(((political analyst))) says

>(((political analyst))) says

is this shit even legit?
is it even a real job?

>first time i click on image
wtf faggot cut your nails you sick animal

it is a real job but i rather have an actual job which requires like actual intellect and shit like that

Of course not. Philosophy is already a field. Political science is not science, otherwise it would be named Politics and it would be considered a science without having to be named a science, like Math, Physics, Genetics, Biology etc.

Did you forget to take your fedora off?

>I don't understand ( ) so it must be fake!
Anything you get a wage for is a job.
Please finish school

Poor rat.

Anything is a job if you can get people to pay you for it.

Are you 13 years old?

all jokes aside social sciences are really important to keep our societal discourse and politics healthy.

but when you are in the sausage factory you don't have the luxury of sitting in your underwear playing monday morning quarterback on a peruvian llama fucking board. you have to do stuff right then and often not have time to think about what the longer term consequences of that will be...

It would be nice to be like in a think tank but being one of those """advisers""" to politicians would probably sucks donkey dicks
no

example this guy

>all jokes aside social sciences are really important to keep our societal discourse and politics healthy.
Incoming (You's) from uneducated faggots incoming.

Is rat-o going to be okay

>implying its not
>name 1 country thats doesn't take social sciences seriously and has a functional democracy

>all jokes aside social sciences are really important to keep our societal discourse and politics healthy.

That's not an argument, that's just a meaningless statement. Political sciences are not science. They do not use scientific methods. At best, they are collecting polling data for statistical analysis or analyzing movements of people and such, at worst they just literally pull things out of their ass and make it sound important. You don't need to analyze behavior itself. That's symptom analysis, it's not relevant. What you want to look at are root causes, which are found in biology, which we can then combine with philosophy to extrapolate reasoning based on facts.

Political sciences are the same as women's studies. Made up courses to trick dumb kids into paying them large amounts of money to learn nothing useful. It's as much a science as psychology is. Bunch of subjective interpretabel crap not based on root causes, but on symptom analysis. Neurosciences are much more useful in that aspect.

>women are meant to run a family, in which equality is important between children and there's a father figure to please who provides
>women have empathy, which means identifying the children and the predators

Is it any wonder that women are natural socialists who are easily tricked into thinking that "needy people" should be imported en masse while their own men are being portrayed as dangerous?

>is this shit even legit?
>is it even a real job?

learn what weasel words are

>At best, they are collecting polling data for statistical analysis or analyzing movements of people and such, at worst they just literally pull things out of their ass and make it sound important.
You say it like that makes their work less significant. Some of the most important work that has affected Joe blow and even faggots like you have been from the social sciences arena.

Also, that's all they can do. you can't fucken double blind a huge sample size and control their shit. this just makes their analysis all the more difficult to do yet they are still quite good at it.

>You don't need to analyze behavior itself. That's symptom analysis, it's not relevant.

Are you retarded?


>What you want to look at are root causes, which are found in biology, which we can then combine with philosophy to extrapolate reasoning based on facts.

This is actually retarded. All philosophies have a leaning to them while social sciences today which actually involve field work require you to talk to people and do surveys and get a dataset that may or may not work with you and then make sense of it. its far more complex than what you'd find in other sciences granted it doesn't require very hard maths but that doesn't make it less important.


>Is it any wonder that women are natural socialists who are easily tricked into thinking that "needy people" should be imported en masse while their own men are being portrayed as dangerous?

What does this even mean? This is some arts / womens studies faggotry

Political scientists claimed Hillary had a ~99% chance to win. Biggest landslide loss in history even with massive voter fraud, the media and everything on her side.

That's really all you need to know about (((political science))). You're even admitting that it doesn't use scientific method, so it can't be a science. If you called it Political Studies, we wouldn't have this conflict of definitions. Studying politics is fine, but it's not a science since there's no scientific method involved. It's as much as a science as engineering is. It might use science based components to construct things the engineer deems useful, but in itself it's not a science. Hell, I'd even settle for "applied sciences" but that would still imply it's not speculation based on easily corrupted data that has no verifiable base in reality outside of biology.

there were plenty of them who also claimed trump will win. MSM didn't give them any air.

this

One of my old uni profs (a literature guy) with no background in politics besides being a hipster commie went on public radio to talk about Trump and called himself a political scientist. It doesn't mean a thing.

It's usually a spokesperson for the jews hired by the network

So what? It means nothing in a 50/50% gambit. Even Paul the Octopus managed to guess like 24 soccer matches correctly in a row. It's not science. Scientific method means repeatable experiments with the same outcomes regardless of where you are. Calling people on the phone is not science.

what is this meme about a 50/50 gambit? wtf are you talking about?

yeah it's like soccer analyst but boring

There's literally 2 options. One of them will win. Some people will pick option 1, others will pick option 2. Some people will always be right no matter the outcome.

thats one thing that political science is about. elections. there is all sort of other fun. figuring out public opinion, figuring about future policy decisions, geopolitics, its a fascinating and very intellectually stimulating field imo because the hustle never ends

And you can verify these results before an election? Did Hillary win?

or idk maybe its all the same and after a few cycles you will figure that out

stop talking to the ausfag, he's clearly stupid

It's a synonym for blogger.

Look it does not really matter that many people got tricked into thinking Hilldawg will win.. they were wrong.
I was right but you don't see me gloating do you? We all learnt from this. It's a fact of life that you can't be right all the time. sometimes you are very wrong.

I don't think you appreciate how difficult it is to predict things in this arena. You perhaps just consume news as it happens and don't think about it and shit.

A FUCKING CAN'T OFFEND MUSLIMS LEAF

I was thinking sports commentator myself. Sure, it's fun and there's a lot of possible things to study such as history, biology, training regiments, diets, nutrition, low-oxygen environments, how muscles store glucose etc but do you really NEED that to be able to comment on sports in the same way these political scientists do? No, it's mostly pulled out of their asses and most of the time they're wrong.

>missing the point
see this retard

no i think you're missing the point

Ah of course, here come the old platitudes. Ya can't be right all the time! Imagine airplane designers said that to people. Can't land safely all the time! Brexit isn't going to happen!

Yes, yes it fucking matters if you want to claim political scientists have value when they're WRONG all the goddamn time because nobody can verify anything they claim. Why are you so obsessed with being called a scientist when clearly, you're not.

when you are working with airplanes and shit it's pretty much down to an exact science but even then you need wind tunnels and shit to model how the wing will perform in certain conditions.

this is not like cutting wood. this is like the equivalent of physics in the """real sciences""" its the study of everything and it isn't nicely sectioned off in areas like motion, optics, space, electricity etc.

Yeah, that's my argument. You need wind tunnels to verify hypothesis made to improve the shape of wings. Where's the wind tunnel of political science? How do you verify your results?

by looking at past results.
they saw that hillary lost and they were all wrong. lessons were learnt from this but no one is claiming to be a divine oracle from god.

Then what is the worth of a wrong hypothesis which is only verified by it failing in the real world? It's basically saying, we're just guessing and seeing what works. That's not science, since you're analyzing outcomes, not root causes.

now you are mixing and matching memes

>is this shit even legit?

Dunno
>is it even a real job?

Do you get paid for it?

If yes, it is a real job.

Is this really the level of discourse you commie "scientists" learned to debate on? No arguments, no explanations, no reasoning, just saying lelelel u r wrong like a 3 year old. I know literal 5 year-olds better at deductive reasoning than you.

Again, you
>Hillary is going to win t. political science
>these people on the phone told me so
>I don't need to verify this, I can just say so on international television
>whoops I was wrong
>well I learnt "lessons"
>continue doing the exact same thing

Yeah, we get it. In politics people have to win and there's a limited number of outcomes so guessing based on who seems popular seems like a good scam for getting paid to know nothing.

>hillary is a terrible person and probably the last person anyone wants in office, including feminists
>still she had a huge female following
Now, this would be an interesting scientific question and look, the data says this:
>low IQ people tend to have an inflated self-worth based on nothing and tend to see everything that contradicts anything tied to this self-worth as a personal attack
Oh would you look at that, the bell-curve for women shows that women are generally lower in intelligence and vary less. Don't like Hillary? You're a SEXIST, there's literally no other reason why you couldn't like Hillary, you MUST hate Hillary because it's the only explanation! Why am I voting for Hillary? FIRST WOMAN PRESIDENT. No need to look at anything else.

And that's what you sound like to me. You don't argue. You just say things without any kind of reasoning behind it or anything to even indicate you have something to back up anything you're saying. You talk like a woman.

oh my god you are a giant cocksucker.
You have no understand or respect for the social sciences and i don't think talking to you any further will change that. you are like thicko and set in your ways so continue falling off the cliff of subtlety and into the icy waters of douchebaggery and faggotry.

youre a bit touchy m8 i think you got BTFO

you're too thick headed to see the value of what they do because maybe it shatters that fragile glass house you have built in your head

Yes, it is.

But you're basically forced to be a globalist if you want to get a degree or a work.

damm buddy you are fragile your self cant handle a bit of criticism can ya have to attack the person not the issue typical liberal tactics melbornise are ya m8?

god damn you are such a faggot. this isn't my first internet fight mate if i wanted i could crush you but instead im going to just going to laugh at your child like and autistic view of the world

what exactly is child like about my view m8 plz do provide evidence

there you go again so cute

there you go again no evidence

youre a pip kid. heres a dime now get outta here dont spend it all in one place

>(((economists))) say

Is economics the most fraudulent """"""""""""""profession"""""""""""""""

why thank you mister now gtfo off this site go back to tumblr you niggerfaggot come back with a real argument or not at all sage fag

BTFO