>The arguments made under the banner of this type of social justice are often petty, usually mean-spirited, and always absolved of any guilt by the speaker’s moral self-positioning. And yes, sometimes they’re sexist and racist, too.
Obviously, this is no red pill, but it has a slightly pinkish hue to it. It provides babbys first step against leftists.
Other urls found in this thread:
thephilosophicalsalon.com
christianpost.com
breitbart.com
en.wikipedia.org
christianpost.com
en.wikipedia.org
twitter.com
"Facts are sexist, so only listen to feminist sources"
Fpbp shut it down
Jesus Christ. This is like writing a paper on a novel and the professor tells you not to read the novel but a bunch of ideological interpretations. What does this have to do with scientific research?
>citing sources written by economists instead of feminists for a paper on economics
The professor isn't wrong.
>"Facts are sexist, so only listen to feminist sources"
>Glaciers, gender, and science
>Glaciers are key icons of climate change and global environmental change. However, the relationships among gender, science, and glaciers – particularly related to epistemological questions about the production of glaciological knowledge – remain understudied. This paper thus proposes a feminist glaciology framework with four key components: 1) knowledge producers; (2) gendered science and knowledge; (3) systems of scientific domination; and (4) alternative representations of glaciers. Merging feminist postcolonial science studies and feminist political ecology, the feminist glaciology framework generates robust analysis of gender, power, and epistemologies in dynamic social-ecological systems, thereby leading to more just and equitable science and human-ice interactions.
Because real science is feminist.
you can do better leaf
"ignore the data, go with your feelings"
amazing I wonder why the US is churning out a bunch of marxists
Do you have any business or economic sources to back this up?
>Facts
No, the research has a pro-patriarchy bias.
>French feminist
Socialism was a mistake.
> "Reality is Patriarchy"
Pure gold.
this is how they brainwash young women
>dont trust officials they are sexists look at femisnist sources instead
This. It was very clearly stated
Camille Paglia is a feminist and would slap that professor's shit.
Of course not, he's just a faggot fucking Canadian farming (you)s
>internalized patriarchy
Isn't it possible to take legal action against these pieces of shit?
/thread
Also checked
Bet you anything the professor in the OP pic is a male.
He's mansplaining feminism to a woman. Solid gold irony.
Makes sense to me. If it doesn't fit in my narrative, it is obviously wrong.
>you have to write a persuasion using my point of view and only a specific set of made up facts
It's a Canadian woman
>ask religious cucks if there is a god
feminism is a cult
equality is a lie
the inequality wouldnt mean they are inferior, unless they hold it to be true in the first place.
ergo:
Females are inferior, by their own admission, while pretending otherwise.
>Do not use business sources.They blame women.The reality is patriarchy
Is this insanity common in western universities?
Good thing i never went to uni
>"I'm gonna write my essay on x subject."
>"That's wrong, you're wrong, stop being wrong. Do this instead because I say it's right."
>the professor tells you not to read the novel but a bunch of ideological interpretations
you just described religion
Nope, they run academia, the judiciary, the media and the government.
There's no way out other than to accelerate the decline.
Feminism is a religion. Whats new?
They are not actually marxists, and the reason is that the (((CIA))) has spent years shilling them. Their agents read their theories and used them to destroy the old left, replacing it with SJW left.
>iragaray
basque separatism gone wrong
This. There is literally nothing wrong with the old left.
so glad I never had a opinion class
maybe helps I took all my humanities in 2005 and before
even my English comp classes were graded simply on the rules of grammar
Obviously coming from a country where everyone is white it's easier to say this BUT
wouldn't it benefit families and white children if women were not disadvantaged by choosing motherhood?
>Write an essay on a topic
>NO NO NO YOU PICKED THE WRONG SIDE, YOU ARE WRONG!!!!
Jesus...
motherhood is "sexist" (I am not even joking)
She is actually from Belgium
Seems like even our worst people you can't refrain from trying to steal them lmao
Also, she wrote that shit in the 70 ies. Seems like feminist infiltration of our highest circle is a deep rooted movement
Try telling that to mothers.
even the term 'mother' is politically incorrect now, because mother is a feminine word and men can be pregnant now. the new terminology is 'pregnant person'
This is why the US is such a joke now.
The construction of socialism in the nordic countries was associated the suppression of minorities, closed borders and ethnic nationalism.
>wouldn't it benefit families and white children if women were not disadvantaged by choosing motherhood?
Yes, but not necessarily in America. In Europe, the far right Polish party helped families, however, the US is multiethnic, so the calculation might be different.
That's what I'm getting at. We should help women. The US should have a civil war.
This wasn't even tepid. I expected more from you.
>The UK.
Another joke country. They are almost as bad as the US, my friend.
I'm fairly certain this shit wouldn't fly in Norway, at least not in a case that's this extreme.
A few years ago, a Norwegian comedian made a series of documentaries for NRK (the Norwegian equivalent of the BBC), where he brought up highly controversial issues like feminism, the gender equality paradox, race and IQ, and nature vs nurture.
The one that focused on feminism included interviews with Norwegian sociologists who worked for a state funded gender research institute, and exposed them as irrational propagandists who refused to listen to reason. As a result of the documentary, the institute was shut down.
I suggest anyone who browses Sup Forums to watch these documentaries, as they're probably the only ones of their kind produces for and broadcast on mainstream western television. They're all translated and available on Youtube. Just search for "Hjernevask", which literally translates to "Brainwash".
dont get mad bro i'm just saiyan now
According to 3rd wave PC SJW "feminists", I mean. Most of the women I know would probably punch such people in the face if it was ever brought up, because it is fucking ridiculous and quite frankly insulting.
Nice read. Thanks for sharing. Shame that as he points out, those who need to hear the message will dismiss anyway.
The frightening thing is that most people seem to be unaware of his batshit crazy feminists really are, and think feminism is about actual equality, and that the crazies are just some tiny fringe movement.
They are leaving the EU and becoming a US state anyway.
it is a proven fact that hate facts opress minorities, oy vey, just read feminist literature you patriarchal pig. you will understand if you rad gloria (((steinem))) you fucking cishet fuckface
>proffessor believes wage gap is real
>"the profssor isnt wrong"
>leaf
when do we nuke you?
>reality has a pro-patriarchy bias
Yes, this funny thing called reality also supports the notion that: "A system organized around the weakest quality in individuals will produce the same quality in its leaders. The mark of the educated man is the suppression of these qualities in favor of better ones. The same is true of civilization."
Guess what, that's patriarchy.
Nukes aren't real. They're just social constructs.
>reality has a pro-patriarchy bias
No, just because some man wrote it down, doesn't mean it's a fact.
How did Jewish culture manage to be the oldest one in existence, yet they are matriarchal?
your light speed privelege is disgusting you cis-light, photo-centrist radiationphobe.
you probably think speeds below the speed of light are inferior, you fucking national lightist, youi fucking nali.
Why cant you just fucking acknowledge your light privelege you fucking opressor. you have a fucking oprressive darkphobe demeneaour that is triggering to me and dark particles, i mean particles of colour, sorry, im not darkphobe like you
you fucking particlist. i hope you fucking die of radiation
Parasitism, that is the only way it would be able to survive.
>tries to shitpost
>doesn't include a photo of moldilocks fungal roastie
You're a queer
What have Jews built, they haven't had a government or a country in 2000 years until the end of WW2. They simply leeched off everyone else. That's matriarchy for you, dumbass.
Tbh this shit genuinely fucking annoys and triggers me
>What does this have to do with scientific research?
Its gender studies, so absolutely nothing.
christianpost.com
>if you dont believe gravity is sexist, its because you are a fucking numbskull
>its the academic's job to think, not yours you fucking transhope sexist
Like you can talk. Cucked faggot.
>muh Joos
dropped
Lol no, they are responsible for the majority of scientific advances.
If it weren't for them, we wouldn't even stop believing in Roman gods, let alone grow out of Christianity.
...
Feminism is JADC.
Just another death cult
We joke about firing up the ovens here, but if feminism has their way they'd round us all up and put them in them without any sense of the irony that we win by getting them finally back into the kitchen cooking where they belong because they have no sense of humour whatsoever
how didnt i realise?
nukes are the real opressors here, they are atomphobes.
why do atoms have to be deconstructed? innocent atoms are killed in every atomic bomb
#notmynuke
also i am nukefluid, your social constructs dont opress me you transphobe
>millennial-social-justice
Ah, the eternal boomer and 70's fags always finding some way to shove the blame off themselves. Yes goy, its the millenial students who came up with all this junk, blame them, blame them! Hate your own children!
Prey tell, how the fuck did millenials influence this professor?
Go wash out your cunt you salty fucking bitch your getting period all over the board
>50%
XD
excellent article. I hope the nazi racist sexist bigot who wrote it can still find work.
What the fuck?
>"You aren't supposed to use statistics from businesses about women who work in that business because they lie to you"
>"get your information off a book no one has heard of"
That's not ethical at all.
>the majority of scientific advances.
That is no different than North Korea or 1984's Big Brother. College professors force you to use propaganda only to reinforce its' views.
>muh muh
Not an argument, subhuman.
How many attempts do you need to spell professor correctly?
Black's and black mixes are subhuman. Very low IQ's with no hope of them ever catcing up.
FACT: Without them, we wouldn't have any physics more complex than classical mechanics, psychology, capitalism, most of the vaccines,...
Just stop being edgy, will you?
> stop being edgy
Do you not know where you post?
>You will not find any sources that state this
My bullshit alarm just pegged. America needs a lot of work right now, but the most pressing issue is a purge in Academics.
You just keep spouting your bullshit, but won't give me any kind of proof for any of your assertions.
Belgium was a mistake.
Cultural-marxist/postmodern ideological roots. Rife not only in Europe and the US, but Australasia and other places which are becoming westernised. Even if the (((CIA))) are manipulating it all, what does it matter? The people still believe it and are therefore adherents to that ideology.
They can be really fun. It is so easy to irritate and anger the tutor and brainless students in those types of classes. Sociology was my favourite.
>FACT: Without them, we wouldn't have any physics more complex than classical mechanics, psychology, capitalism, most of the vaccines,...
i.e almost nothing of science.
>he requires proof that for all of human civilization men built and invented everything that led to the modern era
Take a step outside, I promise, it won't kill you. This exercise will only take a couple seconds. Once you've counted all the things within sight that women built, you can go back in to your little safe space.
Know why it won't take long? Because the answer is "0"
One thing that the wage gap crowd often don't think about is that if women were paid less than men, wouldn't employers only hire women to reduce their overheads?
The feminist crowd on one hand wants to say that women don't get hired enough but on the other hand say that they are paid less and thus a more attractive option for an employer. The two opinions are in direct conflict with each other. If women were paid less then employers would take on more women to reduce labour costs.
We're not talking about the women inventing things, we're talking about them being heads of family and/or society.
A culture led by them is now the most developed and powerful one in the world, and made disproportionately huge progress compared to their numbers.
You claim that this is not true. Prove it!
k
easy enough
en.wikipedia.org
Got any more retarded bullshit you need blown out the back of your skull, Serb?
Aww baby mad?
fuck of walloon
>"ignore the data, go with my feelings"
ftfy
>en.wikipedia.org
What exactly does this prove?
Of course, that assumes women do equal work.
You'll notice they never bring that up.
Why do I get the feeling that when it's inevitably made law women on average must be paid as much as men, regardless of hours worked or quality of said work, that it still won't be enough for them? Women far outnumber men in college and university, yet women still need more preferential treatment according to them.