Now that the dust has settled, which square is right?

Now that the dust has settled, which square is right?

Libertarian Right

Enlightened alt-centrist, my dude.

>implying centrists don't just have conflicting beliefs

Green

Centrist right, ala monarchy.

I'm in the top-right but just barely. Almost bottom-right. I am exactly where Tucker Carlson is according to the site that created that thing.

yes my dude

A society that exists for individuals is a short sighted and stillborn one. Top right.

...

Libertarian Right

Libertarian left is fine too, but I never see those irl

>green is chaotic evil
>Ponzi scheme hand rubbing intensifies

Traditionally "left" is associated with duplicity, inferiority, femininity etc. Think of expressions such as "right hand man", "the right hand of God". Clearly right is superior to left. Additionally that which is higher is clearly superior to that which is lower. Up beats down. So the best square must be the upper right, particularly the upper right corner of it. There can be no debate about this: right is better than left, and up is better than down.

>the weak should help themselves
>charity is looked down upon in a Libertarian society

This is wrong very wrong

Top Left

Life is more than a corporation telling you what and when to buy for their gain. Governments main purpose should be supporting their people not lining the pockets of the top wealthy individuals.

Socialism WILL take the world as automation becomes more mainstream. Corporations do not care about you. They care about money and will do whatever it takes to make more, including laying everyone except themselves off.

in an objectivist society, charity is morally wrong.

...

>still falling for the identity politics meme

>politics is war by other means
>fighting a war without an identity
back to red-dit fuckwit

>"right hand man", "the right hand of God"
Those exist because most people are right-handed and has nothing to do with politics. The term "right-wing" itself came into existance by mere coincidence.

>limiting yourself to the ideologies of your party.
>not being a common sense person
kys

Charitable acts are fine as long as it isn't self-sacrificial. Donating to an animal shelter or something because it makes you happy or serves your interests is fine; cucking yourself by giving to something you have no interest in is not.

You need to lurk more

Things are like theyre today for one reason. (((Them)))

That picture horrifically characterised those ideologies and completely ignores their defining views on social organisation and where they derive their outlook/legitimacy from.

Likewise the author of that somehow thinks that veterans and old people arent weak

The nation is more important than the individual but the nation only blooms when the individual is paramount. Rational self-interested, educated individuals cooperating to build a nation are motivated to succeed. Slaves of imposed ideals are motivated to rebel. People can only choose the path of good if they are also given the option of evil.

Constitutional monarchy and you've got a good thing going.

In between blue and red

Absolutely. And an armed citizenry to go along with it.