Is the final stage of humans to live together in peace with no borders, no need for militaries, studying science together to explore the stars and planets as the human race?
....what if Globalism is actually the course needed to be taken if we want to reach that point?
....what if Soros and the Rothchilds and Rockefellers and every(((one))) else is actually right and has good intentions and we're all too stupid to realize it so we resist cause 'merica?
I somewhat agree with this. I feel it's probably for the greater good.
Hey globalists if you're listening start implementing no child policies
>Is the final stage of humans to live together in peace with no borders, no need for militaries, studying science together to explore the stars and planets as the human race?
if they can cause unity and progress civilzation then i'm all ears for this solution. I'm dying to know how they think they'll unite the savages and include them in a forward movement that is the antithesis to their own existence and are too stupid to get with the program.
The Final Redpill is that (((They))) are completely right. For most this is an impossible reconciliation as it goes against everything they have been taught about Democracy, Life, Free Will, and even Humanity itself.
But at it's core, none of that matters. Only the future ascension of our civilization to the echelons of Godhood matters. Traditionalism and Conservatism are incapable of delivering on that.
Reality is bleak.
...
>The Final Redpill is that (((They))) are completely right. For most this is an impossible reconciliation as it goes against everything they have been taught about Democracy, Life, Free Will, and even Humanity itself.
fuck off ruski their version of ushering in a new world order is predicated on an ability to serve their desires, and enslave us through usury. They're not noble at all, and Traditionalism at least preserves a culture's dignity
>every(((one))) else is actually right and has good intentions and we're all too stupid to realize it so we resist cause 'merica?
You do realize that if the jews were actually capable of this, we would already be living in such an arrangement.
They have had 2000 years to make it work.
But they cant, because of reasons.
The world is full of the fossilized bones of their previous attempts.
>cause 'merica?
Damn right, Merica should rule the world, not some fuggin globelists
This right here. Power corrupts too easily. Under a global government don't be surprised when we never leave the planet and (((they))) just rule over us as slaves for millions of years until the day the sun starts to go red giant and earth no longer supports life. Or worse, they rule over us until then and only when we have to leave earth do they reveal the tech and then we're slaves in a colony ship or slaves on a n asteroid. I prefer competing with ourselves and our neighbors while preserving my culture to slavery.
>Is the final stage of humans to live together in peace with no borders
No.
This would imply that humans are benevolent by nature, but we are nothing of the sort.
The human desire to conquer and lead will never be subverted.
With this in mind, classes and strife are permanent fixtures of humanity.
One million years ago, our physiology put us at odds with each other.
Ten thousand years ago, our tribes put us at odds with each other.
One thousand years ago, our nations put us at odds with each other.
Today, our goals and ideas put us at odds with each other.
Tomorrow, we will find something new about ourselves to fight over.
The machines will try to mitigate this, but they will be usurped by the ruling classes.
We will struggle and vie for status until we destroy ourselves or escape to the stars.
The problem is; they have no solutions to the problems their vision would bring about. Will Muslims just go "oh well guess I'll put down my IED and sing kumaya"? Will everyone give up their geopolitical interests? No, the only way this vision can be brought about is through ruthless domination. Which they of course know, and are trying to bring it about through economic domination.
You're just too stupid to see anything but word on the page instead of intuitively knowing potential problems related to the plans and concepts. Just stop dude, you're an embarrassment.
With negroids there is no future.
I'm absolutely for globalization. Just genocide the niggers, sandniggers, liberals, feminists, cucks, taconiggers, niggers(white), antifa, jews, jew-sympathizers, and whoever else im forgetting. once we kill all of them, the world can come together and become a unified species
So you want states with a fraction of the wealth and power of the US to give up their sovereignty in return for nothing or you want the US to give up its wealth and power in return for countries giving up their sovereignty in return for a share of it?
Neither will happen. Globalism is a scam to make the rich richer.
You're foolishly under the assumption that the kikes will share their lifestyle with you when globalism is achieved.
The true "final" red pill is that Jews want to be in control of every human inhabitant of earth through debt. Slavery on a global scale where (((they))) control every resource this planet has... humans included.
when you say no countries you mean that you want to take a shit in the garden of your neighbor
"globalism" in any form cannot be multicultural. some form of globalization could probably work if everyone was white
>le what if jews are the good guys
i can assure you that they are not
that's actually just the original default red pill
This assumes that "we" 9the already developed) are the ones who need to open our borders and destroy our nations, to the benefit of international corporate and monetary interests.
The globalist moral argument works on debasing humanity, into its lowest and most easily fooled form. It does not benefit anyone but the very top.
If there ever was a final stage. It'd be anarchism, but with everyone somehow managing to live together without people relying or being limited by any form of authority.
It's impossible ofc, but so is global socialism.
No. Humans evolved to have both cells walls and skin. A life without borders is not human at all.
No, humanity will stagnate if we aren't competing.
This, this and this.
Maybe globalization is good in the long run but do the ends justify the means? Cultures are being subversively and militarily forced upon one another and we're to sit back and take it? PAY ME BITCH and I might not shitpost but instead they cheat the money (((themselves))) through deception and gaming governments and media.