/r9k/'s influence ruined Sup Forums, prove me wrong

/r9k/'s influence ruined Sup Forums, prove me wrong.

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=G1LQs7NbTOs
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

r9k helped red pill pol on gender issues

I am now a MGTOW thanks to r9k

Plebbit ruined Sup Forums

oh so you're a faggot good to know.

/r9/ had build Sup Forums

trips of truth.

This board is literally just monkeys in a cage flinging shit at each other.

Literally.

unironically stormfront did

newfags wont remember when Sup Forums was libertarian and there was literally a subforum on stormfront dedicated to spreading WN on here

Reddit's influence ruined Sup Forums

Incorrect. I used to be natsoc but I am actually a technocratic feminist now. Shaming people from an early age is why neets here are unlayable. For women it's twice as bad and they are twice as insecure about sex. Liberating women from misjudgment allows men to not be judges either.

Say what you want about sex but it is not good or bad, it has nothing to do with morality. If you want to save your virginity for the marriage meme go for it, but don't pretend everything I just said isn't true (it's 100% accurate)

Support feminism and get laid you limey cunts.

This is America, proof of guilt is on you.

Are you baiting, or you is just an idiot?

I'm serious, debate me if you like.

checked

Then tell me, why are you a feminist?

>For women it's twice as bad and they are twice as insecure about sex.
[citation needed]

>"Sup Forums was libertarian u guise!"

And like most well adjusted and educated adults, they grew out of advocating for inefficient societal structures purely for the sake of feelings.

I stated it already but I can reiterate.

Women are emotional thinkers. Did you need a citation for that too Monsieur Kermit?

Basically we are all conditioned from an early age to not act out on our thoughts, emotions, judgements and self belief. We are constructed to follow any mental holding pattern presented to us in education and media. All of it including this site and national socialism is complete bullshit. There is no one entity to fix the nation. Only personalities of cohesion exist.

The reality of this world is that few people even here understand their own feelings, are not in coping mode and can be authentic in their actions. For example: a child raised saying he will go to hell for premarital sex. This fucks the kid up into adulthood. It squelched and stifled his opinions and everything since then is just formulating more bullshit from an already nonexistent point. In this instance we can see clearly how it affects the psyche.

Feminism for the first time ever is trying to derail this mental holding pattern by completely eradicating the use of outlandish idealism. We are human, you can aspire to be great but if you are moulded from a false base, you are stifled. Spiritually, physically and mentally. From being shy, from being anxious, from base mannerisms: all inherited from what is right and wrong.
Here is something that will help you understand fully.
youtube.com/watch?v=G1LQs7NbTOs

You wanna hurt us Sup Forums? Go right ahead if it makes you feel any better. we're an easy target. Yeah, you're right. We whine too much. We also feel too much. We could be cold-hearted racists like you, but we don't like to hurt people's feelings. Well, you think what you want about us. We're not changing. We like us. Mummy likes us. WE like us. 'Cause we're the real robots here. What you see is what you get.

You're a loveless faggot with no ideals and nothing to believe in.
>hurt feelings
Go die in a sewer.

>implying men aren't emotional thinkers
No, a peer reviewed study, without one you're talking out of your ass

I've been here for over a year now and I still don't get /r9k/

Men are logically based thinkers. Women are emotionally based thinkers. Give me a citation that men are genetically passive emotion-dominant thinkers. Oh wait, that's women.

So the real problems of our world are that people fell shy, anxious and base mannerisms? no war, no hungry, no death, no plague?
>Feminism for the first time ever is trying to derail this mental holding pattern by completely eradicating the use of outlandish idealism.
Yet feminist anyone raised near of them seems to have this problems a lot more.

I'm not debating on the woes of the world. Just my views on feminism.

>Yet feminist anyone raised near of them seems to have this problems a lot more.

I do not agree. The ones I've met in the states are well adjusted, hold stable careers and raise families with little inner conflict.

You understand this yet you still argue to make them fully equal. You're a fucking idiot with conflicting views. Because women are emotional thinkers they shouldn't have the same rights as men you fucking idiot, this should be common sense

Ridiculous newfaggotry. There were at least as many, if not more, natsocs on Sup Forums as libertarians. Their presence goes back to /n/ where they were corralled from old Sup Forums.
All "swarmfront" faggots did was paste that gay "ANTI-RACIST IS A CODEWORD FOR ANTI-WHITE!" copypasta in every thread and get laughed at and ridiculed, even by natsocs.

>I do not agree. The ones I've met in the states are well adjusted, hold stable careers and raise families with little inner conflict.

I really can't tell if you're just putting effort into some bait. Every feminist I've met has been a used up whore who feels entitled to make political statements, but doesn't understand politics and can't make a statements without referencing her genitals.

I find it funny that whenever women seem to care about politics, their genitals are always brought up. The biggest feminists I've met in my life were all emotional wrecks, had some sort of mental illness, were used up, were unlikable, and were only feminists because they were angry and had some personal vendetta against men

When /r9k/ sends its people, they’re not sending their best. They’re not sending (you). They’re not sending (you). They’re sending people that have lots of problems, and they’re bringing those problems with us. They’re bringing feels. They’re bringing cringe. They’re autists. And some, I assume, are good people.

>Well adjusted
Ever one I've met is instable, crazy, incapable of seem other if not to blame them.
>Hold stable careers
Have you ever seem a woman being fired, no matter how bad she do her job?

>Raise families with little inner conflict.
I've met some sons of feminist they are completely broken.

gamergate ruined 4cuck, prove me wrong.

I have been here before Sup Forums went to shit and even I don't get /r9k/

>before Sup Forums went to shit
>implying implications

I know I have emotions so no you're full of shit. Check out romantiscism and virtually every literary movement for an exemple
>Men are logically based thinkers. Women are emotionally based thinkers.
[citation needed]

Your framework dictates that women are lesser creatures, which is not true at all. They should be equal on the basis that there is no reason for them not to be. Just as men should be considered equal because there would be no reason not to be.

Women and men both obviously defer their tasks differently, but that's not enough reason to revoke rights.

So you're saying they are all wrong and you are right? Could it be you're not the only living being with an individualistic perception of the slice of reality we all share?

Look at how inflated your own ego is grasping at this board's culture to undermine some other group for self acceptance. Slut shaming (what you just did) is out of conditioning at an earlier stage in life. It doesn't make it correct.

As for the genitalia it is merely trying to break conditioning. It all comes down to being as extreme as possible to win people to their side of not caring about being judged.

Tell me this: would you like to be judged for every thing you do sexually? Probably not, and women are definitely the same.

We are both getting into our own experiences at this point. We both see things through a different lens so taking it down that route is unappealing and pointless. I will say that boys are having a hard time being raised these days when they are conditioned to believe they need validation in order to maintain a semblance of self esteem. The feminists I've seen actually raise their kids with open mindsets, allow their kids free will and make sure safety comes before stifling their mentality.

I'm not sure if you're trolling at this point. Look at brain functionality, the endocrine system and pavlovian response based on gender.

>Say what you want about sex but it is not good or bad, it has nothing to do with morality
>it doesn't bother me that my girlfriend has had >200 cocks in her ass, only an insecure virgin would be worried about something like that

you poor beta bastard

I have a lot of sex with a lot of different women. My current lover helps pull women for sexual interactions. Call me a degenerate if you will but I'm great with women and your beta labeling makes no sense. As long as we are std free it is of no concern to you.

pol is a pro-redpill board and r9k has some redpills but yeah most of it is cancer.

we could have done without the redpills if it means getting rid of the other stuff imo

>/r9k/
>influence
pick one

>everything you just wrote
>linking a PUA as an educational source

user, I'm sorry i laughed at you before. I didn't know you were this far gone.

>The feminists I've seen actually raise their kids with open mindsets
Some book say it is the best, them they are doing right. You should try to know some feminism child before saying thing based in random theories.

>He thinks Sup Forums popularized the whole pepe, normie and ree dynamic

Sup Forums ruined /r9k/ for shits and giggles, remember the tumblr raids, Sup Forums created the monster that is now /r9k/ and that fiend is now influencing the way Sup Forums folk think. Boards do that all the time they influence each other, what i'd like to see is a /biz/ Sup Forums mix.

Still no refutation, no rebuttal. Just a stagnant statement and a reaction image.

I've met them, they seem happier than everyone in my family who were raised with false understandings of morality and borderline piety.

PUA and pro feminism, this is the bisgest loser possible.

>Your framework dictates that women are lesser creatures, which is not true at all.
Because they are emotionally, physically, intellectually, and mentally.

>So you're saying they are all wrong and you are right? Could it be you're not the only living being with an individualistic perception of the slice of reality we all share?

Well considering feminism has done absolutely nothing good for society at all, not one thing, other than make ugly girls feel important, yes I am right. Feminism has only served to take privileges away from women, to ruin the nuclear family and monogamy, to force women to be expected to get jobs and bear children, and has allowed women to just be useless sluts who don't want children.

Sexuality should be regulated to an extent, in order to keep stable birthrates and to allow family units to thrive, because when families are created society thrives. Individualistic societies always fall. Just look at how long Rome lasted by controlling and regulating sexuality (controlling women) and then look at neo-platonism and how it ruined Rome. Feminism is about individualism to an extent. It is a degenerate ideology meant to "liberate" women but in reality it does not liberate it just encourages hedonism and it tears apart the more fiber and stability of our society.

>Tell me this: would you like to be judged for every thing you do sexually? Probably not, and women are definitely the same.
But we absolutely need to judge women based on the sex they have, because sex is important, and it's not something we should ever be particularly permissive about

>yes I am cleaning up the sloppy seconds of hundreds of other men
>why are you calling me a beta?!?!
>the taste of cum is worth it because i get my dick wet

I'd give you a hug if I could user, I'm sorry this world has been so brutal to you. You've been so brain washed by those charlatans preying on your desire for intimacy you don't which way is up. How much money have you given to these PUA "teachers"?

>Feminism has only served to take privileges away from women, to ruin the nuclear family and monogamy, to force women to be expected to get jobs and bear children, and has allowed women to just be useless sluts who don't want children.
That is forgetting the bullshit feminism has done to men and only focusing the problems on women (aka how the women suffer).

Feminism has fucked over men even more.

>Feminism has fucked over men even more.

Oh I know it has. I'm just emphasizing the bad it has done to women because I'm arguing with the feminist faggot, whose obviously such a beta he could give a shit less about what it's done to men, because he's a huge white knight faggot clearly

They say people are mirrors in which our words reflect.

>Because they are emotionally, physically, intellectually, and mentally

Huh?

Monogamy was only in existence for a very very brief, finite amount of time. Hedonism and individuality did not end Rome. I've studied its history extensively. The biggest undoing was splitting its territory, the second was massive political corruption. Then the population turned on the system itself after years of war.

Our nation will not fall because people like to have sex with the pill, like material possessions and throw off the mask of shame. If anything our society will only get better. Don't misjudge though, there are corrupt members of society hijacking feminism and also right wing movements. Showing the worst in both theatres.

We should judge sex, but only if it hurts others or yourself. Most of your posturing around the idea that sex is an end-all to understanding worth is simply odd.

I really like that gif

Is there that much of a difference? I thought both groups unironically want "gas the kikes, race war now."

Sup Forums was always pretty shitty.

this

>Monogamy was only in existence for a very very brief
Are you plain idiot?
> I've studied its history extensively
Talks like someone how didn't know history at all, please tell me the book you have read about Rome falls, user.

How long have humans been around? How many years has monogamy been practiced in full without mistresses and brothels?

I've read dozens of books on Rome, it was one of my favorite lessons in history. Amazon has great selections.

If one man got to a brothel this is not monogamy, nice definition of monogamy.
I didn't asked how many books, I asked the name of some. Can you give me it?

Ancient Rome by Nigel Rodgers is a good start.

>I really like that gif

take it man, sounds like you need every bit of happiness you can get. I hope I'm not too forward if I pre- morn your inevitable suicide by substance abuse (a la leaving Las Vegas style)

Alas, a poor soul who sought to find light in the darkest abyss of human suffering. He was too pure for this world and the world consumed him. May he rest in peace

>Ancient Rome by Nigel Rodgers
A good book, what you think about his through on the grain dependence of Rome, and intrigue as reason to the fall of the empire?

Also married men and women would visit brothels. You seem to not understand this. Monogamy with one partner forever with no other sexual contact with someone outside of the marriage practically never took place but for a few centuries throughout history. Even then it wasn't ever 100%

1/10 :/

I enjoy all books written about Rome even if much of it is speculation.

current Sup Forums has ruined the rest of the Sup Forums boards

>1/10 :/

just let it all out, user

It's sad when someone need to create a definition of everything so it agree with his ideology.
Still unable to talk about the book you have (((read))) and enjoy so much, I'm not asking much, just tell me what is the grain dependence.

Revisionism, there was a large subset of both libertarians and NatSocs here, Stormfront at the time was full of boomer redneck nationalists who were obvious as fuck whenever they posted. What's happened since is that the libertarians became race realists and it becomes very easy to become a WN when you see the biological reality of race

There was a massive cultural difference

Sure. If you can counter any points I've made to feminism.

>/r9k/
>Influence
kek

...

>Look at brain functionality, the endocrine system and pavlovian response based on gender
My point was that both genders are emotion driven: I personally don't see why I would use logic if my emotions don't tell me beforehand that something is going wrong or well and I should do something about it
afaik the difference between the male and female endocrine system just means that since both genders have different hormones in different quantities they will feel different emotions in the same situation and so use logic differently to change, maintain, reproduce or avoid an emotion.

You're on Sup Forums seriously you can see in this very thread that men aren't logic driven

The average Sup Forumsak belongs on /r9k/ so they go hand in hand.

Them stop speaking shit, that's why I hate liberals who don't studied a single day of their lives, you think you know something when your only argue is muh felling, muh oppression.