>In this episode of the Waking Up podcast, Sam Harris speaks with Charles Murray about the controversy over his book The Bell Curve, the validity and significance of IQ as a measure of intelligence, the problem of social stratification, the rise of Trump, universal basic income, and other topics.
He actually says right in the opener before the interview even starts that racial difference in intelligence exists, that all the data over the last half century have proven this beyond a doubt, and that within the scientific community there is no real controversy about this, it is simply scientific fact. He goes on to say the controversy over this is simply a "moral panic" on the left that this issue is even being discussed at all.
Of course this is all true and most people here already know that, but it's shocking to hear a public figure say it in 2017. I'm not really a big Harris fan, but I certainly respect him more now.
gad saad has a bunch of evolutionary psychologists on his show., and there's usually a moment with each one where they talk about if its in the best interest of science to look at at the difference in iq between populations. i'd say 90% don't think we should look into it all because there is nothing to gain by it.
Yeah it's the fallback argument. Starts out as "There is absolutely no scientific basis for claiming a difference in intelligence between races" and that was boilerplate for decades, but now that the science is pretty much irrefutable, and to boot we are about five years out from showing link between 'g' and alleles (as they say in the podcast), they can't really use that argument anymore. So now instead they say "We don't gain anything by pointing this out and we should just pretend it isn't there even if it is".
The problem is how it affects behavior. The least intelligent ten percent of whites have IQs below 81; FORTY PERCENT of blacks have IQs that low. Only one black in six is more intelligent than the average white; five whites out of six are more intelligent than the average black. You can argue about what IQ measures or how significant it is, but the fact is it measures something. And that something correlates with how people, regardless of race, behave, function and co-exist in society. For instance it means lower impulse control and lowered ability to delay gratification for an increased reward later. All of this and multiple other factors means an increased propensity for crime. Particularity assaults, violent crime and rape.
This isn't something that can be ignored without consequence.
Jaxson Rogers
I think it is less to do with race and more to do with breeding populations.
If you have one population (white and asian) that, for centuries, measures success based on innovation and construction, then more people with those desirable traits will successfully produce offspring.
Whereas if you have a breeding population (Africans) that, for centuries, propagate a simple hunter-gatherer existence where strength and agility (rather than intelligence) are more useful and desirable, those are the people who will successfully breed there.
It's natural selection, or "natural eugenics" at work. And it will take generations (or genetic manipulation) to repair. It has nothing to do with skin color - it's just that an entire subset of humans valued a different genetic outcome and came up losers because of it.
Lincoln Ward
Intelligence is the most important attribute that separates man from the rest of the animals and that attribute ought to be ignored by science?
That is some serious, major league, grade A bullshit.
Jaxson Ortiz
The concept of race and the concept of intelligence are incredibly ill-defined. The definition of "black" in the US seems to be "looking like they have African ancestors". The definition of "white" in the US seems to be "looking like they have only European ancestors". The definition of "intelligence" in the US seems to be "being able to do well on tests written by the education establishment". "Blacks" have been discriminated against for centuries in the US. They have been systematically denied access to the resources that would allow them to get to the point of being able to do well on establishment tests. How anyone thinks that anyone can conclude anything scientific by defining races and intelligence in this way and studying the differential intelligence of races in the US is beyond me.
Oliver Baker
HOLY SHIAT!
>diferent razes have diferent IQ he comited suicide there, they are going to eat him alive
Joshua Rivera
...
Sebastian Nelson
If IQ, like race, is inherited by genetics, wouldn't be fair under the affirmative action logic, that dumb people get some state assistance? Like... if smart people (like white or rich) have more chances of success in life because of their genetic makeup or birthplace, wouldn't it be fair to artificially increase the income of lower IQ people? /s
Caleb Perez
You clearly have no science background or you've forgotten how it works.
You can certainly conclude all sorts of things, and it is proven in The Bell Curve. There are many easily proven conclusions reached..
Maybe you should try reading it. Or you could continue in your ignorance.
Colton Watson
I hated Sam and Charles' constant "we need to judge people individually etc etc. You can't predict an individuals intelligence etc."
First, to some extent you can predict an individuals intelligence with remarkably few data points (race being one).
Second, why do they refuse to confront the degree to which a low IQ population can actually integrate with high IQ Western populations?
Sam says he wants a "colorblind" society, and I'm glad he has finally come around to studying the IQ literature, but now he needs to come around to the literature on diversity. It is poisonous. Moreover, why is it considered a moral good to want a colorblind society but morally reprehensible to want a society in which diversity is preserved (e.g. a white society for white people).
There has quite literally never been a society below 90 average IQ that has had successful democracy for any lengthy period. IQ is the single greatest predictor of economic output by country. Diversity is poison. Put the damn pieces together. Once the white population is fully dwindled, fingers crossed it doesn't, and there are a few whites at the top of the strata and a lot of blacks at the bottom, does he think they're going to be colorblind and understanding? It will cause tremendous strife.
It's like they've connected the perimeter of the puzzle and filled in the rest with haphazard philosophical musings and delusion.
Justin White
I was thinking of posting this too OP
Benjamin Barnes
The proper conclusion is to stop forcing the impossible, and to allow lower intelligence individuals to leave school early and start a lower end trade or other such job rather than waste time in school.
The purpose of the government is not to force the same outcome on everyone, it is to ensure that there is equality *under the law*
Brody Wood
Murray and Harris might be only semi-red pilled but this is as much as we can hope for at the moment. They do have careers to worry about and not everyone can be Jared Taylor or Philippe Rushton.
Christopher Ramirez
used to listen to this podcast for AI and islam stuff. (((sam))) became so unbearably butthurt during the election that I stopped listening.
i think i'll check this one out though.
Lincoln Gonzalez
They went into this in the podcast and showed that's a bullshit argument, seriously listen to the two hours.
Brody Kelly
Kevin MacDonald's The Culture Of Critique, explains why science is not really science anymore when certain cultural topics are discussed.
The short version is: Jews manipulate the public mind over long periods of time to view exclusive and or racist tendencies as vices in themselves while turning a blind eye to them or excusing them in Jewish people. Jews recognize that such a group evolutionary strategy is beneficial to their own Jewish interests.
Their potent poison has spread all over the white world and will destroy the white people through race mixing if it is not stopped.
Owen Reed
The final red pill is that Sam is right about 99.9% of things.
Brainlets won't accept this.
Brody Adams
"There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics."
Stay in academia too long and sniff your own farts and you start believing in the third lie : statistics.
> Be an outlier to these statistics and you can shed more light on this topic than any study ever made..
Of course, academics would rather sit around sniffing their own farts, made up measures of intelligence, and statistics than do that.
O'well.. It's not like one is immune to being ignorant just because they're highly educated... Sam Harris included
Joseph James
this is the road to being redpill
good thing sam harris is finally being honest about it.
My main criticism of Sam is that he has always been a pussy about this subject.
Samuel Turner
Brainlets accept just about anything self-proclaimed 'experts' say about a topic as true. They do so because they're unable to use their own brain.
Stern - born in Berlin, the grandson of the German-Jewish reform philosopher Sigismund Stern (1812-1867).
Stern, a Jew, was ousted by Hitler's regime ...
Goyim accepted false measure of intelligent as science/fact. Roasties...
Tyler Young
>i can see the truth unlike these "experts", unlike u. u only agree with experts becuz ur a sheep
Leo Ramirez
he is right about things, scientifically. though making moral or political arguments from scientific facts is not a simple matter.
Carson Baker
I can simply conduct 5 minutes of googling and see that there is nothing scientific about an IQ test other than some random psychologist coming up with a bullshit test. A test btw that has obvious ethnic and experiential bias.
Why you can't see this nor "(((experts)))" like Sam Harris says all you need to know about the mainframe and its brainlet goyim terminals....
But Buhh my Intelligent quotient... but buhhh mah Bell curve But buhhhh mah statistics.
Chase Walker
btw .. mah IQ is measured at 137 which means nothing to me.
Brayden Foster
The echo chamber of universities is like a dutch oven or a fart-box
You sit in there spewing shit, and you know it stinks, but you don't mind it because it's familiar (like your own farts), so you just sit there and breathe it all in
Jackson Torres
Based leaf ^
Evan Campbell
its about jews and goyim, not whites and blacks iq
Elijah Scott
You have clearly no idea about what IQ is, how it's measured, what a regression analysis is, or the power of its predictive abilities which absolutely DWARFS the predictive power powers of any other construct developed in the psychological or sociological fields.
Clearly. I have a 137 IQ. Graduate Degrees. Completed Graduate level statistics courses centered on optimization and control theory.
But nah man, I clearly have no clue what IQ is. Statistics lead to false correlations and false causal theories especially when you have no real intelligence or intuitive skill.
psychological or sociological fields... Yeah, because clearly the clowns in this field understand the human brain, psyche, and sociology. They clearly have a grasp on things.
Henry Nguyen
Your claims are unverifiable. Scientists actually publish their claims, and get peer reviewed. Show us anything that demonstrated methodological errors in IQ research.
Pro tip, you can't.
Calling something a "false correlation" shows you have a tenuous grasp on what factor analysis is, at best.
Parker Allen
>Yeah, because clearly the clowns in this field understand the human brain, psyche, and sociology. They clearly have a grasp on things.
The clowns in those fields that don't have a grasp are those that do not actually use proper statistical analysis including factor and regression analysis to demonstrate their claims, such as most Critical Theory papers.
This is why the replication rate in those fields is absolutely abysmal.
IQ research is not amongst them.
Ethan Martinez
Africans actually score worse then US blacks. the muh oppression argument doesn't really hold up. kikes have high IQs and have been chased out of virtually every country they've been in(with good reason though).
people of African decent consistently score lower regardless of geographic location. you're like one step above abos
Asher Wood
Spoken like a virgin grad student whose never seen the outside world beyond the fart box.
Daniel Carter
Christcucks are still on about evolution not being real
Leo Watson
Welp, enjoy the jew narrative of intelligence anons. It's not the first time goyim fell for patent bullshit..
David Foster
Respect im now a fan
Carson Carter
Look how much brain drain of shitskin importation causes. China will definitely surpass us if we let the spics and niggers continue to leach of us
(2013) Edward Dutton and Richard Lynn conclude that Finland has suffered a negative Flynn Effect between the years of 1997 and 2009 in all IQ metrics.
These results are in contrast to the gain Finland accrued between 1988 and 1997. The likely cause is the massively increased importation of migrants from other races, ethnicities, and cultures within that time period coupled with a slackening of mate selection criterion and racial endogamy. These findings are in-line with the consensus that outbreeding reduces IQ and the importation of migrants preempts that happening.
The manifestation of dysgenics in Finland supports IQ heritability, differences between races, and opposes the Flynn Effect and miscegenation propaganda in the same manner.
(2015) Michael Woodley and Curtis Dunkel conclude that France has suffered a 4-point drop in IQ scores in the decade between 1999 and 2008-9 during a period of mass migration from the Middle East and North Africa in particular.
Their conclusions are as follows
• Dutton and Lynn have identified a 4 point decline in French IQ. • Dysgenics and replacement migration are causes. • French IQ losses are found to be associated with the Jensen effect (ρ = .833). • A common factor of g loadings and 3 biological variables loads on the loss-vector. • This supports biological causation.
Henry Watson
>Fuck all statistics
What'd you write your phd dissertation on smart guy?
William Lopez
If we admit there is a difference, we can go about solving it. Genius sperm banks can bridge the intelligence gap rather quickly.
Hudson Reed
HAHAHAHA AAAAHAHAHHAA >My IQ is super high so obviously I know what IQ is. Oh the irony is fucking delicious HAHAHA By the way, get the fuck off my board you sub-140 IQ fucking retard
Kevin Peterson
ttp://psycnet.apa.org/psycinfo/1977-07996-001
(1976) Sandra Scarr and Richard Weinberg conclude that Black children raised in wealthy White homes show better intellectual performance in their youth than Black children raised in Black homes. This supports the idea of youth malleability in the area of intelligence.
The White children in wealthy White homes performed even better in an amount matching the Black-White gap that can be seen in tests of IQ and academic performance outside of this experiment.
(1983) Sandra Scarr and Richard Weinberg conclude their experiment from the 1970s by testing the children again as adults.
Regardless of youth results, both races regressed to their respective racial means. The White-Black gap still existed and was not reduced.
These findings show that IQ malleability in youth exists, but it levels off as individuals age and subsequently regress to their racial means. These results further prove that there is a genetically heritable component to IQ and that there is an innate difference between different racial groups in this arena.
(2015) Shakeshaft et al., analyze 360.000 sibling pairs, 9.000 twin pairs, and 3.000.000 18-year-olds in order to determine the heritability of IQ and its relation to genetic factors.
They conclude that IQ is, "familial, heritable, and caused by the same genetic and environmental factors responsible for the normal distribution of intelligence." They show that high-intelligence is, "a good candidate for, 'positive genetics,'" and conclude that there is a positive end to the distribution of intelligence as it is.
They show that there is no support for the Discontinuity Hypothesis that IQ is the result of environment or that mental illness is the result of something besides genetics.
In total, they conclude that IQ is extremely heritable (85% or more), genetic, polygenic, and does not arise from environmental factors but instead merely interacts with them. They show that people with exceptionally high IQs also tend to have other positive traits and very few negative genetic factors or expressed traits. They conclude IQ has almost no relation to de novo mutations, i.e., new mutations in DNA and that it nearly always matches what is heritable. They show that mental illness does not arise from environmental factors either and must arise from genetic factors and their interaction with the environment. These conclusions lend more credence to both Dual-Inheritance and the Continuity Hypothesis of IQs and Mental Illness.
(2009) Rushton & Ankney analyze data from various studies of over 1.000.000 individuals and confirm that there is a positive correlation between brain size and IQ. Larger skulls have larger brains on average and larger brains have higher IQs on average.
They conclude that this phenomenon is likely primarily genetic and as socioeconomic conditions reach a certain level the effects of nutrition on this narrow down and genetic gaps thus become more visible and exposed
This means that crystallized and fluid forms of intelligence are both genetically transferrable from parent-to-child and have a sort of genetic, "stacking," effect.
The more intelligence alleles an individual possesses the greater expressed effect unlike epistatic genes like those for hair or skin colour.
(1994) In private a number of psychologists and sociologists were much more likely to express a belief in heritability of IQ and other traits related to population groups than when confronted in a public forum.
Scoring gaps on the SAT between Blacks and Whites are increasing.
Income differences do not explain the increase, nor do they explain the scores. Whites from poor families scored more highly than Blacks from wealthy families.
In addition to this, almost no Blacks are among top-scorers on the SAT. A simple calculation of race-neutral competition for collegiate admission yields that if affirmative action were removed from US universities Blacks would matriculate at less than one-third the rate they currently do.
(2005) Toga & Thompson conclude that genetic influences on brain morphology also contribute significantly to IQ and in their own words, "A measure of cognitive ability, known as g, has been shown highly heritable across many studies. We argue that these genetic links are partly mediated by brain structure that is likewise under strong genetic control. Other factors, such as the environment, obviously play a role, but the predominant determinant appears to be genetic."
(2012) Yang et al., conclude that there is a, "greater than 80%," genetic contribution to the prefrontal cortex (the part of the brain associated with reward, attention, short-term memory tasks, planning, and motivation.), a significant genetic contribution to the temporal lobe (the part of the brain associated with Visual memory, language comprehension, and emotion association), a significant genetic contribution to the occipital lobe (dubbed the visual processing center of the mammalian brain), and a nearly 80% environmental influence on the parietal lobe (the part of the brain associated with touch, hand-eye coordination, spatial sense, and navigation).
Liam Russell
Can't wait until his evidence based analysis confirms the legitimacy of the JQ and he proves Hitler did nothing wrong.
(2011) Joshi et al., study twins to conclude that there is a highly significant genetic contribution to cortical thickness and volume. This is believed to have a significant effect on the neurotubule number and density in individuals and thus a highly significant effect on IQ.
In their own words, "The results showed detailed pointwise genetic and environmental contributions on the whole cortex. Several areas in the parietal and frontal lobes were observed to be genetically influenced."
The environmental factors are believed to be heavily genetically influenced due to how genetics define interaction and determine developmental reactions in the brain.
(2001) Thompson et al., conclude in their own words that, "A genetic continuum was detected in which brain structure was increasingly similar in subjects with increasing genetic affinity. Genetic factors significantly influenced cortical structure in Broca's and Wernicke's language areas, as well as frontal brain regions," and, "Preliminary correlations were performed suggesting that frontal gray matter differences may be linked to Spearman's g, which measures successful test performance across multiple cognitive domains (p < 0.05). These genetic brain maps reveal how genes determine individual differences, and may shed light on the heritability of cognitive and linguistic skills, as well as genetic liability for diseases that affect the human cortex."
This further suggests that brain structure, size, and cognitive performance are all heritable and genetic.
Jonathan Collins
I knew someone would bite the bait ...
>My IQ is super high so obviously I know what IQ is. >Oh the irony is fucking delicious HAHAHA
>I'm a jewish psychologist so Obviously I know how to scientifically measure intelligence. >IQ tests conform to biased social norms so obvious its an unbiased measure of intelligence. >My IQ is super high so obviously I can define a standard way to measure everyone's IQ
By the way, thanks for taking a shit on the concept of an IQ test and anyone who claims to have a proper interpretation of it.
(2012) Rushton concludes that there has been no narrowing in the mean Black-White IQ difference predicted by heritable g.
Rushton also invalidates research by Nisbett, Dickens, and Flynn that show black gains in IQ by evaluating their lack of data and use of specious arguments. He shows that the little data they had to prove these points obscured the topic by invoking alleged age and social class interactions and adoption studies of very young children. Their data was based on ideas, not observations. In his own words on the twin studies cited: "There is no evidence of any special cultural influence, such as extreme deprivation or being raised as a visible minority, that operates in one group and not in others."
He shows using a meta-analysis that there has been no reduction in the mean racial differences between Blacks and Whites and that all claims of, "systemic issues," are spurious and unsupported by factual evidence. The credence given to researchers saying that society is to blame for the failures of adopted Blacks comes from a cursory glance at a specious statement - they have no evidence.
(1981) Bouchard Jr. & McGue analyze 111 studies on familial resemblances in measured intelligence and reveal a profile of average correlations consistent with polygenic inheritance modes.
This means that these 111 studies (covering over 1.000.000 people) show evidence of polygenic inheritance modes.
Years after this study was performed polygenic inheritance of DNA was confirmed by genetic studies such as (Davies et al., 2011) and (Deary, Johnson & Houlihan, 2009)
(2009) Way & Lieberman analyze genetic contribution to cultural differences in this piece and draw support for dual-inheritance theory.
They show that there are genetic predispositions for IQ, collectivism, individualism, a wide breadth of aspects of socialization, depression, and other psychocultural phenomena which determine the values of societies and their people. They show that populations have mean genetics which means they have mean dispositions and thus mean personalities as well and thus cultures are formed around those same means.
These findings are supported by (Simoons, F, 1969; Simoons, F, 1970; Cavalli-Sforza, Menozzi & Piazza, 1994; Holden & Mace, 1997; Durham, 1991; Perry et al., 2007; Campbell, 1965; McElreath & Henrich, 2007; Kroeberm & Kluckhohn, 1952; Sasaki, 2013; Cochran & Harpending, 2009; Bentley, Hahn & Shennan, 2004; Boyd & Richerson, 1985; Gabora, 1995; and so many more)
(2013) Karen Wynn shows that infants as young as nine months old prefer individuals who are nice to people of their race and dislike people mean to their race. In addition to this they also like people that are mean to others races and dislike people that are nice to other races.
Ryan Richardson
Regressive Intelligence : Blind men and an elephant
Lincoln Barnes
>i'd say 90% don't think we should look into it all because there is nothing to gain by it.
It's worse.
The lowest level is the leftist who just believes there are no differences and anyone who wants to verify this is actually trying to produce fake results that show something other than what they believe is the certain truth. They've been trained to never look and reject on principle if they're exposed to it.
There's a level of leftist who thinks biological differences between groups, if they exist, are irrelevant because if everyone acts like there are none, and if no-one ever considers they could exist, then we will eventually reach a society that cannot perceive racial differences because every single demonstration of them will be suppressed by excuses and fixes. If everyone lives the lie, then the truth ceases to exist.
Then there's the level that intentionally wants to kill off white people.
(2006) Templer & Arikawa analyze populations by temperature, skin color, per capita income, and IQ and find stark correlations between all of them.
They were able to accurately predict individual IQ by skin color (0,92), mean high Winter temperature of their race (0,76), mean low Winter temperature of their race (0,66), and per capita income (0,63). These findings provide strong support for the idea that colder climates caused selection for higher IQs over an evolutionary epoch.
This helps to explain why groups from hotter climates like those found in Africa are less intelligent and thus earn lower incomes.
(2005) Mekel-Bobrov et al., conclude that the gene ASPM is a specific regulator of brain size, and its evolution in the lineage leading to Homo sapiens was driven by strong positive selection. They show that one genetic variant of ASPM in humans arose merely about 5.800 years ago in Eurasia and has since swept to high frequency across Eurasia under strong positivel selection.
The gene is almost non-existent in Sub-Saharan Africa.
(1998) Thomas, Miller & Mascie-Taylor conclude that the EST00083 ("expressed sequence tag") is an mtDNA (mitochondrial; maternal) polymorphism found more often in high IQ groups. It is articularly common in Europe (less so in Asia) where it is associated with a lineage that dates back 35.000 years. It is nearly non-existent in Africa.
This finding goes along with a discovery by Turner & Partington in 1991 that shows mothers are the primary component in a child's intelligence.
(1998) The Journal of Blacks in Higher Education concludes that at all family income levels, there is a persisting racial gap in SAT scores and that the poorest White children outperform the richest Black children. This further suggests that environment is not the explanation for intelligence or the racial testing gap.
These findings are supported by (Binkley & Collin, 2013; North Carolina SAT Report, 2010; Dixon-Roman & Ezekiel et al., 2013; La Griffe du Lion Volume II Number III, 2000; Wightman, 1994; Murray & Herrnstein, 1996; Scarr & Weinberg, 1983; Scarr & Weinberg, 1976; Ciotti, 1998; Arthur Jensen, 1998; Keyes et al., 2009; Miller et al., 2012; Hicks et al., 2004; Iacono et al., 1999; Hur & Bouchard, 1995; Alford, Funk & Hibbing, 2005; Block & Block, 2005; Bouchard et al., 2012; Lykken et al., 1993)
Isaac Williams
>let me plant a flag right there, I've often considered atheism a win-win position if you look at it from a game theory perspective, if there is no God then there is no issue, but if there is a God then one should not worship him, allow me to explain my reasoning, God supposedly created the first man in his own image, and we know from anthropological studies that the first man was an African, therefor God is a nigger, and obviously worshiping a nigger is a non-starter for those of us who are racially aware
usually I can follow Sam's reasoning but this one was a bit too far for me
(2012) Cheng & Reich et. al., analyze African-Americans in order to understand how their African genetic admixture affected their diabetes-rate, family income, BMI, educational level, and diabetes-related traits.
They concluded that individuals with higher African admixture had lower family incomes, higher BMI, lower educational levels, a higher rate of diabetes, and had less healthy fasting glucose levels, insulin levels, and HOMA-IR (homeostasis).
(2002) Davide Piffer concludes that the genes rs9320913 (A), rs3783006 (C), rs8049439 (T), rs13188378 (G), rs11584700 (G), rs4851266 (T), rs2054125 (T), rs3227 (C), rs4073894 (A) and rs12640626 are genes associated with intelligence and brain-size.
rs236330 is a gene strongly expressed in neurons, including hippocampal neurons and developing brains, where it regulates neuronal morphology.
rs324650 is a gene involved in neuronal excitability, synaptic plasticity and feedback regulation of acetylcholine release.
East Asian populations (Japanese, Koreans, Bei-Chinese) have the highest average frequency of these alleles (39%) with the slimmest curve of distributions. Europeans have the second-highest amount of these alleles (35,5%) with a right-leaning and wide curve. Sub-Saharan Africans have the lowest frequencies of these alleles (16,4%) with a remarkably slim curve of distributions.
He states that these are not the only genes associated with intelligence but they are some of the known genes for intelligence and brain-size determination. They vary in prevalence across different populations and are evidence of recent polygenic selection.
(2008) Li JZ et. al., show the distinct population groups of the Earth by genetically testing individuals from each population group and mapping them by their single nucleotide polymorphisms.
Only three groups - South Asians, Central (West) Asians, and East Asians have overlaps while Middle Easterners, Central Asians, and Indian South Asians have genetic contributions from European population groups. There is no genetic continuum between Africans and any other population group alive. The 40.000 years of evolution put between the rest of Mankind and Africans can be shown as the source of this.
(2007) Witherspoon et. al., conclude that Lewontin's Fallacy that individuals within populations are more genetically unique than between populations is false when more than one genetic variable is used.
They show that Lewontin's Fallacy is based upon cherry-picked selection of specific single nucleotide polymorphisms common to all humans and upon selecting for as few as two single nucleotide polymorphisms the differences become readily apparent and classable. Genetic stratification as a result of this is inevitable without cherry-picking.
When comparing populations at an individual locus they can be shown to be similar and possibly overlapping - when scientists analyze populations over many thousands of loci they never overlap.
Charles Cook
>be fair under the affirmative action logic, that dumb people get some state assistance? Look at it this way, would you want a bunch of retards with Down syndrome as your surgeons or biomedical engineers? Not everyone has a chance, in order to move forward in society, we need the best of the best. We can't hold back and coddle morons to prevent hurting their feelings, otherwise our society would fall behind.
Isaiah Roberts
We dont owe them shit
Mason Ortiz
kek
Jeremiah Diaz
this podcast will redpill 50,000 normies
help spread it
Lucas Edwards
I approve of them getting state assistance as long as they undergo a sterilisation procedure.
Easton King
And he puts this out a few days after the whole "march for science" thing. Nice, very nice.
Jordan Barnes
>I have a high IQ therefore I know IQ is bullshit.
>Ad Hominem >Doesn't refute the potato's claims
Kill yourself.
Jose Thomas
The blond on the right
Austin Perry
The blonde on the right
Evan Morgan
You're making an artificial distinction.
Abos and whites are both products of their environment, only Australia pretty much didn't change for 50 thousand years, so the Abos stayed pretty much the same, whereas Eurasia passed a threshold and entered a feedback loop of the people being able to change the environment, which changed the people, which caused them to change the environment more, which changed the people more, and so on.
Anthony Hill
> I am a jewish psychologist with a high IQ thus I know how to make an unbiased test that accurately and timelessly measures the intelligence capability of all human beings
It's honestly interesting to watch human beings, at this point in history... Having made so much technological progress, yet are so separated from each other and truth to the point of fanatically believing in delusions of their own making.
I'm not going to kill myself. I'm hear to watch you morons divide and kill each other.
Sebastian Gonzalez
Statistically some people enjoy pooping But i just pulled that statistic out of my ass.
Lincoln Miller
this
Ayden Morris
So how long before the left starts calling Sam a racist nazi and he has to mention that hes jewish? I mean if we could get all of them to turn on him for this it could backfire hard on them when everyone realizes hes a jew and we just say the are full of antisemitism.
Jayden Kelly
Why do you shill fucks keep posting (((harris)))? Nothing about (((harris))) is redpilled and he considers you stupid muts as filthy goyim fit to be manipulated.
Christian Fisher
He's said these things before. It's not like this is news
Jeremiah Lee
does he admit it's genetic?
Lucas Sanchez
>hates person just because they are a jew even when they are redpilled as fuck on race and islam and is pro nuking the fuck out of muslims
Go back to stormfront and stay there you inbred cuck. A redpilled jew is 100x better than a bluepilled cuck who just hates on everyone who isnt a white christian because their pastor told them to.
Anthony Perry
>he considers you stupid muts as filthy goyim fit to be manipulated. Any evidence of this, outside of he's a Jew therefore must be evil?
Gabriel Miller
Most Jews are red pilled. They just aren't on our side.
Christian Reyes
> Jew > Pro nuking the fuck out of muslims
Wait...
Hunter Robinson
Yes, inheritable from 50% to 85% (childhood to adulthood), which is a valid fact.
Nathaniel Murphy
He can't take the redpill, because the redpill entails he should blow his own brains out, since jews are objectively the greatest scourge in modern society.
Cooper Kelly
>Satoshi Kanazawa > American-British
Grayson Lewis
Sick burn bro *high fives*
James Cruz
I will especially enjoy watching those burn in hell who say there's nothing to gain from researching race & IQ.
As long as niggers live in the same society as whites people will wonder why they are so bad at everything. And if the correct answer, that they're stupid, is off the table, then "systemic racism" or whatever they're calling Whitey in the future will be to blame.
So to correct for Whitey's devilry there will need to be more taxes, more doles, more section 8 kids plopped down next door by Uncle Sam after you worked a decade to give your children a life safe from them, more kiked-out guilt trips on TV and in the movies, more random violence excused, more cop-killers idolized.
The position of the humanities faculties now is that all qualities of racial groups are illusions.* That's asstarded, but anything other than that would be "essentialist," which means that you got tricked into thinking there was a world out there and you should probably see a therapist. The old IQ results will be explained away by English professor Mkwame Dinudunufa's groundbreaking new theory and he'll go on a speaking tour and win awards and trying to falsify his shit will basically be illegal so gg everyone.
This shit has to be fought, persistently, with science.
*innate white evil and Jewish moral perfection available at some locations
Elijah Richardson
That genocidal fuck wit is finally just coming out and being straight with it then. Is it really any surprise?
A quick rundown of Sam Harris >Believes in a first strike on the Arab world >Believes in torturing Muslim prisoners of war >Believes in Muslim profiling and ID badges >Believes in banning all Muslim immigration to the west >Wants all religion eradicated
And now this.
Alexander Reed
Harris is ok tier. He's more redpilled than the majority, has a good voice, and is intelligent no doubt but his smugness will prevent him from ever ascending to Peterson level or Rushton level of intelligence.
Parker Myers
>filter unique ID Begone, faggot.
Jaxson Parker
>The concept of race and the concept of intelligence are incredibly ill-defined. >The definition of "black" in the US seems to be "looking like they have African ancestors". >The definition of "white" in the US seems to be "looking like they have only European ancestors".
They discuss this in the podcast. When they wrote The Bell Curve race was generally difficult to pin down. Now that the genome has been sequenced and we can easily determine a persons admixture in a one-day test like 23andme, we don't have to worry about the ambiguity of how someone "looks" determine their race. Any race/intelligence testing done today has extremely precise genetic testing as well as intelligence testing. It's not ill-defined anymore. It's actually very precise.
>The definition of "intelligence" in the US seems to be "being able to do well on tests written by the education establishment".
They discuss this in the podcast. In IQ tests that are designed to remove any racial bias at all, the intelligence gap between races actually increases slightly.
>"Blacks" have been discriminated against for centuries in the US. They have been systematically denied access to the resources that would allow them to get to the point of being able to do well on establishment tests.
They discuss this in the podcast. The affect that environment, schooling, parenting has on intelligence is very minor compared to genetics. Very minor. See ;en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Nurture_Assumption
Parenting does matter, it just is a very minor factor compared to genetics. Probably 20/80 or even 10/90, they discuss this in the podcast. This isn't speculation its scientific facts. From adoption studies, twin studies, etc. Intelligence is about 0.70 heriditary; en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heritability_of_IQ Again this is not speculation, its hard fact. It's not economics status or schooling.
What we are we are because of our genetics, it's a bitter pill for most but it's the truth.
Gavin Reed
>sam was right in opposing trump's EO on muslim immigration >sam was right in thinking islam is what makes sand niggers behave like sand niggers TOTALLY DUDE
