Is Evola essential Sup Forumscore?

Is Evola essential Sup Forumscore?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=ijrYNTaTnC8
youtube.com/watch?v=T_rI9ETu0gI
youtube.com/watch?v=D3hucojDPwc&t=337s
youtube.com/watch?v=4YqKf3v2aPs
counter-currents.com/2013/03/marxism-and-satanism/
docs.google.com/document/u/1/d/1y8_RRaZW5X3xwztjZ4p0XeRplqebYwpmuNNpaN_TkgM/pub
youtube.com/watch?v=DNcwaR2xW1Q
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theodor_W._Adorno
youtube.com/watch?v=QiCtdi5nCoA
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

pretty much

how come I never see him mentioned here?

Mostly because we're subliterate mongrels unworthy of his brilliance.

>Mostly because we're subliterate mongrels
yeah but he could have tried harder.

He's a genius

Our guy Steve Bannon is a fan

His shit on Buddhist Sexual Magic is pretty lit famo.

Evola is plebcore

Give us names, patrician.

he btfo'd modernity

how? I seriously know nothing about the goy

For those that are actually interested and willing to put in the time to study instead of just reading:

are you asking for a quick rundown?

Superior version. I apologize, anons.

I'd love one

I've been slowly reading RATM. I don't agree with everything he says, but he's certainly made some interesting points.

Americans should read Yockey.

Informative, thanks

I see a few Evola memes now and then

m8 it's probably impossible to summarize Evola but let me try; He presents the idea of the "World of Tradition", to counter modernity, and woroking from that worldview he analyzes many problems that face the world today and how they can be dealt with, also the French Revolution was a mistake.

An aristocrat who claims that aristocrats should govern society?
How objective.

He doesn't so much claim aristocrats should govern, as he claims that they do govern.

>Support Arianism
>Brown eyes
>Black hair


C.U.C.K

That repressed homosexual claimed a lot of things.

ain't nothing wrong with a bit of homo love

Evola neither accepted, practiced, or tolerated homosexuality.

>gay
and dropped

If you can't read a simple thread then Evola is probably out of your league for now ;)

I've seen him listed here a few times.

if you'd like to hear a sample of his thought, here's a fairly well-made video of a youtuber reciting one of his essays:
youtube.com/watch?v=ijrYNTaTnC8
I found I had a stronger reaction to his recitations of de Maistre and Rivera:
youtube.com/watch?v=T_rI9ETu0gI
youtube.com/watch?v=D3hucojDPwc&t=337s

Never married, never had children, and was into sado-masochism.
Yeah...

Good stuff.

Here's another video for those interested:

youtube.com/watch?v=4YqKf3v2aPs

What Historical Period?

He got cucked 2

let me recommend this book for all the budding aristocrats of Sup Forums... pic related.

it's a quick read.

Strangely enough, Bowden (in the video I posted above) mentions those into S&M, "In a sense, therefore, Satanism—rather like sado-masochistic sexuality (which it resembles)—attracts towards it two sets of people: namely, those who wish to obey and those who wish to issue commands."

counter-currents.com/2013/03/marxism-and-satanism/

Because /nu/pol.

Nothing wrong with being blackpilled.

youtube.com/watch?v=4YqKf3v2aPs

Something contemporary would be nice. Thanks.

>Nothing wrong with being blackpilled.

oh there's tons of stuff wrong with it if you're not powerful enough lol

Noted.

Reading The Metaphysics of War. Amazing.

Stirner and Bordigan.

Amazing.

he was talking about the Aryans as a spiritual race

This.

Two spooks?

> babby's first encounter with S&M

>le blonde hair blue eye are the only aryans maymay

You are literally doing the jews work

lol that part was awesome, i will give him that.

>fuck the east we've been doing this shit for centuries

You have failed, about as hard as one can fail user.

Yup, he stated that you can be jewish with an aryan soul.

I don't know much about it. What I've seen is just (((porn))) files that popped up in the days of Kazaa.

husserl heidegger (literal nazi) maurice Merleau-Ponty
Cioran
peter Sloterdijk
frankfurt school
etc

That's oversimplifying his concept to a very gay extent tho.

Bobby Fischer.

> trusting brit flags on Sup Forums
prepare to get referenced to harry potter

Thanks to both of you.

Is that Codreanu on the left?

see what i told you?
>frankfurt school
this fucking nigger

It's simplified, but accurate

Also, his aristocrat is not primarily defined by wealth or pure heredity. More than anything it's an inner orientation, someone who's utterly internally consistent and fixed on higher values and truths than the pursuit of venality or comfort.

This, quads confirm

Checked and I had hope. Still wouldn't mind reading for the sake of it.

I remember an old thread before the exodus where someone linked a forum that had some decent arguments for the right learning the Frankfurt school of thought. Something along the lines of not falling into a false dichotomy while also learning tools to detect their MO.

>pol memes
Adorno was a traditionalist

Cultural Marxism isn't a thing

this

R A R E
A
R
E

Adorno was also Jewish. Even those with "Aryan souls" can fall victim to innate behavior.

Evola got better with age but he was still a nutty wop and a gigantic pooaboo (unforgivable crime desu).

>Adorno
>Aryan

what

What is next; Horkheimer is actually a NatSoc?

Yup. Just like Hitler.
>muh aryan caste

The whole "Frankfurt School was unconventionally conservative" line is so stupid. The only good thing Adorno did was shitpost about Jazz.

Big Poppa Poo working the students of the western esoteric.

ive read a fair amount of evola. I found metaphysics of war to be very helpful in the way we can ... well perceive the fundeamentals of ourselves in the world as men of tradition did.

Do you know of any other readings like it?

docs.google.com/document/u/1/d/1y8_RRaZW5X3xwztjZ4p0XeRplqebYwpmuNNpaN_TkgM/pub

After Nietzsche read Stirner>Edmund Husserl>Martin Heidegger>Theodor W. Adorno and Max Horkheimer>Maurice Merleau-Ponty>Emil Cioran>Peter Sloterdijk

Bumping Evola Bread

youtube.com/watch?v=4YqKf3v2aPs

Here's a fancy presentation on Evola spoken by a cheeky brit.

See
Yep.

It's listed as an entry work but "Mystery of the Grail" does a fine job of talking about symbols, man, and tradition (all pertaining to the Grail).

Yeah just because Evola said something like that doesnt mean it applies to Adorno who is the definition of a cancerous cultural marxist

>I DON'T WANT MY IDEAS CHALLENGED!!!
Stick to YouTube videos
woi

he was a traditionalist and his critique of capitalism was p.good

IIRC both Evola and Bowden instead spoke highly of (((Catholicism))) despite the proof in the pudding being priest rapes done in the 1990s, 00s and on Milo Yiannopoulos recently

The irony being that Evola's own Maestro, René Guenon, left the catcholic church in the 1920s since he foresaw the cyclical degeneracy way ahead of Evola (then decades later, Evola argued for the Right Hand Path-institution of Islam degenerating itself too, ie that The East is not immune to damage either)

no, Spengler is

I know, user. It was just a reference to an earlier post. A Jew is a Jew is a Jew (or any other group for that. matter).

That is right. I dont want my homeland challenged and changed by some jew.

Thats why we dont listen to his drivel but put a bullet through his skull.

I mean I can see what he meant with Emil Maurice for example but certainly not with fucking Adorno

youtube.com/watch?v=DNcwaR2xW1Q

>"In a sense, therefore, Satanism—rather like sado-masochistic sexuality (which it resembles)—attracts towards it two sets of people: namely, those who wish to obey and those who wish to issue commands."

>Those who wish to follower
>Those who wish to lead
t. a more sober reading of that sentence

>demonizing S&M sexuality when Marxism is about levelling (equality, world with societal/political classes removed) instead of hierarchy

>everyone throwing kneejerk reactions with """""""muh satanism""""""
David Icke did so about his NWO, Alex paid-actor Jones about his NWO-later-termed-Globalists............

Adorno was trying to save western civilization

I was at hell for a man of the right (Berkeley) so I don't mind the challenge. I just know I'm going to "literally can't even" as I read the books. Relax.

They spoke highly of it due to the tradition, no? I'm pretty sure Evola was disappointed at Benito's friendship with the (((Church))) since he wanted a return to paganism.

Good man/writer.

Has anyone here read Rosenberg's "The Myth of the Twentieth Century" or is does it fall into the pure propaganda category?

evola IS Sup Forumscore

When you mean anglo-liberal jew infested capitalism with western you are right to some extend.

If you mean traditionalist Europe you are a fucking retard and should commit suicide right now

ayy fucking lmao

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theodor_W._Adorno

>... and composer known for his critical theory of society.
>critical theory
Marxists, Millennial SJWs, Christian Churches (See Sweden's 'Svenska Kyrkan' co-operating with RC Church and Orthodox Churces re: importing more nonwhites into Sweden because >Samaritan), Jewish academia, feminist academia... plenty of (((Critical Theory))) demonstrated right there so you must be wrong

Do you think that being Jewish or having Jewish thoughts can be synonymous with what the West is and should be?

Evola' paganism felt more natural and less forced than Himmler's LARPing squad.
At least Rome had a well documented tradition to follow. Nazi occultism was just a weird hodgepodge of theosophy and Conan the barbarian.

related:

Evola is a faggot and if you're interested in esoterics you should read Plato and Aristotle before you engage in any modern metaphysical sophistry.

I mean to say, well, let me see if i can describe what im searching for. (If after you read this and still think mystery of the grail is what i should read, ill check it out.)

after reading ride the tiger, and power of yoga.. they didnt strike me in the same way metaphysics of war did...

In that it seems, metaphysics of war said a man of tradition overcomes fear etc to will traditional values.

Ride the tiger talked about there not being those values anymore so one had to either try to find those transcendent values or create his own (I will concede that statement may be oversimplifying it so it has some errors but anyway)

I was hoping for a book that dscribed the actually day to day action. You might think the metaphyscis of war described the inner world of the man of tradition.

Even rereading this i dont think i articulated what i wanted to.

why? he only critiques (((capitalism)))
race realist traditionalist Peter Sloterdijk is also a cultural theorist

dont talk about things you know nothing about

TAKE IT BACK!!

you're fucking retarded

Never ask a Bong for recs.
Look into
>Thomas Carlyle
>George Fitzhugh
>HL Mencken
>Samuel Johnson

Evola interviewed (with english subs)
youtube.com/watch?v=QiCtdi5nCoA