The Hypocrisy of /pol

There is all this talk about obtaining a "3.14 qt virgin waifu" whatever that means

But are you a virgin yourself?

Why should a women retain her purity if you yourself have not?

Talk about a double standard

,btfo

Keys and locks.
How many times do we have to go over this?

for the same exact reason that leafs are not range banned.

sometimes a leaf will actually make an argument.

this was not that time though

There's a difference between not being a virgin and having a couple km of cock mileage

>just now realizing Sup Forums is full of retarded degenerates
Fuck off, leaf.

oh, trust me, everyone here is a virgin.

>Why should a women retain her purity if you yourself have not?
B-but I have

This.

They're not virgins by choice lol

The data which suggest that women are more likely to divorce the more partners they have had does not apply to men. So take it up with the data and objective reality for having a double standard.

This

and most of them will claim theyre a virgin by choice.

not me

Heh..

>but are you a virgin yourself?
of course I am? are there non virgins on Sup Forums?

>pol is one person

also

>leaf

First of all, there's a reason for the double standard.

Secondly, I, a virgin, found a qt (ratio of the circumference of a circle to it's diameter) virgin waifu. So #notall Sup Forumsacks

4 low energy raiders

you have to go back

How can a man he a virgin? Unless he gets fucked in the ass men cannot be virgins the don't have a cunny or cherry to pop

tits or gtfo, wench

you are not a key, you are a fucking disease risk.

>implying that Sup Forums isn't full of virgins.
OP btfo

the only worthwhile arguement I have heard

speak for yourself

>Thinks that virginity for men and women is the same thing and comparable at all

A man having sex just sprays his DNA outside of his body, with little effect on him. A women having sex takes another mans DNA into her body. There's a lot of evidence now that DNA becomes a permanent part of her as well.

Getting raped doesn't count sven

>Implying it's a double standard

I have kept my purity for 21 long years and I am not about to throw it out the window like some jezebel babylonian harlot.

I touch myself only to the purest of 2D waifus and one day they will manifest and make for me a harem that I can finally share my virginity with as god intended.

gotta be pretty depressing fighting "hate" by making fun of rape.

i'm 29 and still a virgin

Anyone who talks about only wanting virgins, no hymen no diamond, etc. is virtually guaranteed to be a virgin themselves. They set unrealistic expectations for the girls that they want, so that when they inevitably fail to find them they can say "I'm not settling for some whore!" instead of facing up to the fact that even though "all women are whores who will sleep with anyone" they couldn't get anyone to sleep with them. It's basically a defense mechanism to protect themselves from their own failure

Kek

Even Holly Mary mother of Jesus had encounters Tiberius Pantera and there's good enough evidence to prove that the Roman soldier was the father of Jesus, the glorified virgin wasn't even a virgin!

It's just that now it's normalized to talk about your sexual activity and for some reason it became hip.

Where is the evidence? One piece of evidence?

Because a key which opens many locks is a master key, while a lock which can be opened by many keys is useless.

/thread

Men can't be virgins, leaf. That's for women.

>Talk about a double standard

So what, doesn't bother me.

Yes. I have kept myself very pure. I wouldn't degrade myself with premarital sex. That's so pathetic. I have my dignity.

I'M not whoring around and had only 4 partners in my 20s and. If I'll go for some 17 and she'll have 0-2 partners like I did I'm cool with it.

Men evolved to try to fuck as many women as possible, thus male promiscuity is a beneficial genetic trait.

However, women evolved to be highly selective because you can't have Chad's baby when you have a sperg growing in your womb. Thus, promiscuity in women is a negative genetic trait.

Mates tend to choose mates with beneficial genetic traits. Thus, the evolutionary beneficial trait is the logical one to pursue. Chads get to fuck the virgins, and betas get the dregs.

t. not virgin and I like science

No, but I've only fucked escorts.

Here.
time.com/3461485/how-previous-sexual-partners-affect-offspring/

And that's just the physical effect. A woman could theoretically get around that by only wearing condoms. But there's a lot of other psychological effects as well that differ from the genders having sex, like being a less reliable mother and wife the more partners she's had. Something to do with less sturdy interpersonal bonds and thoughts of previous cocks.

I only fuck hookers OP.

I'm a virgin, I'm saving myself for marriage. I'll only marry a girl who's perfect.
>Hardly any perfect girls exist in this day and age...

Not even close to being true, Sup Forums is full of degenerates who tinder smash and has a surprising amount of married cucks.

The only reason you can even ask this question is because of birth control. Without it women who do not stay chaste end up with bastard children they probably can't support. So, it's for their own good. For men this risk just doesn't exist. Is it a double standard? Yes, but there's for a good reason for it.

>inb4 promoting degeneracy
I'm just trying to explain to OP why the stigma exists for women and not men.

>trust me
kek

femanon here, i agree, it's a total double standard. i would NEVER consider a relationship with a man who had even masturbated before he met me. men with hearts full of lust and evil should confine their sexual activities to other men.

see

Dont tell them.

We are just a bunch autistic teenage virgins

This. but i'm asexual.

>Implying any of us have even touched a woman

NORMALFAGS GET OFF MY BOARD!! REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE