading the relatively few survivors from that island was South Doctor, the heroic progenitor of the Pima tribe. South Doctor was a powerful medicine man. South Doctor held magical crystals in his left hand and guided the survivors from a cataclysmic deluge to safety between the Gilla and Salt Rivers.

* Ancestral traditions throughout Mesoamerican civilisations and Andean civilisations consistently describe their founding fathers as tall, bearded, light-skinned and blonde-haired/red-haired. (end of part 1)

You stupid goyim the Egyptian is the most pure beautiful smart master race.

(start of part 2) * The Australian Aborigines recall the 'Land Of Mystery', which is also known as the 'Land Of Perfection'. The 'Land Of Mystery' was a huge city surrounded by four walls, their exterior covered entirely in white quartz. The 'Land Of Mystery' was described as mountainous, volcanic and luxuriant in plant growth, among which stood great buildings of domes and spires - this from a people to whom architecture was unknown until relatively modern times.

* The Incas believed that their civilisation had been founded by Kon-Tiki Viracocha, a red-haired, light-skinned man who appeared in the Andes from the east following a terrible flood.

* Polynesian legends tell us about light-skinned, blonde-haired culture-bearers who fled to the Pacific islands after their homeland sank into the ocean.

You are as delusional as the we wuz kangz folks, if not more.

Also i dont see how that picture you posted proves your argument. Retard

Its about how he was raised as a milab experiment. put it on in the background or something its just an interview.
but its all blackpills all that guy does
>cloning
>child abduction
>ritualistic pedophilia
>aliens
>space colonies
>mind control

its everything, its the rabbit hole

>black pharaohs
Egypt was thousand years old by then and they ruled for 50 years

(start of part 3) * The Aztecs traced their earliest origins, not to America, but to a vanished island far away across the Sunrise Sea (their name for the Atlantic Ocean). Their founding fathers were culture-bearers from this far away island.

* Several Native American tribes, such as the Menominee of the Upper Great Lakes Region, recount in their oral traditions how a worldwide flood was precipitated by greedy foreigners, the light-skinned 'Marine Men', who dug into the ground to gain riches (especially copper).

(start of part 4) "You Greeks are all young in mind. You have no belief rooted in old tradition and no knowledge hoary with age. And the reason is this: There have been and will be many different calamities to destroy mankind, the greatest of them by fire and water, lesser ones by countless other means...
But in our temples we have preserved from earliest times a written record of any great or splendid achievement or notable event which has come to our ears whether it occurred in your part of the world or here or anywhere else; whereas with you and others, writing and the other necessities of civilisation have only just been developed when the periodic scourge of the deluge descends, and spares none but the unlettered and uncultured, so that you have to begin again like children, in complete ignorance of what happened in our part of the world or in yours in early times...
You remember only one deluge, though there have been many, and you do not know that the finest and best race of men that ever existed lived in your country; you and your fellow citizens are descended from the few survivors that remained, but you know nothing about it because so many succeeding generations left no record in writing." - Timaeus 22d-23c (end)

>We wuz kangz and did astronomy and shit
>Given half an island by crackers that we reduced to an uncivilized wilderness(Haiti) until the crackers helped us out, even today its a complete shithole but we wuz kings I swear man
>Given a country made by the crackers Liberia, we turned it into a shithole as well with some help from our Liberian cousins
>Every settlement we live in America becomes a crime ridden violent hellhole on the verge of collapse if white people just all moved away
>We still kangz n shit though

Can you fucking stop? They already have made enough research to precisely determine what Egyptians were.
They weren't black, nor white, there are still indeginous egyptians with zero middle eastern DNA to this day you sick fuck, and they aren't black.
The last dynasty was nubian, from Sudan, and they fucked everything up.
observationdeck.kinja.com/no-egyptians-arent-white-but-they-arent-black-eithe-1665322870

>turkic
More like modern day greeks and lebanese

The alleged mulatto pharaohs came from Nubia and they brought in a Nubian army. This led the permanent collapse of Egypt.

Egypt never recovered from the blackening. They got their asses kicked by the Assyrians and various Eurasian invaders after that.

Black Americans share r1b DNA with ancient Egyptian royalty. But I digress, they aren't related to ancient Egyptians in any significant or meaningful way. However their closest living relatives are what most would consider black.

WE WUZ some niggas on the street because WE WUZ

There's a book by Ellis Silver called 'Humans Are Not From Earth: A Scientific Evaluation Of The Evidence'. He says (among other things) that sunburn, our relatively high chance of experiencing back pain and pain during labour are types of evidence that Earth is not an optimal environment for human beings (read: white people) and that we come from elsewhere.
My theory regarding the origin of the white race is that the white race comes from elsewhere in the Milky Way galaxy and, at some point in the distant past, our earliest ancestors colonised vast swathes of the Milky Way galaxy (and are possibly still doing so) and both Mars and Earth were colonised by them along the way. There are pyramidal structures and a Sphinx-like object in various NASA photos of Mars. I also think that a fiercely destructive interplanetary war caused the destruction of a planet that used to exist between Mars and Jupiter, leaving only the asteroid belt that we know today. This war also sterilised Mars, turning what was once a lush, verdant, Earth-like planet into a cold, lifeless desert.

WE WUZ PLANESWALKERS N SHIT

>Egyptians
>Black
OOGA BOOGA CONGO MAN
ME WANT WHITE WOMEN
BICH NOODS

The only black Egyptians were slaves, taken from lands close to The Congo. It's already been proven Nubians were not black.

There were black kings in Egypt, as people have pointed out.

It's just that most of them weren't black, and neither were most Egyptians.

The nubians had egipt under their control for a time and in that period pharaohs were black.

This board is going to shit. Nobody makes compeling arguments any more. You are fucking cancer.

Literally black.

Aren't the bahamas 90% black?

kek

Humans (whites/caucasoids) are BILLIONS of years old and are NOT NATIVE to Earth. Here is merely SOME evidence (though DEFINITELY not ALL of the evidence) suggesting not only a human presence on Earth BILLIONS of years ago, but also suggesting complex human civilisations on Earth BILLIONS of years ago:

* A human skull fragment from Hungary dated between 250,000 and 450,000 years ago
* A human footprint with accompanying paleoliths (stones deliberately chipped into a recognisable tool type), bone tools, hearths and shelters, discovered in France and dated 300,000 to 400,000 years
* Paleoliths in Spain, a partial human skeleton and paleoliths in France; two English skeletons, one with associated paleoliths, ALL at least 300,000 years old
* Skull fragments and paleoliths in Kenya and advanced paleoliths, of modern human manufacture, in the Olduvai Gorge in Tanzania, dated between 400,000 and 700,000 years
* Neoliths (the most advanced stone tools and utensils) in China of a type that indicate full human capacity, dated to 600,000 years
* Hearths, charcoal, human femurs and broken animal bones, all denoting modern humanity, in Java, dated to 830,000 years
* An anatomically modern human skull discovered in Argentina and dated between 1 million and 1.5 million years years (eoliths -chipped pebbles, thought to be the earliest known tools- at Monte Hermoso, also in Argentina, are believed to be between 1 and 2.5 million years old).
* A human tooth from Java yielding a date between 1 and 1.9 million years years
* Incised bones, dated between 1.2 and 2.5 million years, have been found in Italy
* Discoveries of paleoliths, cut and charred bones at Xihoudu in China and eoliths from Diring Yurlakh in Siberia dated to 1.8 million years
* Eoliths in India, paleoliths in England, Belgium, Italy and Argentina, flint blades in Italy, hearths in Argentina, a carved shell, pierced teeth and even two human jaws all bearing a minimum date of 2 million years (end of part 1)

We don't deny the existence of black pharaoh (two short dinasty) we deny the claim from african-american to have ancestry with them

Europeans evolved in low UV Europe thats why they get sunburn you stupid fuck.

Back pain is due to our shitty primate skeletons becoming bipedal.

(start of part 2) Curiously enough, several of the very earliest artifact discoveries display a truly extraordinary level of sophistication. In Idaho, for example, a 2-million-year-old clay figurine was unearthed in 1912. But even this discovery does not mark an outer limit. Bones, vertebrae and even complete skeletons have been found in Italy, Argentina and Kenya. Their minimum datings range from 3 million to 4 million years. A human skull, a partial human skeleton and a collection of neoliths discovered in California have been dated in excess of 5 million years. A human skeleton discovered at Midi in France, paleoliths found in Portugal, Burma and Argentina, a carved bone and flint flakes from Turkey all have a minimum age of 5 million years.
How far back can human history be pushed with discoveries like these? The answer seems to be a great deal further than orthodox science currently allows. As if the foregoing discoveries were not enough, we need to take account of:
* Paleoliths from France dated between 7 and 9 million years
* An eolith from India with a minimum dating of 9 million years
* Incised bones from France, Argentina and Kenya no less than 12 million years old
* More paleolith discoveries from France, dated at least 20 million years ago
* Neoliths from California in excess of 23 million years
* Three different kinds of paleoliths from Belgium with a minimum dating of 26 million years
* An anatomically modern human skeleton, neoliths and carved stones found at the Table Mountain, California and dated at least 33 million years ago
But even 33 million years is not the upper limit. A human skeleton found in Switzerland is estimated to be between 38 and 45 million years old. France has yielded up eoliths, paleoliths, cut wood and a chalk ball, the minimum ages of which range from 45 to 50 million years.
There's still more.

(start of part 3) In 1960, H. L. Armstrong announced in Nature magazine the discovery of fossil human footprints near the Paluxy River, in Texas. Dinosaur footprints were found in the same strata. In 1983, the Moscow News reported the discovery of a fossilised human footprint next to the fossil footprint of a three-toed dinosaur in the Turkamen Republic. Dinosaurs have been extinct for approximately 65 million years.
In 1983, Professor W. G. Burroughs of Kentucky reported the discovery of three pairs of fossil tracks dated to 300 million years ago. They showed left and right footprints. Each print had five toes and a distinct arch. The toes were spread apart like those of a human used to walking barefoot. The foot curved back like a human foot to what appeared to be a human heel. There was a pair of prints in the series that showed a left and right foot. The distance between them is just what you'd expect in modern human footprints.
In December 1862, The Geologist carried news of a human skeleton found 27.5 m (90 ft) below the surface in a coal seam in Illinois. The seam was dated between 286 and 320 million years. It's true that a few eoliths, skull fragments and fossil footprints, however old, provide no real backing for the idea of advanced prehistoric human civilisations.
But some other discoveries do.
In 1968, an American fossil collector named William J. Meister found a fossilised human shoe print near Antelope Spring, Utah. There were trilobite fossils in the same stone, which means it was at least 245 million years old. Close examination showed that the sole of this shoe differed little, if at all, from those of shoes manufactured today.
In 1897, a carved stone showing multiple faces of an old man was found at a depth of 40 m (130 ft) in a coal mine in Iowa. The coal there was of similar age.

(start of part 4) A piece of coal yielded up an encased iron cup in 1912. Frank J. Kenwood, who made the discovery, was so intrigued he traced the origin of the coal and discovered it came from the Wilburton Mine in Oklahoma. The coal there is about 312 million years old.
In 1844, Scottish physicist Sir David Brewster reported the discovery of a metal nail embedded in a sandstone block from a quarry in the north of England. The head was completely encased, ruling out the possibility that it had been driven in at some recent date. The block from which it came is approximately 360 million years old.
On 22 June 1844, The Times reported that a length of gold thread had been found by workmen embedded in stone close to the River Tweed. This stone too was around 360 million years old.
Astonishing though these dates may appear to anyone familiar with the orthodox theory of human origins, they pale in comparison with the dates of two further discoveries.
According to Scientific American, dated 5 June 1852, blasting activities at Meeting House Hill, in Dorchester, Massachusetts, unearthed a metallic, bell-shaped vessel extensively decorated with silver inlays of flowers and vines. The workmanship was described as 'exquisite'. The vessel was blown out of a bed of Roxbury conglomerate dated somewhat earlier than 600 million years.
In 1993, Michael A. Cremo and Richard L. Thompson reported the discovery 'over the past several decades' of hundreds of metallic spheres in a pyrophyllite mine in South Africa. The spheres are grooved and give the appearance of having been manufactured. If so, the strata in which they were found suggest they were manufactured 2.8 BILLION years ago.

Look at the hair though. No nigger has such light hair.

spittin' truth there, brotha!

those cumskins wastill livin' in da stone age when we exploring space n' shit.

ALL OF US WAS KINGS, EVERYONE IN EGYPT WAS KINGS, ONLY ''PEOPLE'' THAT WORKED WERE THE CUMSKINS

i dont think any white man thinks that, try again

(start of part 5) What are we to make of these perplexing discoveries? They cannot simply be dismissed. If even ONE of these discoveries is TRUE (and I believe that MANY if not ALL of these discoveries are TRUE), then it changes EVERYTHING that modern mainstream anthropologists THOUGHT they knew about the human species. (end)

This is all part of the white man's plan to keep us down. We used to be so much more.

>Why can't Sup Forums accept that there were black kings in Egypt?

I know, these racist don't even want to acknowledge the Egyptian King Mahatudindu and his great accomplishments in the mud cookie industry.

basically everything that is rumored already. will look into it

...

which civilization will negroids claim for themselves next?
mayans?

POWERFUL

Needs a gold tooth for extra effect

Damn...guess that unicode doesn't work here.

Probably Greece, Iran, and Turkey. Lebanese ancestors were enemies of the Egyptians.

You probably had Central Asians who looked Turkic ride in with Mesopotamians and Levantines following in to settle and develop the land.

Turkic like people picked up the Afro-Asiatic language from the women. The only thing that connects Afro-Asiatic language speakers is the presence of mitochondrial DNA between some women in their populations.

Jordan because of Michael Jordan