Capitalism is showing itself to be an outdated model, What's next guys?

Capitalism is showing itself to be an outdated model, What's next guys?

Other urls found in this thread:

technologyreview.com/s/530901/technology-stalled-in-1970/
aeon.co/essays/has-progress-in-science-and-technology-come-to-a-halt
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

White Man Dictatorship.

You want shit done properly?

damn china u ridicurous

National Socialism, retard

Anarcho Capitalism

isn't that also capitalist?

Capitalism is just a system. A set of abstract mathematical relations. And like all systems, it only works well in a narrow and well-defined parameter space. China is an example of what happens when the parameters aren't tuned properly. Garbage in, garbage out.

Political system != economic system

What about a true free market? Wouldn't a completely free market handled itself better than with any regulations?

Homosocialist dogmatic expressionism.

ancap is the only answer.

Wathever hitler was doing in nazi germany, seemed to be working no?

I'm going to post this repeatedly till it sinks in

If you're 19

Libertarian-monarchism.

National Socialism.

Hitler was borrowing from bankers/MIC

moldbuggian monarchical neocameralism

Cryptic-Space-Nazi-Libertarianism, fucking plebtugal

This graph is less than useless. The correlation could have always been zero. The very selective snapshot (1975-2013) suggests you're trying to massage data to force your desired conclusion.

What does that mean?

you and every other 17 year old has thought about this, and no, its not a good idea.

Your mom is an outdated model but I still use her every weekend.

New world order, one global government.

Quick Rundownism

There's speculation we've hit "peak technology". Simply put, we're at odds with the laws of physics when it comes to making any "theoretical" discoveries viable in the physical world.

I feel like we could use technology to not have work so much, and just shitpost here? would it work, do you think?

...

Capitalism won't be outdated until we get rid of or at least greatly mitigate scarcity.

>creeping socialism infests free-market capitalism
>blame capitalism when system fails

You are now aware that all ISM's are jew inventions.

>something something purges and fake economic models

Looking at history, the most stable and successful system is monarchy.

We could have androids who work for us and get paid for it. They're also cute and have a vagoo and we can fuck them.

How to anarchism and capitalism even go together?

>peak technology

What exactly do you mean? Got any links for that?

You really don't understand capitalism.

say it with me!

not
an
argument
nigger

They don't

Are you retarded? This is why it's so fucking hilarious you have never heard of this. Mining is 20% of the global economy and its the first stage of 100% of manufacturing. While actual mine production has been increasing from old deposits, the graph shows the discovery of new deposits has collapsed. That graph shows how much future inventory there is for consumption. Currently none.
Also, all exploration data is massaged and or shit. The practical reality is actually much worse.

Not communism

Judaism is the only true working system. I mean look at who controls the world lads.

No it's not. Multikulti cultists are trying to apply socialist/commie systems in a capitalist society and those systems fail. So they blame capitalism.

technologyreview.com/s/530901/technology-stalled-in-1970/
aeon.co/essays/has-progress-in-science-and-technology-come-to-a-halt

Idk, probably kill myself

...

true free markets

thanks

It can, but only if everyone is high IQ, moral, and shares the same culture. Good luck achieving that anytime soon.

>'true' free markets
>sweatshops, child labor, toxic water and getting fired when your arm is crushed in the unsafe machine so you and your family die in the gutter instead of in a wood box beside the gutter is great

Whites with 115+ IQ only.

Capitalism is a core concept that works but it's becoming apparent to more people that there has to be a balance of social initiative in order to combat economic corruption.

It's called Democratic Socialism.

If you ignore the complete parasitism of the monarch and aristocracy and the dangerousness of absolutism.

Regardless of what it's called, central banking should not be involved.

Mining has definitely hit peak technology. I started in the industry and trucks weighed 100 tons. Now they weigh 200 tons. How big can a diesel truck get? Ultimately its still just a diesel truck, excavators, bulldozers. We had some advances in chemistry and in drilling post WW2 but ultimately we are at the tail end of the WW2 expansion. Mining has not changed in any meaningful way since then.
Computing fucked exploration. The industry transitioned about 20 years before the software was actually functional.

Hardly anywhere is full socialist.

Capitalism in its true form is a completely free market without regulation. A free market with a NAP would allow complete freedom and opportunity for the people.

Retard

>Ancap
>Gassing people for speaking freely
DUMBASS

shitpsoting is too tiring we can probably automate that too

>posts communist china
haha fuck you retard

...

Judaism goy

I think Nick Land said it best:
>The point is this: If you think there’s a difference between capitalism and artificial intelligence you’re not seeing either at all clearly. The Austrians already understood that capitalism is an information processing system, and the decentralized robotics / networks types on the other side grasp that AI isn’t going to happen in a research lab. ‘Anthropomorphism’ has nothing to do with it. Complex Adaptive Systems are the place to start.

Basically, capitalism is the thing pulling the strings, not us. It's not an outdated model, it's the ONLY model. The flow of capital happens in such a way that intelligence is an emergent property of the system. That's why the market is so much better at finding fair prices than humans are. Another emergent property of the system is the generation of incentive structures that encourage us to further optimize the system. Capitalism is an AI that is optimizing itself in order to increase its own intelligence.

Being a commie is a violation of the NAP, all bets are off.

Any idea when asteroid mining will become a thing?

Except every employer has a surplus of labour meaning you work for anyone else it's still the same shitty wage.

Libertarians believe in free speech. They would be fine with a communist since communists are just advocating for something using free speech.

ok bernie sanders

woah

almonds activated

>fighting corruption with more corruption
yea, it should definitely work

We should go for a controlled population decline

Perfectly. There is a system. Everyone plays along even though that system is to their detriment.
What is to stop me using capitalism to disrupt that system to my benefit and the benefit of others?
Exploration geologists are typically libertarian, can change the GDP of a country with minimal tools and also happen to be the most ridiculed discipline in the media. Coincidence?

>Having certain thoughts violates the NAP
Are you retarded?

Pic related is literally a libertarian utopia.

You're totally not an idiiot

yeah sure buddy

Capitalism has lifted more people out of poverty than communism

I mean--sure it's just slavery with more steps, but so is communism and is objectively less effective than capitalism

Capitalism is not an ideology.

It's a consumption free-for-all. It is our most base animal instinct multiplied by 7.5 billion.

It will never be outdated. It is the natural order of things.

Which works until you open the borders and you have thousands of leeches that will never "pay in" at all in their lives

Nationalist democratic socialism

Capitalism is objectivily the most ineffiencent system. There is literally people who want to work but can't.

Wrong. Animal instinct is take what you want, capitalism lets you own property.

50/50. Currenty we can't mine economically on earth. Its estimated over the last 20 years, 1:20,000 mines turned a profit. Its due to the thermodynamic failure of oil. But in space, we can use nukes and we don't have to worry about liberals shutting the mine down to advance deforestation. So there is a chance at least.

not an argument

this tbqhwy fampai

Imperial Rule

Capitalism is totally fine, the problem is State interventionism which is omnipresent.

Read some Friedman or some Smith.

there are far more people in communist nations right now that cant eat than there are in capitalist nations that can't work

Libertarianism with a VERY small State. To mantain some borders and make our roads hehe

I know Im stupid for saying it, but socialism is FINALLY attainable now that robots are completely automated. If we can make them work right, we literally never have to work again besides robot repair

>Capitalism is objectivily the most ineffiencent system. There is literally people who want to work but can't.
That has fuck all to do with efficiency. Efficiency is about the production of capital, and capitalism is far-and-away the best system for that.

One-line writing prompt one-posts are spam regardless of ideology. If OP was not a bot or a paid shill, perhaps he would have attempted to argue and prove his assertion.
READ THE RULES
DO NOT REPLY TO SPAM

Well we don't really have capitalism soooo I don't get your question.

You can't argue about results.
Soc. Dem. with a regulated free market has produced the most prosperous societies.
The only argument that could be made against it is:
Those kinds of systems only work in white prosperous and educated nations.
Essentially chicken or the egg debate.
Only time will tell.
Edgy shit like: full blown wild west capitalism, communism, fascism... have been discredited by history.
Brace yourself for the obvious but strangely hard to accept truth:
The way things are right now, is the best way to organize a society. If there was a better way, we would be doing it. Change will come slowly and gradually if it ever comes.
Or some fringe society will find a better way to organize, and by doing so rise to the top of the food chain. Then everybody will copy them, and then that will be the norm.
Status quo is, and always will be king.

t. dude who read a lot of political philosophy, pol. "science" and sociology

Capitalism = private ownership of the means of production

So basically we do have capitalism.

Man fuck your 'roads'

I don't understand well all the models, where do I start

Anarkee RULES!!!

Why I posted my graph. Capitalism is the most efficient system at converting resources to capital, but it requires people to be aware of resources.
No one in this thread, or the West as a whole appears to have the vaguest notion of resources. If they did, they would be going mental.
If you go back to the golden age of Western growth and read what people wrote, they see physical resources as the driver of growth. Somehow, and I have no idea how, everyone was tricked into thinking "money" was the driver of growth.
How can you make a rational decision to invest in your own resource supply if you don't even know it exists?

>posts a picture from a communist country

We also have Socialism by that same argument. Not to we have a free market would call this capitalism.

I don't know, because what you posted is communism.

If you can't work you can't eat

>have workers not working
>have factories just idoling
That's ineffienciny

Roads and cars were one of the largest misallocations of capital in human history, right next to 400 square meter suburban McMansions.
These are bulk resource consumers that don't produce anyone. I want roads. And heroin, I hear its fun, but not good for me in the long term.

It's litterally the most beneficial system to the individual.

Read road to serfdom by Hayek. Any other system is only more efficient because they fuck the wants and needs of the individual for the "collective good". That might involve building 1000 factories, planting 1000 trees, or killing 1000 innocent people. It's not up to you, it's up to a oligarchical structure that directs the economy.

Taking over the economy is essentially taking over the will of men, btw. Money is how you make your wants reality, and it your wants don't jobs with the "common" wants then youre fucked. Capitalism is ingenious because everyone gets a small peice of a hope to make their dream a reality. There are no guarantees and it's very chancy, but it's open and evolving, and benefits those who work toward things.

People are going to shit on me for saying this, but start with Marx. Read The German Ideology and then Capital Volume 1. Whether you like it or not, most of the discourse on the subject is done using Marxian terms.

Socialism is socialized ownership of the means of production.

Roads have always been built. It does not always have to be the state building them.