What is most valuable thing in Cali for NK to bomb?

San Francisco, Los Angeles or San Diego? I costantly think it is the third one, isn't there some naval base for the pacific fleets there?

Yolo county.

See, this is why MIRVs matter, you wouldn't have to choose.
Nukes are so old hat, if your missile doesn't split into a dozen warheads than can flatten an area the size of Cali in it's entirety, you've got no game.

Is Kim really that short

Right above Eric Clanton.

nothing is more intellectual, self-critical, open-minded and honest than leftist cartoonists' impressions of things they don't understand am i right guys

LA would be the biggest economically and morale wise. San Diego would be the best military blow. SF is probably the easiest to get a sub into.

>What is most valuable thing in Cali for NK to bomb?

The water supply?

Just bomb Nor Cal for fucks sake then America will be great again and your greatest ally after getting rid of isreal.

>mfw cia

>"nor cal"
isnt northern california where all the whtie people are and the southern park is nothing but niggers, spics, jews, degenerate hollywood, "dude weed", and valley girl sluts?
seems to me southern california is the place that needs nuked.

Nork induced Orville happening when?

Nowhere. NK has no delivery system.

You know damn well who Kim would bomb.

Sony Pictures Studios, Culver City, CA 90232

San Diego would be prime target territory but the fact that the do actually have a military base means they are most likely prepared with anti-missile technology. LA would be a good blow morale wise and would cripple one of the largest airports in the world (LAX). SF is the least critical but would still be an adequate show of force; unfortunately it is the least probable if getting nuked out of those 3

SF is considered "Norcal"

The most important thing for the Norks to bomb is Busan, a major pretty in South Korea. This would greatly slow US reinforcements to the peninsula and make a North Korean ground offensive possible (though still very difficult).

NorCal is typically only used to refer to the more inland counties (Sacramento, Placer, Yolo)
SF and surrounding areas are referred to as the Bay Area. Nuking NorCal would mean trashing 65% of California's white population

bay area--silicon valley
goodbye apple, goodbye facebook

>The left now sides with China.

What happened to Tibet, man? So not groovy.

That'd be LA county then

Compare this shit to Ben Garrison cartoons. There is no soul, no heart, no details. Just some dumb propaganda drawn with the support of politician's and media's money. Ben Garrison cartoons have so many details and effort. Also he is not a shill

the silicon valley. having that bombed would be a very bad thing.

You genuinely scare me Russia. Please pay no attention to POTUS/proxy wars, America wants to be your friend

Yellowstone's super volcano.

If they bomb anything, I hope it's LA.

Libtards won't win anything for a thousand years

probably san fran as it would cripple silicon valley

>left wing cartoonists literally pretending that China is somehow the voice of reason

It's like in addition to not following modern politics, they don't even know major historical events.

Nuke HooverDam, way better target than the other cities, it'll be chaos in all of them, and poison drinking water and fuck up the power grid for most of the west coast if not an even larger area

>Look Ivan, you put 12 nukes on rocket, you no need precision aim, one hit target every time
Can you be any more Russian