What are some Sup Forums approved books?

What are some Sup Forums approved books?

Other urls found in this thread:

archive.is/igbUi
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

...

...

...

The Holy Bible.

The cover on mine is a lot better

...

>slave morality
>Sup Forums approved

Whoops, here's the larger version.

Kike on a stick

...

Oera Linda

...

...

...

Well it would explain Sup Forums's autism

I'm more interested in what's on the /pol unapproved books list and read them. Fuck authority.

best book

Stellar mind. Read "Nomos" for a rhetoric class. Heavy stuff but worth it.

isnt somewhere a mega file with all the books ?
i saw it once here

I'd recommend people read How to Win Friends and Influence People by Dale Carnegie first. Sounds like a shitty self help book at first but it's more like "The Prince Lite", a good springboard before you read Machiavelli's work.

ROTHSCHILD LEAKS
archive.is/igbUi
ITS OVER BOYS

This book helped me understand why Trump was going to be a failure has president. He was going to have no allies and everyone will work against him because he doesn't have any of the skills and talents that hundreds of famous leaders throughout human history have had.

Any non-fiction books on geopolitics?

...

These are some of the books I'm reading. Let me know your thoughts on any of them.

Predicted the flaw in natrual right in liberal democracy and it's inevitable slide to self indulgent nihilism, and actually gives a workable solution. Return to classical Philosophy.

This and Mein Kampf

American Psycho. Maybe not redpilled asf. But absolutely based.

Nobody said Turner Diaries yet? wtf?

Nobody said Ayn Rand????

GULAG ARCHIPELAGO

BLACK BOOK OF COMMUNISM

Stoicism is shit, mate in the modern age man. If no one stands up against injustice and evil, then surely we are lost.

That said, this book is pretty solid; it passes along some amazing wisdom.

I've only read inferno but it was pretty great; albeit a little dense and hard to understand if you don't have good annotations/footnotes

>Ayn Rand
You have much to learn.

...

I think there is room for debate as to whether or not this book is better than Mein Kampf.

Beautifully insight into the mind of a great man who had nothing but love and revolution in his heart.

...

Big time fpbp

Ayn rand is a fairy tale, a romantic story of heroism. While its values are political in nature, to take this story as a political manifesto is incredibly foolish.

>Sup Forumstards
>books

What does pol think of Might is right?

Of course not, we've read Plato's Republic where that student gets btfo by Socrates

Nice try fag

A People That Shall Dwell Alone
Separation and its Discontents
The Culture of Critique

Kevin MacDonald's stuff is essential. If you live in the West and don't understand Jews you're gonna stay in their mental zoo.

Why cant you just read one several times? Volume set?

This. It's the only book you'll ever need.

Redpill: The book

This really is the best right answer.

Elaborate? I only picked up might yesterday, haven't started it yet

he said books not toilet paper

...

1/32 is a good read, the rest is jewry and long lists of who beget whom, boring as fuck, then paul eats shrooms and we get revelations which is cool in a scifi sort of way, 4/10

...

...

The death of the west - pat buchanan

NOT THAT ONE

MARCUS AURLEIUS MASS MURDERED CHRISTIANS
BC OF WHATS WRITTEN IN THAT BOOK

Got a copy on my shelf

Hoppe's citations are a huge list of red pills

A few off the top of my head:

Why Race Matters (Levin)
Race, Evolution, and Behavior (Rushton)
The Unheavenly City (Banville)
On Power (de Jouvenal)

What does Sup Forums think of Starship Troopers? I haven't read it years but my main takeaway was the need to earn responsibility in society and that some are undeserving of this. Looking back I think it was my first redpill, or at least got me started in the right direction.

>inb4 some ancap says a democracy is an inherrently coercive institution

Basically the argument is that might doesn't make right because the stronger can still fuck his own shit up and do crimes against himself, this might makes right is not justice.

That said for all pragmatic sense might makes right is true, but it must be tempered with noble reason to be sustainable, lest your authority wanes and another overcomes you.

I was just going to mention this
I fucking hate stoics

Witold Gombrowicz is a gem of fiction. His writing perfectly captures the fleeting, sometimes disjointed stream of consciousness thought process that emblemizes the minds and essence of educated people. People who think the way he does, not in terms of specific ideas per se, but in style and approach, will be fucking floored by every sentence and paragraph, nonstop.

I can't recommend his works enough. Ferdydurke is his most acclaimed novel, and it's great, but my personal favorite is Pornografia and I think it makes a better primer due to the fact that it's shorter. You'll know if you resonate with the style without as much of an investment.

>No one has Art of War

>(((Christians)))

Obviously in one of those macros but w/e

Hey Sean, whatcha doin?

Oh look, a shill!

So? (((Christianity))) aka nu-jews deserved it

Thanx, I'm gonna try and get these.

A novel by Dominic

Inferno I thought was the most entertaining but the pros of reading Paridiso and Purgatorio are how beautiful the descriptions are, there are real stand out cantos. But it's really the best in the Italian, not sure what english translation is the most faithful and poetic

the only right answer

You mean they haven't burned all copies of this already?

...

>Catholic Serbs
>opinions

Origins of Terrorism by Walter Reich is an excellent read and quite interesting as well. Delving into the mind and motives of different organizations from the IRA to the Jihadist movement.

Stoicism is a silly philosophy.

>Muh suicide because muh life is painful!

What a weakling.

Never read that one what's it about? I read his Mere Christianity

nothin much man just waiting for people to catch on that this is some revolutionary shit

What's it about?

That's a good one. I liked how he used be an intellectual and fell for all these edgey memes.

Top tier stuff

I personally recommend Sex and Character by (((Otto Weininger))). It sounds like some kind of Freudian analysis of men, women and sexual liberty but it's a scathing critique of women and Jews, basically why they ruin everything. The author hated his race so much that he committed sudoku a year later.

Weininger was considered a genius by Ludwig Wittgenstein, and admired by both Adolf Hitler and Albert Einstein.

10/10 can't recommend enough.

I tried to like this but I do not understand how people do without a history degree because I lost almost all the context concerning the examples he used.

Lol good news actually, even my ultraliberal library (nasty looks when I check out Pat Buchanan and Robert Bork) has a copy.

I got a free copy off an apartment complex's bookshelf in my ultraliberal city.

Also some old likely Jew bitch gave me a sarcastic "good job" after looking at my ballot (Trump, of course) when I voted at that library. /but I digress

Christianity is cancer. All religions are cancer. During the times of MA, Romans were in hight doubt about the roman gods and were actually non-religious. Things screwed up later unfortunately.

niggers be physical removed

Ohhh now that I know he was a Jew I want to read it even more

Knew he was an hero, though, and it scared me off. Thought he was a pussy, not a noble seppuku bro just tryna save us from his genes

Marcus Aurelius was some peaceful, non-judgemental loving person. I really cannot see how that applies to the foaming mouthed fascists of Sup Forums.

The non religious thing was a "im a philosopher like the greeks" meme. Plenty were religious, but they did struggle with feeling like it mattered plenty. Mostly they took it seriously but had very mixed feelings about it

Any sauce about that sounds interesting

It's a retelling of a pagan myth with Christian understanding. Pretty interesting little book.

This books (among other things) tell of runes in use centuries before their official appearance (according to the office of those who actually destroyed that culture)

Yeah we all need to read a lot of history written pre-WW2 by whites

We don't teach our kids our history and then we wonder how the profs get them to believe the whole thing was just the prehistory of the Holocaust

It really doesn't.
I hate coming here as often as I do but you find some great jewels in the great ocean of piss.

This book series is pretty red pilled.

It doesn't. Read the thread. Lots of people here shit on stoicism because it's not the "Gorilla Mentality" they wank to.

It's one of my favorite books, but this is a very fair criticism. Unless you have an extensive knowledge of history (particularly Italian history), it can be extremely difficult to digest, at times.

That being said, thankfully, we live in the age of the internet. I suggest finding an ebook, and doing your research as you read it. It will take a long time, but imho it's worth the effort.

Guns, germs and steel by jared diamond

Recently got these copies.

Now am awaiting for the libertarians and cuckolds of the board to sperg out at me

Never see this suggested in threads even though Sup Forums identifies with a lot of the ideas in this book

Set of war is a meditative piece more than a handbook on war. I'd recommend it for anyone seeking the completion of a heroic journey, but understand it's a piece meant to reflect wisdom.
One of the pieces that has stuck with me is the line "never interrupt your enemy as they're making a mistake." I don't know if it's because I'm prideful, humble, honorable, or simply looking for a fair fight, but I often times will reveal holes in my opponents plans much to my own detriment.