Red Pill Me on Hitler

>Ive been an active member on here for past 4 years

>Never bought into Hitler hype

>Realized over past few years how our society is controlled and ran by Pedo's

>Ready to take Hitler red pill

Give me best screencaps and red pills ya got

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=oZUTyrtDkRE&list=PL8V4qO3l5jWJdsAyjidqPe134AUZgZoz0&index=26&t=2s&ab_channel=AlertaJudiadaInt.
youtube.com/watch?v=MhGQrryQPfM&ab_channel=Zonwending
youtube.com/watch?v=qwS6HtMKNOA
youtube.com/watch?v=9tpY9zG79xk&t=2s&ab_channel=EndtheReds
mises.org/library/hitlers-economics
youtube.com/watch?v=SLpX3t6g0AA
avalon.law.yale.edu/imt/hossbach.asp
tomatobubble.com/smigly_rydz.html
youtube.com/watch?v=q3V3D1aio_U&t=359s&ab_channel=1TheRevolutionIsNow
jrbooksonline.com/polish_atrocities.htm
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Watch the greatest story never told

Gud Guy; Never Kill Anyone; Jews lie of 7zillion; DinduNottin

...

...

...

...

Skip the first hour and a half of basically dick riding propaganda, other stuff later is OK still a little Nazi bias though

...

...

youtube.com/watch?v=oZUTyrtDkRE&list=PL8V4qO3l5jWJdsAyjidqPe134AUZgZoz0&index=26&t=2s&ab_channel=AlertaJudiadaInt. This is the best short video but if you want the full story watch the greatest story never told.

...

Fucking leafs.

youtube.com/watch?v=MhGQrryQPfM&ab_channel=Zonwending

Great meme, idk if he's as good as the hype.

First chapter of Mein Kampf was about family hardship and how beating children is bad.

...

How old are you, sweetie?

Hitler lost. I don't like losers.

...

These are all great boys keep em coming

Fat 60% white loser

He was a commie.

First hour and a half is the history setup; fucking leafs

...

...

Nice try kike.

He was against both capitalism and communism, you retard. Hitler had some great ideas for civilization but unfortunately none of them will ever bear fruit, thanks to (((them))).

no he wasn't, he just put the wellbeing of his people before exploiting others for profit.

...

Go lose another war bro

...

...

That quote if from Strasser, not Hitler. Our Führer is right wing.

>member

Hitler was most likely gay with Ernst Rohm (pic related):

>Hitler was aware of Röhm's homosexuality. At this point they were so close that they addressed each other as du (the German familiar form of "you"). No other top Nazi leader enjoyed that privilege, and their close association led to rumors that Hitler himself was homosexual.[6] Röhm was the only Nazi leader who dared to address Hitler by his first name "Adolf" or his nickname "Adi" rather than "mein Führer."[5]

Fascism is for submissives:

Fascism is for submissives looking for a strong man father figure. Those who follow fascists are by definition followers and weaklings.

Look up the etymology. Fascism comes from the term 'fasces'; a bundle of sticks wrapped around (one could say in rapture to) an axe handle with a projecting axe blade.

This is the core metaphor that defines fascism. The metaphor being that the many must give their will power up to the one (usually a strong man leader).

This ideology is by definition about weak people looking to give up their own power or direction (and most often giving up their own rights and freedoms in the process). To usurp themselves, to be submissive... and ergo the whole ideology is one of weakness. Fascists are the most submissive and weak people in my opinion.

You know I'm fine with people who want to be strong, who want to be an authority; but being a leader is about genuinely giving others help in exploring their own individual strengths, it's not about claiming the authority of a collective of submissives as if that makes you strong. It doesn't; it makes for the weakest ideology and followers possible. Fascism is the most deflationary, it poses the biggest lie, and is hence comprised of the biggest losers.

A human should be a human beyond all states; and hence able to inhabit all states. Fascism is nihilistic to individual authority and hence is nothing but a fragile empty shell that looks tough but ultimately hides deep weakness and as my title suggests; fascism contains some of the most submissive and damaged people possible. People in need of a genuine strength; but looking in the wrong place.

youtube.com/watch?v=qwS6HtMKNOA

RAKE

Yea the German soldiers were so submissive right thats why they almost always killed more than they lost and cucked the french men how submissive of them. Also do you not know how basic human order works you need a leader preferably a strong one who can lead you to victory.

Indeed.

"An individual’s capacity to contribute stands side by side with his legal and social standing in the economic process. This alone shows him how necessary his contribution to the community is towards creating his own prosperity. The National-Socialist employee must understand that the prosperity of the national economic structure means his own material prosperity. The National-Socialist employer must understand that the happiness and the contentment of his employees form the foundation for the development of his own economic strength.

National-Socialist employees and employers are both officer and trustee of the entire national community. They are granted a high degree of personal liberty in their work because experience has shown that when a man is given extensive freedom, his capacity for work increases greatly, much more than it does by coercion from above. Lack of freedom prevents the natural process of elimination from occurring which blocks the promotion of the most capable, able, and diligent people." - Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf

>being a leader is about genuinely giving others help in exploring their own individual strengths
And that is excluded from the German's facism how? Just because you say so? Among themselves, Germans had these growing moments in spades.

>you need a leader

Found the faggot.... and no; (you) need a leader faggot. I lead myself.

He is either a shill , troll or retarded.

Happy birthday

I'll smoke one for you today dawg

Hitler may have been gay for Rohm, but everyone was gay for Hitler. And Sup Forums still follows that fine tradition.

S-senpai.

>implying leadership is not necessary for society to function
>implying a strong man is not the best leader of anything by default
>typing lots of other pointless words I did not read

...

>Uh, I lead myself
>Also, I demand others do the same. Don't join up or anything!
Sounds like you just want to take the high seat before somebody more qualified can or have more targets you can take advantage of. I'd like to see you try either.

>implying leadership is not necessary for society to function

Just keep watching television canada-cuck

"On the other side, we have the true Germanic democracy consisting of a free election. This leader is bound to assume full responsibility for everything he does. In this format, there is no roll call of a majority on individual questions, but only the rule of an individual who has to support his decisions with his property and his life. To anyone who objects by saying no one would be willing to devote himself to such a risky responsibility under those conditions, there is but one answer: thank God. It is the very purpose of a Germanic democracy to keep every unworthy political climber who might by chance fall into the office from gaining any power in the government of his fellow man through the back door. The very magnitude of this responsibility is meant to scare off weaklings and incompetents." - Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf

Anyone ever checked for other numbers?

hmmm really so who is Malcolm Turnbull ?

If you don't think leadership is a core component of a functioning society, you are genuinely dumb.

Unsourced internet pictures. We meet again.

As a dictator Hitler was a less successful Stalin (a worse motherfucker).

As a statesman Hitler resembled Wilhelm II the most. Similar fuck ups. Now Germany rules the whole Europe because of their economy and diplomacy.

I find this a remarkable coincidence:

"And the children of Israel journeyed from Rameses to Succoth, about six hundred thousand on foot that were men, beside children." - Exodus 12:37 (KJV)

Ha right still salty how easily you were conquered? The soviet union got nowhere near the third reich all they had was a lot of men and funding from the united states.

How is that rambling even close to an actual discussion about history? I know it's Sup Forums but that's really fucking low.

He created the world's first decent animal protection laws.

not an argument

>i lead myself
>gimme free shit gubment reeee

And both III Reich and USSR were economic failures. The difference is that Stalin had much more convenient geographical location and was much more cunning. WWII happened because of him, his contribution was much more significant than Hitler's (and of course he started it fighting side by side with him) and managed to switch sides when it was convenient and basically make two powerful democratic leaders his bitches.

hmm I sorry shall i rephrase you said something stupid and incorrect

>As a dictator Hitler was a less successful Stalin (a worse motherfucker).

>As a statesman Hitler resembled Wilhelm II the most. Similar fuck ups. Now Germany rules the whole Europe because of their economy and diplomacy.

The soviet union was a poor shit hole of my country who only survived because the winter its man power and ally funding. Where as the German Reich had of the best economic resurrections and is still to this day is a economic powerhouse. And still to this day Russia while better than before is still a poor corrupt shit hole.

Economic failures what the fuck are you talking about? Hitler ended unemployment and Germany's economy was the best it had ever been.

Another unsourced image. Who claimed it? When? How? Few reports made by people like Karski or Pilecki that were smuggled to the US and that they ignored? I don't get it. Yeah the toughest camps were located in the General Government, Auschwitz has always been known as a concentration camp with an unnatural death toll and whoever created this map probably mixed two camps next to each other.

Stutthof was definitely a concentration camp. Also a place of many executions usually POWs of the September-October campaign.

youtube.com/watch?v=9tpY9zG79xk&t=2s&ab_channel=EndtheReds

mises.org/library/hitlers-economics

A very good quick rundown about Hitler's economic plan. Basically don't expect to create a healthy economy while preparing yourself for a war of conquest.

Can't watch it for some reason. Does it say anything about the testimonies given by Hoess, Brunner or Wisliceny? This is also part of my family history so don't expect me to play along sometimes like today I'm not in a mood. War crimes happened. This war wasn't clean.

Yup i knew it your letting your little bitch emotions cloud your judgement. Your still asshurt how humiliating your crushing defeat was.

Here's an actual commie saying that Nazi Germany was a capitalist country:

youtube.com/watch?v=SLpX3t6g0AA

The mistake that the guy in the video makes is that socialism does not imply any economic system, but its tangential to it. The truth is that it was a mix of private enterprise along with socialist policies.

It wasn't. To us WWII isn't just a bunch of iconic battles or images. The closer you are to the heart of the conflict the more sources and reliable information you have. Historiography in Poland is really solid and now the most popular theory is that we should've allied with Germany at least while USSR was still a threat.


HITLER'S PLANS FOR WAR IN EUROPE IN 1937

avalon.law.yale.edu/imt/hossbach.asp

It wasn't until April 1939 that Hitler decided to attack us. Huge mistake.


Also being attacked from four sides by 2 powerful aggressive dictatorships and fighting a real good fight is nothing to be ashamed and of course it was far from over. This is why jokes about invading Poland don't affect us at all because we know this from a different perspective (and people always forget about USSR). If anything we're ashamed of our government.

It isn't even the same definition of socialism. Bolshevist and National socialist had different definitions of socialism.

>a real good fight

Please you idiots still had cav and your right you should have sided with the nazis and let the German minority in Poland go free but you didn't you oppressed and prepared for war then got BTFO.

The most basic you can get is: state has the right to redistribute wealth. In communism state owned all factories in national socialism there were private owners but they still had to coopearte (Krupp).

Well, Marshall Smigly-Rydz seems to have been as thick as you, so it's no wonder you got your butts kicked so quickly.

tomatobubble.com/smigly_rydz.html

If Marshall Jozef Pilsudski hadn't died in 1935, things could have been much different.

Germans also had cavalry. It was 1939. It wasn't the mai but useful for transport.

>you should have sided with the nazis
For some time but yeah.

>and let the German minority in Poland go free
It was free to go. Interestingly enough Polish-German relations improved under Hitler. No tarrif wars or speeches about taking over this or that part of Poland but plenty of cultural cooperation.

>you didn't you oppressed and prepared for war

Nobody wanted war but the sad thing is that our ministers didn't listen to Piłsudski while he was still alive. He said that we couldn't have both Hitler and Stalin as our enemies. Pic related was a Soviet spy who convinced minister Beck that Stalin is interested in staying in his own country.

...

Lot of bullshit on this website. It's true Hitler respected Piłsudski and that Rydz was a fuck up but to claim that he was the most powerful person in the country (and not Beck, Moscicki or Sławoj-Składkowski) is ridiculous. He wanted to be the president (a strong office thanks to the April Constitution) but by 1939 he was powerless. Although he made one speech just like Beck's. This whore article mixes up so many things holy crap.

Is this a meme? Another unsourced image? No one in Poland defends this idiot but not because he "wanted war" (of course he didn't no one in Poland wanted it we just got here and protected ourselves from the Bolsheviks) but because he ran away.

You are literally Hitler.

...

LOL I knew

>MUH unsourced image!

>No one in Poland wanted it

>He wanted it.

And i'm sure no one else wanted it to right just him only wahhhh its getting mixed up. fuck off you slavic polish some of a bitch.

youtube.com/watch?v=q3V3D1aio_U&t=359s&ab_channel=1TheRevolutionIsNow Let me guess you can't watch this video either.

You Poles have a very selective memory. Did they teach you that Hitler made a peace offering? Probably not. Well, here it is:
1) Return of the Free City of Danzig to the Reich (Danzig was 90% German at the time)
2) A extra-territorial road and rail link from Pomerania to East Prussia. We're talking about 30km and I believe this was negotiable.

In exchange:
1) Customs-free access to the port of Danzig
2) Guarantee of Poland's existing borders. Keep in mind the plebiscite promised for Upper Silesia in the Treaty of Versailles never came off.
3) Poland promises not to mangle German names (OK, I made that up, but how do you get from Marienburg to Malbork?)

Hitler made that offer six times and was turned down. The actual attack was supposed to happen on August 25th, but Hitler called it off at the last minute to try one last time.

Oh yeah, the link you gave barely mentions Poland and the Gleiwitz Incident is a postwar fabrication.

> oppose freedom
> required violence to stay in power
> judge groups by ethnicity instead of individuals by merit
> destroyed all of europe
> millions dead
> degenerate sexual habits

hitler / nazism = hyper blue pill

de-civilizing is not the way to tackle the pedo problem, mass citizen vigilance is.

Also i will be called a kike shill for posting this, should mean enough.

Pretty sure hitler was a pedo faggot

Do people not release the reason France lost was because their army got surrounded along with the British but the British fucked off back to their Island. Also the fact that they were fighting a WWI style war when Germany was using the Blitzkrieg. Has nothing to do with the average French soldier.

>If you don't think leadership is a core component of a functioning society, you are genuinely dumb.

Said on Sup Forums

...who is user's leader again? Can I get an email address please?

Rydz wanted one thing: to be the president. But he wasn't the most likely candidate. After Piłsudski the power was divided between three or four people and Beck was by far the most influential. Alhough Rydz is criticised for chaotic leadership Beck is the main source of our criticism for his romantic ideas. Even though a short tetm alliance with Hitlet was most rational he chose to ally with UK instead (a country that is always against Poland) and France (traditional ally but weaker after WW1). According to one theory the Brits finally agreed to diveryt Hitler's attention from France as it was his first target and Poland was just thete to guarantee secured eastern border. April 1939 changed all that.

Actually, no. The French built the Maginot Line to force the Germans to do the Schlieffen Plan all over again, but this time French mobile forces along with the British Expeditionary Force would meet the Germans in Belgium and not on French soil.

Their plan was actually sound but it depended on the Germans cooperating with it. The funny thing was the Germans almost did that. The original plan was a re-run of the Schlieffen Plan, but Hitler decided instead to go with a plan that Manstein and Guderian came up with.

Lastly, Churchill gave the order for the British to abandon their equipment and retreat to Dunkirk but didn't tell the French and Belgians ahead of time.

Also the corridor was originally our idea, Gdansk/Danzig was a free city administered by the League of Nation and didn't mattet at all with Gdynia right next to it. It all was less significant than diplomacy and alliances.

Actually, no. The French built the Maginot Line to force the Germans to do the Schlieffen Plan all over again, but this time French mobile forces and the British Expeditionary Force along with the Belgian army would meet the Germans in Belgium and not on French soil.

Their plan was actually sound but it depended on the Germans cooperating with it. The funny thing was the Germans almost did that. The original plan was a re-run of the Schlieffen Plan, but Hitler decided instead to go with a plan that Manstein and Guderian came up with.

Lastly, Churchill gave the order for the British to abandon their equipment and retreat to Dunkirk but didn't tell the French and Belgians ahead of time.

Sorry for the dup post. Other people having problems posting? Are we getting DDOS's?

...

One of the great tragedies of discussing WWII with people from countries far away from the source of the conflict (applies to apologists on all sides) is that while sometimes they praise historians like Victor Suvorov or David Irving for going against the grain they have no opportunity to read the works of the "third guy" (who was acquinted with both of them and whom he greatly admired) - Paweł Wieczorkiewicz the absolute guru of "secret wars", diplomatic history, Soviet Union and the origins of WWII. He gave no fucks about anyones feelings and had enemies among the lefties and romantic conservatists alike. Would probably trigger a few nazis. According to him:

-Lenin was probably the worst man in history
-Nuremberg trial was a lie
-Petain was a great French patriot
-Poles were in the wrong in the conflict with Ruthenians and Kossaks and Khmelnitsky was a great man
-Polish officers responsible for the Warsaw Uprising should be executed

So much better than some retarded internet conspiracies.

At least his pupil continues his work. The titles alone should put them in Sup Forums hall of fame. ("Jews: politically incorrect stories")

This book alone should be more than enough.

Am Polish.

Poland thought it would benefit from a quick war with Germany. Get into war, powerful allies France and U.K. Kick German ass, German opposition to Hitler's takes over as country is thrown into turmoil, and Poland comes out the winner

The gleiwitz false flag propoganda had to be invented after the war to conceal the fact that Poland

The treatment of Germans in Poland was bad during interwar years.

What can one say of the hate that speaks from the pages of one of the more popular papers, the largest Polish newspaper Ilustrowany Kurjer Codzienny, which appeared on April 20th, 1929, in Cracow? "Away with the Germans behind their natural border! Let's get rid of them behind the Oder!" "Silesian Oppeln is Polish to the core; just as all of Silesia and all of Pomerania were Polish before the German onslaught!"17

"To absorb all of East Prussia into Poland and to extend our western borders to the Oder and Neisse rivers, that is our goal. It is within reach, and at this moment it is the Polish people's great mission. Our war against Germany will make the world pause in amazement."18

"There will be no peace in Europe until all Polish lands shall have been restored completely to Poland, until the name Prussia, being that of a people long since gone, shall have been wiped from the map of Europe, and until the Germans have moved their capital Berlin farther westwards."19

jrbooksonline.com/polish_atrocities.htm

>Ive been an active member on here for past 4 years

Don't know the truth about Hitler

...

...