"Armata" will have a 152-millimeter gun missile launcher, sub-kiloton tactical nuclear technology and you go, You’re talking about building a nuclear tank, a tank that fires a nuke.
RUSSIAN NUCLEAR TANK UNDER CONSTRUCTION
That's it? We've already created that and nuclear firearms. It's a very long list. We have the NucleAR-15 for example.
Metal Gear!?
Met--
Dammit.
Nuclear firecracker
It will not need to turn, will drive straight to Berlin, comrade
>sub-kiloton
just fire FOABs for that
A WEAPON TO SURPASS METAL GEAR
Metal Gear?
can't shoot a FOAB out of a tank.
A WEAPON TO SURPASS WITH METAL GEAR
>where do you work out?
not with that attitude
hit it in the forward roadwheel, de-track it, drift in a circle around it in a jet turbine powered m1a2. the turret traverse is too slow and you beat him on the reload. no problem.
It must be stopped before it enters phase 2!
>nuclear shoot the ground
>rocket jump away
Can't beat a nuclear frog tank.
DAYLEE
AUSSIE
POLITICS
DISCUSSION
Psycho mantis?
How can American bois even compete?
HUMAN EXPERIMENTS
So, at what point of the loading process do the nukes go live? If one gets destroyed at a bad moment does this wipe out everything near it?
kek...well played, comrade
I did something like this in GTA.
Russians attention whoring as usual.
Lol why is it always penile compensation with you people?
When you have a dick, you compare it. You'd understand if you had one.
You're talking to a lad with 9 inches mate, don't get uppity.
I should also add
>American banter
>Lol why is it always penile compensation with you people?
>goes on to compare his penis.
Nah, I said Penis compensation not Penis comparison.
You're the first one to bring up the topic of my Penis, fat boy.
>9 inches
I know right? In my opinion anything under 8 inches is useless.
The US was going to make a nuke Granada in the 1960s or something but they worked out it would be hard to find someone dumb enough to throw it!
They should revisit this plan
I don't know if my dick is tiny cause my fat covers it all up, and the rest of it gets tucked in to my foreskin. At least it looks comfy.
dicklets never learn
They truly aren't real men.
...
When did I mention my height, physical strength, or combat experience?
>England brings up the heat
>America answers with unrelated bullshit pic
bravo
SNAAAAAAKE, WE'RE NOT FINISHED YET!
that's why they try to compensate with bullshit like . truly pathetic
>miniature nuclear reactors
Metal Gears are awesome and all, but everyone knows what this really means.
WE GUNDAM NOW BITCHES
>152mm nuclear APFSDS fired out of tanks
jesus christ russia
So much for armoring anything
When you said you were compensating for your penis YOU STUPID BUCK TOOTH BRIT
Now go back to stuffing crumpets up your tight, little swollen anus.
>Sub-kiloton
>LEL
The fact that he kept going this long after I stopped saying anything shows just how angry of a person he is. No need to bother him, he already has to live with himself.
Really boys? I sound like the angry one?
Jeez you Americans are a parody of yourselves.
muh recessive genes
t. liquid snake
Metal Gear?
I don't get how this would be better than launching a shell from a battleship or a submarine. Its use would be very limited as you can't just fire it anywhere unless you want scorched earth.
throwing around acronyms you heard once to sound smart, when you don't actually understand what they mean, makes you look like a retard
Did you rike it?
see cunt this is why nobody likes you leaf cunts, you're all pussy liberals
ww3 wont happen, at most it will be some china-US war freedom v commie scenario and thats it
ww3 wont happen for a long time you fuckin autist, go back to buzzfeed
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
WATERHEAD
That tank looks like it skipped leg day
Wrong
Gray Fox? You're that ninja.
>no possibility of achieving air superiority
>build nuke tank
Metal Gear??
haha they should call that thing the zoop snoopler
isnt it that the same argument for not building nuclear subs, air carriers and the rest?
Shagohad?
Subs are ment to be stealthy, air carriers are heavily defended. How will this one avoid being blown up?
Nyet, bear cavalry.
the ruskies have an unhealthy obsession with tanks.
correct, if it doesn't have legs then it's not a metal gear.
>tfw the Russians are ACTUALLY making the shagohod
>complaining about burger banter when every single post you've made in this thread is trash
Fugg
>defenseone.com
>, the Kinetic Energy Projectile, or KEP, a tungsten-based charge moving at three times the speed of sound that can destroy anything in its path.
HAHAHA
Its like the good old joke
>Chinese enginners invented a new Iron Bomb
>Radius of devastation is equal to the radius of the bomb
Why not just throw a big rock off the plane while we're at it.
Looks like an electric toothpick on a track
Of course I wouldn't say that too it's face
pic related is us nuclear powered tank prototype idea never even go to blueprint
its unrelated
Yes
why use tanks for nuke delivery? seems stupid and dangerous
Oh no fucking idea, I was just thinking if it works for all of those other machines then why not.
Besides, put them in enemies soil and watch them nuke themselves when they blow one up.
a shock and awe tactic perhaps?
METAL GEAR? IT CANT BE!
Old news. Soviets had nuclear 7.62 ammo for sniper rifles.
KUWABARA, KUWABARA
>fire the cannon
>misfire
>nuclear shell explodes in the barell
>entire armoured battalion wiped out
Yeah sounds like a terrific idea
this. shagohod it is
Fucking leaf
>apfsds
>neuclear
>fin stabilised discarding sabot
>having a payload
>having a large enough mass to fit a neuclear payload and still maintain the structural integrity needed to actually be apfsds
Think before you post
>we think
>we assume
>there is a possibility
Yeah.
Based Russia
You may have size but my ferocious four incher has the advantage in speed!
Behold. A weapon to surpass the Metal Gear.
Just don't teleport behind anyone.
Does this new tank resist Molotov-coctails?
This is even more dumb than our stealth tank
I'm pretty sure any modern tank resists Molotov cocktails.
No Russian made things can resist Molotov cock-tail.
Twisted logic. Why will we do that? Tanks are expendable. You don't just slap nuke on everything because you CAN do it.
>pic
awesome concept, why did it die off?
whats Metal Gear really designed for ?
okay. we have to create something new then. Now if you excuse me for I have to speak to my generals. Thanks for the advices.
we already have those, m8
3БB3 152mm nuclear shell (2.5 kilotons) for SPGs Aкaция, Mcтa-C and Гиaцинт
that's not how nukes work, it requires a very specific chain reaction to go off
This is also the reason why they designed c4, it requires extreme heat and a direct shockwave to start the explosion, which makes it safe to stockpile and transport
AHAHAHahahahah JAPANESE NEVER FUCKING LET DOWN I SWEAR ITS YOUR HIGH IQ
PROOF THE IQ TRUMPS EVERYTHING AND LITERALLY CREATES BETTER HUMANS. I LOVE YOU JAPAN user
We already have artillery that fires nukes. I'm unimpressed.